Center case volume is associated with Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined failure to rescue in cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Our understanding of the impact of a center's case volume on failure to rescue (FTR) after cardiac surgery is incomplete. We hypothesized that increasing center case volume would be associated with lower FTR. METHODS: Patients undergoing a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation in a regional collaborative (2011-2021) were included. After we excluded patients with missing Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores, patients were stratified by mean annual center case volume. The lowest quartile of case volume was compared with all other patients. Logistic regression analyzed the association between center case volume and FTR, adjusting for patient demographics, race, insurance, comorbidities, procedure type, and year. RESULTS: A total of 43,641 patients were included across 17 centers during the study period. Of these, 5315 (12.2%) developed an FTR complication, and 735 (13.8% of those who developed an FTR complication) experienced FTR. Median annual case volume was 226, with 25th and 75th percentile cutoffs of 136 and 284 cases, respectively. Increasing center-level case volume was associated with significantly greater center-level major complication rates but lower mortality and FTR rates (all P values < .01). Observed-to-expected FTR was significantly associated with case volume (P = .040). Increasing case volume was independently associated with decreasing FTR rate in the final multivariable model (odds ratio, 0.87 per quartile; confidence interval, 0.799-0.946, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing center case volume is significantly associated with improved FTR rates. Assessment of low-volume centers' FTR performance represents an opportunity for quality improvement.

Pulmonary Hypertension and Operative Risk in Mitral Valve and Coronary Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) is a known risk factor for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), though less well understood for valve operations. We hypothesized PHT is associated with lower risk during mitral valve operations compared to CABG. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated mitral valve or CABG operations (2011-2019) in a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database were stratified by pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). The association of PASP by procedure type was assessed by hierarchical regression modeling, adjusting for STS predicted risk scores. RESULTS: Of the 2542 mitral and 11,059 CABG patients, the mitral population had higher mean STS risk of mortality (3.6% versus 2.4%, P < 0.0001) and median PASP (42 mmHg versus 32 mmHg, P < 0.0001). PASP was independently associated with operative mortality and major morbidity in both mitral and CABG patients. However, for mitral patients a 10-mmHg increase in PASP was associated with lower odds of morbidity (odds ratio: 1.06 versus 1.13), mortality (odds ratio: 1.11 versus 1.18) and intensive care unit time (4.3 versus 7.6 h) compared with CABG patients (interaction terms P < 0.0001). Among mitral patients, median PASP was higher in stenotic versus regurgitant disease (57 mmHg versus 40 mmHg, P < 0.0001). However, there was no differential association of PASP on morbidity or mortality (interaction terms P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although mitral surgery patients tend to have higher preoperative pulmonary artery pressures, PHT was associated with a lower risk for mitral outcomes compared with CABG. Further research on the management and optimization of patients with PHT perioperatively is needed to improve care for these patients.

Effect of Socioeconomic Distress on Risk-Adjusted Mortality After Valve Surgery for Infective Endocarditis.

Infective endocarditis affects patients of all socioeconomic status. We hypothesized that the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), a comprehensive assessment of socioeconomic status, would be associated with risk-adjusted mortality for patients with endocarditis. All patients with endocarditis (2001-2017) in a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database were analyzed. DCI scores range from 0 (no socioeconomic distress) to 100 (severe distress) and account for unemployment, poverty rate, median income, housing vacancies, education level, and business growth by zip code. The most distressed patients (top quartile, DCI > 75) were compared to all other patients. Hierarchical logistic regression modeled the association between DCI and mortality. A total of 2,075 patients were included (median age 55 years, 65.2% urgent/emergent cases, 42.7% self-pay). Major morbidity was 32.8% and operative mortality was 9.5%. Tricuspid/pulmonic valve endocarditis was present in 12.5% of cases, with significantly worse mean DCI compared to patients with left-sided endocarditis (median 55.3, IQR 20.3-77.6 vs 46.8, IQR 17.3-74.2, P = 0.016). High socioeconomic distress (DCI > 75) was associated with higher rates of major morbidity, operative mortality, increased length of stay, and higher total cost. After risk-adjustment, DCI was independently predictive of higher operative mortality for patients with endocarditis (OR 1.24 per DCI quartile increase, 95% CI 1.06-1.45, P < 0.001). Increasing DCI, an indicator of poor socioeconomic status, independently predicts increased risk-adjusted mortality and resource utilization for patients with endocarditis. Accounting for socioeconomic status allows for more accurate risk prediction and resource allocation for patients with endocarditis.

