RESUMEN
Background & Aims: The investigational first-generation core inhibitor vebicorvir (VBR) demonstrated safety and antiviral activity over 24 weeks in two phase IIa studies in patients with chronic HBV infection. In this long-term extension study, patients received open-label VBR with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NrtIs). Methods: Patients in this study (NCT03780543) previously received VBR + NrtI or placebo + NrtI in parent studies 201 (NCT03576066) or 202 (NCT03577171). After receiving VBR + NrtI for ≥52 weeks, stopping criteria (based on the treatment history and hepatitis B e antigen status in the parent studies) were applied, and patients either discontinued both VBR + NrtI, discontinued VBR only, or continued both VBR + NrtI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <20 IU/ml at 24 weeks off treatment. Results: Ninety-two patients entered the extension study and received VBR + NrtI. Long-term VBR + NrtI treatment led to continued suppression of HBV nucleic acids and, to a lesser extent, HBV antigens. Forty-three patients met criteria to discontinue VBR + NrtI, with no patients achieving the primary endpoint; the majority of virologic rebound occurred ≥4 weeks off treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). There were no deaths. Most AEs and laboratory abnormalities were related to elevations in alanine aminotransferase and occurred during the off-treatment or NrtI-restart phases. No drug-drug interactions between VBR + NrtI and no cases of treatment-emergent resistance among patients who adhered to treatment were observed. Conclusions: Long-term VBR + NrtI was safe and resulted in continued reductions in HBV nucleic acids following completion of the 24-week parent studies. Following treatment discontinuation, virologic relapse was observed in all patients. This first-generation core inhibitor administered with NrtI for at least 52 weeks was not sufficient for HBV cure. Clinical trial number: NCT03780543. Impact and implications: Approved treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (cHBV) suppress viral replication, but viral rebound is almost always observed after treatment discontinuation, highlighting an unmet need for improved therapies with finite treatment duration producing greater therapeutic responses that can be sustained off treatment. First-generation core inhibitors, such as vebicorvir, have mechanisms of action orthogonal to standard-of-care therapies that deeply suppress HBV viral replication during treatment; however, to date, durable virologic responses have not been observed after treatment discontinuation. The results reported here will help researchers with the design and interpretation of future studies investigating core inhibitors as possible components of finite treatment regimens for patients with cHBV. It is possible that next-generation core inhibitors with enhanced potency may produce deeper and more durable antiviral activity than first-generation agents, including vebicorvir.
RESUMEN
Chronic hepatitis B, a major cause of liver disease and cancer, affects >250 million people worldwide. Currently there is no cure, only suppressive therapies. Efforts to develop finite curative hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapies are underway, consisting of combinations of multiple novel agents with or without nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. The HBV Forum convened a webinar in July 2021, along with subsequent working group discussions to address how and when to stop finite therapy for demonstration of sustained off-treatment efficacy and safety responses. Participants included leading experts in academia, clinical practice, pharmaceutical companies, patient representatives, and regulatory agencies. This Viewpoints article outlines areas of consensus within our multistakeholder group for stopping finite therapies in chronic hepatitis B investigational studies, including trial design, patient selection, outcomes, biomarkers, predefined stopping criteria, predefined retreatment criteria, duration of investigational therapies, and follow-up after stopping therapy. Future research of unmet needs are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis B Crónica , Hepatitis B , Humanos , Hepatitis B Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Virus de la Hepatitis B/genética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Biomarcadores , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B , ADN Viral , Hepatitis B/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (cHBV) is mostly indefinite, with new finite-duration therapies needed. We report safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of the investigational HBV core inhibitor ABI-H2158. This Phase 1a/b study (NCT03714152) had three parts: Part A, participants received a single ascending oral dose of ABI-H2158 (5-500 mg) or placebo; Part B, participants received multiple doses of ABI-H2158 300 mg once (QD) or twice (BID) daily