Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 33(2): 86-97, 2024 01 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460119

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence has shown racial and ethnic disparities in rates of harm for hospitalised children. Previous work has also demonstrated how highly heterogeneous approaches to collection of race and ethnicity data pose challenges to population-level analyses. This work aims to both create an approach to aggregating safety data from multiple hospitals by race and ethnicity and apply the approach to the examination of potential disparities in high-frequency harm conditions. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, multicentre study, a cohort of hospitals from the Solutions for Patient Safety network with varying race and ethnicity data collection systems submitted validated central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and unplanned extubation (UE) data stratified by patient race and ethnicity categories. Data were submitted using a crosswalk created by the study team that reconciled varying approaches to race and ethnicity data collection by participating hospitals. Harm rates for race and ethnicity categories were compared with reference values reflective of the cohort and broader children's hospital population. RESULTS: Racial and ethnic disparities were identified in both harm types. Multiracial Hispanic, Combined Hispanic and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander patients had CLABSI rates of 2.6-3.6 SD above reference values. For Black or African American patients, UE rates were 3.2-4.4 SD higher. Rates of both events in White patients were significantly lower than reference values. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of harm data across hospitals with varying race and ethnicity collection systems was accomplished through iterative development of a race and ethnicity category framework. We identified racial and ethnic disparities in CLABSI and UE that can be addressed in future improvement work by identifying and modifying care delivery factors that contribute to safety disparities.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Pacientes Internos , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Blanco
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(12): e2346545, 2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38060226

RESUMEN

Importance: Pediatric ventilator-associated events (PedVAEs, defined as a sustained worsening in oxygenation after a baseline period of stability or improvement) are useful for surveillance of complications from mechanical ventilation. It is unclear whether interventions to mitigate known risk factors can reduce PedVAE rates. Objective: To assess whether adherence to 1 or more test factors in a quality improvement bundle was associated with a reduction in PedVAE rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter quality improvement study obtained data from 2017 to 2020 for patients who were mechanically ventilated and cared for in neonatal, pediatric, and cardiac intensive care units (ICUs). These ICUs were located in 95 hospitals participating in the Children's Hospitals' Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS) network in North America. Data analyses were performed between September 2021 and April 2023. Intervention: A quality improvement bundle consisted of 3 test factors: multidisciplinary apparent cause analysis, daily discussion of extubation readiness, and daily discussion of fluid balance goals. This bundle was distributed to a subgroup of hospitals that volunteered to participate in a collaborative PedVAE prevention initiative under the SPS network guidance in July 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Each SPS network hospital submitted monthly PedVAE rates from January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2020, and test factor data were submitted from July 1, 2018, to May 31, 2020. Analyses focused on hospitals that reliably submitted PedVAE rate data, defined as outcomes data submission through May 31, 2020, for at least 80% of the baseline and postbaseline periods. Results: Of the 95 hospitals in the SPS network that reported PedVAE data, 21 were grouped in the Pioneer cohort and 74 in the non-Pioneer cohort. Only 12 hospitals (57%) from the 21 Pioneer hospitals and 33 (45%) from the 74 non-Pioneer hospitals were considered to be reliable reporters of outcome data. Among the 12 hospitals, the PedVAE rate decreased from 1.9 to 1.4 events per 1000 ventilator days (absolute rate difference, -0.6; 95% CI, -0.5 to -0.7; P < .001). No significant change in the PedVAE rate was seen among the 33 hospitals that reliably submitted PedVAE rates but did not implement the bundle. Of the 12 hospitals, 3 that reliably performed daily discussion of extubation readiness had a decrease in PedVAE rate from 2.6 to 1.2 events per 1000 ventilator days (absolute rate difference, -1.4; 95% CI, -1.0 to -1.7; P < .001), whereas the other 9 hospitals that did not implement this discussion did not have a decrease. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that a multicenter quality improvement intervention targeting PedVAE risk factors was associated with a substantial reduction in the rate of PedVAEs in hospital ICUs. The findings suggest that ICU teams seeking to reduce PedVAEs incorporate daily discussion of extubation readiness during morning rounds.


Asunto(s)
Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Respiración Artificial , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Niño , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Ventiladores Mecánicos , Hospitales Pediátricos
3.
Pediatrics ; 152(3)2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37539480

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reliable bundle performance is the mainstay of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) prevention despite an unclear relationship between bundle reliability and outcomes. Our primary objective was to evaluate the correlation between reported bundle compliance and CLABSI rate in the Solutions for Patient Safety network. The secondary objective was to identify which hospital and process factors impact this correlation. METHODS: We examined data on bundle compliance and monthly CLABSI rates from January 11 to December 21 in 159 hospitals. The correlation (adjusting for temporal trend) between CLABSI rates and bundle compliance was done at the network level. Negative binomial regression was done to detect the impact of hospital type, central line audit rate, and adoption of a comprehensive safety culture program on the association between bundle compliance and CLABSI rates. RESULTS: During the study, hospitals reported 27 196 CLABSI on 20 274 565 line days (1.34 CLABSI/1000 line days). Out of 2 460 133 observed bundle opportunities, 2 085 700 (84%) were compliant. There was a negative correlation between the monthly bundle reliability and monthly CLABSI rate (-0.35, P <.001). After adjusting for the temporal trend, the partial correlation was -0.25 (P = .004). On negative binomial regression, significant positive interaction was only noted for the hospital type, with Hospital Within Hospital (but not freestanding children's hospitals) revealing a significant association between compliance ≥95% and lower CLABSI rates. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to best practice guidelines is associated with a reduction in CLABSI rate. Hospital-level factors (hospitals within hospitals vs freestanding), but not process-related (central line audit rate and safety culture training), impact this association.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Infección Hospitalaria , Niño , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitales Pediátricos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones
4.
Nurs Clin North Am ; 54(1): 115-126, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30712538

RESUMEN

Interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) was recommended to improve siloed and fragmented patient care. The Institute of Medicine recommended nurses lead this change through innovative models of patient-centered care and IPCP participation. One strategy to improve patient experience is rounding. This project presents a nurse-led interprofessional bedside rounding model to improve communication and collaboration between providers and with patients on a complex inpatient unit. Outcomes were analyzed using Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores to examine patient experience. Postimplementation results demonstrate an increase in HCAHPS patient experience scores for this patient population above hospital and national average.


Asunto(s)
Relaciones Interprofesionales , Atención de Enfermería/normas , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Médicos/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA