Phenotypic Models of Drug-Drug-Gene Interactions Mediated by Cytochrome Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes.

Genetic polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and drug-drug interactions are major sources of inadequate drug exposure and ensuing adverse effects or insufficient responses. The current challenge in assessing drug-drug gene interactions (DDGIs) for the development of precise dose adjustment recommendation systems is to take into account both simultaneously. Here, we analyze the static models of DDGI from in vivo data and focus on the concept of phenoconversion to model inhibition and genetic polymorphisms jointly. These models are applicable to datasets where pharmacokinetic information is missing and are being used in clinical support systems and consensus dose adjustment guidelines. We show that all such models can be handled by the same formal framework, and that models that differ at first sight are all versions of the same linear phenoconversion model. This model includes the linear pharmacogenetic and inhibition models as special cases. We highlight present challenges in this endeavor and the open issues for future research in developing DDGI models for recommendation systems.

Assessment of Substrate Status of Drugs Metabolized by Polymorphic Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2 Enzymes: An Analysis of a Large-Scale Dataset.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of substrates of polymorphic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes is important information to enable drug-drug interactions (DDIs) analysis and the relevance of pharmacogenetics in this context in large datasets. Our aim was to compare different approaches to assess the substrate properties of drugs for certain polymorphic CYP2 enzymes. METHODS: A standardized manual method and an automatic method were developed and compared to assess the substrate properties for the metabolism of drugs by CYP2D6, 2C9, and 2C19. The automatic method used a matching approach to three freely available resources. We applied the manual and automatic methods to a large real-world dataset deriving from a prospective multicenter study collecting adverse drug reactions in emergency departments in Germany (ADRED). RESULTS: In total, 23,878 medication entries relating to 895 different drugs were analyzed in the real-world dataset. The manual method was able to assess 12.2% (n = 109) of drugs, and the automatic method between 12.1% (n = 109) and 88.9% (n = 796), depending on the resource used. The CYP substrate classifications demonstrated moderate to almost perfect agreements for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 (Cohen's Kappa (κ) 0.48-0.90) and fair to moderate agreements for CYP2C9 (κ 0.20-0.48). CONCLUSION: A closer look at different classifications between methods revealed that both methods are prone to error in different ways. While the automated method excels in time efficiency, completeness, and actuality, the manual method might be better able to identify CYP2 substrates with clinical relevance.

Nutrimetric Validation of Solanidine as Dietary-Derived CYP2D6 Activity Marker In Vivo.

CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of many drugs. Its activity is affected by pharmacogenetic variability leading to highly polymorphic phenotypes between individuals, affecting safety and efficacy of drugs. Recently, solanidine, a steroidal alkaloid from potatoes, and its metabolites, has been identified as a dietary-derived activity marker for CYP2D6. The intraday variability in plasma within individuals has not been studied yet in healthy subjects. As part of a CYP phenotyping cocktail study with 20 healthy participants, plasma concentrations of solanidine, 4-OH-solanidine and 3,4-secosolanidine-3,4-dioic acid (SSDA) were determined using a sensitive liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method in urine and in plasma at timepoints 0, 2.5, 5, 8, and 24 hours after intake of test substances. The participants were phenotyped for CYP2D6 with oral metoprolol (12.5 mg) with 15 plasma sampling points over 24 hours (DRKS00028922). Metabolic ratios (MRs) of metabolite to parent plasma concentrations were formed from single timepoints and the area under the curve (AUC). All participants were genotyped for CYP2D6. The intra-individual variability of the CYP2D6 metabolite SSDA was highly stable with a median SD of 11.62% over 24 hours. MR SSDA/solanidine was more variable (median SD 31.90%) but correlated significantly at all measured timepoints with AUC MR α-OH-metoprolol/metoprolol. The AUC MR SSDA/solanidine showed a significant linear relationship with the genetically predicted CYP2D6 activity score. This study substantiates the MR SSDA/solanidine as CYP2D6 activity marker. The high correlation with metoprolol MR indicates a valid prediction of the CYP2D6 phenotype at any timepoint during the study day.

