RESUMEN
Suicide is a leading cause of death among youth, and emergency departments (EDs) play an important role in caring for youth with suicidality. Shortages in outpatient and inpatient mental and behavioral health capacity combined with a surge in ED visits for youth with suicidal ideation (SI) and self-harm challenge many EDs in the United States. This review highlights currently identified best practices that all EDs can implement in suicide screening, assessment of youth with self-harm and SI, care for patients awaiting inpatient psychiatric care, and discharge planning for youth determined not to require inpatient treatment. We will also highlight several controversies and challenges in implementation of these best practices in the ED. An enhanced continuum of care model recommended for youth with mental and behavioral health crises utilizes crisis lines, mobile crisis units, crisis receiving and stabilization units, and also maximizes interventions in home- and community-based settings. However, while local systems work to enhance continuum capacity, EDs remain a critical part of crisis care. Currently, EDs face barriers to providing optimal treatment for youth in crisis due to inadequate resources including the ability to obtain emergent mental health consultations via on-site professionals, telepsychiatry, and ED transfer agreements. To reduce ED utilization and better facilitate safe dispositions from EDs, the expansion of community- and home-based services, pediatric-receiving crisis stabilization units, inpatient psychiatric services, among other innovative solutions, is necessary.
RESUMEN
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed new challenges in health care delivery for patients of all ages. These included inadequate personal protective equipment, workforce shortages, and unknowns related to a novel virus. Children have been uniquely impacted by COVID-19, both from the system of care and socially. In the initial surges of COVID-19, a decrease in pediatric emergency department (ED) volume and a concomitant increase in critically ill adult patients resulted in re-deployment of pediatric workforce to care for adult patients. Later in the pandemic, a surge in the number of critically ill children was attributed to multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. This was an unexpected complication of COVID-19 and further challenged the health care system. This article reviews the impact of COVID-19 on the entire pediatric emergency care continuum, factors affecting ED care of children with COVID-19 infection, including availability of vaccines and therapeutics approved for children, and pediatric emergency medicine workforce innovations and/or strategies. Furthermore, it provides guidance to emergency preparedness for optimal delivery of care in future health-related crises.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pediatric injuries associated with participation in sports are common. Understanding the epidemiology and trends of sports-related injuries is an important component of injury prevention efforts and is the objective of this study. METHODS: A retrospective review of sports injuries presenting during the course of 1 year (2019) to the emergency department (ED) of Benjamin Russell Hospital for Children, a large academic children's hospital, was performed. Inclusion criteria focused on patients 18 years old and younger whose ED visit resulted from active participation in a sport. Cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Demographic data were collected and included sex, age, race, injury specifics (sport, location, type, and mechanism). Descriptive statistics were performed and categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 1333 injuries seen by the ED during 2019 were sports injuries. Most commonly, these injuries were associated with football (43%), basketball (36%), soccer (11%), or baseball (8%). Considering sports-related injuries, 428 (32%) patients were 12 years and younger and 905 (68%) were 12 years old and older. The median age was 13 years (interquartile range 4 years). Other demographic findings included male sex 1143/1333 (86%) and Black race 835/1333 (63%). School was the most common location for sports injuries (28%). When comparing injuries by age groups (younger than 12 vs 12 and older), football and baseball injuries were more common in those younger than 12 years (53% vs 38%, z = 5.2, P < 0.00001; and 14.0% vs. 5.6%, z = 4.9, P < 0.00001, respectively), whereas basketball and soccer injuries were more common in those 12 years and older (43% vs 22%, z = 7.4, P < 0.00001; and 11.4% vs 9.3%, z = 5.9, P < 0.00001, respectively). When comparing injuries by sex, football and baseball injuries were more common in males (49% vs 6%, z = 11.1, P < 0.00001; and 9.4% vs. 2.1%, z = 3.3, P < 0.00001, respectively), whereas basketball and soccer injuries were more common in females (59% vs 32%, z = 7.2, P < 0.00001; and 27% vs 8%, z = 7.8, P < 0.00001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sports injuries that are commonly encountered in the ED differ in age and sex. Basketball and soccer injuries were more likely to be encountered in older females, whereas baseball and football injuries were more likely seen in younger males. This may reflect efforts that have been previously focused on the sports considered to be higher risk, especially for concussive injuries. This information can help guide future preventive efforts provided by primary physicians, schools, and coaches.