Comparing treatment modalities for transplant kidney vesicoureteral reflux in the pediatric population.

INTRODUCTION: Non-refluxing ureteral reimplantation is favored in pediatric renal transplantation to prevent complications, such as vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in the transplant ureter. VUR resulting in febrile urinary tract infections remains a problem in this population, leading to repeated hospitalizations and increased morbidity. Revision of the vesicoureteral anastomosis can be a surgical challenge due to scar tissue and tenuous vascularity of the transplant ureter. Therefore, alternative options such as endoscopic injection of Deflux at the neo-orifice and surveillance with prophylactic antibiotics have emerged as potential treatment modalities for transplant ureter VUR. OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed their experience of the management of VUR in the transplant ureter, comparing outcomes of various modalities. STUDY DESIGN: With Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review of all renal transplant patients from January 2002 to January 2017 was conducted. All patients with VUR on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) after surgery were identified. Indications for end-stage renal disease, urologic comorbidities, pretransplant VCUG, and operative details were recorded. After transplantation, febrile urinary tract infections, ultrasound findings, and any further interventions-surveillance, subureteral endoscopic injection of Deflux, or ureteral reimplantation-were documented along with their outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, VUR was identified in 35/285 (12.3%) transplant patients after a non-refluxing ureteroneocystostomy. VUR was managed with surveillance in 17/35 (49%), intravesical Deflux injection in 11/35 (31%), and immediate redo ureteral reimplantation in 7/35 (20%). Ten out of 11 patients undergoing Deflux injection had a postoperative VCUG. All patients developed VUR recurrence; the majority showed immediate failure and only 1/10 showed late recurrence. Of the immediate failures, 3/9 patients were maintained on prophylactic antibiotics, and 6/9 patients underwent ureteral reimplantation. In these six patients undergoing reimplantation after failed Deflux, 3/6 (50%) patients required additional surgeries: One patient developed recurrence of reflux and two patients developed ureterovesical junction obstruction. In contrast, no complications were seen in patients undergoing primary ureteral reimplantation. DISCUSSION: The study is limited by low numbers and a retrospective design. However, the results of this study differ significantly from the published Deflux series showing a success rate of more than 50% in the treatment of transplant kidney VUR. In fact, post-Deflux redo ureteral reimplantation was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: The use of Deflux in the post-transplant setting has poor results. In the study series, 11/11 patients demonstrated clinical and radiographic failure. Therefore, as an institution the authors do not recommend Deflux as first-line treatment of VUR in the transplant patient.

Imaging characteristics associated with failure of nonoperative management in high-grade pediatric blunt renal trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Some children who sustain high-grade blunt renal injury may require operative intervention. In the present study, it was hypothesized that there are computed tomography (CT) characteristics that can identify which of these children are most likely to need operative intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all pediatric blunt renal trauma patients at a single level-I trauma center from 1990 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were: children with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Grade-IV or V renal injuries, aged ≤18 years, and having available CT images with delayed cuts. The CTs were regraded according to the revised AAST grading system proposed by Buckley and McAninch in 2011. Radiographic characteristics of renal injury were correlated with the primary outcome of any operative intervention: ureteral stent, angiography, nephrectomy/renorrhaphy, and percutaneous nephrostomy/drain. RESULTS: One patient had a Grade-V injury and 26 patients had Grade-IV injuries. Nine patients (33.3%) underwent operative interventions. Patients in the operative intervention cohort were more likely to manifest a collecting system filling defect (P = 0.040) (Fig. A) and lacked ureteral opacification (P = 0.010). The CT characteristics, including percentage of devascularized parenchyma, medial contrast extravasation, intravascular contrast extravasation, perirenal hematoma distance and laceration location, were not statistically significant. Of the 21 patients who had a collecting system injury, eight (38.1%) needed ureteral stents. Renorrhaphy was necessary for one patient. Although the first operative intervention occurred at a median of hospital day 1 (range 0.5-2.5), additional operative interventions occurred from day 4-16. Thus, it is prudent to closely follow-up these patients for the first month after injury. Two patients with complex renal injuries had an accessory renal artery resulting in well-perfused upper and lower pole fragments, and were managed nonoperatively without readmission (Fig. B). CONCLUSIONS: Collecting system defects and lack of ureteral opacification were significantly associated with failure of nonoperative management. A multicenter trial is needed to confirm these findings and whether nonsignificant CT findings are associated with operative intervention. In the month after renal injury, these patients should be mindful of any changes in symptoms, and maintain a low index of suspicion for an emergency room visit. For the physician, close follow-up and appropriate counseling of these high-risk patients is advised.