or placebo, for 10 days; Part C, cHBV patients received ABI-H2158 (100, 300, or 500 mg QD or 300 mg BID) or placebo, for 14 days. Ninety-three participants enrolled. In Parts A/B, there were no serious adverse events (SAEs) or deaths, and all treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were Grade 1. In Part C, two patients had Grade 3 TEAEs unrelated to ABI-H2158; there were no deaths, SAEs or Grade 4 TEAEs. In Part A, median time to maximum ABI-H2158 plasma concentration (Tmax ) and mean terminal elimination half-life (t½ ) were 1-4 and 9.8-20.7 h, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve increased dose proportionally. In Part B, Day 10 Tmax was 2 h, mean t½ was 15.5-18.4 h, and exposure accumulated 1.7- to 3.1-fold. In Part C, Day 14 Tmax was 1 h, exposure accumulated 1.4- to 1.8-fold, and ABI-H2158 was associated with >2 log10 declines in HBV nucleic acids. In conclusion, ABI-H2158 in cHBV patients following 14 days of dosing was well tolerated and demonstrated potent antiviral activity. Safety and pharmacokinetics supported future QD dosing.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Hepatitis B Crónica , Humanos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Virus de la Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a DrogaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors do not completely suppress HBV DNA in chronic HBV infection (cHBV). Vebicorvir (VBR) is an investigational core inhibitor that interferes with multiple aspects of HBV replication. This phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of VBR in combination with entecavir (ETV) in treatment-naïve patients with cHBV. METHODS: HBeAg-positive, treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis were randomised 1:1 in a double-blind manner to once-daily VBR 300 mg+ETV 0.5 mg or placebo (PBO)+ETV 0.5 mg for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in mean log10 HBV DNA from Baseline to Week 12 and 24. RESULTS: All patients in both treatment groups (PBO+ETV: 12/12; VBR+ETV: 13/13) completed the study. At Week 12, VBR+ETV led to a greater mean (SD) reduction from Baseline in log10 IU/ml HBV DNA (-4.45 [1.03]) vs. PBO+ETV (-3.30 [1.18]; p = 0.0077). At Week 24, VBR+ETV led to a greater reduction from Baseline in log10 IU/ml HBV DNA (-5.33 [1.59]) vs. PBO+ETV (-4.20 [0.98]; p = 0.0084). Greater mean reductions in pregenomic RNA were observed at Week 12 and 24 in patients receiving VBR+ETV vs. PBO+ETV (p <0.0001 and p <0.0001). Changes in viral antigens were similar in both groups. No drug interaction between VBR and ETV was observed. Two patients experienced HBV DNA rebound during treatment, with no resistance breakthrough detected. The safety of VBR+ETV was similar to PBO+ETV. All treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were Grade 1/2. There were no deaths, serious adverse events, or evidence of drug-induced liver injury. CONCLUSIONS: In this 24-week study, VBR+ETV provided additive antiviral activity over PBO+ETV in treatment-naïve patients with cHBV, with a favourable safety and tolerability profile. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03577171 LAY SUMMARY: Hepatitis B is a long-lasting viral infection of the liver. Current treatments can suppress hepatitis B virus but do not offer the opportunity of cure, hence, new treatment approaches are required. Herein, we show that the combination of the novel core inhibitor vebicorvir with an existing antiviral (entecavir) in treatment-naïve patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus demonstrated greater antiviral activity than entecavir alone. Additionally, vebicorvir was safe and well tolerated. Thus, further studies evaluating its potential role in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Hepatitis B Crónica , Humanos , Antivirales/efectos adversos , ADN Viral , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Antígenos e de la Hepatitis B , Virus de la Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Transcriptasa Inversa/uso terapéutico , ARN , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: HBV nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NrtIs) do not completely suppress HBV replication. Previous reports indicate persistent viremia during NrtI treatment despite HBV DNA being undetectable. HBV core inhibitors may enhance viral suppression when combined with NrtIs. This phase II trial (NCT03576066) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the investigational core inhibitor, vebicorvir (VBR), in virologically- suppressed patients on NrtIs. METHODS: Non-cirrhotic, NrtI-suppressed patients with chronic HBV were randomised to VBR 300 mg once daily or matching placebo (PBO) for 24 weeks. Treatment was stratified by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status. The primary endpoint was change from Baseline in serum HBeAg or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) after 24 weeks. RESULTS: Of 73 patients enrolled, 47 were HBeAgâpositive and 26 were HBeAg negative. In HBeAg-positive and -negative patients, there were no differences in the change from Baseline at Week 24 for HBsAg or HBeAg. Using a novel, high-sensitivity assay to detect HBV DNA, a greater proportion of patients with detectable HBV DNA at Baseline achieved undetectable HBV DNA at Week 24 in the VBR+NrtI vs. PBO+NrtI group. In HBeAg-positive patients, a greater change from Baseline in HBV pregenomic (pg)RNA was observed at Week 24 with VBR+NrtI vs. PBO+NrtI. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in VBR+NrtI patients included upper respiratory tract infection, nausea, and pruritus. No serious adverse events, Grade 4 TEAEs, or deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this 24-week study, VBR+NrtI demonstrated a favourable safety and tolerability profile. While there were no significant changes in viral antigen levels, enhanced viral suppression was demonstrated by greater changes in DNA and pgRNA with the addition of VBR compared to NrtI alone. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT03576066. LAY SUMMARY: Core inhibitors represent a novel approach for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, with mechanisms of action distinct from existing treatments. In this study, vebicorvir added to existing therapy reduced HBV replication to a greater extent than existing treatment and was generally safe and well tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis B Crónica , Antivirales/efectos adversos , ADN Viral , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B , Antígenos e de la Hepatitis B , Virus de la Hepatitis B/genética , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Genotype 3b hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents approximately 50% of patients with genotype 3 in China. We compared the efficacy of sofosbuvir (SOF) plus ribavirin (RBV) in Chinese patients with genotype 3a and 3b HCV. METHODS: The analyzed data are from a phase 3, open-label study of SOF plus RBV for 24 weeks conducted in China. The primary endpoint for the trial was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12). RESULTS: Of 126 patients included in this analysis, 58 (46%) had genotype 3a and 68 (54%) had genotype 3b. Both the subtypes were similar in age, sex, body mass index, IL28B, and baseline HCV RNA. However, more treatment-experienced and cirrhotic patients were in the genotype 3b group. All 100% of patients with genotype 3a (95% confidence interval [CI], 94-100), and 91% (95% CI, 82-97) of patients with genotype 3b achieved SVR12 (P = 0.030). For treatment-experienced patients with genotype 3b, the SVR12 rate was 73% (95% CI, 39-94) and 88% (95% CI, 64-99) among patients with and without cirrhosis (P = 1.00), respectively. CONCLUSION: SOF plus RBV for 24 weeks in patients with HCV genotype 3 infection resulted in high rates of SVR. However, the SVR12 rate among patients with genotype 3b was lower than that observed in patients with genotype 3a infection, particularly among treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Sofosbuvir/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , China , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In clinical studies, sofosbuvir-velpatasvir has demonstrated high cure rates and favorable tolerability in patients chronically infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) of any genotype. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir administered with minimal medical monitoring to patients in India. METHODS: At 16 sites in India, 129 adult patients with chronic HCV infection of any genotype initiated 12 weeks of once-daily sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (400-100 mg). Patients with compensated cirrhosis or prior treatment experience could be included in the study. Study drug was dispensed monthly, but there were no on-treatment study assessments. The primary efficacy endpoint was rate of sustained virologic response (HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL) 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12), which was compared to a pre-specified performance goal of 85%. RESULTS: The majority of patients had HCV genotype 3 infection (70%), followed by HCV genotype 1 (22%). The SVR12 rate was 93% (120/129; 95% CI, 87% to 97%) (p = 0.009 compared with the 85% performance goal). Of the nine patients who did not achieve SVR12, 1 experienced virologic failure, 2 relapsed after treatment, 1 withdrew consent after treatment, and 5 were lost to follow-up (1 during and 4 after treatment). Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir was well-tolerated, and no patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache (3% of patients), upper abdominal pain (2%), and pyrexia (2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study conducted at multiple sites in India, sofosbuvir-velpatasvir administered without genotype restriction or on-treatment safety assessments was well-tolerated and highly effective.