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Baloncesto , Fútbol , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Anciano , Preescolar , Adolescente , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Fútbol/lesiones , Baloncesto/lesiones , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Injuries are the number one cause of death in children and cause significant morbidity. Common scenarios for injury include wheeled recreational devices (WRDs) that allow children to be mobile and independent (example ATV-all terrain vehicles, dirt bikes, bicycles, skateboards, and scooters). We present a case series review of these external causes of injury. This study aims to evaluate epidemiologic trends in WRD injuries and patterns in usage of protective gear. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients were identified as meeting criteria for inclusion with the following causes of injuries-103 bicycle, 73 ATV, 27 dirt bike, 14 skateboard, 13 motorcycle, 7 go carts, 3 hover board, 3 roller skates, 1 dune buggy, 1 motor scooter, 1 rip stick, and 1 tractor toy. Ages of patients ranged from 2 to 18 years of age with the greatest range being noted for bicycles (2-17 years) and motorcycles (3-18 years). The mean age was higher for motorcycle and skateboard (12.9 and 11.6, respectively) and lowest for scooter and bicycle (8.3 and 9.2, respectively). The majority of [overall study (97%) and for each mode of transportation] patients were Caucasian, which is in contrast to our overall ED population, which is only 42% Caucasian. The majority of patients were male [190 (72%)]. Over half of the overall patients, 159 of the 263 (60%), were not wearing a helmet (with only 10 charts having no documentation of helmet use). In regard to ATV riders specifically, 58% were not wearing helmets at the time of injury, with an additional 5 patients who reported their helmet came off. The lowest percentage of riders reporting appropriate helmet use was skateboarders with only 21% wearing helmets, and the highest percentage was dirt bike riders with 74% reporting helmet use. CONCLUSION: Common scenarios for injury include WRDs that allow children to be mobile and independent. Most of these injuries were found in Caucasian males between the ages of 9-12 with low rates of helmet use. This study adds to the literature with a description of the breadth of products children use and are injured while using.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The leading cause of death in children less than 19 years old is motor vehicle crashes (MVC). Non-use or improper use of motor vehicle car seats significantly adds to the morbidity and mortality. Emergency department (ED) encounters provide an opportunity for caregiver education. Our objective was to determine the effect of an educational intervention on knowledge and counseling behaviors of pediatric ED nurses regarding child passenger safety (CPS). METHODS: A pre/post educational intervention study was conducted with nursing staff in an urban ED. Responses to CPS related knowledge and counseling behaviors were collected using surveys administered before and after the intervention. The ED nurse education intervention was a one-hour lecture based on the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) CPS guidelines and Alabama state law regarding ages for each car seat type and teen driving risky behaviors. Individual data from pre and post surveys were matched, and nominal variables in pre-post matched pairs were analyzed using McNemar's test. To compare categorical variables within pre or post test data, we used the Chi-square test. RESULTS: Pretests were administered to 83/110 ED nurses; 64 nurses received the educational intervention and posttest. On the pretests, nurses reported "never" or "occasionally" counseling about CPS for the following: 56% car seats, 62% booster seat, 56% teen driving, 32% seat belts. When comparing the pretest CPS knowledge between nurses working 0-1 year vs. ≥ 2 years there was no statistically significant difference. Two CPS knowledge questions did not show significance due to a high correct baseline knowledge rate (> 98%), including baseline knowledge of MVC being the leading cause of death. Of the remaining 7 knowledge questions, 5 questions showed statistically significant improvement in knowledge: age when children can sit in front seat, state GDL law details, seat belt state law for back seat riders, age for booster seat, and rear facing car seat age. All four counseling behavior questions showed increases in intent to counsel families; however, only intent to counsel regarding teen driving reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Educational efforts improved pediatric ED nursing knowledge regarding CPS. Intent to counsel was also improved following the education.
