Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Integr Environ Assess Manag ; 13(1): 62-73, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27464004

RESUMEN

The ecosystem services (ES) concept holds much promise for environmental decision making. Even so, the concept has yet to gain full traction in the decisions and policies of environmental agencies in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. In this paper we examine the opportunities for and implications of including ES in risk assessments and the risk management decisions that they inform. We assert that use of ES will: 1) lead to more comprehensive environmental protection; 2) help to articulate the benefits of environmental decisions, policies, and actions; 3) better inform the derivation of environmental quality standards; 4) enable integration of human health and ecological risk assessment; and 5) facilitate horizontal integration of policies, regulations, and programs. We provide the technical basis and supporting rationale for each assertion, relying on examples taken from experiences in the United States and European Union. Specific recommendations are offered for use of ES in risk assessment and risk management, and issues and challenges to advancing use of ES are described together with some of the science needed to improve the value of the ES concept to environmental protection. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:62-73. © 2016 SETAC.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Toma de Decisiones , Ecosistema , Unión Europea , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Gestión de Riesgos
2.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 35(3): 529-49, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26923857

RESUMEN

Environmental management decisions at mercury-contaminated sediment sites are predicated on the understanding of risks to various receptors, including fish. Toxicity reference values (TRVs) for interpreting risks to fish have been developed to assess mercury concentrations in fish or fish prey. These TRVs were systematically evaluated based on several lines of evidence. First, their conceptual basis and specific derivation were evaluated, including a close review of underlying toxicity studies. Second, case studies were reviewed to investigate whether TRVs are predictive of effects on fish populations in the field. Third, TRVs were compared with available information regarding preindustrial and present-day background concentrations of mercury in fish. The findings show that existing TRVs are highly uncertain, because they were developed using limited data from studies not designed for TRV derivation. Although field studies also entail uncertainty, several case studies indicate no evidence of adverse effects despite mercury exposures that exceed the available TRVs. Some TRVs also fall within the range of background mercury concentrations in predatory or prey fish. Lack of information on the selenium status of mercury-exposed fish is a critical confounding factor, and the form of methylmercury used in toxicity testing may also contribute to differences between TRV-based predictions and field observations of mercury effects on fish. On balance, the available information indicates that several of the TRVs reviewed are lower than necessary to protect fish populations. The 20% effect concentration from a previously published dose-response analysis appears closer to an effect threshold, based on available laboratory data. Additional research is needed to provide a stronger basis to establish dose-response relationships for mercury effects on fish.


Asunto(s)
Peces/metabolismo , Mercurio/toxicidad , Reproducción/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Peces/crecimiento & desarrollo , Mercurio/análisis , Mercurio/normas , Compuestos de Metilmercurio/análisis , Compuestos de Metilmercurio/normas , Compuestos de Metilmercurio/toxicidad , Óvulo/efectos de los fármacos , Óvulo/metabolismo , Valores de Referencia , Pruebas de Toxicidad/normas , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/normas , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidad
3.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 32(1): 49-61, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23147390

RESUMEN

Increased temperature and other environmental effects of global climate change (GCC) have documented impacts on many species (e.g., polar bears, amphibians, coral reefs) as well as on ecosystem processes and species interactions (e.g., the timing of predator-prey interactions). A challenge for ecotoxicologists is to predict how joint effects of climatic stress and toxicants measured at the individual level (e.g., reduced survival and reproduction) will be manifested at the population level (e.g., population growth rate, extinction risk) and community level (e.g., species richness, food-web structure). The authors discuss how population- and community-level responses to toxicants under GCC are likely to be influenced by various ecological mechanisms. Stress due to GCC may reduce the potential for resistance to and recovery from toxicant exposure. Long-term toxicant exposure can result in acquired tolerance to this stressor at the population or community level, but an associated cost of tolerance may be the reduced potential for tolerance to subsequent climatic stress (or vice versa). Moreover, GCC can induce large-scale shifts in community composition, which may affect the vulnerability of communities to other stressors. Ecological modeling based on species traits (representing life-history traits, population vulnerability, sensitivity to toxicants, and sensitivity to climate change) can be a promising approach for predicting combined impacts of GCC and toxicants on populations and communities.


Asunto(s)
Cambio Climático , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminantes Ambientales/toxicidad , Animales , Clima , Ecología , Ecosistema , Contaminación Ambiental/estadística & datos numéricos , Cadena Alimentaria , Humanos , Modelos Químicos , Reproducción , Medición de Riesgo , Estrés Fisiológico , Temperatura
4.
Sci Total Environ ; 407(3): 1035-47, 2009 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19004475

