Flipping the script: Understanding riboswitches from an alternative perspective.

Riboswitches are broadly distributed regulatory elements most frequently found in the 5'-leader sequence of bacterial mRNAs that regulate gene expression in response to the binding of a small molecule effector. The occupancy status of the ligand-binding aptamer domain manipulates downstream information in the message that instructs the expression machinery. Currently, there are over 55 validated riboswitch classes, where each class is defined based on the identity of the ligand it binds and/or sequence and structure conservation patterns within the aptamer domain. This classification reflects an "aptamer-centric" perspective that dominates our understanding of riboswitches. In this review, we propose a conceptual framework that groups riboswitches based on the mechanism by which RNA manipulates information directly instructing the expression machinery. This scheme does not replace the established aptamer domain-based classification of riboswitches but rather serves to facilitate hypothesis-driven investigation of riboswitch regulatory mechanisms. Based on current bioinformatic, structural, and biochemical studies of a broad spectrum of riboswitches, we propose three major mechanistic groups: (1) "direct occlusion", (2) "interdomain docking", and (3) "strand exchange". We discuss the defining features of each group, present representative examples of riboswitches from each group, and illustrate how these RNAs couple small molecule binding to gene regulation. While mechanistic studies of the occlusion and docking groups have yielded compelling models for how these riboswitches function, much less is known about strand exchange processes. To conclude, we outline the limitations of our mechanism-based conceptual framework and discuss how critical information within riboswitch expression platforms can inform gene regulation.

Genome-wide binding analysis of 195 DNA binding proteins reveals "reservoir" promoters and human specific SVA-repeat family regulation.

A key aspect in defining cell state is the complex choreography of DNA binding events in a given cell type, which in turn establishes a cell-specific gene-expression program. Here we wanted to take a deep analysis of DNA binding events and transcriptional output of a single cell state (K562 cells). To this end we re-analyzed 195 DNA binding proteins contained in ENCODE data. We used standardized analysis pipelines, containerization, and literate programming with R Markdown for reproducibility and rigor. Our approach validated many findings from previous independent studies, underscoring the importance of ENCODE's goals in providing these reproducible data resources. We also had several new findings including: (i) 1,362 promoters, which we refer to as 'reservoirs,' that are defined by having up to 111 different DNA binding-proteins localized on one promoter, yet do not have any expression of steady-state RNA (ii) Reservoirs do not overlap super-enhancer annotations and distinct have distinct properties from super-enhancers. (iii) The human specific SVA repeat element may have been co-opted for enhancer regulation and is highly transcribed in PRO-seq and RNA-seq. Collectively, this study performed by the students of a CU Boulder computational biology class (BCHM 5631 -Spring 2020) demonstrates the value of reproducible findings and how resources like ENCODE that prioritize data standards can foster new findings with existing data in a didactic environment.