Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 70
Filtrar
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 2024 Mar 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527607

RESUMEN

Cefazolin is the most common antibiotic used for prophylaxis in obstetrics and gynecology. Among those with a penicillin allergy, alternative antibiotics are often chosen for prophylaxis, given fears of cross-reactivity between penicillin and cefazolin. Alternative antibiotics in this setting are associated with adverse sequelae, including surgical site infection, induction of bacterial resistance, higher costs to the healthcare system, and possible Clostridium difficile infection. Given the difference in R1 side chains between penicillin and cefazolin, cefazolin use is safe and should be recommended for patients with a penicillin allergy, including those who experience Immunoglobulin E-mediated reactions such as anaphylaxis. Cefazolin should only be avoided in those who experience a history of a severe, life-threatening delayed hypersensitivity reaction manifested as severe cutaneous adverse reactions (Steven-Johnson Syndrome), hepatitis, nephritis, serum sickness, and hemolytic anemia in response to penicillin administration. In addition, >90% of those with a documented penicillin allergy do not have true allergies on skin testing. Increased referral for penicillin allergy testing should be incorporated into routine obstetric care and preoperative assessment to reduce suboptimal antibiotic prophylaxis use. More education is needed among providers surrounding penicillin allergy assessment and cross-reactivity among penicillins and cephalosporins to optimize antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetrics and gynecology.

2.
J Infect Dis ; 224(12 Suppl 2): S75-S79, 2021 08 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396404

RESUMEN

Many women with lower genital tract infections associated with sexually transmitted pathogens have evidence of upper genital tract inflammation despite the absence of symptoms and signs traditionally associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). New biomarkers are needed to identify these women with clinically mild PID or subclinical PID (silent salpingitis) to facilitate initiation of early treatment and ameliorate the sequelae associated with upper genital tract infection and inflammation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/etiología , Salpingitis , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/complicaciones , Vagina/microbiología , Endometritis/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación , Salpingitis/patología , Conducta Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/microbiología
3.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 30(11): 1588-1596, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292794

RESUMEN

Background: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is the second most common vulvovaginitis (VV). About 20% of women will experience recurrent infections in their lifetime with non-albicans Candida (NAC) species being one of the causative agents. Although studies have looked at risk factors for recurrent VVC they are limited in scope. In this study, we explore whether risks of recurrent VVC are increased with NAC infections compared to Candida albicans infections. Methods: Through an institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review, we identified 174 women with positive yeast cultures and followed their charts to assess recurrent visits and treatments. We also assessed several baseline variables such as race, age, body mass index (BMI), obstetric history, probiotic use, contraceptive use, mycological therapy, steroid use, hormone replacement therapy, menopausal status, and medical comorbidities. Results: Women with NAC VV were more likely to have multiple visits for recurring infections compared to women who had C. albicans VV (66% vs. 34%). The women with multiple recurrences were younger, had a lower BMI, had lower parity, and endorsed higher use of probiotics. Conclusion: Women with positive NAC cultures were more likely to have multiple visits to their physicians for VV complaints. Identifying the causative species using vaginal fungal cultures can more accurately guide therapy and lead to better outcomes for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Candida albicans , Candidiasis Vulvovaginal , Candida , Candidiasis Vulvovaginal/diagnóstico , Candidiasis Vulvovaginal/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidiasis Vulvovaginal/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(4): 382.e1-382.e13, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33964219