RESUMEN
Although disasters can affect anyone in a given community or region, those with access and functional needs have the highest rates of morbidity and mortality during an emergency or disaster. There are many unique and complex issues that should be considered when planning and caring for these individuals in a disaster situation. Who are these individuals, what specific issues should be addressed when considering these members of the population, and what recommendations can be made to address their unique needs? How can we include them as part of the all-hazard, comprehensive approach to disaster management? The first part of this three-part series identifies who is included in this population and what are the legal considerations that arise in caring for, not only this unique group but also all the members of the community in a disaster. The second part considers evacuation, sheltering, sheltering in place, communication, medical needs, independence, supervision, and transportation (CMIST) with a focus on mental health. The third part deals with the medical aspect of CMIST and with recommendations that may aid disaster responders and planners in caring for these high-risk individuals in a disaster.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Planificación en Desastres , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Voluntarios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comunicación , Víctimas de Desastres , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Humanos , Responsabilidad Legal , Transportes , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Although disasters can affect anyone in a given community or region, those with access and functional needs have the highest rates of morbidity and mortality during an emergency or disaster. There are many unique and complex issues that should be considered when dealing with these individuals in a disaster situation. Who are these individuals, what specific issues should be addressed, and what recommendations can be made in order to address their unique needs? How can we include them as part of the all-hazard, comprehensive approach to disaster management? The first part of this three-part series identifies who is included in this population and what are the legal considerations that arise in caring for not only this unique group but also all of the members of the community in a disaster. The second part considers evacuation, sheltering, sheltering in place, communication, medical needs, independence, supervision, and transportation (CMIST) with a focus on mental health. The third part deals with the medical aspect of CMIST and with recommendations that may aid disaster responders and planners in caring for these high-risk individuals in a disaster.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Personas con Discapacidad , Planificación en Desastres , Desastres , Transportes , Urgencias Médicas , HumanosRESUMEN
Although disasters can affect anyone in a given community or region, those with access and functional needs have the highest rates of morbidity and mortality during an emergency or disaster. There are many unique and complex issues that should be considered when dealing with these individuals in a disaster situation. Who are these individuals, what specific issues should be addressed when considering these members of the population, and what recommendations can be made in order to address their unique needs? How can we include them as part of the all-hazard, comprehensive approach to disaster management? The first part of this three-part series identifies who is included in this population and what are the legal considerations that arise in caring for not only this unique group but also all of the members of the community in a disaster. The second part considers evacuation, sheltering, sheltering in place, communication, medical needs, independence, supervision, and transportation (CMIST) with a focus on mental health. The third part deals with the medical aspect of CMIST and with recommendations that may aid disaster responders and planners in caring for these high-risk individuals in a disaster.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Planificación en Desastres/métodos , Desastres , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes , Urgencias Médicas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , TransportesRESUMEN
Disasters affect all ages of patients from the newborn to the elderly. Disaster emergency management includes all phases of comprehensive emergency management from preparedness to response and recovery. Disaster planning and management has frequently overlooked the unique issues involved in dealing with the pediatric victims of a disaster. The following will be addressed: disaster planning and management as related to pediatric patients and the integration of pediatric disaster management as part of an all-hazard, comprehensive emergency management approach. Key recommendations for dealing with children, infants, and special needs patients in a disaster are delineated.
Asunto(s)
Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Urgencias Médicas , Adaptación Psicológica , Niño , Preescolar , Planificación en Desastres/legislación & jurisprudencia , Urgencias Médicas/psicología , Refugio de Emergencia , Familia , Humanos , Lactante , Evaluación de Necesidades , Terrorismo , Recursos HumanosAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Fusobacterium/complicaciones , Mononucleosis Infecciosa/complicaciones , Faringitis/microbiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/complicaciones , Adolescente , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Infecciones por Fusobacterium/diagnóstico , Fusobacterium necrophorum , Humanos , Mononucleosis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Faringitis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pyogenesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Participation in sports is a popular activity for children across the country. Prevention of sports-related injuries can be improved if details of injuries are documented and studied. