Radiographic Features of the Metacarpal in Blauth Type III Thumb Hypoplasia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether radiographs can be used to aid in the determination of Blauth IIIA and IIIB thumbs. METHODS: Six pediatric hand surgeons were asked to evaluate the radiographs of 77 thumbs and classify the thumb as IIIA or IIIB and indicate which morphologic features influenced their decision. Quantitative measurements and ratios of radiographs were obtained and compared between IIIA and IIIB thumbs. RESULTS: The radiographic features selected for type IIIA thumbs include near-normal length and near-normal width and for type IIIB thumbs, abnormally short, tapered proximal end, and round proximal end. The six surveyed surgeons reached consensus in 82% (63/77) of thumbs, and this matched the enrolling surgeon's classification in 77% (59/77) cases. The ratio of the length of the thumb metacarpal compared with the length of the index metacarpal was different between IIIA and IIIB thumbs (66% ± 0.08% and 46% ± 0.18%, respectively). The ratio of the width of the thumb metacarpal shaft at its narrowest aspect to the width of the thumb metacarpal base was notably different between IIIA and IIIB (68% ± 0.13% and 95% ± 0.28%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Near-normal length and near-normal width of the metacarpal were used to predict IIIA and abnormally short, abnormally narrow, and a round or tapered base of the metacarpal were used to predict IIIB classification. The length of the thumb metacarpal relative to the index metacarpal is on average 66% of the length of the index metacarpal in IIIA thumbs compared with 46% in IIIB thumbs. The width of the shaft of the thumb metacarpal at its narrowest is 68% of the width of the thumb metacarpal base in IIIA thumbs, indicating a flared base. In IIIB thumbs, the shaft width was on average 95% of the base width, indicating a tapered base. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level III.

The Impact on Families of Children With Congenital Upper Extremity Differences.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact on caregivers of caring for a child with congenital upper extremity differences. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, caregivers of patients enrolled in the multi-institutional Congenital Upper Limb Difference (CoULD) registry were contacted. Demographic information and the Impact on Family Scale (IOFS), a validated measure of perceived caregiver strain, were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures from the CoULD registry, the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were also analyzed for correlation with IOFS. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine caregivers participated. Factors with significantly stronger impact on family included public insurance; bilateral upper extremity involvement; household income of $20,000-40,000; additional musculoskeletal diagnosis; and a single adult caregiver household. There was a significantly increased subcategory of IOFS-Finance score for distant travel to see the surgeon. Additionally, all categories of the PODCI (upper extremity, mobility, sports, pain, happiness, and global) demonstrated a negative correlation with IOFS. PROMIS upper extremity and peer relations also demonstrated an inverse relationship with IOFS, whereas PROMIS pain interference had a positive correlation with IOFS. The overall IOFS for children with CoULDs was greater than previously reported for children with brachial plexus birth injury, and less than cerebral palsy and congenital heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers of children with congenital upper extremity differences report a significant impact on family life. Socioeconomic factors, such as economically disadvantaged or single-caregiver households, and clinical factors, such as bilateral upper extremity involvement, correlate with greater family impact. These findings represent opportunities to identify at-risk families and underscore the importance of caring for the whole family through a multidisciplinary approach. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Patient and Caregiver Impressions of the Impact of Madelung Deformity: A CoULD Registry Analysis.