Over- and Undertreatment With Levothyroxine.

BACKGROUND: Levothyroxine is a very commonly prescribed drug, and treatment with it is often insufficient or excessive. Nonetheless, there have been only a few reports on the determinants of inadequate levothyroxine treatment. METHODS: Data from 2938 participants in the population-based Rhineland Study were analyzed. Putative determinants of inadequate levothyroxine treatment (overtreatment, thyrotropin level <0.56 mU/L; undertreatment, thyrotropin level >4.27 mU/L) were studied with logistic regression. The determinants of the levothyroxine dose were assessed with linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 23% of the participants (n = 662) stated that they were taking levothyroxine. Among these participants, 18% were overtreated and 4% were undertreated. Individuals over 70 years of age and above were four times as likely to be overtreated (OR = 4.05, 95% CI [1.20; 13.72]). Each rise in the levothyroxine dose by 25 µg was associated with an increased risk of overtreatment (OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.02; 1.03]) and of undertreatment (OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00; 1.03]). Well-controlled participants (normal thyrotropin levels 0.56-4.27 mU/L) received a lower levothyroxine dose (1.04 ± 0.5 µg/kg/d) than overtreated (1.40 ±0.5 µg/kg/d) or undertreated (1.37 ±0.5 µg/kg/d) participants. No association was found between sociodemographic factors or comorbidities and the levothyroxine dose. Iodine supplementation was associated with a lower daily dose (ß = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.28; -0.10]), while three years or more of levothyroxine exposure was associated with a higher daily dose (ß = 0.24, 95% CI [0.07; 0.41]). CONCLUSION: Levothyroxine intake was high in our sample, and suboptimal despite monitoring. Our findings underscore the need for careful dosing and for due consideration of deintensification of treatment where appropriate.

Use of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications associated with falls leading to emergency department visits: results from the ADRED study.

PURPOSE: Drug intake might be a modifiable factor for the individual fall-risk of older adults, and anticholinergic properties of drugs need to be considered. This study is aimed at analyzing the association of older adults' individual anticholinergic load with particular focus on use of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications with falls in multi-medicated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases of the prospective, observational, multi-center study on adverse drug reactions leading to emergency departments (ADRED study) between 2015 and 2018 in Germany were analyzed comparing the exposure of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications on the chance to present with a fall with patients without exposure. Logistic regression analysis was used adjusting for pre-existing conditions, drug exposure, and the individual anticholinergic burden by drug use. To this end, a combination of seven expert-based anticholinergic rating scales was used. RESULTS: The anticholinergic burden was higher in patients with overactive bladder anticholinergic medications (median 2 [1; 3]) compared to not taking drugs of interest. Presenting with a fall was associated with overactive bladder anticholinergic medications (odds ratio (OR) 2.34 [95% confidence interval 1.14-4.82]). The use of fall-risk increasing drugs was likewise associated (OR 2.30 [1.32-4.00]). The anticholinergic burden itself seemed not to be associated with falls (OR 1.01 [0.90-1.12]). CONCLUSIONS: Although falls occur multifactorial in older adults and confounding by indication cannot be ruled out, the indication for a drug treatment should be decided with caution when other, non-pharmacological treatment options have been tried. GERMAN CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER: DRKS-ID: DRKS00008979, registration date 01/11/2017.