Ventricular septal rupture and cardiogenic shock complicating STEMI during COVID-19 pandemic: An old foe re-emerges.

The COVID 19 pandemic resulted in a total reduction in the number of hospitalizations for acute coronary syndromes. A consequence of the delay in coronary revascularization has been the resurgence of structural complications of myocardial infarctions. Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) complicating late presenting acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with high mortality despite advances in both surgical repair and perioperative management. Current data suggests a declining mortality with delay in VSR repair; however, these patients may develop cardiogenic shock while waiting for surgery. Available options are limited for patients with VSR who develop right ventricular failure and cardiogenic shock. The survival rate is very low in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing surgical or percutaneous VSR repair. In this study we present two late presenting ST elevation MI patients who were complicated by rapidly declining hemodynamics and impending organ failure. Both patients were bridged with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to cardiac transplant.

Variability and Utilization of Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation Ablation During Mitral Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) at the time of mitral valve surgery is a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Class IA recommendation with evidence from randomized trial data. We hypothesized that concomitant AF ablation rates have increased over time with implementation of this evidence-based practice. METHODS: All patients (N = 7261) undergoing mitral valve operations (2011-2018) were queried from a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Patients with preoperative AF were stratified by concomitant AF ablation. Trends in concomitant ablation were evaluated over time as well as by center and surgeon mitral surgical volume. The associations between patient and center factors on implementation of concomitant ablation were assessed with multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 1675 patients with preoperative AF underwent isolated mitral valve operations, with 1044 (64.6%) undergoing concomitant ablation. The utilization of concomitant ablation decreased over the study period (-2.82%/year), and was strongly associated with surgeon mitral valve volume (high 78.2% vs medium 62.5% vs low 59.0%; P < .001). Multivariate regression demonstrated age and comorbidities were strong predictors, but high volume mitral surgeons (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; P < .001) were twice as likely to perform concomitant AF ablation. Finally, patients with preoperative AF undergoing ablation were significantly less likely to be in AF at discharge (10.1% vs 53.8%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing evidence and societal recommendations, we demonstrate a persistent underutilization of concomitant AF ablation during isolated mitral surgery across a large number of low-volume and high-volume centers. These data suggest significant variability and may represent an opportunity for improvement.

Outcomes of surgical mitral valve replacement: A benchmark to assess transcatheter technologies.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter mitral valve replacement in intermediate and high surgical risk patients. We analyzed outcomes of surgical mitral valve replacement in a regional consortium to provide benchmark data for emerging alternative therapies. METHODS: All patients undergoing mitral replacement with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (STS PROM) in a regional consortium from 2001 to 2017 were analyzed. Patients with endocarditis were excluded. Patients were stratified by STS PROM into low (<4%), moderate (4%-8%), and high risk (>8%) cohorts. Mortality, postoperative complications, and resource utilization were evaluated for each group. RESULTS: A total of 1611 patients were analyzed including 927 (58%) low, 370 (23%) moderate, and 314 (20%) high-risk patients. The mean STS PROM was 2%, 5.6%, and 15.4% for each group. Mortality was adequately predicted for all groups while the most common complications included prolonged ventilation, reoperation, and renal failure. Higher risk patients had longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay (2 vs. 3 vs. 5 days, p < .0001 and 7 vs. 8 vs. 10 days, p < .0001) and higher total hospital costs ($38,029 vs. $45,075 vs. $59,171 p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve replacement is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality, particularly for low and intermediate-risk patients. These outcomes also serve as a benchmark with which to compare forthcoming results of transcatheter mitral valve replacement trials.

