Higher Immunological Response after BNT162b2 Vaccination among COVID-19 Convalescents-The Data from the Study among Healthcare Workers in an Infectious Diseases Center.

Introduction: The BNT162b2 vaccination studies did not specifically focus on groups that were heavily exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods: Study participants were recruited from hospital employees who received BNT162b2 vaccination at the Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw. Blood samples were collected before and after each vaccination dose. At each timepoint, the levels of anti-SARS CoV-2 IgM, anti-n SARS-CoV-2 IgG, and S-RBD antibodies were measured. Data on concomitant diseases and the vaccine's adverse events (VAE) were collected after each vaccination dose. In the statistical analyses, non-parametric tests were used. Results: In total, 170 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. Their median age was 51 years (interquartile range (IQR): 41−60 years); most of them were women (n = 137, 80.6%) working in direct contact with patients (n = 137, 73.2%); and 46 (27.0%) had concomitant diseases. More than one fifth of subjects had COVID-19 before their first dose of vaccination (n = 38, 22.6%). In terms of immunological responses, our investigations showed a high level of efficacy for the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination as measured by S-RBD antibody concentrations: these were positive in 100% of participants 14 days after the second dose of the vaccine. It was also observed that employees with high S-RBD antibodies (>=433 BAU/mL) were more likely to be COVID-19 convalescents before receiving the first vaccine dose (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The BNT162b2 vaccine is safe and effective among HCWs. Vaccine adverse events occurred, but serious events were not observed. Moreover, the BNT162b2 vaccine is effective against symptomatic and severe COVID-19­none of the workers that acquired a SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination required hospitalization or medical care. We also observed higher immunological responses among COVID-19 convalescents.

The Beneficial Effect of the COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose among Healthcare Workers in an Infectious Diseases Center.

Introduction: Healthcare workers in Poland received a booster dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech, Manufacturer: Pfizer, Inc., and BioNTech; Moguncja, Germany) at the beginning of October 2021. Here, we report on the preliminary results of an ongoing clinical study into the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 of healthcare workers previously exposed to the virus, with or without evidence of past infection, in the Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw before and after the vaccine booster dose. Methods: Blood samples were collected on the day the vaccine booster dose was administered and again 14 days later. The levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (against the n-protein, indicative of disease) and S-RBD (indicative of a response to vaccination) were measured. Results: One hundred and ten health care workers from the Hospital for Infectious Diseases were included in the study. The percentage of subjects with a positive test for anti-n-protein IgG antibodies at both time points remained unchanged (16, 14%), while a statistically significant increase in the percentage of subjects producing high levels of S-RBD antibodies (i.e., >433 BAU/mL) was observed (from 23, 21% to 109, 99%; p = 0.00001). Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that the booster dose of the vaccine significantly increases the percentage of people with high levels of S-RBD antibodies, regardless of previous contact with the virus, which may indicate greater protection against both the disease and a severe course of COVID-19.

Usefulness of SOFA score and artesunate - based treatment in severe malaria ­ a single center study

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to assess the usefulness of the guidelines of treatment recommended in Malaria diagnosis and treatment guideline published by University College London Hospitals-NHS Foundation Trust on 26th June 2013, usefulness of artesunate-based therapy and usefulness of SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score in treatment of severe malaria. Severe malaria is usually caused by Plasmodium falciparum and most of the time fulfills the criteria of sepsis which are specified in the new definition of sepsis. The other malaria species are commonly considered to be the cause of mild course of malaria, however more and more cases of severe malaria are reported in the course of tertian fever malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax and in the disease caused by Plasmodium knowlesi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with malaria were hospitalized in the Department of Adults' Infectious Diseases and in the Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw between December 2013 and April 2017. All patients were treated according to Malaria diagnosis and treatment guideline UCLH. RESULTS: Thirteen patients in our study fulfilled the criteria of severe malaria. All fourteen patients presented with a SOFA score ≥2 points. Intravenous artesunate was administered to all patients in doses recommended in the UCLH guidelines. All patients presented with thrombocytopenia and elevated level of D-Dimers. The main factor influencing the dynamics of SOFA score was thrombocytopenia. All the patients fully recovered without any complications. CONCLUSIONS: The malaria treatment guidelines used in the Department for Infectious Diseases in Adults and in the Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw in years 2013-2017 are effective. In assessing the severity of malaria SOFA score is useful especially as a warning of possibility of a severe course of the disease.