MASLD in people with HIV exhibits higher fibrosis stage despite lower disease activity than in matched controls.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is common in people with HIV (PWH). The morphological spectrum of MASLD compared to matched controls and of the correlation between the NAFLD activity score (NAS) and fibrosis stage in PWH remains unknown. METHODS: Overall, 107 liver biopsies from PWH with MASLD (MASLD-PWH) were matched to 107 biopsies from individuals with MASLD and without HIV (MASLD controls) on age at biopsy, race/ethnicity, sex, type 2 diabetes, body mass index (BMI) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level. Biopsies were scored using NAS. RESULTS: Compared to MASLD-controls, MASLD-PWH had lower steatosis grade (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: (0.47-0.90), p = 0.01), lower lobular inflammation grade (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: (0.34-0.89), p = 0.02), less portal inflammation (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: (0.25-0.72), p = 0.002) and less ballooned hepatocytes (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: (0.41-0.88), p = 0.01). Thus, NAS was lower in MASLD-PWH (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: (0.56-0.85), p < 0.001) than in MASLD controls. There was a trend towards lower prevalence of steatohepatitis in MASLD-PWH (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: (0.68-1.03), p = 0.09). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that MASLD-PWH cases had significantly less steatosis (OR: 0.66, p = 0.03), portal inflammation (OR: 0.34, p = 0.001) and ballooned hepatocytes (OR: 0.55, p = 0.01), yet higher stage fibrosis (OR: 1.42, p = 0.03) compared to MASLD controls. CONCLUSION: The NAS and histological drivers of fibrosis (e.g. inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning) are less pronounced in MASLD-PWH, and yet fibrosis stage was generally higher when compared to matched controls with MASLD without HIV. This suggests HIV-specific factors beyond hepatic necroinflammation may contribute to fibrosis progression in MASLD-PWH.

Higher Rate of SBP Recurrence with Secondary SBP Prophylaxis Compared to No Prophylaxis in Two National Cirrhosis Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) bacteriology has changed over time. Reappraisal of primary SBP prophylaxis showed an increased rate of resistance in patients on primary prophylaxis with resultant discontinuation of this prophylaxis throughout the VA. We aimed to re-evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of secondary SBP prophylaxis (SecSBPPr). METHODS: Using validated ICD 9/10 codes, we utilized the VA Corporate Data Warehouse and the Non-VA National TriNetX database to identify patients in two different large US systems who survived their first SBP diagnosis (with chart review from two VA centers) between 2009-2019. We evaluated the prevalence of SecSBPPr and compared outcomes between those started on SecSBPPr versus not. RESULTS: We identified 4673 Veterans who survived their index SBP episode; 54.3% of whom were prescribed SecSBPPr. Multivariable analysis showed higher SBP recurrence risk in those on vs. off SecSBPPr(HR-1.63[1.40-1.91], p<0.001). This was accompanied by higher fluroquinolone-resistance odds in SecSBPPr patients (OR=4.32[1.36-15.83], p=0.03). In TriNetX we identified 6708 patients who survived their index SBP episode; 48.6% were on SecSBPPr. Multivariable analysis similarly showed SecSBPPr increased SBP recurrence risk (HR-1.68[1.33-1.80], p<0.001). Both datasets showed higher SBP recurrence trends over time in SecSBPPr patients. Results remained consistent at 6-month and 2-year timepoints. CONCLUSION: In two national data sets of >11,000 patients with SBP we found that SecSBPPr was prescribed in roughly half of patients. When initiated, SecSBPPr, compared to no prophylaxis after SBP, increased the risk of SBP recurrence in multivariable analysis by 63-68%, and this trend worsened over time. SecSBPPr should be reconsidered in cirrhosis.

A Clinical Review of Noninvasive Tests for Hepatic Fibrosis.

Identifying hepatic fibrosis is paramount in managing patients with chronic liver disease. The etiology of liver disease can be owing to many factors, including chronic viral hepatitis, steatotic liver diseases such as alcohol-associated liver disease or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, and cholestatic liver diseases. Currently, invasive liver biopsy with histopathologic evaluation is the gold standard; however, noninvasive tests are becoming more prevalent, especially because they do not carry the risks of invasive procedures such as biopsy. This article reviews noninvasive tests for fibrosis, separating them into blood-based and imaging-based tests.