PURPOSE: This study seeks to investigate demographics of patients with Madelung deformity in a large, geographically diverse sample and understand patient and caregiver perceptions of the impact of this condition. We hypothesized that patients with untreated Madelung deformity have greater pain and lower function compared to the normal population but are less affected than the chosen control group, namely, patients with proximal radioulnar synostosis (PRUS). METHODS: This retrospective study queried the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry, a multicenter registry of patients treated in tertiary care pediatric hospitals. We searched patients enrolled as of July 2022 and identified 3,980 total patients and 66 (1.7%) with a diagnosis of Madelung deformity. We reviewed demographics and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS; peer relations, depressive symptoms, pain interference, and upper extremity function domains) scores at time of enrollment. We used a matched cohort comparison with propensity scoring for 50 patients with Madelung deformity and 50 patients with PRUS (control cohort). RESULTS: Patients with Madelung deformity presented at an average age of 13.1 years (± 2.1 years). Ninety-eight percent were female, and 82% were White. Seventy-four percent had distal radius-only deformity. Upper extremity PROMIS scores in both the Madelung deformity and the PRUS groups were significantly "worse" than normal, confirming our hypothesis. The Madelung deformity and PRUS cohort scores were not consistently different from one another. PROMIS scores from all other domains, including pain interference, were similar to, or better than normal for both groups, disproving the second part of our hypothesis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Madelung deformity averaged 13 years of age and were nearly all female, and the majority had only distal involvement of the radius. Patients with Madelung deformity had lower function based on PROMIS scores, similar to the control cohort, whereas all other PROMIS measures were similar to or better when compared to normal values. Pain interference scores in both cohorts were lower than normal values. Patients with Madelung deformity have decreased function, similar to the comparative cohort of patients with PRUS, but do not present with increased pain. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Symptom Prevalence III.

Syndromic Involvement of Patients Presenting With Congenital Upper Limb Anomalies: An Analysis of 4,317 Cases.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the patterns of syndromic involvement for patients with congenital upper limb anomalies (CULAs). We hypothesize that patients with CULAs will present with predictable syndromic patterns. METHODS: This retrospective study queried the multicenter Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry. Of the 4,317 patients enrolled, 578 (13%) reported one or more syndromes. Syndromes were confirmed to be recognized by the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Demographics were reviewed and compared with the full CoULD registry group. Syndromes reported by five or more patients were examined to determine the type of CULA according to Oberg/Manske/Tonkin classifications. RESULTS: Of the 578 children with one or more reported syndromes, 517 had Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man recognized syndromes (cohort A), In cohort A, 58 syndromes were each represented by a single patient within the registry. Forty-eight syndromes in cohort A were reported by two or more patients, which accounted for 461 of the total patients with reported syndromes. However, VACTERL and Poland syndromes were the most commonly reported syndromes. Patients with CULAs and syndromes frequently exhibited bilateral involvement (61%), compared with the entire CoULD group (47%) and other orthopedic (50%) and medical conditions (61%) compared with the entire CoULD group (24% and 27%, respectively). Additionally, they exhibited a lower frequency of family history of a congenital orthopedic condition (21%) or a family member with the same CULA (9%) compared with the entire CoULD group (26% and 14%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Associated syndromes were recorded in 578 patients (13%) in the CoULD registry as follows: 58 syndromes represented by a single patient, 48 by 2 or more patients, and 23 syndromes by 5 or more patients. Rare syndromes that are only represented by a single patient are more likely to be unknown by a pediatric hand surgeon, and consultation with a geneticist is advised. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Differential Diagnosis/Symptom Prevalence Study IV.

Effect of Race and Geography on Patient- and Parent-Reported Quality of Life for Children With Congenital Upper Limb Differences.

PURPOSE: Patient beliefs about health and disability are shaped by many social factors and are a key determinant in their ultimate outcome. We hypothesized that pediatric and parent-reported outcome measures regarding a child's congenital upper limb difference will be affected by geographic location, parent education, sex, ethnicity, race, age, and presence of additional medical comorbidities. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the multicenter Congenital Upper Limb Difference registry were included. Age, sex, race, ethnicity, medical comorbidities, highest level of parental education, area deprivation index, and geographic region were recorded. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in the pediatric and parent-reported domains of upper extremity, anxiety, pain interference, peer relationships, and depressive symptoms were collected. RESULTS: The only difference between geographic regions in the United States in pediatric and parent-reported PROMIS was that parents in the Midwest reported higher upper extremity function scores in children with upper limb differences than the West. Black patients demonstrated higher scores in parent and child-reported domains of depression, pain, and anxiety, and lower scores in upper extremity function than White and Asian peers. Additionally, children with medical comorbidities also demonstrated worse outcomes in multiple PROMIS domains. There was no difference in scores based on sex, parent education, and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: In children with congenital upper limb differences, race and additional medical comorbidities have an impact on patient- and parent-reported PROMIS outcome measures in multiple domains, with Black children and those with additional medical comorbidities scoring lower than their peers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As we strive to develop a health care system that provides equitable care to all patients, providers who care for children with upper limb differences should be aware that race and additional medical comorbidities can negatively affect patient- and parent-reported PROMIS outcome measures.