RESUMEN

As part of a comprehensive ecological risk assessment on a broad range of species, the potential for adverse effects in birds was evaluated at a chromate ore processing residue disposal site, Study Area 7, located at the confluence of the Lower Hackensack River, Passaic River, and Upper Newark Bay. Although detection of elevated concentrations of total chromium in sediment prompted the study, it was also necessary to consider potential risks related to other chemicals present in elevated concentrations due to widespread anthropogenic activities in Upper Newark Bay and its watershed. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' TrophicTrace software was used to predict exposure to avian receptors using measured concentrations of chemicals in sediment, measured concentrations of chemicals in benthic invertebrates, and measured site physicochemical parameters. The TrophicTrace model was improved as part of the Study Area 7 ecological risk assessment to account for (1) incidental ingestion of sediment by dabbling and diving birds, (2) area use factors for spatial overlap of wide-ranging fish species and piscivorous birds, (3) spatially-explicit utilization of the site by birds with a variety of foraging strategies, and (4) temporal patterns of site utilization by migratory species. The ecological risk assessment demonstrated that chromium in sediment does not pose unacceptable hazards to avian receptors. Potentially unacceptable hazards were indicated for several organic chemicals (i.e., pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, and dioxins/furans), with hazard quotients highest for Upper Newark Bay reference conditions, reflecting potential widespread chemical impacts to the estuary. The modifications to TrophicTrace conducted for this assessment may be prudent and applicable for improving the accuracy and realism of other assessments involving avian receptors exposed to chemicals via contaminated sediment and transfer through the food web.


Asunto(s)
Aves , Cromo/análisis , Agua Dulce/análisis , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Alimentación Animal , Migración Animal , Animales , Aves/fisiología , DDT/análisis , Diclorodifenil Dicloroetileno/análisis , Diclorodifenildicloroetano/análisis , Ecosistema , Peces , Sedimentos Geológicos/análisis , Humanos , Invertebrados , New Jersey , Fenómenos Fisiológicos de las Plantas , Bifenilos Policlorados/análisis , Densidad de Población , Población Urbana
5.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol ; 53(1): 36-49, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17464441

RESUMEN

A Sediment Quality Triad (SQT) study consisting of chemical characterization in sediment, sediment toxicity and bioaccumulation testing, and benthic community assessments was performed in the Lower Hackensack River, New Jersey. Chemistry data in sediment and porewater were evaluated based on the equilibrium partitioning approach and other published information to investigate the potential for chemical effects on benthic organisms and communities. Relationships were supported by laboratory toxicity and bioaccumulation experiments to characterize chemical effects and bioavailability. Benthic community results were evaluated using a regional, multimetric benthic index of biotic integrity and four heterogeneity indices. Evidence of slight benthic community impairment was observed in five of nine sediment sample stations. Severe lethal toxicity to amphipods (Leptocheirus plumulosus) occurred in four of these five stations. Although elevated total chromium concentrations in sediment (as high as 1900 mg/kg) were the rationale for conducting the investigation, toxicity was strongly associated with concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) rather than total chromium. PAH toxic units (SigmaPAH TU) in sediment and SigmaPAH concentrations in laboratory organisms from the bioaccumulation experiment showed a clear dose-response relationship with toxicity, with 0% survival observed in sediments in which SigmaPAH TU > 1-2 and SigmaPAH concentrations in Macoma nasuta were >2 micromol/g, lipid weight. Metals detected in sediment and porewater, with the possible exception of copper, did not correlate with either toxicity or levels in tissue, likely because acid-volatile sulfide levels exceeded concentrations of simultaneous extracted metals at all sample locations. The study reinforces the value of using multiple lines of evidence approaches such as the SQT and the importance of augmenting chemical and biological analyses with modeling and/or other approaches to evaluate chemical bioavailability and toxicity of sediments.


Asunto(s)
Sedimentos Geológicos , Invertebrados/efectos de los fármacos , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/toxicidad , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidad , Animales , Sedimentos Geológicos/análisis , Invertebrados/clasificación , Invertebrados/fisiología , Metales/análisis , Metales/toxicidad , New Jersey , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análisis , Densidad de Población , Ríos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis
6.
Integr Environ Assess Manag ; 1(1): 77-82, 2005 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16637151

RESUMEN

As part of an agency evaluation of the development of risk assessment tools, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) issued a staff paper in March 2004 describing the current state of practices and policies regarding risk assessment from the agency's perspective. The staff paper provided a rationale for the agency's positions regarding technical topics frequently the subject of comments or complaints. Considerations relevant to ecological risk assessment were included, primarily in a single chapter focused on this topic. This commentary highlights four technical issues important to the advancement of ecological risk assessment practice and discusses how some of the points raised by the U.S. EPA in the staff paper have significance to ecological risk assessors. Discussion regarding incorporating population- and community-level analysis into risk assessments and the apparent reluctance of the U.S. EPA to adopt advances in this area is provided. Also, continuing inconsistencies in the body weight scaling of toxicity values between human health and ecological risk assessment practices are discussed. Ideas for refining the calculation of exposure point concentrations for ecological receptors and the progression between screening steps and comprehensive risk assessment are also discussed.


Asunto(s)
Medición de Riesgo , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Animales , Peso Corporal , Ambiente , Contaminantes Ambientales/toxicidad , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...