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the relative effectiveness of preincision cefazolin with or without adjunctive prophylaxis (macrolides or metronidazole) vs cefazolin alone in decreasing the incidence of postcesarean delivery surgical site infections. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic search on PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from October 25, 2020, to November 25, 2020, to identify studies comparing cefazolin with adjunctive macrolides or metronidazole with cefazolin alone. The reference lists were reviewed, and a manual search of articles published after the last database search was performed. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Overall, 3 randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective observational study of reproductive-age women undergoing cesarean deliveries were included in the study. We excluded studies of women who were immunocompromised (eg, patients who were HIV positive) or women with a diagnosis of chorioamnionitis before cesarean delivery. All patients received first-line cefazolin (either cefazolin 1 g or 2 g). We compared preincision cefazolin alone with preincision cefazolin plus adjunctive therapy (500 mg, oral or intravenous formulations of azithromycin, metronidazole, or clarithromycin). METHODS: A total of 6 review authors independently assessed the risk of bias for each study, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias criteria. Synthesis and further appraisal were done using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation levels and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists appraisal guidelines. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Treatment effects were evaluated using meta-analysis, and pooled relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were generated using random-effects models using the Review Manager 5 software (version 5.4.1). RESULTS: Overall, 3 randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective observational study representing 2613 women met the criteria for inclusion. Significant reductions in surgical site infections (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.63; 3 randomized controlled trials) and the duration of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -1.46; 95% confidence interval, -2.21 to -0.71; 2 randomized controlled trials) were observed with preincision cefazolin and adjunctive prophylaxis compared with cefazolin alone. No significant difference was observed in maternal febrile morbidity (relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-1.25; 2 randomized controlled trials). CONCLUSION: Our findings have provided evidence for the use of preincision adjunctive extended-spectrum prophylaxis with cefazolin over cefazolin alone. However, future investigations are required to establish the relative efficacies of different adjunctive antibiotic options.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Cesárea/métodos , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Infección Puerperal/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo
6.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(3): 556-564, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32992023

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the success rate, complications, and hospital length-of-stay of 3 modalities of minimally invasive management of tubo-ovarian abscesses (TOAs): laparoscopy, ultrasound-guided drainage, and computed tomography-guided drainage. DATA SOURCES: Electronic-based search in PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, using the following Medical Subject Heading terms: "minimally invasive surgical procedures," "drainage," "abscess," "tubo-ovarian," "ovarian diseases," and "fallopian tube diseases." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Of the 831 articles in the initial results, 10 studies were eligible for inclusion in our systematic review. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: A total of 975 patients were included in our study; 107 (11%) had laparoscopic drainage procedures, and 406 (42%) had image-guided (ultrasound or computed tomography) drainage of TOAs. Image-guided TOA drainage had higher success rates (90%-100%) than laparoscopic drainage (89%-96%) and the use of antibiotic treatment alone (65%-83%). Patients treated with image-guided drainage had no complications (for up to 6 months of follow-up) and shorter lengths of hospital stay (0-3 days on average) compared with laparoscopic drainage (5-12 days) or conservative management with antibiotics alone (7-9 days). CONCLUSION: Although conservative management of TOAs with antibiotics alone remains first-line, our review indicates that better outcomes in the management of TOA were achieved by minimally invasive approach compared with conservative treatment with antibiotics only. Of the minimally invasive techniques, image-guided drainage of TOAs provided the highest success rates, the fewest complications, and the shortest hospital stays compared with laparoscopy. The low magnitude of evidence in the included studies calls for further randomized trials. This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (register, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO;CRD 42020170345).


Asunto(s)
Absceso/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Enfermedades del Ovario/cirugía , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos
7.
Vaccine ; 38(44): 6930-6940, 2020 10 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32883555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational trivalent group B streptococcus (GBS) vaccine in US pregnant women, transplacental serotype-specific antibody transfer and persistence in infants, and serotype-specific antibodies in breast milk. METHODS: This randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trial administered one dose of trivalent GBS vaccine (n = 49) or placebo (n = 26) to healthy pregnant 18-40-year-old women at 240/7-346/7 weeks' gestation. Women were enrolled from March 2014 to August 2015. Safety follow-up continued through postpartum day 180. Primary immunogenicity objectives were to evaluate serotype Ia/Ib/III-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in sera from women on day 1 (pre-vaccination), day 31, delivery and postpartum days 42 and 90, and from infants at birth (cord blood), days 42 and 90. Antibody transfer ratios (cord blood/maternal sera at delivery) and serotype-specific secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) and IgG in breast milk after delivery and on postpartum days 42 and 90 were evaluated. The planned sample size was not based on statistical assumptions for this descriptive study. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Serious adverse events were reported for 16% of GBS-vaccinated women and 15% of their infants, and 15% of placebo recipients and 12% of their infants; none were fatal or deemed vaccine-related. Serotype-specific IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were 13-23-fold higher in vaccine vs placebo recipients on day 31 and persisted until postpartum day 90. Median antibody concentrations were substantially higher in women with detectable pre-vaccination antibody concentrations. Antibody transfer ratios in the vaccine group were 0.62-0.82. Infant IgG GMCs and breast milk sIgA GMCs were higher in the vaccine vs the placebo group at all timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal immunization with the trivalent GBS vaccine in US women had a favorable safety profile, elicited antibodies that were transplacentally transferred and persisted in infants for a minimum of 3 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02046148.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Vacunas Estreptocócicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Lactante , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Streptococcus agalactiae , Adulto Joven
8.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings ; 27(2): 207-216, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31858362