Reliability of the Masada Classification for Forearm Involvement in Patients With Hereditary Multiple Osteochondromas (HMO).

BACKGROUND: Classifications describing forearm lesions in patients with Hereditary Multiple Osteochondromatosis (HMO) have been used to recommend surgical intervention and stratify outcomes; however, there is no consensus on which classification offers greater reliability. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the Masada classification and newer classifications among pediatric hand surgeons. METHODS: One hundred one patients with HMO between June 2014 and October 2019 were enrolled in the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry. Of those, 67 patients with 101 forearms were included. Four pediatric hand surgeons from the CoULD study group undertook an online evaluation. Each rater classified radiographs according to the Masada classification. Six weeks later, raters were asked to reclassify images according to the Masada, Gottschalk, and Jo classifications. Rater agreement for these classifications was assessed by estimating Fleiss kappa along with a 95% CI. RESULTS: Interrater agreement for Masada classification after the first reading was poor (κ=0.35; 95% CI=0.30-0.41) across all raters. Interrater agreement across the 4 raters decreased for the Masada classification from the first to the second reading (κ=0.35 vs 0.21; P <0.001). Intrarater agreement for the Masada classification ranged from 0.32 to 0.63 from the first to the second study reading. Gottschalk and Jo classifications yielded significantly better interrater agreement compared with Masada (κ=0.43 vs 0.21; P <0.001). Unclassifiable cases were highest in the Masada classification (34% to 44%) and lower in the Jo (17%) and Gottschalk (14%) classifications. CONCLUSION: Despite wide use, the Masada classification was found to have low reliability when classifying forearm deformities in HMO. Gottschalk offered more options for location, yet lacked deformity description including radial head dislocation. Jo classification offered more locations than Masada and incorporated radial head dislocation in some patterns. Based on the shortcomings in all 3 classification systems, the development of a more inclusive and reliable classification is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; Diagnostic.

The Impact of Isolated Versus Multiple Osteochondromas: Analysis of the CoULD Registry.

PURPOSE: The burden of upper extremity (UE) osteochondromas on function and self-perception among pediatric patients is unclear. The purpose of our study was to study the impact of osteochondromas in comparison to population norms and to evaluate solitary versus multiple osteochondromas on subjective UE function as measured by patient rated outcomes. METHODS: We utilized the CoULD (Congenital Upper Limb Differences) Registry to review all pediatric patients presenting with osteochondromas between January 2014 and February 2021. Demographic information was collected and patients were classified as having either single or multiple osteochondromas. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) tools were utilized for assessment. Scores for PODCI subscales of UE function, Pain/comfort, and Happiness and PROMIS domains of UE Function, Pain, Depression, Anxiety, and Peer Relations were reviewed. Differences between groups were analyzed using the Student t test. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria for the study with an average age of presentation of 9.3 years and 61 patients (62%) were male. Overall, patients demonstrated worse UE Function as well as greater Anxiety and Depression in comparison to the population normals on PROMIS assessment. Patients also demonstrated worse patient and parent reported PODCI UE, Sports and Physical Functioning, Pain/Comfort and Global Functioning scores compared with population norms but demonstrated better than average happiness scores. Patients with multiple osteochondromas demonstrated greater PROMIS pain interference and more disability in PODCI Sports and Physical Functioning, Pain/Comfort and Global Functioning compared with those with solitary osteochondromas. CONCLUSION: Patients with UE osteochondromas have worse overall function in comparison to population norms, exceeding established minimally clinically important difference values. In addition, patients with multiple osteochondromas reported more pain and poorer physical function than those with solitary osteochondromas. Physicians should be alert to the physical and psychosocial burden of this disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prognostic.

