RESUMEN
Heart failure (HF) is a complex and progressive disease marked by substantial morbidity and mortality rates, frequent episodes of decompensation, and a reduced quality of life (QoL), with severe financial burden on healthcare systems. In recent years, several large-scale randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have widely expanded the therapeutic armamentarium, underlining additional benefits and the feasibility of rapid titration regimens. This notwithstanding, mortality is not declining, and hospitalizations are constantly increasing. It is widely acknowledged that even with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on board, HF patients have a prohibitive residual risk, which highlights the need for innovative treatment options. In this scenario, groundbreaking devices targeting valvular, structural, and autonomic abnormalities have become crucial tools in HF management. This has led to a full-fledged translational boost with several novel devices in development. Thus, the aim of this review is to provide an update on both approved and investigated devices.
RESUMEN
Background: The gold-standard treatment for end-stage heart failure is heart transplantation, but the lack of organ donors remains an important limitation in this field. An accurate selection of marginal hearts is fundamental to increase organ availability. Purpose: In our study we analyzed if recipients receiving marginal donor (MD) hearts, selected by dipyridamole stress echocardiography according to the ADOHERS national protocol, had different outcomes compared to recipients with acceptable donor (AD) hearts. Methods: Data were collected and retrospectively analyzed from patients who received an orthotopic heart transplant at our institution between 2006 and 2014. Dipyridamole stress echo was performed on identified marginal donors and selected hearts were eventually transplanted. Clinical, laboratory and instrumental features of the recipients were evaluated and patients with homogenous baseline characteristics were selected. Results: Eleven recipients transplanted with a selected marginal heart and eleven recipients transplanted with an acceptable heart were included. Mean donor age was 41 ± 23. The median follow-up was 113 months (IQR 86-146 months). Age, cardiovascular risk and morpho-functional characteristics of the left ventricle were comparable between the two populations (p > 0.05). Left atrial size was significantly higher in patients with marginal hearts (acceptable atrial volume: 23 ± 5 mL; marginal atrial volume: 38 ± 5 mL; p = 0.003). Acceptable donor recipients showed a higher impact of Cardiac Allograph Vasculopathy (p = 0.019). No rejection differences were found between the two groups. Four patients deceased, three were standard donor recipients and one was from the marginal donor group. Conclusions: Our study shows how cardiac transplant (Htx) from selected marginal donor hearts through a non-invasive bedside technique can alleviate the shortage of organs without a difference in survival compared to acceptable donor hearts.