RESUMEN

Many women receive their regular check-ups and preventive care through a women's health clinic, including their behavioral health needs. Most of these clinics have not yet developed the capacity to adequately manage behavioral health concerns. We describe our clinical experience integrating behavioral health services into a women's health clinic. In one year, 108 women (54% White, Mage= 35) were referred for behavioral health treatment 47% were identified using a screening questionnaire, 51% were referred by their women's health provider and 2% were self-referred. The most common presenting concerns were anxiety (52%) and depressive symptoms (48%). Sixty-one (56%) patients completed an intake assessment, of whom 33 (54%) engaged in follow-up treatment (M = 3.7 treatment sessions, SD = 3.0). Behavioral health screening and treatment appears to be feasible and effective within a women's health setting. Further research is needed to overcome barriers to referrals and treatment engagement in this population.


Asunto(s)
Salud de la Mujer , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 222(3): 219-223, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31499057

RESUMEN

Bacterial vaginosis is the most common cause of abnormal vaginal discharge or malodor, affecting up to one third of US women. Most women with bacterial vaginosis are unaware of the infection, making it difficult to diagnose in the absence of a microscopic examination of vaginal discharge or using point-of-care testing. Untreated bacterial vaginosis elevates the risk of postoperative surgical infections in women undergoing obstetric and gynecological procedures. Treatment with antimicrobial agents that target bacterial vaginosis has been shown to reduce the rate of postoperative infections following hysterectomy and surgical abortions. Furthermore, in a cost-comparison model, screening for and treatment of bacterial vaginosis prior to hysterectomy was shown to be superior to no screening in terms of infection rates and cost. The bacterial vaginosis diagnostic criteria are simple and screening tests are inexpensive; bacterial vaginosis screening is a relatively fast process in patients who present for preoperative appointments. Treatment options approved by the Food and Drug Administration include metronidazole, clindamycin, tinidazole, and secnidazole. Given the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and the risks associated with operating on a woman with untreated bacterial vaginosis, women undergoing hysterectomy, surgical abortion, and potentially cesarean delivery should be screened for bacterial vaginosis, and those who screen positive should be treated with an appropriate antimicrobial agent.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Premedicación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Vaginosis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Vaginosis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/etiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Vaginosis Bacteriana/microbiología
11.
Obstet Gynecol Surv ; 74(2): 99-110, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30756124

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication of cesarean delivery. Seen in up to 12% of cesarean deliveries, it is a major cause of prolonged hospital stay and a burden to the healthcare system. Interventions and techniques must be identified to decrease the risk of cesarean delivery SSIs. OBJECTIVE: We review the categories of SSI, current studies that have focused on various interventions to decrease SSI, and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative recommendations for cesarean delivery SSI prevention. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A thorough search of PubMed for all current literature was performed. Various surgical interventions and techniques were reviewed. We included studies that looked at preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions for SSI prevention. RESULTS: We have summarized several surgical interventions and techniques as well as current consensus statements to aid the practitioner in preventing SSIs after cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Upon analysis of current data and consensus statements pertaining to cesarean deliveries, there are certain preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions and techniques that can be recommended to decrease the risk of cesarean delivery SSI.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adulto , Cesárea/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología
12.
Sex Transm Dis ; 46(1): 2-8, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30067546

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Our primary objective was to determine the rate of persistent Trichomonas infection among pregnant women posttreatment. The secondary objective was to determine if oral multidose metronidazole was associated with fewer cases of persistent Trichomonas compared with single-dose treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with genital Trichomonas vaginalis from 2008 to 2017. We calculated the rate of persistent Trichomonas by dividing the number of positive Trichomonas tests collected 21 days or longer posttreatment by the total number of women treated and retested. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare the rates of positive tests after single and multidose metronidazole. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with persistent infection. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-two women with 565 pregnancies were diagnosed with Trichomonas infection. The majority of subjects were prescribed either single-dose (n = 352) or multidose metronidazole (n = 74). Posttreatment Trichomonas tests were collected 21 days or longer in 326 subjects and 44% (143) were positive. Rates of positive Trichomonas tests among women receiving single-dose and multidose regimens were similar (45% vs. 40%, P = 0.50). Women who had ≥1 pregnancy affected by Trichomonas infection were more likely to have a positive test posttreatment (adjusted odds ratio, 20.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-215.3). Obese women were less likely to have a positive test posttreatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Given high rates of positive Trichomonas tests and increased detection with nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), all pregnant women should be retested with NAATs approximately 3 weeks posttreatment. Further studies are needed to determine the most effective treatment of Trichomonas infection in pregnant women.