Utility of Lille Score in Predicting 30-Day Survival in Steroid-Treated Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), the Lille score is used to assess futility of steroids. However, the ability of the Lille score to predict 30-day survival in AH is not well-defined. Our aim is to compare the utility of the Lille score in predicting 30-day survival in those with AH treated with steroids. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 882 patients hospitalized with AH from January 1st, 2012 through December 30th, 2019 was performed. Of these, 201 patients with severe AH met the threshold to receive steroids. Those with data to calculate Lille score < 0.45 on day 4 (n = 29) or 7 (n = 89) who continued steroids were compared to 83 patients with Lille scores ≥ 0.45 on day 4 (n = 18) or 7 (n = 65) who stopped steroids. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. For comparison, a contemporaneous matched control group was also analyzed of 110 patients who were hospitalized with severe AH, but did not receive steroids. RESULTS: In patients with Lille score < 0.45, survival was higher at 30-day when compared to those with Lille score ≥ 0.45 (94.9% vs. 80.72%; p = 0.002). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Lille score (< 0.45) to predict 30-day survival was 95%, 19%, 63%, and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In severe AH, those with Lille score < 0.45 at day 4 or 7 have improved 30-day survival compared to those with Lille score ≥ 0.45. In those receiving steroids, Lille score has excellent sensitivity to predict 30-day survival but poor specificity.

A Possible Reversible Cause of Cognitive Impairment: Undiagnosed Cirrhosis and Potential Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients with Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Dementia and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) have symptom overlap and are challenging to differentiate. The presence of undiagnosed cirrhosis may lead to missed opportunities to treat HE, which was found in a veterans database. This needs validation in a non-veteran cohort. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2009 and 2019 using national non-Veteran patient data from the multi-center TriNetX database. Participants included 68,807 patients with a dementia diagnosis at ≥2 visits, no prior diagnosis of cirrhosis, and with sufficient laboratory test results to calculate the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, which indicates liver disease. Prevalences of high FIB-4 scores (>2.67 and >3.25) were measured within the cohort, and associations between high FIB-4 and comorbidities/demographics were examined. RESULTS: Within the cohort (44.7% male, 78.0% White, mean age 72.73 years (±11.09), 7.6% (n = 5815) had a FIB-4 index > 3.25 and 12.8% (n = 8683) had FIB-4 > 2.67. In multivariable logistic regression models, FIB-4 > 3.25 was associated with male gender (OR: 1.42 [1.33-1.51]), congestive heart failure (OR: 1.73 [1.59-1.87]), viral hepatitis (OR: 2.23 [1.84-2.68]), alcohol use disorder (OR: 1.39 [1.22-1.58]), and chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.38 [1.28-1.48]), and inversely associated with White race (OR: 0.76 [0.71-0.82]) and diabetes (OR: 0.82 [0.77-0.88]). Similar findings were associated with the FIB-4 > 2.67 threshold. CONCLUSION: The findings of this national cohort suggest that the FIB-4 index could be utilized to screen for potential undiagnosed cirrhosis in patients with dementia, and that hepatic encephalopathy might be misdiagnosed as dementia or cause worsening of cognitive function in patients with dementia.

Utility of scores to predict alcohol use after liver transplant: Take them with a grain of salt.

The Sustained Alcohol use post-Liver Transplant (SALT) and the High-Risk Alcohol Relapse (HRAR) scores were developed to predict a return to alcohol use after a liver transplant (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease. A retrospective analysis of deceased donor LT from October 2018 to April 2022 was performed. All patients underwent careful pre-LT psychosocial evaluation. Data on alcohol use, substance abuse, prior rehabilitation, and legal issues were collected. After LT, all were encouraged to participate in rehabilitation programs and underwent interval phosphatidylethanol testing. Patients with alcohol-associated liver disease were stratified by < or > 6 months of sobriety before listing. Those with <6 months were further stratified as acute alcoholic hepatitis (AH) by NIAAA criteria and non-AH. The primary outcome was the utility of the SALT (<5 vs. ≥5) and HRAR (<3 vs. ≥3) scores to predict a return to alcohol use (+phosphatidylethanol) within 1 year after LT. Of the 365 LT, 86 had > 6 months of sobriety, and 85 had <6 months of sobriety; 41 with AH and 44 non-AH. In those with AH, the mean time of abstinence to LT was 58 days, and 71% failed prior rehabilitation. Following LT, the return to drinking was similar in the AH (24%) compared to <6-month non-AH (15%) and >6-month alcohol-associated liver disease (22%). Only 4% had returned to heavy drinking. The accuracy of both the SALT and HRAR scores to predict a return to alcohol was low (accuracy 61%-63%) with poor sensitivity (46% and 37%), specificity (67%-68%), positive predictive value (22%-26%) with moderate negative predictive value (81%-83%), respectively with higher negative predictive values (95%) in predicting a return to heavy drinking. Both SALT and HRAR scores had good negative predictive value in identifying patients at low risk for recidivism.