Minimally Invasive vs Open Coronary Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Cost and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Limited multi-institutional data evaluating minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) outcomes have raised concern for increased resource utilization compared with standard sternotomy. The purpose of this study was to assess short-term outcomes and resource utilization with MICS CABG in a propensity-matched regional cohort. METHODS: Isolated CABG patients (2012-2019) were extracted from a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Patients were stratified by MICS CABG vs open CABG via sternotomy, propensity-score matched 1:2 to balance baseline differences, and compared by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 26,255 isolated coronary artery bypass graft patients, 139 MICS CABG and 278 open CABG patients were well balanced after matching. There was no difference in the operative mortality rate (2.2% open vs 0.7% MICS CABG, P = .383) or major morbidity (7.9% open vs 7.2% MICS CABG, P = .795). However, open CABG patients received more blood products (22.2% vs 12.2%, P = .013), and had longer intensive care unit (45 vs 30 hours, P = .049) as well as hospital lengths of stay (7 vs 6 days, P = .005). Finally, median hospital cost was significantly higher in the open CABG group ($35,011 vs $27,906, P < .001) compared with MICS CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Open CABG via sternotomy and MICS CABG approaches are associated with similar, excellent perioperative outcomes. However, MICS CABG was associated with fewer transfusions, shorter length of stay, and ∼$7000 lower hospital cost, a superior resource utilization profile that improves patient care and lowers cost.

Impact of tricuspid regurgitation with and without repair during aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement (AVR) are worse in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR), but the impact of concomitant tricuspid valve intervention remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of tricuspid intervention in patients with TR undergoing AVR. METHODS: Patients undergoing AVR in a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database (2001-2017) were stratified by severity of TR and whether or not they underwent concomitant tricuspid intervention. Operative morbidity and mortality were compared between the 2 groups. Further analysis was performed using propensity score-matched pairs. RESULTS: Among 17,483 patients undergoing AVR, 8984 (51%) had no TR, 7252 (41%) had mild TR, 1060 (6%) had moderate TR, and 187 (1%) had severe TR. Overall, more severe TR was associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Tricuspid intervention was performed in 104 patients (0.6%), including 0.2% of patients with mild TR, 2% of those with moderate TR, and 31% of those with severe TR. In the propensity score-matched analysis, there was not a statistically significant difference in operative mortality between the 2 groups (18% vs 9%; P = .16), but there was significantly higher composite major morbidity (51% vs 26%; P = .006) in the tricuspid intervention group compared with those without surgical TR correction. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing severity of TR is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality after AVR. Correction of TR at the time of surgical AVR is not associated with increased operative mortality and has been shown to improve long-term outcomes.

Preclosure technique versus arterial cutdown after percutaneous cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Arteriotomy repair through the preclosure technique during elective arterial access procedures is well documented. Outcomes associated with application of this technique to the removal of arterial access cannulas in patients undergoing urgent venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have not previously been reported. METHODS: We reviewed the records of consecutive patients who required VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock. Patients were compared by use of the preclosure device (Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System; Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Ill) at time of VA-ECMO cannulation. The rate of limb complications (composite of limb ischemia, infection, and site necrosis) and secondary end points of bleeding events, pseudoaneurysm, distal part embolization, and intensive care unit length of stay after decannulation were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Ninety-nine consecutive patients managed with VA-ECMO were identified and the preclosure device was utilized in 51 of these patients. Preclosure device failure occurred in 5 instances (9.8%) and was successfully managed with surgical repair in 4 cases and endovascular intervention in another. Use of the preclosure device was associated with both fewer limb complications (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.78) and bleeding events (odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.89). Pseudoaneurysm (n = 0) and distal part embolization (n = 1) were infrequently encountered in the cohort and no difference in intensive care unit length of stay after decannulation was noted between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, use of the preclosure technique in weaning from VA-ECMO was technically feasible, safe, and associated with an approximate 80% lower likelihood of limb complications and bleeding events compared with surgical removal.