How Risky Are Risk Factors? An Analysis of Prenatal Risk Factors in Patients Participating in the Congenital Upper Limb Differences Registry.

Purpose: Risk factors for congenital upper limb differences (CoULDs) are often studied at the general population level. The CoULD registry provides a unique opportunity to study prenatal risk factors within a large patient sample. Methods: All patients enrolled between June 2014 and March 2020 in the prospective CoULD registry, a national multicenter database of patients diagnosed with a CoULD, were included in the analysis. We analyzed self-reported, prenatal risk factors, including maternal smoking, alcohol use, recreational drug use, prescription drug use, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and gestational hypertension. The outcome measures included comorbid medical conditions, proximal involvement of limb difference, bilateral involvement, and additional orthopedic conditions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of the risk factors, controlling for sex and the presence of a named syndrome. Results: In total, 2,410 patients were analyzed, of whom 72% (1,734) did not have a self-reported risk factor. Among the 29% (676) who did have at least 1 risk factor, prenatal maternal prescription drug use was the most frequent (376/2,410; 16%). Maternal prescription drug use was associated with increased odds of patient medical comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] = 1.43, P = .02). Gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with increased odds of comorbid medical conditions (OR = 1.58, P = .04), additional orthopedic conditions (OR = 1.51, P = .04), and proximal involvement (OR = 1.52, P = .04). Overall, reporting 1 or more risk factors increased the odds of patient comorbid medical conditions (OR = 1.42, P < .001) and additional orthopedic conditions (OR = 1.25, P = .03). Conclusions: Most caregivers (72%) did not report a risk factor during enrollment. However, reporting a risk factor was associated with patient medical and orthopedic comorbidities. Of note, GDM alone significantly increased the odds of both these outcome measures along with proximal limb differences. These findings highlight the ill-defined etiology of CoULDs but suggest that prenatal risk factors, especially GDM, are associated with a higher degree of morbidity. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic III.

Poor Outcomes of Pediatric Acute Compartment Syndrome in the Setting of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Multicenter Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a well-described condition that merits emergent surgical decompression. Peripheral arterial cannulation can increase the likelihood of ACS in patients requiring extracorporeal membranous oxygen (ECMO). Comorbidities in these critically ill patients may portend negative consequences of decompressive fasciotomy. This study investigated the clinical short-term and mid-term outcomes in pediatric patients with ECMO-associated ACS. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series at 3 pediatric hospitals from 2006 to 2019, including children ages 0 to 19 years who underwent peripheral arterial cannulation and developed ACS. RESULTS: Eighteen patients developed ACS after receiving peripheral cannulation ECMO. Mean time to diagnosis after cannulation was 63.1 hours. All patients were diagnosed clinically; the most common findings were tight compartments, swelling, and loss of peripheral pulses. Eight patients (44%) died due to underlying illness. Treating physicians decided against decompression for 5 patients due to their underlying illness, instability, and concern for infection. Thirteen patients (72%) underwent decompressive fasciotomies. Ten surgical patients required subsequent surgeries and 6 (33%) developed surgical site infections. Of the 7 surviving surgical patients, 4 (57%) required extremity amputations and 4 had lower extremity neurological deficits on follow-up. Two of 3 nonsurgical patients (66%) had functional lower extremity motor deficits on follow-up. No surviving nonoperative patients developed infections or required amputations. CONCLUSIONS: ACS on ECMO is associated with high rates of complications including neurologic deficits, infection, and amputation. Patients treated nonoperatively avoided complications such as infection and amputation, but had more functional neurological deficits than surgical patients. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider the high morbidity of compartment release in these critically ill patients and, with critical care teams, assess whether the potential benefits of surgery outweigh expected risks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Seasonal Variation in Parental Satisfaction With Pediatric Orthopaedics.