Effects of Food Insecurity on Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis in People With HIV.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Food insecurity (FI) is a risk factor for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and advanced fibrosis in the general population, but its impact on liver disease in people with HIV (PWH) is unknown. METHODS: We examined the association of FI with prevalence of NAFLD and fibrosis in a diverse cohort of PWH. PWH aged ≥ 18 years on antiretroviral therapy, HIV RNA <200 copies/mL, and without other known liver diseases were screened for NAFLD (controlled attenuated parameter ≥263 decibels/meter) and advanced fibrosis (liver stiffness measurement ≥11 kilopascals) by vibration controlled transient elastography at 8 U.S. CENTERS: Participants were categorized as food insecure using the Six-Item Short Form Household Food Security Survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis by FI status. RESULTS: Among 654 PWH, NAFLD was present in 348 (53%) and advanced fibrosis in 41 (6%). FI was present in 203 of participants (31%), including 97/348 with NAFLD (28%) and 18/41 with advanced fibrosis (44%). In multivariable analysis, FI was associated with lower odds of NAFLD (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.88) and a greater, but nonsignificant, odds of advanced fibrosis (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.65-2.90). We identified a significant interaction between FI and diabetes (P = .02) on fibrosis risk, with greater odds of fibrosis among food insecure PWH and diabetes (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.15-12.73) but not among food insecure nondiabetics (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.47-2.98). CONCLUSIONS: FI is highly prevalent among PWH and associated with lower odds of NAFLD, and among PWH with diabetes, there is greater odds of advanced fibrosis. FI may contribute to hepatic fibrosis through mechanisms other than steatosis in PWH.

Noninvasive liver disease assessment to identify portal hypertension: Systematic and narrative reviews supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Portal hypertension is a serious complication of cirrhosis, which leads to life-threatening complications. HVPG, a surrogate of portal pressure, is the reference standard test to assess the severity of portal hypertension. However, since HVPG is limited by its invasiveness and availability, noninvasive liver disease assessments to assess portal pressure, especially clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), are needed. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic review of Ovid MEDLINE(R) Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus from each database's inception to April 22, 2022. We included only studies in English that examined ≥50 patients in single liver disease etiologies, which compared noninvasive tests (blood and/or imaging) to HVPG for predicting clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH; defined as HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg) in patients with chronic liver disease. Outcomes included measures of diagnostic test accuracy. Additionally, a narrative review of studies not eligible for the systematic review is also provided. Nine studies with 2492 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was substantial heterogeneity with regard to liver disease studied and cutoff values used to detect CSPH. Blood-based tests, including aspartate-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) (56% sensitivity and 68% specificity) and FIB-4 (54% sensitivity and 73% specificity) had low accuracy measures. Imaging-based tests (transient elastography and shear wave elastography detection of liver stiffness measurement [LSM]) had better accuracy but also had substantial variation; at 15 kPa, TE sensitivity was 90%-96% and specificity was 48%-50%, while at 25 kPa, its sensitivity and specificity were 57%-85% and 82%-93%, respectively. The narrative review suggested that imaging-based tests are the best available noninvasive liver disease assessment to detect CSPH; CSPH is highly unlikely to be present at an LSM ≤15 kPa and likely to be present at an LSM ≥25 kPa. CONCLUSIONS: While imaging-based noninvasive liver disease assessment appeared to have higher accuracy than blood-based tests to detect CSPH, only 9 studies fit the a priori established inclusion criteria for the systematic review. In addition, there was substantial study heterogeneity and variation in cutoffs for LSM to detect CSPH, limiting the ability to establish definitive cutoffs to detect CSPH.

Accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Blood-based biomarkers have been proposed as an alternative to liver biopsy for noninvasive liver disease assessment in chronic liver disease. Our aims for this systematic review were to evaluate the diagnostic utility of selected blood-based tests either alone, or in combination, for identifying significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4), and cirrhosis (F4), as compared to biopsy in chronic liver disease. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We included a comprehensive search of databases including Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Scopus through to April 2022. Two independent reviewers selected 286 studies with 103,162 patients. The most frequently identified studies included the simple aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and fibrosis (FIB)-4 markers (with low-to-moderate risk of bias) in HBV and HCV, HIV-HCV/HBV coinfection, and NAFLD. Positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios across direct and indirect biomarker tests for HCV and HBV for F2-4, F3-4, or F4 were 1.66-6.25 and 0.23-0.80, 1.89-5.24 and 0.12-0.64, and 1.32-7.15 and 0.15-0.86, respectively; LR+ and LR- for NAFLD F2-4, F3-4, and F4 were 2.65-3.37 and 0.37-0.39, 2.25-6.76 and 0.07-0.87, and 3.90 and 0.15, respectively. Overall, the proportional odds ratio indicated FIB-4 <1.45 was better than aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index <0.5 for F2-4. FIB-4 >3.25 was also better than aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index >1.5 for F3-4 and F4. There was limited data for combined tests. CONCLUSIONS: Blood-based biomarkers are associated with small-to-moderate change in pretest probability for diagnosing F2-4, F3-4, and F4 in viral hepatitis, HIV-HCV coinfection, and NAFLD, with limited comparative or combination studies for other chronic liver diseases.