Hospital Variability Drives Inconsistency in Antiplatelet Use After Coronary Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Continuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after acute myocardial infarction is recommended by current guidelines. We sought to evaluate guideline adherence over time and factors associated with postoperative DAPT within a regional consortium. METHODS: Isolated CABG patients from 2011 to 2017 who had a myocardial infarction within 21 days prior to surgery were included. Patients were stratified by DAPT prescription at discharge and by time period, early (2011-2014) vs late (2015-2017). Hierarchical regressions were then performed to evaluate factors influencing DAPT use after CABG. RESULTS: A total of 7314 patients were included with an overall rate of DAPT utilization of 31.2% that increased from 29.6% in the early to 33.4% in the late era (P < .01). There was considerable variability in hospital rates of DAPT (range 9.5%-92.1%) and hospital level changes over time (26% increased, 11% decreased, and 63% remained stable). After adjustment for clinical factors, era was not associated with DAPT use but treating hospital remained significantly associated with DAPT use. Other clinical factors associated with increased DAPT utilization included off-pump surgery (odds ratio [OR] 4.48, P < .01) and prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 2.02, P < .01), and atrial fibrillation (OR 0.39, P < .01) was associated with decreased utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Dual antiplatelet use has increased between 2011 and 2017, driven primarily by evolving patient demographics. Significant hospital-level variability drives inconsistency in DAPT utilization. Efforts to promote DAPT use for patients treated with CABG after myocardial infarction in concordance with current guidelines should be targeted at the hospital level.

Outcomes of non-elective coronary artery bypass grafting performed on weekends.

OBJECTIVES: A weekend effect with increased mortality has previously been reported in surgical patients and those with acute myocardial infarction (MI). We hypothesized that a similar phenomenon may exist in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Patients undergoing non-elective isolated CABG (2011-2017) were included from a multicentre regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Patients were stratified by weekend versus weekday operations and further analysed by specific day of the week. RESULTS: A total of 14 374 patients underwent urgent or emergency isolated CABG with 410 (2.9%) operated on over the weekend. Weekend operations were more often emergency (36.1% vs 5.0%, P < 0.001) and more likely to be in the setting of MI (70.0% vs 51.2%, P < 0.001). Cardiopulmonary bypass times were similar [91 min (71-114) vs 94 min (74-117), P = 0.0749] and the frequency of complete revascularization equivalent (83.4% vs 85.3%, P = 0.284) between weekend and weekday operations. In risk-adjusted analyses, there was no increased odds for mortality in patients operated on over the weekend [odds ratio (OR) 1.07, P = 0.811]; however, there was an increased odds of major morbidity (OR 1.37, P = 0.034). Furthermore, compared with Monday, morbidity increased as the operative day approached the weekend (Tuesday 0.98, P = 0.828; Wednesday 1.07, P = 0.469; Thursday 1.12, P = 0.229; Friday 1.19, P = 0.041; weekend 1.47, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: While patients requiring surgery on the weekend are higher risk, there is no independent effect of weekend surgery on mortality. However, these patients are at increased risk for major morbidity, the causes of which require further investigation.

Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure Outcomes and Cost: A Multi-institutional Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is frequently performed during cardiac operations, but the impact of LAAC on patient outcomes is not fully known. We hypothesized that the addition of LAAC would increase morbidity and resource utilization. METHODS: All patients undergoing cardiac surgery from a multi-institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database from 2011 to 2016 were stratified by LAAC. The effect of LAAC on risk-adjusted outcomes was assessed by hierarchical regression modeling accounting for preoperative risk factors, planned surgical procedure, hospital, and year. RESULTS: Concomitant LAAC was performed on 2384 of 28,311 patients (9.3%), who were older, with a greater burden of preoperative atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Although the addition of LAAC increased the risk of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR 1.69, P < 0.01), it did not increase rates of major morbidity (OR 1.00, P = 0.970), stroke (OR 0.92, P = 0.787), or mortality (OR 0.93, P = 0.684). Although cardiopulmonary bypass time was not significantly increased by LAAC, patients' total hospitalization costs were $3035 higher (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Although concomitant LAAC was not associated with major complications, there were higher risk-adjusted rates of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, LAAC added approximately $3000 to a patient's total hospital cost. These short-term risks and costs should be weighed against potential long-term benefits of left atrial appendage closure.