RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) and pediatric neurointensive care units (neuro-PICU) are growing fields. Although some institutions have established independent neuro-PICUs meeting most Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) standards for neurocritical care units, many centers lack the resources to do so. We describe an alternative neuro-PICU model as a designated unit within a mixed pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and its effects on nursing sentiment. METHODS: We established a 6-bed neuro-PICU within a 36-bed noncardiac PICU. Charge nurses were tasked with admitting PNCC patients into these beds. For nursing expertise, we used a core group of 12 PNCC specialty nurses and instituted PNCC nursing education to PICU nurses. We observed the number of PNCC patients admitted to neuro-PICU beds and surveyed charge nurses to identify barriers to assigning patients. We surveyed PICU nursing staff to explore sentiment regarding PNCC before and after establishing the neuro-PICU. Nursing criteria were compared with NCS standards. RESULTS: In the 40-month period, our PICU saw 2060 PNCC admissions. Overall, occupied neuro-PICU beds housed PNCC patients 74.1% of the time. The biggest barriers to patient placement were too many competing placement requests, not enough neuro-PICU beds when specialty census was high, and difficulty assigning one nurse to two PNCC patients. In surveys after establishing the neuro-PICU, compared to before, experienced nurses reported being more interested in obtaining Emergency Neurological Life Support certification (94.2% vs 80.6%, P = .0495), and inexperienced nurses reported being more familiar with PNCC clinical pathways (53.5% vs 31.7%, P = .0263). Most NCS criteria related to nursing organization were met. CONCLUSIONS: Focused neuro-PICUs should be developed to complement advances in the field of PNCC. Alternative neuro-PICU models are possible and can increase nursing interest in further education and awareness of clinical pathways, but barriers exist that require institutional commitment to nursing development to sustain the delivery of specialized care to this population.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Enfermería en Neurociencias , Humanos , Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos , Niño , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enfermería Pediátrica , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Cuidados CríticosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nurses are vital partners in the development of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) programs. Nursing expertise is acknowledged to be an integral component of high-quality specialty patient care in the field, but little guidance exists regarding educational requirements to build that expertise. We sought to obtain expert consensus from nursing professionals and physicians on curricular priorities for specialized PNCC nursing education in pediatric centers across the United States. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi study technique surveying a multidisciplinary expert panel of nursing professionals and physicians. Online surveys were distributed to 44 panelists over three rounds to achieve consensus on curricular topics deemed essential for PNCC nursing education. During each round, panelists were asked to rate topics as essential or not essential, as well as given opportunities to provide feedback and suggest changes. Feedback was shared anonymously to the panelist group throughout the process. RESULTS: From 70 initial individual topics, the consensus process yielded 19 refined topics that were confirmed to be essential for a PNCC nursing curriculum by the expert panel. Discrepancies existed regarding how universally to recommend topics of advanced neuromonitoring, such as brain tissue oxygenation; specialized neurological assessments, such as the serial neurological assessment in pediatrics or National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; and some disease-based populations. Panelists remarked that not all centers see specific diseases, and not all centers currently employ advanced neuromonitoring technologies and skills. CONCLUSIONS: We report 19 widely accepted curricular priorities that can serve as a standard educational base for PNCC nursing. Developing education for nurses in PNCC will complement PNCC programs with targeted nursing expertise that extends comprehensive specialty care to the bedside. Further work is necessary to effectively execute educational certification programs, implement nursing standards in the field, and evaluate the impact of nursing expertise on patient care and outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Increased safety reports related to interprofessional teamwork on an acute care unit at a quaternary children's hospital prompted a teamwork-focused improvement effort on the pediatric neurosurgery service. METHODS: An interprofessional workgroup was formed and met twice monthly throughout the project. A survey using modified validated items was disseminated to pediatric neurosurgery nurses, advanced practice providers (APPs), and physicians in March 2021 to identify opportunities for improvement. Structured debriefs on survey results promoted discourse on teamwork. The researchers implemented two interventions: (1) nursing-centered interprofessional education and (2) a rounding checklist before redistributing the survey in December 2021. RESULTS: Baseline and follow-up survey response rates were 84.1% (58/69) and 71.4% (50/70), respectively. Nurses at baseline perceived lower teamwork scores for 12 items compared to physicians and APPs (p < 0.05). Nurse perceptions improved after interventions in: "using 'we' rather than 'they'" (21.3% vs. 51.2% agree, pâ¯=â¯0.003), "I am confident that this team works effectively" (46.8% vs. 80.5%, pâ¯=â¯0.001), "shared understanding of each other's role on the team" (48.9% vs. 73.2% agree, pâ¯=â¯0.02), and "getting others on the team to listen" (46.8% vs. 75.6%, pâ¯=â¯0.004). Mean teamwork effectiveness improved from 4.12 to 5.25 (out of 7; p < 0.0001). Nurses ranked three interventions as most effective: interprofessional training (35/41, 85.4%), educational clinical pearls (14/41, 34.1%), and structured opportunities to discuss teamwork (10/41, 24.4%). CONCLUSION: Interprofessional training, a teamwork survey, and structured debriefing improved nurse perceptions of teamwork. Interventions targeting social components of change can improve teamwork even without process changes.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirugia , Médicos , Niño , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Pacientes Internos , Grupo de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) is a quickly growing subspecialty within pediatric critical care medicine. Standards for care, education, and application of neuromonitoring technologies in PNCC are still being developed. We sought to identify and improve knowledge deficits in neurocritical care with an educational boot camp for nurses. SETTING: Quaternary children's hospital with 36 PICU beds. DESIGN: Preinterventional and postinterventional study. METHODS: A 2-day boot camp course covering neurologic and neurosurgical topics pertinent to PNCC was provided to 46 pediatric acute and critical care nurses divided into three cohorts over 3 years. Participant characteristics were collected, and precourse and postcourse knowledge assessments were administered. RESULTS: Regarding participant characteristics, neither critical care registered nurse certification nor years of nursing experience were associated with better precourse baseline knowledge. Knowledge gaps spanned bedside neurologic assessments, physiologic goals in brain injury, and side effects of neurocritical care medications. In postcourse assessments, all participants showed improvement in scores, and most participants sustained improvements after 6 months. Nurses reported significant improvement in self-reported confidence in caring for the PNCC population. We also observed shorter ICU lengths of stay, decreased hospital incident reports, and decreased time to stroke imaging, although these programmatic metrics cannot be credited to nursing education alone. CONCLUSIONS: PNCC programs should include nursing expertise in the field. However, topics specific to PNCC may not be adequately addressed by existing general critical care nursing education and certification. A multimodal educational boot camp can be an effective method to improve nursing knowledge in PNCC. Our results demonstrate that specialty nursing education in PNCC is both innovative and feasible, with the potential to improve patient care. Further research is needed to determine the benefits of specialty education on quality of care and clinical outcomes.