A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of pharmacogenetic testing before starting drug therapy has been well documented for several single gene-drug combinations. However, the clinical utility of a pre-emptive genotyping strategy using a pharmacogenetic panel has not been rigorously assessed. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised, crossover implementation study of a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel in 18 hospitals, nine community health centres, and 28 community pharmacies in seven European countries (Austria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK). Patients aged 18 years or older receiving a first prescription for a drug clinically recommended in the guidelines of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (ie, the index drug) as part of routine care were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included previous genetic testing for a gene relevant to the index drug, a planned duration of treatment of less than 7 consecutive days, and severe renal or liver insufficiency. All patients gave written informed consent before taking part in the study. Participants were genotyped for 50 germline variants in 12 genes, and those with an actionable variant (ie, a drug-gene interaction test result for which the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group [DPWG] recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) were treated according to DPWG recommendations. Patients in the control group received standard treatment. To prepare clinicians for pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing, local teams were educated during a site-initiation visit and online educational material was made available. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions within the 12-week follow-up period. Analyses were irrespective of patient adherence to the DPWG guidelines. The primary analysis was done using a gatekeeping analysis, in which outcomes in people with an actionable drug-gene interaction in the study group versus the control group were compared, and only if the difference was statistically significant was an analysis done that included all of the patients in the study. Outcomes were compared between the study and control groups, both for patients with an actionable drug-gene interaction test result (ie, a result for which the DPWG recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) and for all patients who received at least one dose of index drug. The safety analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03093818 and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between March 7, 2017, and June 30, 2020, 41 696 patients were assessed for eligibility and 6944 (51·4 % female, 48·6% male; 97·7% self-reported European, Mediterranean, or Middle Eastern ethnicity) were enrolled and assigned to receive genotype-guided drug treatment (n=3342) or standard care (n=3602). 99 patients (52 [1·6%] of the study group and 47 [1·3%] of the control group) withdrew consent after group assignment. 652 participants (367 [11·0%] in the study group and 285 [7·9%] in the control group) were lost to follow-up. In patients with an actionable test result for the index drug (n=1558), a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction occurred in 152 (21·0%) of 725 patients in the study group and 231 (27·7%) of 833 patients in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·54-0·91]; p=0·0075), whereas for all patients, the incidence was 628 (21·5%) of 2923 patients in the study group and 934 (28·6%) of 3270 patients in the control group (OR 0·70 [95% CI 0·61-0·79]; p <0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Genotype-guided treatment using a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel significantly reduced the incidence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions and was feasible across diverse European health-care system organisations and settings. Large-scale implementation could help to make drug therapy increasingly safe. FUNDING: European Union Horizon 2020.

Inhalation therapies in COPD - adverse drug reactions impact on emergency department presentations.

PURPOSE: Inhaled drugs have been cornerstones in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for decades and show a high prescription volume. Due to the local application, drug safety issues of these therapies are often underestimated by professionals and patients. Data about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by inhaled therapy in patients with COPD and polypharmacy are rare. We aimed to analyze the use and relevance of inhaled therapies in those patients in relation to ADR complaints, which were severe enough to warrant presentation to the emergency department. METHODS: Emergency department cases due to suspected ADRs of the ADRED database (n = 2939, "Adverse Drug Reactions in Emergency Departments"; DRKS-ID: DRKS00008979, registration date 01/11/2017) were analyzed for inhaled drugs in patients with COPD. ADRs in cases with overdosed inhaled drugs were compared to non-overdosed cases. ADRs, potentially caused by inhaled drugs, were evaluated, clustered into complexes, and assessed for association with inhaled drug classes. RESULTS: Of the 269 included COPD cases, 67% (n = 180) received inhaled therapy. In 16% (n = 28), these therapies were overdosed. Overdosed cases presented the complexes of malaise and local symptoms more frequently. Related to the use of inhaled anticholinergics, local (dysphagia-like) and related to inhaled beta-2 agonists, local (dysphagia-like) and sympathomimetic-like ADRs presented more frequently. CONCLUSION: Overdosed inhaled therapies in patients with COPD lead to relevant ADRs and impact on emergency room presentations. These are rarely associated to inhaled therapy by healthcare professionals or patients. Due to the high volume of inhaled drug prescriptions, pharmacovigilance and patient education should be more focused in patients with COPD. German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS-ID: DRKS00008979.

The gradient model of brain organization in decisions involving "empathy for pain".