Asunto(s)
Carbamatos/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/uso terapéutico , Sofosbuvir/uso terapéutico , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Adulto , Anciano , Carbamatos/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Monitoreo de Drogas , Femenino , Genotipo , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/efectos adversos , Humanos , India , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Viral/sangre , Recurrencia , Sofosbuvir/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This study evaluated 12-week retreatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who did not achieve sustained virologic response after previous treatment with a sofosbuvir- and velpatasvir-containing regimen. All 31 patients maintained a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the last sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir dose.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Carbamatos/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/uso terapéutico , Sofosbuvir/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Aminoisobutíricos , Ciclopropanos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Lactamas Macrocíclicas , Leucina/análogos & derivados , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Quinoxalinas , Retratamiento , Respuesta Virológica SostenidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment with combined sofosbuvir and velpatasvir has resulted in high sustained virological response rates in patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) with genotypes 1-6 in clinical trials and real-world settings, but its efficacy and safety has not been assessed in Asia, a region with diverse HCV genotypes. METHODS: In this single-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients from 38 sites across China, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, and Malaysia, who were chronically infected with HCV genotypes 1-6, and were HCV treatment-naive or treatment-experienced, either without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis. Patients self-administered a combined sofosbuvir (400 mg) and velpatasvir (100 mg) tablet once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response, defined as HCV RNA less than 15 IU/mL at 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12), assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of adverse events leading to premature discontinuation of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02671500, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between April 14, 2016, and June 30, 2017, 375 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 374 completed the full treatment course and one discontinued treatment. Overall, 362 (97% [95% CI 94-98]) of 375 patients achieved SVR12. Among 42 patients with HCV genotype 3b, all of whom had baseline resistance-associated substitutions in NS5A, 25 (89% [95% CI 72-98]) of 28 patients without cirrhosis and seven (50% [23-77]) of 14 patients with cirrhosis achieved SVR12. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (36 [10%] patients) and headache (18 [5%] patients). There were no discontinuations due to adverse events. Serious adverse events were reported in three (1%) patients, none of which was judged to be related to sofosbuvir-velpatasvir treatment. INTERPRETATION: Consistent with data from other phase 3 studies, single-tablet sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12 weeks is an efficacious and safe treatment for Asian patients with chronic HCV infection, but might have lower efficacy in those infected with HCV genotype 3b and with cirrhosis. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Carbamatos/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/uso terapéutico , Cirrosis Hepática/sangre , Sofosbuvir/uso terapéutico , Adulto , China , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Genotipo , Cefalea/inducido químicamente , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/sangre , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Viral/sangre , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/inducido químicamente , Singapur , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Tailandia , Resultado del Tratamiento , VietnamRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Japan, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis currently have no treatment options. In this Phase 3 study, we evaluated sofosbuvir-velpatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks in patients with any HCV genotype and decompensated cirrhosis [Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) class B or C] in Japan. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive sofosbuvir-velpatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks. Randomization was stratified by CPT class and genotype. Sustained virologic response 12 weeks following completion of treatment (SVR12) was the primary efficacy endpoint. RESULTS: Of the 102 patients enrolled, 57% were treatment naive, 78% and 20% had genotype 1 and 2 HCV infection, respectively, and 77% and 20% had CPT class B and C cirrhosis, respectively, at baseline. Overall, 61% of patients were female and the mean age was 66 years (range 41-83). SVR12 rates were 92% (47/51) in each group. Among patients who achieved SVR12, 26% had improved CPT class from baseline to posttreatment week 12. Most adverse events (AEs) were consistent with clinical sequelae of advanced liver disease or known toxicities of ribavirin. Four patients (8%) who received sofosbuvir-velpatasvir and seven (14%) who received sofosbuvir-velpatasvir plus ribavirin experienced a serious AE. The 3 deaths (bacterial sepsis, gastric varices hemorrhage, hepatocellular carcinoma) were attributed to liver disease progression. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12 weeks provides a highly effective and well-tolerated therapy for Japanese patients with HCV and decompensated cirrhosis. Ribavirin did not improve efficacy but increased toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Carbamatos/administración & dosificación , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/administración & dosificación , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Ribavirina/administración & dosificación , Sofosbuvir/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Carbamatos/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Japón , Cirrosis Hepática/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ribavirina/efectos adversos , Sofosbuvir/efectos adversos , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Hepatitis C , Sofosbuvir , Carbamatos , Genotipo , Hepacivirus , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos , Humanos , Cirrosis HepáticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In phase III studies, the fixed dose combination of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) administered for 12â¯weeks led to a sustained virologic response at 12â¯weeks (SVR12) in 96% of NS5A inhibitor-experienced patients, and an SVR12 rate of 98% in DAA-experienced patients who had not previously received an NS5A inhibitor. Herein, we evaluate the relationship between the presence of detectable resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) at baseline and treatment outcome, and whether RASs were selected for in cases of virologic failure. METHODS: NS3, NS5A, and NS5B deep sequencing analyses were performed at baseline for all patients and at the time of virologic failure. Results are reported using a 15% cut-off. RESULTS: A total of 82.7% of NS5A inhibitor-experienced patients (205/248) had baseline NS3 and/or NS5A RASs; 79% had baseline NS5A RASs. SVR12 rates were similar in patients with or without NS3 and/or NS5A RASs, and with or without VOX- or VEL-specific RASs. RASs at NS5A position Y93 were present in 37.3% of patients and 95% achieved SVR12. All patients with ≥2 NS5A RASs achieved SVR12. Baseline NS3 and/or NS5A RASs were present in 46.6% (83/178) of non-NS5A inhibitor DAA-experienced patients, all of whom achieved SVR12. All patients with baseline NS5B nucleoside inhibitor RASs, including two patients with S282T, achieved SVR12. Treatment-selected resistance was seen in one of seven patients who relapsed. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline RASs had no impact on virologic response in DAA-experienced patients following treatment with SOF/VEL/VOX for 12â¯weeks. Selection of viral resistance with virologic relapse was uncommon. LAY SUMMARY: In phase III studies, 12â¯weeks of treatment with the combination of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) cured 97% of patients with hepatitis C virus who failed prior treatment with direct-acting antiviral drugs. Herein, we show that the presence of pretreatment drug resistance did not affect treatment outcome in these patients who had previously received direct-acting antivirals. We also showed that new drug resistance was rare in patients who failed treatment with SOF/VEL/VOX for 12â¯weeks. This has important implications for the selection of best retreatment strategies for these patients.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Carbamatos/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/uso terapéutico , Sofosbuvir/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Aminoisobutíricos , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Carbamatos/administración & dosificación , Ciclopropanos , Farmacorresistencia Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genotipo , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/administración & dosificación , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Lactamas Macrocíclicas , Leucina/análogos & derivados , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/administración & dosificación , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Quinoxalinas , Retratamiento , Sofosbuvir/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In phase 3 trials and real-world settings, smaller proportions of patients with genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and cirrhosis have a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) with the combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir than in patients without cirrhosis. It is unclear whether adding ribavirin to this treatment regimen increases SVRs in patients with genotype 3 HCV infection and cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a phase 2 trial of 204 patients with genotype 3 HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis (mean age 51 ± 7.4 years) at 29 sites in Spain from August 19, 2016 through April 18, 2017. Patients were assigned to groups given sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for 12 weeks (n = 101) or sofosbuvir and velpatasvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks (n = 103). The primary efficacy end point was SVR12. RESULTS: The overall rates of SVR12 were 91% (92 of 101; 95% CI 84-96) for the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir group and 96% (99 of 103; 95% CI 90-99) for the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir plus ribavirin group. In the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir group, a smaller proportion of patients with baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) in nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) achieved an SVR12 (84%) than did patients without (96%). In the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir plus ribavirin group, baseline RASs had less effect on the proportion of patients with an SVR12 (96% for patients with baseline RASs; 99% for patients without). The most common adverse events (which occurred in ≥10% of patients) were asthenia (12%) in the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir group and asthenia (27%), headache (24%), and insomnia (12%) in the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir plus ribavirin group. