RESUMEN
AIMS: To compare the prevalence of minor incisional complications in canine patients undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) surgery that had a hydrogel liquid bandage (HLB) applied to their incision, with patients that had a light adhesive bandage applied. METHODS: Thirty dogs undergoing TPLO surgery were randomly assigned to either application of a light adhesive bandage to the incision, with removal 18-24 hours later, or application of a clear-drying polyethylene glycol HLB to the incision. Erythema, swelling, discharge, and dehiscence were assessed 1 day (Day 1) and 10-14 days (Days 10-14) postoperatively. All persons completing the assessment were blinded to the treatment. Outcomes were compared for the two groups using Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS: On both Day 1 and Days 10-14, the distribution of dogs with erthemyma or swelling did not differ between the two groups (p≥0.4). The prevalence of erythema was the same in the bandage and HLB groups at Day 1 (11/15; 73%) and was similar at Days 10-14 (3/11 (27%) and 2/11 (18%), respectively). Prevalence of swelling was also the same in the two groups on Day 1 (11/15; 73%) and was similar at Days 10-14 (3/11 (27%) and 6/11 (55%), respectively). On Day 1, 2/15 (13%) dogs in the HLB group and none of the dogs in the bandage group had incisional discharge (p=0.483). No dogs were observed with discharge on Days 10-14. No dehiscence, infection, or any other major incisional complication was observed in either group at any point in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that prevalence of minor incisional complications after TPLO surgery treated with HLB or with a traditional adhesive bandage may be comparable. No major adverse effects were seen with the use of HLB. CLINICIAL RELEVANCE: Due to several disadvantages of traditional bandaging, which can require post-operative maintenance and removal, lasts only a short time, and be painful when removed, an alternative with fewer drawbacks is desirable. HLB may present such an alternative.