Imaging-based noninvasive liver disease assessment for staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transient elastography (TE), shear wave elastography, and/or magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), each providing liver stiffness measurement (LSM), are the most studied imaging-based noninvasive liver disease assessment (NILDA) techniques. To support the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines on NILDA, we summarized the evidence on the accuracy of these LSM methods to stage liver fibrosis (F). APPROACH AND RESULTS: A comprehensive search for studies assessing LSM by TE, shear wave elastography, or MRE for the identification of significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4), or cirrhosis (F4), using histopathology as the standard of reference by liver disease etiology in adults or children from inception to April 2022 was performed. We excluded studies with <50 patients with a single disease entity and mixed liver disease etiologies (with the exception of HCV/HIV coinfection). Out of 9447 studies, 240 with 61,193 patients were included in this systematic review. In adults, sensitivities for the identification of F2-4 ranged from 51% to 95%, for F3-4 from 70% to 100%, and for F4 from 60% to 100% across all techniques/diseases, whereas specificities ranged from 36% to 100%, 74% to 100%, and 67% to 99%, respectively. The largest body of evidence available was for TE; MRE appeared to be the most accurate method. Imaging-based NILDA outperformed blood-based NILDA in most comparisons, particularly for the identification of F3-4/F4. In the pediatric population, imaging-based NILDA is likely as accurate as in adults. CONCLUSIONS: LSM from TE, shear wave elastography, and MRE shows acceptable to outstanding accuracy for the detection of liver fibrosis across various liver disease etiologies. Accuracy increased from F2-4 to F3-4 and was the highest for F4. Further research is needed to better standardize the use of imaging-based NILDA, particularly in pediatric liver diseases.

Diagnostic Ability of Simple Noninvasive Blood Tests to Predict Increased Liver Stiffness in People Living With HIV and Steatotic Liver Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Steatotic liver disease is common in people with HIV (PWH). Identifying those with advanced fibrosis (AF, bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis), F3-4, is important. We aimed to examine the performance of FIB-4 and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score (NFS) in PWH to identify those with AF assessed by liver stiffness measurement (LSM). METHODS: We prospectively collected data on adults participating in 2 National Institute of Health-sponsored HIV NAFLD networks. All had HIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART) ≥6 months with HIV RNA <200 copies/mL. Those with viral hepatitis, other liver disease, excessive alcohol use, or hepatic decompensation were excluded. Vibration-controlled transient elastrography for LSM was performed, and AF defined as ≥11 kPa was compared with FIB-4 and NFS at predefined thresholds (<1.3 and >2.67 for FIB-4 and <-1.455 and >0.675 for NFS). RESULTS: A total of 1,065 participants were analyzed: mean age 51.6 years, 74% male, 28% White, 46% Black, 22% Hispanic, with 34% overweight (body mass index 25-29 kg/m 2 ) and 43% obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 ). Features of the metabolic syndrome were common: hyperlipidemia 35%, type 2 diabetes 17%, and hypertension 48%. The median CD4 + T-cell count was 666 cells/mm 3 , 74% had undetectable HIV RNA, and duration of HIV-1 was 17 years with most taking a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (92%) and an integrase inhibitor (83%). The mean LSM was 6.3 kPa, and 6.3% had AF. The area under the receiver characteristic curve for FIB-4 and NFS to identify AF were 0.70 and 0.75, respectively. While both had high negative predictive values (97%-98%), the sensitivity at low thresholds and specificity at high thresholds were 64% and 97% for FIB-4 and 80% and 96% for NFS, respectively. Neither FIB-4 nor NFS at either threshold had good positive predictive value to detect AF. DISCUSSION: FIB-4 and NFS have excellent specificity and negative predictive value for detecting AF, and thus can be used as screening tools in PWH to exclude those with AF who do not need further testing (LSM) or referral to hepatologist.

Test characteristics for combining non-invasive liver fibrosis staging modalities in individuals with Hepatitis C virus.