Asunto(s)
Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Parasitarias del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Vaginitis por Trichomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Trichomonas vaginalis/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , North Carolina , Embarazo , Complicaciones Parasitarias del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vaginitis por Trichomonas/diagnóstico , Trichomonas vaginalis/aislamiento & purificación
13.
J Rural Health ; 35(3): 319-329, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30010217

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We sought to determine if infants born in rural counties had an increased risk of contracting HIV. METHODS: Data were obtained from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control for all women living with HIV delivering from 2004 to 2014. In this retrospective cohort study, maternal and neonatal outcomes from urban and rural counties were compared. Binomial statistical analyses were conducted using Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests, χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with perinatal HIV infection. FINDINGS: Six hundred and sixty-six women living with HIV had 868 pregnancies and delivered 885 infants; 17% (148) were born in rural counties. Eleven infants (1.2%) were diagnosed with perinatal HIV infection. The proportion of women taking antenatal antiretroviral therapy (ART) was similar between rural and urban counties (84% vs 87%; P = .3), but women in urban counties were more likely to have an HIV RNA viral load <40 copies/mL before delivery (32% vs 42%; P = .05). Factors associated with perinatal HIV infection were intra- and postpartum maternal HIV diagnosis (aOR 61.4 [95% CI: 6.7-562.5]; P < .001), parenteral drug use (aOR 7.5 [1.6-34.7]; P = .01), and preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) (aOR 4.6 [1.2-17.8]; P = .3). CONCLUSIONS: Delivery in a rural county was not associated with an increased risk of perinatal HIV transmission. Women delivering in rural counties taking ART were less likely to have HIV viral suppression, which is a risk factor for perinatal HIV infection.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/métodos , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Población Rural/tendencias , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , South Carolina/epidemiología
15.
AANA J ; 85(1): 1-12, 2017 Feb 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182855

RESUMEN

Surgical site infections are the most common complication of surgery in the United states. Of surgeries in women of reproductive age, hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed, second only to cesarean birth. Therefore, prevention of surgical site infections in women undergoing gynecologic surgery is an ideal topic for a patient safety bundle. The primary purpose of this safety bundle is to provide recommendations that can be implemented into any surgical environment in an effot to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection. This bundle was developed by a multidisciplinary team convened by the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. The bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. In addition to recommendations for practice, each of the domains stresses communication and teamwork between all members of the surgical team. Although the bundle components are designed to be adaptable to work in a variety of clinical settings, standardization within institutions is encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Consenso , Femenino , Humanos
16.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 46(1): 100-113, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27955845

RESUMEN

Surgical site infections are the most common complications of surgery in the United States. Of surgeries in women of reproductive age, hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed, second only to cesarean birth. Therefore, prevention of surgical site infections in women undergoing gynecologic surgery is an ideal topic for a patient safety bundle. The primary purpose of this safety bundle is to provide recommendations that can be implemented into any surgical environment in an effort to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection. This bundle was developed by a multidisciplinary team convened by the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. The bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. In addition to recommendations for practice, each of the domains stresses communication and teamwork between all members of the surgical team. Although the bundle components are designed to be adaptable to work in a variety of clinical settings, standardization within institutions is encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Humanos , Hemorragia Posparto/prevención & control , Estados Unidos
17.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(1): 50-61, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27926634