BACKGROUND: The degree of parental satisfaction with health care is determined by the family's characteristics and expectations. Many aspects of human physiology and behavior have seasonal rhythms. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether parental satisfaction scores vary across the year in a pediatric orthopaedic outpatient population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 22,951 parental satisfaction scores related to outpatient pediatric orthopaedic encounters between October 2015 and April 2019. Parental satisfaction was measured using the provider subdomain of the shortened version of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS). Families were stratified according to various pediatric orthopaedic subspecialty services. RESULTS: The satisfaction scores of all pediatric orthopaedic encounters combined did not vary significantly across the year (P=0.8745). When the families were stratified into groups by pediatric orthopaedic subspecialty clinic, variation in seasons was not associated with statistically significant variation in satisfaction scores for the elective surgery, sports medicine, trauma/fracture care, and hand/upper extremity services. However, satisfaction with the spine service was significantly lower in the winter compared with the summer and fall (73.9±3.8 vs. 83.5±5.3 and 82.6±3.6, respectively; P=0.0147). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of pediatric spine care in a region with 4 distinct seasons received lower parental satisfaction scores during the winter than during the summer and fall. This seasonal variation is an additional source of bias in the measurement of satisfaction with health care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-retrospective study.

Social Deprivation and Congenital Upper Extremity Differences-An Assessment Using PROMIS.

PURPOSE: Social deprivation, a measure of socioeconomic status, has been shown to negatively affect perceptions of orthopedic conditions and outcomes of treatment. The objective of this study was to assess whether social deprivation correlates with subjective assessment of function in pediatric patients with congenital hand differences. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) registry were assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The PROMIS scores for Pain Interference, Peer Relations, Anxiety, Depression, and Upper Extremity (UE) function were obtained for all patients 5 years and older at initial presentation. Social deprivation was determined by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI); the index ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores being the most deprived. The PROMIS scores were correlated with the ADI for all patients. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-five pediatric patients with congenital UE differences were evaluated. Average age was 11 years, 56% were female, and 55% had bilateral involvement. Overall, PROMIS scores were within 1 SD of normal for Peer Relations, Pain, Depression, and Anxiety. However, child-reported scores for UE function (39) were more than 1 SD below the national average (50). The mean ADI for the cohort was lower than the national average, indicative of less deprivation, with 14% of patients in the most deprived national quartile. Children in the highest ADI quartile reported PROMIS scores that reflected higher Pain Interference (41 vs 45), lower Peer Relations (55 vs 50), higher Anxiety (44 vs 49), and higher Depression (43 vs 47) than children in the lowest ADI quartile. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS scores were normal for psychosocial measures in children with congenital hand differences when evaluated as an entire cohort. However, child self-reported PROMIS scores for Pain Interference, Peer Relations, Anxiety, and Depression were worse in more socially deprived areas, suggesting more psychosocial challenges in these children. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pediatric patients with congenital upper extremity differences in areas of higher social deprivation report lower psychosocial well-being. The care of these individuals must be considered within the context of their environment because they may be more at risk for negative outcomes secondary to environmental and societal stressors.

Impact of Biofeedback in the Treatment of Nonspecific Persistent Wrist and Forearm Pain in Adolescents.

