RESUMEN
Human activities are increasing wildfires and livestock activity in arid ecosystems with potential implications for the spread of invasive grasses. The objective of this study was to test whether fire history and cattle activity alter soil resource gradients, thereby affecting patterns of Bromus rubens L. (red brome) invasion. Six paired burned and unburned transect lines (1-km long) were established in the northeast Mojave Desert along the boundaries of four independent wildfire scars. At 100-m transect increment points, we measured the distance to the two nearest cowpats, and two random points and measured the density, height, biomass, and seed production of red brome, soil moisture and inorganic nitrogen (N). Cattle activity was 29% greater along burned transects compared to unburned transects (P < 0.05). Red brome height, density, and seed production were 11-34% greater along burned transects than unburned transects (P < 0.05). Red brome height, biomass, density, and seed production were twofold to tenfold greater next to cowpats compared to random points (P < 0.05). Soils along burned transects and beneath cowpats had greater soil inorganic N (P < 0.05), which was positively correlated with red brome density, height, biomass, and seed production (R2 = 0.60-0.85, P < 0.0001). Transgenerational effects were evident as seeds from red brome next to cowpats had 27% higher germination than seeds collected from random points. Positive responses of red brome to increased inorganic N related to fire and cattle activity may contribute fine fuel infill that drives invasive grass-fire cycles in deserts.
Asunto(s)
Incendios , Incendios Forestales , Humanos , Bovinos , Animales , Suelo , Bromus/fisiología , Nitrógeno/análisis , EcosistemaRESUMEN
Traditional teaching practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses have failed to support student success, causing many students to leave STEM fields and disproportionately affecting women and students of color. Although much is known about effective STEM teaching practices, many faculty continue to adhere to traditional methods, such as lecture. In this study, we investigated the factors that affect STEM faculty members' instructional decisions about evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs). We performed a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with faculty members from the Colleges of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering who took part in a professional development program to support the use of EBIPs by STEM faculty at the university. We used an ecological model to guide our investigation and frame the results. Faculty identified a variety of personal, social, and contextual factors that influenced their instructional decision-making. Personal factors included attitudes, beliefs, and self-efficacy. Social factors included the influence of students, colleagues, and administration. Contextual factors included resources, time, and student characteristics. These factors interact with each other in meaningful ways that highlight the hyper-local social contexts that exist within departments and sub-department cultures, the importance of positive feedback from students and colleagues when implementing EBIPs, and the need for support from the administration for faculty who are in the process of changing their teaching.