RESUMEN

Surgical site infections are the most common complication of surgery in the United States. Of surgeries in women of reproductive age, hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed, second only to cesarean birth. Therefore, prevention of surgical site infections in women undergoing gynecologic surgery is an ideal topic for a patient safety bundle. The primary purpose of this safety bundle is to provide recommendations that can be implemented into any surgical environment in an effort to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection. This bundle was developed by a multidisciplinary team convened by the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. The bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. In addition to recommendations for practice, each of the domains stresses communication and teamwork between all members of the surgical team. Although the bundle components are designed to be adaptable to work in a variety of clinical settings, standardization within institutions is encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/normas , Rol Profesional , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Temperatura Corporal , Consenso , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Cultura Organizacional , Política Organizacional , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo
18.
Int J STD AIDS ; 28(9): 902-909, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27864473

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to describe the time required to obtain a negative chlamydia test in pregnant and nonpregnant women following treatment to inform test-of-cure collection and recommend an abstinence period to avoid reinfection. Seventy-two women with Chlamydia trachomatis infection, 36 pregnant and 36 nonpregnant, were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Women were excluded less than 18 years of age, if they had been treated for chlamydia, reported an allergy to macrolide antibiotics, or if they had Myasthenia Gravis. Women were treated for chlamydia with single-dose therapy and submitted weekly vaginal chlamydia nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Once NAAT were negative, the participants completed the study. Forty-seven women completed the study per protocol. The primary outcome was to determine the time to a negative chlamydia NAAT following treatment, with secondary outcomes of determining the appropriate time to collect a test-of-cure following chlamydia treatment and to recommend an appropriate abstinence period following treatment to avoid reinfection. Results showed that the time to a negative chlamydia NAAT was significantly different between groups (log-rank p = 0.0013). The median number of days to obtain a negative chlamydia NAAT was 8 days (IQR 7-14) in pregnant and 7 days (IQR 6-10) in nonpregnant women (WRST p = 0.04). All participants had a negative chlamydia NAAT by day 29 post-treatment. Following single-dose treatment for chlamydia, both pregnant and nonpregnant women should test negative with NAAT by 30 days post-treatment. Clinicians should collect a test-of-cure in pregnant women no earlier than 1 month. To avoid reinfection, women should avoid condomless intercourse for at least 1 month.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Chlamydia trachomatis/efectos de los fármacos , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , ARN Bacteriano/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Chlamydia/microbiología , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , ARN Bacteriano/genética , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vagina/microbiología , Adulto Joven
19.
Anesth Analg ; 124(1): 233-242, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27918335

RESUMEN

Surgical site infections are the most common complication of surgery in the United States. Of surgeries in women of reproductive age, hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed, second only to cesarean birth. Therefore, prevention of surgical site infections in women undergoing gynecologic surgery is an ideal topic for a patient safety bundle. The primary purpose of this safety bundle is to provide recommendations that can be implemented into any surgical environment in an effort to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection. This bundle was developed by a multidisciplinary team convened by the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. The bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. In addition to recommendations for practice, each of the domains stresses communication and teamwork between all members of the surgical team. Although the bundle components are designed to be adaptable to work in a variety of clinical settings, standardization within institutions is encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/normas , Control de Infecciones/normas , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/normas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica/normas , Consenso , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Cuidados Preoperatorios/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
J Infect Dis ; 214(11): 1621-1628, 2016 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27471322

RESUMEN

Previous studies have demonstrated that Neisseria gonorrhoeae sialylates the terminal N-acetyllactosamine present on its lipooligosaccharide (LOS) by acquiring CMP-N-acetyl-5-neuraminic acid upon entering human cells during infection. This renders the organism resistant to killing by complement in normal human serum. N-acetyllactosamine residues on LOS must be free of N-acetyl-5-neuraminc acid (Neu5Ac; also known as "sialic acid") in order for organisms to bind to and enter urethral epithelial cells during infection in men. This raises the question of how the gonococcus infects men if N-acetyllactosamine residues are substituted by Neu5Ac during infection in women. Here, we demonstrate that women with gonococcal infections have levels of sialidases present in cervicovaginal secretions that can result in desialylation of (sialylated) gonococcal LOS. The principle sialidases responsible for this desialylation appear to be bacterial in origin. These studies suggest that members of the cervicovaginal microbiome can modify N. gonorrhoeae, which will enhance successful transmission to men.


Asunto(s)
Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Gonorrea/transmisión , Lipopolisacáridos/metabolismo , Microbiota , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/metabolismo , Neuraminidasa/metabolismo , Vagina/enzimología , Femenino , Gonorrea/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Vagina/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...