Comprehensive review of imaging in pancreas transplantation: a primer for radiologists.

Pancreas transplantation is a complex surgical procedure performed to restore normoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes and includes whole/segmental organ transplant and islet cell transplantation (ICT). In the United States, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) is most commonly performed due to the higher occurrence of end-stage renal disease in diabetic patients. Understanding the surgical technique and postoperative anatomy is imperative for effective and accurate surveillance following transplantation. Imaging plays an essential role in patients with pancreatic transplants and is often used to evaluate viability, vascular and parenchymal anatomy, and identify potential complications. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound, color and spectral Doppler, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and angiography have a complementary role in the postoperative evaluation following a pancreas transplant. The common complications after a whole organ pancreas transplant include vascular thrombosis, graft rejection, pancreatitis, and infections. Complications can be classified into vascular (partial or complete venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, stenosis or pseudoaneurysm), parenchymal (pancreatitis, graft rejection), and bowel-related or miscellaneous causes (bowel obstruction, anastomotic leak, and peripancreatic fluid collections). Islet cell transplantation is an innovative therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. It involves isolating insulin-producing islet cells from donor pancreas and transplanting into recipients, to provide long-term insulin independence or significantly reduce insulin requirements. In recent years, isolation techniques, immunosuppressive regimens, and post-transplant monitoring advancements have propelled ICT as a viable therapeutic option. This comprehensive review aims to provide insights into the current state-of-the-art imaging techniques discussing both normal and abnormal features following pancreas transplantation.

Material density dual-energy CT images: value added in early diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis : Original research.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of material density (MD) images generated from a rapid kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT (rsDECT) in early detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (60 ± 13 years; 24 women) with PC detected on multiple abdominal DECT scans were included. Four separate DECTs with varying findings of PC from each patient were used for qualitative/quantitative analysis, resulting in a total of 120 DECT scans (n = 30 × 4). Three radiologists independently reviewed DECT images (65 keV alone and 65 keV + MD) for diagnosis of PC (diagnostic confidence, lesion conspicuity, sharpness/delineation and image quality) using a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative estimation of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was done. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Odds ratio calculation were used to compare between the two protocols. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated using Kappa coefficient analysis. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 65 keV + MD images showed a slightly higher sensitivity (89%[95%CI:84,92]) for PC detection compared with 65 keV images alone without statistical significance (84%[95%CI:78,88], p = 0.11) with the experienced reader showing significant improvement (98%[95%CI:93,100] vs. 90%[95%CI:83,94], p = 0.02). On a per-patient basis, use of MD images allowed earlier diagnosis for PC in an additional 13-23% of patients. On sub-group analysis, earlier diagnosis of PC was particularly beneficial in patients with BMI ≤ 29.9 kg/m2. 65 keV + MD images showed higher diagnostic confidence, lesion conspicuity, and lesion sharpness for the experienced reader (p < 0.001). CNR was higher in MD images (1.7 ± 0.5) than 65 keV images (0.1 ± 0.02, p < 0.001). All readers showed moderate interobserver agreement for determining PC by both protocols (κ = 0.58 and κ = 0.47). CONCLUSION: MD images allow earlier and improved detection of PC with the degree of benefit varying based on reader experience and patient body habitus.

Part 2: Current Concepts in Radiologic Imaging & Intervention in Acute Biliary Tract Diseases.

Acute cholangitis is encountered commonly in critically ill, often elderly, patients. The most common causes of cholangitis include choledocholithiasis, biliary strictures, and infection from previous endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical intervention of the biliary tract. Rare causes of acute cholangitis in the United States include sclerosing cholangitis and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, the latter predominantly occurring in immigrants of Asian descent. Multidisciplinary management of these conditions is essential, with intensivists, surgeons, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, endoscopists, and infectious disease physicians typically involved in the care of these patients. In this paper intended for intensivists predominantly, we will review the imaging findings and radiologic interventional management of critically ill patients with acute cholangitis, primary and secondary sclerosing cholangitis, and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

Part 1: Current Concepts in Radiologic Imaging and Intervention in Acute Cholecystitis.