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with findings from previous studies, a high rate of patients (91% and 96%) with genotype 3 HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis achieved an SVR12 with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir, with or without ribavirin. Of patients treated with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir without ribavirin, fewer patients with baseline NS5A RASs achieved an SVR12 compared with patients without baseline NS5A. ClinicalTrials.govNCT02781558.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Carbamatos/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/uso terapéutico , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Sofosbuvir/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Carbamatos/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/patogenicidad , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/virología , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Viral/sangre , ARN Viral/genética , Ribavirina/efectos adversos , Sofosbuvir/efectos adversos , España , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga ViralRESUMEN
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) exhibits great genetic diversity and is classified into 7 genotypes (GTs), with varied geographic prevalence. Until the recent development of pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral regimens, the determination of HCV GT was necessary to inform optimal treatment. Methods: Plasma samples with unresolved GT using standard commercial genotyping methods were subjected to HCV full-genome sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis was performed to assign GT. Results: Four patients, previously classified as GT5 by LiPA or Abbott RealTime polymerase chain reaction assays, were identified as infected with a novel HCV GT. This novel HCV GT, GT8, is genetically distinct from previously identified HCV GT1-7 with >30% nucleotide sequence divergence to the established HCV subtypes. All 4 patients were originally from Punjab, India, but now reside in Canada and are epidemiologically unlinked. Despite presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions within the GT8 virus of all 4 patients (NS3: V36L, Q80K/R; NS5A: Q30S, Y93S), all patients achieved a sustained virologic response; 2 treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir for 8 weeks, 1 with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks and 1 with sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir for 12 weeks. Conclusions: The discovery of a novel HCV GT8 confirms the circulation of this newly identified lineage in the human population.
Asunto(s)
Hepacivirus/clasificación , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C/virología , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/farmacología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Farmacorresistencia Viral/genética , Femenino , Variación Genética/genética , Genoma Viral/genética , Genómica , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacos , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , India , Masculino , Filogenia , ARN Viral/sangre , ARN Viral/genética , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Análisis de Secuencia de ARNRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In Japan, there is a growing population of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who failed a direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-based regimen. In this Phase 3 study, we evaluated sofosbuvir-velpatasvir plus ribavirin in Japanese patients with genotype 1 or 2 HCV infection who previously received DAAs. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive sofosbuvir-velpatasvir plus ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks. Randomization was stratified by HCV genotype and presence of cirrhosis. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12-week post-treatment (SVR12). RESULTS: Of 117 participants, 81% had HCV genotype 1 infection, 33% had cirrhosis, and 95% had NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) at baseline. Overall, SVR12 rates were 97% (58/60; 95% CI 88-100%) with 24 weeks of treatment and 82% (47/57; 95% CI 70-91%) with 12 weeks. For HCV genotype 1 and 2 infected patients, the SVR12 rates with 24 weeks of treatment were 98% and 92%, respectively. In both treatment groups, SVR12 rates in HCV genotype 1 patients were statistically superior to a historical control rate of 50% (p < 0.001). For patients with NS5A RASs at baseline, 85% (46/54) in the 12-week group and 96% (54/56) in the 24-week group achieved SVR12. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract viral infection, anemia, and headache. Three (2.6%) patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir plus ribavirin was highly effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients who previously failed a DAA-based regimen. Baseline NS5A RASs did not affect treatment outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Carbamatos/administración & dosificación , Carbamatos/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/genética , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ribavirina/administración & dosificación , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Sofosbuvir/administración & dosificación , Sofosbuvir/uso terapéutico , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sofosbuvir, an NS5B inhibitor, combined with velpatasvir, an NS5A inhibitor (SOF/VEL), produces high sustained virologic response rates 12â¯weeks after treatment (SVR12) in patients with genotype 1-6 HCV infection, and has no anticipated clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressants. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SOF/VEL in adults with recurrent chronic genotype 1-4 HCV infection after liver transplant. METHODS: Patients received SOF/VEL 400/100â¯mg daily for 12â¯weeks. Patients could be treatment experienced or treatment naïve with no cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis. The primary endpoints were SVR12 and discontinuations due to adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were enrolled and treated in this study (37 [47%] had genotype 1, 3 [4%] genotype 2, 35 [44%] genotype 3, and 4 [5%] genotype 4 HCV). Of these, 81% were male, 82% were white, 18% had compensated cirrhosis, and 59% were treatment experienced. The most commonly used immunosuppressants were tacrolimus (71%), mycophenolic acid (24%), cyclosporine (14%), and azathioprine (11%). Median (range) time from liver transplantation was 7.5 (0.3, 23.9) years. The SVR12 rate was 96%. By genotype, SVR12 rates were 95% (genotype 1), 100% (genotype 2), 97% (genotype 3), and 100% (genotype 4). Two patients experienced virologic relapse: one with genotype 1a infection was non-cirrhotic and treatment naïve, and one with genotype 3 infection was non-cirrhotic and treatment experienced. One patient discontinued SOF/VEL due to hyperglycemia. No serious or severe adverse events were deemed SOF/VEL-related by the investigator, and no liver transplant rejection episodes or deaths occurred during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SOF/VEL for 12â¯weeks was highly effective and well tolerated in genotype 1-4 HCV-infected liver transplant recipients with and without cirrhosis. LAY SUMMARY: Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir is a combination of two drugs in one tablet that is approved for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. When patients with chronic HCV infection receive a liver transplant, the HCV infection usually recurs, and damages the transplanted liver. This study tested the effects of 12â¯weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir treatment in patients who had HCV recurrence after a liver transplant. Three months following the end of treatment, 96% of patients were cured of HCV infection. Clinical trial number: NCT02781571.
Asunto(s)
Carbamatos , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C Crónica , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Sofosbuvir , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Carbamatos/administración & dosificación , Carbamatos/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sofosbuvir/administración & dosificación , Sofosbuvir/efectos adversos , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antiviral regimens containing NS5A inhibitors are highly effective treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but are not always successful. In the POLARIS-1 phase 3 study, sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 12 weeks was highly effective in the treatment of chronic HCV infection in patients previously treated with a direct-acting antiviral regimen containing an NS5A inhibitor. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir in patients from the deferred treatment group of POLARIS-1, who were initially assigned to masked placebo treatment. METHODS: This open-label, deferred treatment substudy was done at 73 clinical sites (hospitals and clinics) in the USA, France, Canada, the UK, Germany, Australia, and New Zealand. Patients who received placebo in the primary study and who did not have a new clinically significant illness at the post-treatment week 4 assessment were eligible to enter this substudy. Participants received a combination tablet of sofosbuvir (400 mg), velpatasvir (100 mg), and voxilaprevir (100 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was achievement of sustained virological response (defined as HCV RNA concentration below the lower limit of quantification) 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). The primary safety outcome was the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment due to adverse events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02607735, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, number 2015-003455-21. FINDINGS: 152 patients received placebo in the primary study and were potentially eligible for participation in the open-label substudy, of whom 147 were enrolled from March 30, 2016, to Oct 12, 2016. All 147 patients completed treatment, and 143 (97%; 95% CI 93-99) achieved SVR12. Four (3%) patients had virological relapse; all had HCV genotype 1a infection and one also had compensated cirrhosis. The most common adverse events were fatigue (31 [21%]), headache (29 [20%]), diarrhoea (28 [19%]), and nausea (21 [14%]). No deaths, treatment discontinuations, or treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: Supporting the results from the blinded portion of the phase 3 primary study, the single-tablet regimen of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 12 weeks was safe, well tolerated, and highly effective in patients with chronic HCV infection who had previous treatment failure with NS5A inhibitor-containing regimens. A salvage regimen for this population represents an important advance for patients with limited retreatment options. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Carbamatos/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/uso terapéutico , Sofosbuvir/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/antagonistas & inhibidores , Ácidos Aminoisobutíricos , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Carbamatos/efectos adversos , Ciclopropanos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Lactamas Macrocíclicas , Leucina/análogos & derivados , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Quinoxalinas , ARN Viral/sangre , Sofosbuvir/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Combining antiviral regimens in the hepatitis C virus (HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-coinfected population can be complex as they share overlapping mechanisms for elimination that may result in drug interactions. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) with multiple antiretroviral (ARV) regimens were evaluated. Methods: Healthy volunteers were enrolled into 2 phase 1, open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, cross-over studies. SOF/VEL and ARV regimens were administered alone and in combination; ARVs (and pharmacokinetic enhancers) included atazanavir (ATV), cobicistat (COBI), darunavir (DRV), dolutegravir (DTG), efavirenz (EFV), elvitegravir (EVG), emtricitabine (FTC), lopinavir (LPV), raltegravir (RAL), rilpivirine (RPV), ritonavir (RTV), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Geometric least squares means ratios (coadministration:alone) and 90% confidence intervals were constructed for area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval, maximum concentration, and trough, for all analytes. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: In total, 237 participants were enrolled. No clinically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of SOF, SOF metabolite GS-331007, or VEL were observed other than an approximate 50% decrease in VEL exposure when administered with EFV/FTC/TDF. No clinically relevant differences in the PK of ARVs were observed when administered with SOF/VEL. Study treatments were well tolerated, including no observed creatinine clearance changes during evaluation of TDF-containing regimens. Conclusions: SOF/VEL and ARV regimens including ATV, COBI, DRV, DTG, EVG, FTC, LPV, RAL, RPV, RTV, TAF, or TDF may be coadministered without dose adjustment. Use of SOF/VEL with EFV-containing regimens is not recommended due to an approximate 50% reduction in VEL exposure.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/farmacocinética , Carbamatos/farmacocinética , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/farmacocinética , Sofosbuvir/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Carbamatos/efectos adversos , Estudios Cruzados , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sofosbuvir/efectos adversos , Tenofovir/efectos adversos , Tenofovir/farmacocinética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In the ION-4 trial, hepatitis C virus relapse was rare, occurring only in African American patients, 80% receiving efavirenz for human immunodeficiency virus infection. We observed no indication that CYP2B6 polymorphisms associated with increased plasma efavirenz exposure explained the relapses.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Benzoxazinas/metabolismo , Citocromo P-450 CYP2B6/genética , Fluorenos/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Sofosbuvir/uso terapéutico , Negro o Afroamericano , Alquinos , Benzoxazinas/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Coinfección/etnología , Coinfección/virología , Ciclopropanos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Genotipo , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/etnología , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacos , Hepatitis C/etnología , Hepatitis C/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antiviral therapy is effective among people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST), but studies are limited by small numbers of nongenotype 1 (GT1) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment completion, adherence, SVR12, and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapies in HCV patients receiving and not receiving OST. METHODS: Ten phase 3 studies of sofosbuvir-based regimens included ION (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in GT1), ASTRAL (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks in GT1-6), and POLARIS (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in GT1-6). Patients with clinically significant drug use (last 12 months) or noncannabinoids detected at screening were ineligible. RESULTS: Among 4743 patients, 4% (n = 194) were receiving OST (methadone; n = 113; buprenorphine, n = 75; other, n = 6). Compared with those not receiving OST (n = 4549), those receiving OST (n = 194) were younger (mean age, 48 vs 54), more often male (73% vs 61%), GT3 (38% vs 17%), treatment-naïve (78% vs 65%), and cirrhotic (36% vs 23%). Among those receiving and not receiving OST, there was no significant difference in treatment completion (97% vs 99%, P = .06), SVR12 (94% vs 97%, P = .06), relapse (0.5% vs 2.1%, P = .19), adverse events (78% vs 77%, P = .79), or serious adverse events (3.6% vs 2.4%, P = .24). There was no difference in SVR12 in patients with cirrhosis (99% vs 95%, P = .25) or those with G3 (95% vs 95%, P = .77) in those receiving OST. Among patients receiving OST, SVR12 was high among those receiving methadone (95%) and buprenorphine (96%). CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir-based therapies are effective and safe in patients receiving OST.