Influential models of cortical organization propose a close relationship between heteromodal association areas and highly connected hubs in the default mode network. The "gradient model" of cortical organization proposes a close relationship between these areas and highly connected hubs in the default mode network, a set of cortical areas deactivated by demanding tasks. Here, we used a decision-making task and representational similarity analysis with classic "empathy for pain" stimuli to probe the relationship between high-level representations of imminent pain in others and these areas. High-level representations were colocalized with task deactivations or the transitions from activations to deactivations. These loci belonged to 2 groups: those that loaded on the high end of the principal cortical gradient and were associated by meta-analytic decoding with the default mode network, and those that appeared to accompany functional repurposing of somatosensory cortex in the presence of visual stimuli. These findings suggest that task deactivations may set out cortical areas that host high-level representations. We anticipate that an increased understanding of the cortical correlates of high-level representations may improve neurobiological models of social interactions and psychopathology.

Emergency Department Visits Due to Dyspnea: Association with Inhalation Therapy in COPD and Cases with Adverse Drug Reactions.

Purpose: Dyspnea is a leading symptom of COPD that causes presentations in emergency departments or negatively impacts on them. Guideline-based inhalation therapies are intended to reduce dyspnea in COPD patients. This study analyzed how common guideline recommended inhalation therapy regimens are occurring in clinical practice among COPD patients presenting to emergency departments due to adverse drug reactions in polytherapy using data of the German ADRED database. Patients and Methods: In total, 269 COPD cases were identified. In a further analysis, all cases were analyzed for documented GOLD stage and guideline-recommended inhalation therapy for COPD. Dyspnea and other symptoms identified during ED presentation were analyzed and compared between patients who did and did not receive the guideline's recommended inhalation therapy. Results: In this observation, 41% (n = 46) of all 112 cases with a documented COPD and GOLD stage received an underdosed therapy according to current guidelines. Dyspnea was the most common identified symptom (32%, n = 36) in this cohort and occurred more often in patients who received an underdosage of inhalation therapy (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with COPD presenting to ED with ADRs show a high rate of non-guideline-recommended inhalation therapy and present more often with dyspnea compared to those COPD patients who received an adequate dosing of inhalation therapy.

Pharmacogenetic and drug interaction aspects on ketamine safety in its use as antidepressant - implications for precision dosing in a global perspective.

Ketamine and its enantiomer S-ketamine (esketamine) are known to produce rapid-onset antidepressant effects in major depression. Intranasal esketamine has recently come onto the market as an antidepressant. Besides experience from short-term use in anaesthesia and analgesia, the experience with ketamine as long-term medication is rather low. The use of ketamine and esketamine is limited due to potential neurotoxicity, psychotomimetic side effects, potential abuse and interindividual variability in treatment response including cessation of therapy. Therefore, taking a look at individual patient risks and potential underlying variability in pharmacokinetics may improve safety and dosing of these new antidepressant drugs in clinical practice. Differential drug metabolism due to polymorphic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and gene-drug interactions are known to influence the efficacy and safety of many drugs. Ketamine and esketamine are metabolized by polymorphic CYP enzymes including CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and CYP2A6. In antidepressant drug therapy, usually multiple drugs are administered which are substrates of CYP enzymes, increasing the risk for drug-drug interactions. We reviewed the potential impact of polymorphic CYP variants and common drug-drug interactions in antidepressant drug therapy affecting ketamine pharmacokinetics, and the role for dose optimization. The use of ketamine or intranasal esketamine as antidepressants demands a better understanding of the factors that may impact its metabolism and efficacy in long-term use. In addition to other clinical and environmental confounders, prior information on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic determinants of response variability to ketamine and esketamine may inform on dose optimization and identification of individuals at risk of adverse drug reactions.

Green Tea Extract to Prevent Colorectal Adenomas, Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Preclinical, epidemiological, and small clinical studies suggest that green tea extract (GTE) and its major active component epigallocatechingallate (EGCG) exhibit antineoplastic effects in the colorectum. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind trial of GTE standardized to 150 mg of EGCG b.i.d. vs placebo over 3 years was conducted to prevent colorectal adenomas (n = 1,001 with colon adenomas enrolled, 40 German centers). Randomization (1:1, n = 879) was performed after a 4-week run-in with GTE for safety assessment. The primary end point was the presence of adenoma/colorectal cancer at the follow-up colonoscopy 3 years after randomization. RESULTS: The safety profile of GTE was favorable with no major differences in adverse events between the 2 well-balanced groups. Adenoma rate in the modified intention-to-treat set (all randomized participants [intention-to-treat population] and a follow-up colonoscopy 26-44 months after randomization; n = 632) was 55.7% in the placebo and 51.1% in the GTE groups. This 4.6% difference was not statistically significant (adjusted relative risk 0.905; P = 0.1613). The respective figures for the per-protocol population were 54.3% (151/278) in the placebo group and 48.3% (129/267) in the GTE group, indicating a slightly lower adenoma rate in the GTE group, which was not significant (adjusted relative risk 0.883; P = 0.1169). DISCUSSION: GTE was well tolerated, but there was no statistically significant difference in the adenoma rate between the GTE and the placebo groups in the whole study population.

Comparative Investigation of Methods for Analysis of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-Specific Antisera.

In light of an increasing number of vaccinated and convalescent individuals, there is a major need for the development of robust methods for the quantification of neutralizing antibodies; although, a defined correlate of protection is still missing. Sera from hospitalized COVID-19 patients suffering or not suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were comparatively analyzed by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and pseudotype-based neutralization assays to quantify their neutralizing capacity. The two neutralization assays showed comparable data. In case of the non-ARDS sera, there was a distinct correlation between the data from the neutralization assays on the one hand, and enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA), as well as biophysical analyses, on the other hand. As such, surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based assays for quantification of binding antibodies or analysis of the stability of the antigen-antibody interaction and inhibition of syncytium formation, determined by cell fusion assays, were performed. In the case of ARDS sera, which are characterized by a significantly higher fraction of RBD-binding IgA antibodies, there is a clear correlation between the neutralization assays and the ELISA data. In contrast to this, a less clear correlation between the biophysical analyses on the one hand and ELISAs and neutralization assays on the other hand was observed, which might be explained by the heterogeneity of the antibodies. To conclude, for less complex immune sera-as in cases of non-ARDS sera-combinations of titer quantification by ELISA with inhibition of syncytium formation, SPR-based analysis of antibody binding, determination of the stability of the antigen-antibody complex, and competition of the RBD-ACE2 binding represent alternatives to the classic PRNT for analysis of the neutralizing potential of SARS-CoV-2-specific sera, without the requirement for a BSL3 facility.

Validation of self-reported medication use applying untargeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics techniques in the Rhineland study.

AIMS: To assess the validity of self-reported continuous medication use with drug metabolites measured in plasma by using untargeted mass spectrometric techniques. METHODS: In a population-based cohort in Bonn, Germany, we compared interview-based, self-reported medication intake with drug-specific metabolites measured in plasma (based on participants who completed their study visits between March 2016 and February 2020). Analyses were done stratified by sex and age (<65 years vs ≥65 years). Cohen's kappa (κ) statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 13 drugs used to treat hypertension, gout, diabetes, epilepsy and depression were analysed in a sample of 4386 individuals (mean age 55 years, 56.1% women). Eleven drugs showed almost perfect agreement (κ > 0.8), whereas sitagliptin and hydrochlorothiazide showed substantial (κ = 0.8, 95% CI 0.71-0.90) and moderate agreement (κ = 0.61, 95% CI 0.56-0.66), respectively. Frequency of use allowed sex- and age-stratified analyses for eight and nine drugs, respectively. For five drugs, concordance tended to be higher for women than for men. For most drugs, concordance was higher among individuals aged ≥65 years than among individuals aged <65 years, but these age-related differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: High concordance rates between self-reported drug use and metabolites measured in plasma suggest that self-reported drug use is reliable and accurate for assessing drug use.