Non-invasive methods have largely replaced biopsy to identify advanced fibrosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV). Guidelines vary regarding testing strategy to balance accuracy, costs and loss to follow-up. Although individual test characteristics are well-described, data comparing the accuracy of using two tests together are limited. We calculated combined test characteristics to determine the utility of combined strategies. This study synthesizes empirical data from fibrosis staging trials and the literature to estimate test characteristics for Fibrosis-4 (FIB4), APRI or a commercial serum panel (FibroSure®), followed by transient elastography (TE) or FibroSure®. We simulated two testing strategies: (1) second test only for those with intermediate first test results (staged approach), and (2) second test for all. We summarized empiric data with multinomial distributions and used this to estimate test characteristics of each strategy on a simulated population of 10,000 individuals with 4.2% cirrhosis prevalence. Negative predictive value (NPV) for cirrhosis from a single test ranged from 98.2% (95% CB 97.6-98.8%) for FIB-4 to 99.4% (95% CB 99.0-99.8%) for TE. Using a staged approach with TE second, sensitivity for cirrhosis rose to 93.3-96.9%, NPV to 99.7-99.8%, while PPV dropped to <32%. Using TE as a second test for all minimally changed estimated test characteristics compared with the staged approach. Combining two non-invasive fibrosis tests barely improves NPV and decreases or does not change PPV compared with a single test, challenging the utility of serial testing modalities. These calculated combined test characteristics can inform best methods to identify advanced fibrosis in various populations.

Outcomes of early vs late treatment initiation in solid organ transplantation from hepatitis C virus nucleic acid test-positive donors to hepatitis C virus-uninfected recipients: Results from the HCV-TARGET study.

Curative hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy has increased transplantation from HCV-infected nucleic acid test-positive donors to HCV-uninfected recipients (D+/R-). We evaluated outcomes of early and late HCV treatment among D+/R- nonliver organ transplants. Patients received HCV regimens per local standard (n = 10 sites). Outcomes were compared between early and late treatments. Early treatment regimens (ETR) (n = 56) were initiated pretransplantation to day 7 posttransplant. Late treatment regimens (LTRs) (n = 102) began median 31 (range, 8-114) days posttransplant. There were 79 kidney, 50 lung, 23 heart, and 6 mixed transplants, similar between groups. HCV RNA was quantifiable in 98% of LTR versus 44.6% of ETR recipients (P < .001). Mean (range) days on treatment were 28 (7-93) ETR and 81 (51-111) LTR (P < .0001). There were no virological failures with ETR, but relapse (n = 3) and nonresponse (n = 2) in LTR (P = .16), including fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis postrelapse (n = 1). Sustained virological response was 100% (95% confidence interval, 93.4-100.0) in ETR (n = 54) and 94.9% (95% confidence interval, 88.5-98.3) in LTR (n = 98). Acute rejection occurred in 11 (19.6%) ETR and 25 (24.5%) LTR. In total, 11 HCV-unrelated deaths occurred: 8 ETR and 3 LTR. Organ transplantation from HCV-infected nucleic acid test-positive donors to HCV-uninfected recipients was safe. ETR led to fewer virological failures with shorter treatment duration, supporting recommendations to initiate treatment promptly posttransplant.

Prevalence of steatotic liver disease, MASLD, MetALD and significant fibrosis in people with HIV in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has recently been proposed as a replacement term for NAFLD. AIMS: To assess the effects of this new nomenclature on the prevalence and distribution of different SLD categories in people with HIV (PWH) and identified factors associated with MASLD and clinically significant fibrosis (CSF). METHODS: PWH were prospectively enrolled from 9 US centres and underwent clinical evaluation and vibration-controlled transient elastography for controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM). SLD was defined as CAP ≥ 263 dB/m, CSF as LSM of ≥8 kPa, and advanced fibrosis (AF) as LSM ≥ 12 kPa. The prevalence of SLD, MASLD, metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD), ALD, cryptogenic (cSLD), CSF and AF were determined. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with MASLD and CSF risk. RESULTS: Of 1065 participants, 74% were male, mean (SD) age 51.6 ± 11.9 years, 46% non-Hispanic Black and 74% with undetectable HIV RNA. The prevalence of SLD was 52%, MASLD 39%, MetALD 10%, ALD 3%, CSF 15% and AF 4%. Only 0.6% had cSLD. Black race was protective whereas obesity, ALT and AST levels were associated with increased risk of MASLD and CSF in MASLD. HIV or antiretroviral therapy did not affect MASLD risk. CONCLUSIONS: MASLD and MetALD are the dominant causes of SLD in PWH, affecting almost half. Application of the new nomenclature resulted in minimal change in the proportion of patients with MASLD who would have been diagnosed previously with NAFLD.