PURPOSE: Biofeedback is a self-regulation technique in which patients learn to control what were once thought to be involuntary bodily processes. The goal of this study was to examine a sample of adolescents with persistent, nonspecific wrist and forearm pain to assess whether biofeedback can improve symptoms. A secondary goal was to identify any shared characteristics. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients seen by an upper-extremity surgeon and a biofeedback expert at a pediatric hospital from 2011 through 2017. Data collected included Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC) and Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) scores, pain intensity, frequency, and duration; as well as self-report of depression, anxiety, self-harm, and/or suicidal ideation. Additional data included biological sex, brace or orthosis wear, history of injury, prior medical or surgical treatments, and the presence of paresthesias. Biofeedback sessions were held every 1 to 2 weeks, for typically 5 sessions. RESULTS: Sixteen patients met inclusion criteria; 9 completed biofeedback. Eight patients were female (88%) and 1 was male (11%). The dominant extremity was affected in 8 patients (89%). Seven of the 9 patients who completed biofeedback had improvement or resolution of symptoms (78%). Both patients who completed biofeedback but did not have improvement in pain underwent surgery before biofeedback referral. Three patients reported paresthesias; each had an elevated CDI and MASC score (33%). Six patients did not report paresthesias, and one patient had similar elevated CDI and MASC scores CONCLUSIONS: More females than males were seen and referred to biofeedback in this study group. There appears to be an association between underlying anxiety or depression and the report of paresthesias. Biofeedback is an available nonsurgical treatment modality for persistent wrist and forearm pain that should be considered in appropriate patients. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Association of Radial Longitudinal Deficiency and Thumb Hypoplasia: An Update Using the CoULD Registry.

BACKGROUND: Deficiency of the radial aspect of the forearm and hand is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency of the upper limb. Radial longitudinal deficiency is associated with several named syndromes. The purpose of the present study was to explore patterns of radial longitudinal deficiency and thumb hypoplasia in syndromes and to examine the severity of these differences across various syndromes. METHODS: Data were collected from the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) registry. Congenital differences are classified in the registry with use of the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) classification system. Diagnosis of a syndrome by a physician as noted in the CoULD registry was recorded. Thumb deficiency and radial deficiency were classified according to the modified versions of the Blauth criteria and the Bayne and Klug criteria, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 259 patients with 383 affected limbs with radial deficiency. Eighty-three of these patients had a diagnosed syndrome. The severity of radial deficiency was correlated with the severity of thumb deficiency. The Kendall tau coefficient indicated significant correlation between radial severity and thumb severity (tau = 0.49 [95% confidence interval = 0.40 to 0.57]; p < 0.05). Subjects with a syndrome were twice as likely to have bilateral deficiency and 2.5 times more likely to have both radial and thumb deficiency compared with subjects without a syndrome. Subjects with VACTERL syndrome (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb defects) had patterns of thumb and radial deficiency similar to the general cohort, whereas subjects with Holt-Oram syndrome, TAR (thrombocytopenia absent radius) syndrome, and Fanconi anemia demonstrated varied presentations of thumb and radial deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The present study investigated the characteristics of patients with radial longitudinal deficiency and thumb hypoplasia. Our results support the findings of previous research correlating the severity of radial deficiency with the severity of thumb deficiency. Furthermore, we identified characteristic features of patients with radial longitudinal deficiency and associated syndromes.

Shoulder Release and Tendon Transfer following Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy: Gains, Losses, and Midline Function.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder release and tendon transfer is frequently performed to address persistent weakness from neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Although postoperative improvements in motion are well described, associated deficits are poorly documented, and functional assessments are lacking. Loss of ability to reach midline can occur with surgery and may result in impairment. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess the gains, losses, functional changes, and patient-reported outcome associated with the authors' surgical approach. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing surgery with 2-year follow-up were included (n = 30). Prospectively recorded assessments by therapists were reviewed. Changes were assessed by t test and Wilcoxon rank sum (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Active external rotation and abduction improved and internal rotation diminished. Aggregate modified Mallet score increased with improvements in all subscales, except that hand to spine was unchanged and hand to belly decreased. Functional assessment using the Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure revealed an increase of aggregate score, with no decline in any subscales. Improvements were in hand to back of head, forward overhead reach, holds plate with palm up, opening large container, and strings bead. Aggregate patient self-report of appearance and function increased (from 18 to 23). Loss of ability to reach midline occurred in three patients (10 percent) who had extended Erb or total palsy and preoperative limitations of internal rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary reconstruction rebalances shoulder motion by increasing external rotation and abduction and reducing internal rotation. In this study, a conservative surgical approach results in overall improvement in task-based abilities and self-reported outcomes and preservation of internal rotation within a functional range. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The Utility of the Early Postoperative Follow-up and Radiographs After Operative Treatment of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children.

BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures are common elbow injuries in pediatric patients. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons published guidelines for the standard of care in the treatment of displaced SCH fractures, however, no recommendations for follow-up care were made. With the recent push to eliminate unnecessary radiographs and decrease health care costs, many are questioning postoperative protocols. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the utility of the 1-week follow-up appointment after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of displaced SCH fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review performed at a single institution from 2014 to 2016 included patients under 14 years of age with a closed, displaced SCH fracture treated with CRPP. Exclusion criteria included patients without complete clinical or radiographic follow-up. Variables examined included time to initial follow-up, change in treatment plan after 1-week x-rays, complications, demographics, fracture type, pin number and configuration, reduction parameters, immobilization, time to pin removal, duration of casting, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients were divided into 2 groups based on time to initial follow-up. Overall, 368 had an initial follow-up at 7 to 10 days (group 1) and 44 at 21 to 28 days (group 2). There was no difference in age, sex, fracture type, pin configuration, or a number of pins between groups. Statistically significant findings included time to initial follow-up and days to pin removal (group 1 at 26.2 d vs. group 2 at 23.8 d), type of immobilization (group 1 with 5% circumferential casts and group 2 with 70%), and time to surgery (26.2 vs. 62.9 h, respectively). There was no significant difference in complication rates and only a 0.5% rate of change in management in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative follow-up and radiographs did not change the patient outcome and might be eliminated in children with displaced SCH fractures treated with CRPP. Given the current focus of on efficiency and cost-effective care, eliminating the 1-week postoperative appointment would improve appointment availability and decrease medical cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Therapeutic.

Orthopaedic Manifestations in Turner Syndrome.

Turner syndrome is one of the most common chromosomal anomalies occurring in live-born females. It has been extensively reviewed in the medical literature, yet little has been discussed regarding the skeletal manifestations that present to the orthopaedic surgeon. It is important for the orthopaedic surgeon to be familiar with the clinical findings and comorbid conditions in Turner syndrome because they may be the first line of diagnosis when a patient presents for short stature, scoliosis, or slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Recent studies have identified the short stature homeobox gene as the main cause of the skeletal differences in patients with Turner syndrome, affecting longitudinal bone growth. Skeletal deformities including short stature, delayed skeletal maturation, angular deformity of the limbs, spinal deformity, and early-onset osteoporosis have been associated with Turner syndrome. This article will review the skeletal manifestations of Turner syndrome and propose guidelines for the treatment and monitoring of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level V.

Patient Safety Checklists: Do They Improve Patient Safety for Supracondylar Humerus Fractures?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to investigate whether a safety checklist could be used consistently in an academic center, and, whether its presence correlates with a decreased rate of complications, and therefore, improved overall patient safety. METHODS: Data from 3 years before and after the implementation of the checklist were compared. Prechecklist data from August 2008 through August of 2011, including all operative supracondylar humerus fractures treated at our institution, were retrospectively reviewed. Postchecklist data, from August 2011 to August 2014 were prospectively collected. Patients' charts and their imaging were all reviewed for: fracture type, nerve injury, placement of a medial pin, infection, loss of alignment, loss of fixation, and return to the operating room (OR). Patients who were within the checklist group were reviewed for checklist compliance and concordance of resident and attending-attested checklists. RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty-one operative supracondylar humerus fractures were reviewed-394 in the prechecklist group and 537 in the postchecklist group. There was no significant difference in fracture type between the prechecklist and postchecklist groups. No significant differences were found between prechecklist and postchecklist patients in regards to loss of fixation, loss of alignment, infection, or nerve injury. In the postchecklist group, the number of medial pins placed was significantly less than in the prechecklist group (P=0.0001), but this was not found to have clinical significance. In the prechecklist group, 11 patients returned to the OR for a second procedure, whereas 4 in the postchecklist group had a return to the OR. This finding was significant (P=0.015), but the returns to the OR were not related to checklist parameters. The checklist compliance of the attending physicians was 85.85% and the residents were compliant 83.11% of the time. There were documented discrepancies between resident and attending checklists in 7.38% of all total checklists. CONCLUSIONS: Our patient safety checklists are not necessarily affecting patient care in a clinically significant manner. It is important that we validate and refine these specialty-specific checklists before becoming reliant on them. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Forearm Fixation is Not Necessary in the Treatment of Pediatric Floating Elbow.