Clonal Hematopoiesis-Associated Gene Mutations in a Clinical Cohort of 448 Patients With Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are at risk of secondary therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs). Acquired blood-specific mutations in clonal hematopoiesis (CH)-associated genes are t-MN risk factors, and their occurrence associated with cancer therapy and age. Patients with ovarian cancer (OC) showed a particularly high prevalence of CH-associated gene mutations, which may additionally be explained by the high proportion of a hereditary disease cause in this cancer entity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 448 OC patients enrolled in the AGO-TR1 study; 249 were enrolled at primary diagnosis and 199 at platinum-sensitive recurrence. Analyses included the most frequently altered CH-associated genes (ASXL1, DNMT3A, GNAS, JAK2, PPM1D, SF3B1, SH2B3, SRSF2, TET2, TP53). Results were analyzed according to the BRCA1/2 germline (gBRCA1/2) mutation status. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: Advanced age at blood draw and a high number of prior platinum-based chemotherapy lines were risk factors to acquire CH-associated gene mutations, with gene-specific effects observed. Binomial logistic regression suggested increased probabilities for gBRCA1/2 mutation carriers to acquire CH-associated PPM1D and TP53 gene mutations (PPM1D: odds ratio = 4.30, 95% confidence interval = 1.48 to 12.46, P = .007; TP53: odds ratio = 6.20, 95% confidence interval = 0.98 to 53.9, P = .06). This observation was due to a statistically significantly increased number of platinum-based chemotherapy lines in gBRCA1/2 mutation carriers vs noncarriers (PPM1D: mean [SD] = 2.04 [1.27] vs 1.04 [0.99], P < .001; TP53: mean [SD] = 2.83 [1.33] vs 1.07 [1.01], P < .001). No interaction between platinum-based chemotherapy and gBRCA1/2 mutation status with the occurrence of CH-associated gene mutations was observed. CONCLUSIONS: A positive gBRCA1/2 mutation status is not a risk factor to acquire CH-associated gene mutations. OC patients may benefit from monitoring CH-associated gene mutations, especially following carboplatin exposure. Future clinical studies are required to assess whether treatment regimen should be adapted according to individual t-MN risks.

Association of CYP2B6 genetic polymorphisms with bupropion and hydroxybupropion exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Bupropion is metabolized to its active metabolite, hydroxybupropion (HB), by the genetically polymorphic cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) enzyme. Despite its significant role in bupropion metabolism, the magnitude of the impact of CYP2B6 genotype on the exposure of bupropion has not been quantified. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the association of bupropion and HB exposure with CYP2B6 variant alleles and genotype-defined metabolizer phenotypes. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scifinder, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL were screened to identify studies that met the following inclusion criteria (search updated on February 2021): (1) area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) of bupropion and/or HB in relation to CYP2B6 genotypes was studied, and (2) study participants were genotyped for common CYP2B6 variant alleles including at least CYP2B6*6. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias in each included study. The ratio of means (RoM) between CYP2B6 genotype or genotype-defined phenotype groups for bupropion exposure was calculated for each study and combined in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review, and 10 (including N = 413 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. All 10 studies involved healthy adult volunteers, where other medications were not allowed. The AUCs of HB and the active moiety (bupropion + HB) were significantly reduced in CYP2B6*6 carriers compared with the non-carriers (HB: RoM 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83; active moiety: RoM 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.88). Both CYP2B6 poor and intermediate metabolizers had significantly decreased exposures to HB and the active moiety than normal metabolizers. CONCLUSION: The CYP2B6*6 allele and genotype-determined CYP2B6 poor and intermediate metabolizer phenotypes are associated with significantly lower exposures to HB and the total active moiety. The findings of this study suggest opportunities to further study precision dosing strategies for bupropion therapy based on CYP2B6 genotype.

Antidepressant drug treatment protecting from COVID-19: one more piece in the repurposing puzzle.