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review of injuries that occurred as a direct result of sports participation (both organized and non-organized play) from November 2006 to November 2007. Because the vast majority of injuries were a result of participation in football or basketball, these injuries were focused upon. The injuries specifically examined were closed head injury (CHI), lacerations and fractures. RESULTS: There were 350 football and 196 basketball injuries (total 546). Comparing injuries between the two groups fractures were found to be more prevalent in football compared to basketball (z = 2.14; p = 0.03; 95%CI (0.01, 0.16)). Lacerations were found to be less prevalent among helmeted patients than those without helmets. (z = 2.39; p = 0.02; 95%CI (-0.17,-0.03)). CHI was more prevalent among organized play compared to non-organized (z = 3.9; p<0.001; 95%CI (0.06, 0.16)). Among basketball related visits, non-organized play had a higher prevalence of injury compared to organized play. (z = 2.87; p = 0.004; 95% CI (0.04, 0.21)). Among football related visits, organized play had a higher prevalence of injury compared to non-organized play (z = 2.87; p = 0.004; 95%CI (0.04.0.21)). No differences in fracture or laceration prevalence were found between organized and non-organized play. CONCLUSIONS: Football and basketball related injuries are common complaints in a pediatric Emergency Department. Frequently seen injuries include CHI, fractures and lacerations. In our institution, fractures were more prevalent among football players and CHI was more prevalent among organized sports participants.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Baloncesto/lesiones , Niño Hospitalizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Fútbol Americano/lesiones , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Alabama/epidemiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/prevención & control , Niño , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/prevención & control , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Dispositivos de Protección de la Cabeza , Humanos , Laceraciones/epidemiología , Laceraciones/prevención & control , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the impact of a brief educational video shown to parents during an emergency department visit for minor febrile illnesses. We hypothesized that a video about home management of fever would reduce medically unnecessary return emergency department visits for future febrile episodes. METHODS: A convenience sample of 280 caregivers presenting to one urban pediatric emergency department was enrolled in this prospective, randomized cohort study. All the caregivers presented with a child aged 3 to 36 months with complaint of fever and were independently triaged as nonemergent. A pretest and posttest were administered to assess baseline knowledge and attitudes about fever. One hundred forty subjects were randomized to view either an 11-minute video about home management of fever or a control video about child safety. Subjects were tracked prospectively, and all return visits for fever complaints were independently reviewed by 3 pediatric emergency physicians to determine medical necessity. RESULTS: There were no differences between the fever video and the control groups in baseline demographics (eg, demographically comparable). The fever video group had a significant improvement in several measures relating to knowledge and attitudes about childhood fever. There was no statistical difference between the intervention and control groups in subsequent return visits or in the determination of medical necessity. CONCLUSIONS: A brief standardized video about home management of fever improved caregiver knowledge of fever but did not decrease emergency department use or increase medical necessity for subsequent febrile episodes.
Asunto(s)
Fiebre/diagnóstico , Educación en Salud , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Padres/educación , Adolescente , Adulto , Preescolar , Escolaridad , Femenino , Fiebre/terapia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Triaje , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric resuscitation has been a topic of discussion for years. It is difficult to keep abreast of changing recommendations, especially for busy pediatricians who do not regularly use these skills. This review will focus on the most recent guidelines for resuscitation drugs. RECENT FINDINGS: Three specific questions will be discussed: standard dose versus high-dose epinephrine, amiodarone use, and the future of vasopressin in pediatric resuscitation. The issue of using high-dose epinephrine for cardiopulmonary resuscitation refractory to standard dose epinephrine has been a topic of debate for many years. Recently, a prospective, double-blinded study was performed to help settle the debate. These results will be reviewed and compared with previous studies. Amiodarone is a medication that was added to the pediatric resuscitation algorithms with the most recent recommendations from the American Heart Association in 2000. Its use and safety will also be discussed. Another topic that is resurfacing in resuscitation is the use of vasopressin. Its mechanism and comparisons to other agents will be highlighted, although its use in the pediatric patient has not been thoroughly studied. SUMMARY: Pediatric resuscitation is a constantly evolving subject that is on the mind of anyone taking care of sick children. Clinicians are continually searching for the most effective methods to resuscitate children in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. It is important to be familiar with not only the agents being used but also the optimal way to use them.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Agonistas Adrenérgicos/administración & dosificación , Agonistas Adrenérgicos/uso terapéutico , Amiodarona/administración & dosificación , Amiodarona/uso terapéutico , Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Niño , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Vasopresinas/administración & dosificación , Vasopresinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chemical restraint in the pediatric patient is an evolving clinical practice. Although a rare occurrence, chemically restraining a child may be necessary for the child's safety, healthcare worker's safety, and to expedite the medical evaluation. The purpose of this manuscript to review the definition and indications for chemical restraints, specific classes of drugs used for chemical restraints, and the legal implications associated with chemical restraints. RECENT FINDINGS: Three classes of drugs will be reviewed: benzodiazepines, neuroleptics, and atypical antipsychotics, including side effects, dosages, and routes of administration. There are controversies surrounding some of these drugs. Very few recent studies have focused this topic on the pediatric patient. A recently published practice parameter will be reviewed that addresses the prevention and management of aggressive behavior in children and adolescents. In addition, specific studies looking at different drugs, particularly the newer atypical antipsychotics, will be reviewed. Literature discussing the controversies regarding droperidol usage in the emergency department will also be highlighted. SUMMARY: The differential diagnosis for the agitated, violent, or psychotic patient is extensive and must be taken into consideration when deciding to use chemical restraints. When the decision is made to use chemical restraints, healthcare workers should be aware of the pharmacologic options as well as the complications associated with the agents.