Acute calculous cholecystitis and acute acalculous cholecystitis are encountered commonly among critically ill, often elderly, patients. Multidisciplinary management of these conditions is essential, with intensivists, surgeons, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, infectious disease physicians, gastroenterologists, and endoscopists able to contribute to patient care. In this article intended predominantly for intensivists, we will review the imaging findings and radiologic treatment of critically ill patients with acute calculous cholecystitis and acute acalculous cholecystitis.

Dual-energy CT applications on liver imaging: what radiologists and radiographers should know? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of DECT techniques, acquisition workflows, and post-processing methods. By doing so, we aim to elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of DECT compared to conventional single-energy CT imaging. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE/EMBASE for DECT studies in liver imaging published between 1980 and 2024. Information regarding study design and endpoints, patient characteristics, DECT technical parameters, radiation dose, iodinated contrast agent (ICA) administration and postprocessing methods were extracted. Technical parameters, including DECT phase, field of view, pitch, collimation, rotation time, arterial phase timing (from injection), and venous timing (from injection) from the included studies were reported, along with formal narrative synthesis of main DECT applications for liver imaging. RESULTS: Out of the initially identified 234 articles, 153 met the inclusion criteria. Extensive variability in acquisition parameters was observed, except for tube voltage (80/140 kVp combination reported in 50% of articles) and ICA administration (1.5 mL/kg at 3-4 mL/s, reported in 91% of articles). Radiation dose information was provided in only 40% of articles (range: 6-80 mGy), and virtual non-contrast imaging (VNC) emerged as a common strategy to reduce the radiation dose. The primary application of DECT post-processed images was in detecting focal liver lesions (47% of articles), with predominance of study focusing on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (27%). Furthermore, a significant proportion of the articles (16%) focused on enhancing DECT protocols, while 15% explored metastasis detection. CONCLUSION: Our review recommends using 80/140 kVp tube voltage with 1.5 mL/kg ICA at 3-4 mL/s flow rate. Post-processing should include low keV-VMI for enhanced lesion detection, IMs for tumor iodine content evaluation, and VNC for dose reduction. However, heterogeneous literature hinders protocol standardization.

Cholangiocarcinoma imaging: from diagnosis to response assessment.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a highly aggressive primary liver cancer arising from the bile duct epithelium, represents a substantial proportion of hepatobiliary malignancies, posing formidable challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Notably, the global incidence of intrahepatic CCA has seen a rise, necessitating a critical examination of diagnostic and management strategies, especially due to presence of close imaging mimics such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA). Hence, it is imperative to understand the role of various imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), elucidating their strengths, and limitations in diagnostic precision and staging accuracy. Beyond conventional approaches, there is emerging significance of functional imaging tools including positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI, providing pivotal insights into diagnosis, therapeutic assessment, and prognostic evaluation. This comprehensive review explores the risk factors, classification, clinical features, and role of imaging in the holistic spectrum of diagnosis, staging, management, and restaging for CCA, hence serving as a valuable resource for radiologists evaluating CCA.

Does CT overestimate extra-pancreatic perineural invasion in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT in the assessment of extra-pancreatic perineural invasion (EPNI) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 123 patients (66 men; median age, 66 years) with PDAC who underwent radical surgery and pancreatic protocol CT for assessing surgical resectability between September 2011 and March 2019. Among the 123 patients, 97 patients had received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Two radiologists reviewed the CT images for evidence of EPNI using a 5-point scale (5 = definitely present, 4 = probably present, 3 = equivocally present, 2 = probably absent, and 1 = definitely absent). Diagnostic performance for assessing EPNI was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve for assessing EPNI were 98%, 30%, and 0.62 in all patients; 97%, 22%, and 0.59 in patients with neoadjuvant CRT; and 100%, 100%, and 1.00 in patients without neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. False-positive assessment of EPNI occurred in 23% of patients (n = 28/123), and 100% of these (n = 28/28) had received neoadjuvant CRT. There was moderate to substantial agreement between the readers (ĸ = 0.49-0.62). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic protocol CT has better diagnostic performance for determination of EPNI in treatment naïve patients with PDAC and overestimation of EPNI is likely in patients who have received preoperative CRT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Pancreatic protocol CT has better diagnostic performance for the detection of EPNI in treatment naïve patients compared to patients receiving neoadjuvant CRT.