In the article Analysis of the impact of antidepressants and other medications on COVID-19 infection risk in a chronic psychiatric in-patient cohort, Catherine L. Clelland and colleagues for the first time suggest a protective effect of antidepressants against infection with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) itself. During the observation period of the first wave of the pandemic in New York, more than 50% of patients in the psychiatric hospital studied were infected. From retrospective analysis of the hospital medical records, the authors found a significantly lower risk for infection in patients with antidepressant medication compared to treatment with other psychiatric drugs. The findings of a reduced infection incidence in patients who were already on antidepressant drug therapy underlines a preventive efficacy of antidepressants against COVID-19. Taken together with the prior obtained data of efficacy against deterioration of COVID-19 disease, this study adds a piece of evidence to the positive benefit-risk of antidepressants in repurposing condition against COVID-19.

Comirnaty-Elicited and Convalescent Sera Recognize Different Spike Epitopes.

Many of the approved SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are based on a stabilized variant of the spike protein. This raises the question of whether the immune response against the stabilized spike is identical to the immune response that is elicited by the native spike in the case of a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Using a peptide array-based approach, we analysed the binding of antibodies from Comirnaty-elicited, convalescent, and control sera to the peptides covering the spike protein. A total of 37 linear epitopes were identified. A total of 26 of these epitopes were almost exclusively recognized by the convalescent sera. Mapping these epitopes to the spike structures revealed that most of these 26 epitopes are masked in the pre-fusion structure. In particular, in the conserved central helix, three epitopes that are only exposed in the post-fusion conformation were identified. This indicates a higher spike-specific antibody diversity in convalescent sera. These differences could be relevant for the breadth of spike-specific immune response.

Prevalence of ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism in the Cuban population.

OBJECTIVES: ABCB1 gene polymorphisms can modify P-glycoprotein function with clinical consequences. METHODS: The 3435C>T polymorphism prevalence was analyzed using oligonucleotide probes and next-generation sequencing in 421 unrelated healthy individuals living in Cuba. Data were stratified by gender, ethnic background and residence. The genotype and allelic frequencies were determined. RESULTS: The genotype distribution met the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium assumption. The allelic frequency was 63.5% for the 3435C variant. The genotype frequencies were 41.1% for CC, 44.9% for CT and 14.0% for TT. The allele and genotype distributions differed between individuals living in La Habana and Santiago de Cuba (p<0.05) when ethnic background was analyzed. The allelic distribution was similar among Admixed and Black subjects, and they differed from Caucasians. The CC genotype was equally distributed among Admixed and Black subjects, and they differed from Caucasians. The TT genotype frequency differed between Caucasians and Admixed. The CT genotype was distributed differently among the three groups. Similar distribution was obtained in Brazilians, whereas some similarities were observed in African, Spanish and Chinese populations, consistent with the mixed Cuban ethnic origin. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on allele and genotype frequencies of the 3435C>T polymorphism in Cuba, which may support personalized medicine programs.

Individualized versus Standardized Risk Assessment in Patients at High Risk for Adverse Drug Reactions (The IDrug Randomized Controlled Trial)-Never Change a Running System?

The aim of this study was to compare effects of an individualized with a standardized risk assessment for adverse drug reactions to improve drug treatment with antithrombotic drugs in older adults. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in general practitioner (GP) offices. Patients aged 60 years and older, multi-morbid, taking antithrombotic drugs and at least one additional drug continuously were randomized to individualized and standardized risk assessment groups. Patients were followed up for nine months. A composite endpoint defined as at least one bleeding, thromboembolic event or death reported via a trigger list was used. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. In total, N = 340 patients were enrolled from 43 GP offices. Patients in the individualized risk assessment group met the composite endpoint more often than in the standardized group (OR 1.63 [95%CI 1.02-2.63]) with multiple adjustments. The OR was higher in patients on phenprocoumon treatment (OR 1.99 [95%CI 1.05-3.76]), and not significant on DOAC treatment (OR 1.52 [95%CI 0.63-3.69]). Pharmacogenenetic variants of CYP2C9, 2C19 and VKORC1 were not observed to be associated with the composite endpoint. The results of this study may indicate that the time point for implementing individualized risk assessments is of importance.