BACKGROUND: Ipsilateral supracondylar humerus and forearm fractures in the pediatric population are an uncommon injury associated with high-energy trauma. Current literature suggests a high rate of compartmental syndrome with this fracture pattern and recommends surgical stabilization of both injuries. We investigate whether surgical treatment of the supracondylar fracture with closed reduction of the forearm fracture and placement into a noncircumferential cast may be an appropriate treatment. METHODS: Retrospective clinical and radiographic review of 47 patients (22 male, 25 female; mean age 6 y) with modified Gartland type 2 or type 3 supracondylar humerus fracture requiring surgical stabilization and an ipsilateral forearm fracture from a single institution over 78 months. RESULTS: Forty-seven pediatric "floating elbow" cases that had operative management of the supracondylar fracture were identified. A total of 21/47 (45%) had displaced forearm fractures that required closed manipulation. Of these, 17/21 (81%) underwent closed reduction of the displaced forearm fracture(s) and were placed into a noncircumferential cast or splint. No patients lost reduction or required remanipulation of either fracture. No patients developed signs of elevated compartment pressures. All patients went on to radiographic union without secondary procedures. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that a supracondylar humerus fracture with an ipsilateral forearm fracture can be safely managed with operative stabilization of the supracondylar humerus fracture alone. Simultaneous closed reduction of the ipsilateral displaced forearm fracture and use of noncircumferential immobilization postoperatively is safe and was not associated with the development of elevated compartment pressures or need for remanipulation. Previous studies that relate a high rate of compartment syndrome with this injury pattern may be misguided, as method of postoperative immobilization may be a more significant factor in the development of elevated compartment pressures than the injury pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Laboratory predictors for risk of revision surgery in pediatric septic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Reported complications of pediatric septic arthritis range from minor growth abnormalities to potentially life-threatening conditions and death; some children require multiple surgeries for eradication of infection. The purpose of this study is: (1) to determine the failure rate of a single surgical incision and drainage (I&D) in pediatric septic arthritis, (2) to identify risk factors for failure which are detectable at the time of initial presentation, and (3) to trend post-operative C-reactive protein (CRP) values to see if there is a difference between children who fail a single I&D and those who do not. METHODS: The medical records for 105 children who underwent operative management of septic arthritis were retrospectively reviewed. Single and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Eighty-four children required one surgical intervention [mean age 5.18 years (±4.01); 38 females (45 %), 46 males (55 %)], 21 children required revision surgery [mean age 8.16 years (±4.54); 4 females (19 %), 17 males (81 %)], and the overall rate of revision surgery was 20 %. Delayed diagnosis (p = 0.015), elevated CRP at presentation (p = 0.000), positive blood culture (p = 0.000), and age (p = 0.009) were all associated with revision surgery in bivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, CRP at presentation and positive blood culture were significant risk factors for revision surgery (p = 0.005 and p = 0.025, respectively). Additionally, markedly elevated CRP levels on post-operative days (POD) 1-4 were each independently significant risk factors for requiring multiple surgeries (all p < 0.000). Fever, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and leukocyte count were not risk factors for multiple surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a positive blood culture or marked elevation in CRP at presentation or on POD 1-4 were associated with revision surgery. These findings may help improve surgical planning for both the initial surgery in order to avoid revisions, as well as revision surgery, should it be indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.