Intra-patient variability of iodine quantification across different dual-energy CT platforms: assessment of normalization techniques.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate intra-patient variability of iodine concentration (IC) between three different dual-energy CT (DECT) platforms and to test different normalization approaches. METHODS: Forty-four patients who underwent portal venous phase abdominal DECT on a dual-source (dsDECT), a rapid kVp switching (rsDECT), and a dual-layer detector platform (dlDECT) during cancer follow-up were retrospectively included. IC in the liver, pancreas, and kidneys and different normalized ICs (NICPV:portal vein; NICAA:abdominal aorta; NICALL:overall iodine load) were compared between the three DECT scanners for each patient. A longitudinal mixed effects analysis was conducted to elucidate the effect of the scanner type, scan order, inter-scan time, and contrast media amount on normalized iodine concentration. RESULTS: Variability of IC was highest in the liver (dsDECT vs. dlDECT 28.96 (14.28-46.87) %, dsDECT vs. rsDECT 29.08 (16.59-62.55) %, rsDECT vs. dlDECT 22.85 (7.52-33.49) %), and lowest in the kidneys (dsDECT vs. dlDECT 15.76 (7.03-26.1) %, dsDECT vs. rsDECT 15.67 (8.86-25.56) %, rsDECT vs. dlDECT 10.92 (4.92-22.79) %). NICALL yielded the best reduction of IC variability throughout all tissues and inter-scanner comparisons, yet did not reduce the variability between dsDECT vs. dlDECT and rsDECT, respectively, in the liver. The scanner type remained a significant determinant for NICALL in the pancreas and the liver (F-values, 12.26 and 23.78; both, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We found tissue-specific intra-patient variability of IC across different DECT scanner types. Normalization mitigated variability by reducing physiological fluctuations in iodine distribution. After normalization, the scanner type still had a significant effect on iodine variability in the pancreas and liver. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Differences in iodine quantification between dual-energy CT scanners can partly be mitigated by normalization, yet remain relevant for specific tissues and inter-scanner comparisons, which should be taken into account at clinical routine imaging. KEY POINTS: • Iodine concentration showed the least variability between scanner types in the kidneys (range 10.92-15.76%) and highest variability in the liver (range 22.85-29.08%). • Normalizing tissue-specific iodine concentrations against the overall iodine load yielded the greatest reduction of variability between scanner types for 2/3 inter-scanner comparisons in the liver and for all (3/3) inter-scanner comparisons in the kidneys and pancreas, respectively. • However, even after normalization, the dual-energy CT scanner type was found to be the factor significantly influencing variability of iodine concentration in the liver and pancreas.

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography to Photon Counting Computed Tomography: Emerging Technological Innovations.

Computed tomography (CT) has seen remarkable developments in the past several decades, radically transforming the role of imaging in day-to-day clinical practice. Dual-energy CT (DECT), an exciting innovation introduced in the early part of this century, has widened the scope of CT, opening new opportunities due to its ability to provide superior tissue characterization. The introduction of photon-counting CT (PCCT) heralds a paradigm shift in CT scanner technology representing another significant milestone in CT innovation. PCCT offers several advantages over DECT, such as improved spectral resolution, enhanced tissue characterization, reduced image artifacts, and improved image quality.