RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pulsed-field energy (PFA) and very high-power short-duration radiofrequency (vHPSD-RF) are two novel ablation methods for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Both PFA and vHPSD-RF show promise for improving efficacy, safety, and reducing procedure durations. However, direct comparisons between these two techniques are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of 82 patients with symptomatic AF. Of these, 52 patients received PFA and 30 received vHPSD-RF (90 W, 4 s) as index procedure. At the 6-month follow-up, AF recurrence occurred in 4 patients following PFA and 5 patients following vHPSD-RF (p-value = 0.138). Significant improvements in the EHRA and NYHA stages were evident in both PFA (p < 0.001 and p = 0.047, respectively) and vHPSD-RF groups (p = 0.007 and p = 0.012, respectively). The total procedure duration and the left atrial dwell time were significantly shorter in the PFA group (64 ± 19 min vs. 99 ± 32 min, p < 0.001 and 41 ± 12 min vs. 62 ± 29 min, p < 0.001, respectively). The fluoroscopy time and dose area product were significantly higher in PFA (14 ± 6 vs. 9 ± 5 min, p < 0.001 and 14 ± 9 vs. 11 ± 9 Gy cm2, p = 0.046, respectively). One patient in the vHPSD-RF group suffered a stroke, not directly linked to the procedure (0 vs. 1 major complication, p = 0.366). CONCLUSION: Based on this retrospective single-center study, PFA and vHPSD-RF were associated with similar effectiveness and safety profiles. PFA was linked to shorter procedure times and higher radiation exposure compared to vHPSD-RF.
RESUMEN
AIMS: We aimed to investigate the tolerability, safety, and effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation therapy (EECP) versus individual shear rate therapy (ISRT) in patients with lower extremity atherosclerotic disease (LEAD). METHODS: Eighteen patients (age: 73.1 ± 6 years) underwent EECP and ISRT, each daily over five consecutive days in a cross-over design with a 1 week resting period in between the two regimens. A quality-of-life questionnaire was used to assess the therapy experience. Oxygen saturation (SO2 ), relative hemoglobin amount (rHb) and blood flow (Flow) in the capillary-venous-system (microcirculation) of the skin were monitored continuously during all therapy sessions using the micro-lightguide spectrophotometer, also known as oxygen to see (O2C). The effects of EECP and ISRT on the renal function and skeletal muscles were evaluated using serial blood and urine tests. RESULTS: EECP therapy had to be terminated early before the end of the 5th session in 10 patients (55.6%) because of discomfort. Four patients (22.2%) experienced signs of critical limb ischaemia under EECP. The total score of the quality-of-life questionnaire was significantly higher (= better tolerated) post-ISRT compared with EECP. Microcirculation monitoring revealed that ISRT significantly increased the SO2 , blood flow and rHb during the therapy. All three parameters remained significantly increased in the observation period after ISRT. The serum levels of creatin kinase and myoglobin increased significantly under EECP. CONCLUSIONS: ISRT significantly improves tolerability, safety, and effectiveness over EECP in patients with LEAD.
