Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 77
Filtrar
1.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 50(1): 41-48, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38057189

RESUMEN

Voluntary event reporting (VER) systems underestimate the incidence of safety events and often capture only serious events. A limited amount of data is collected through these systems, and they may be inadequate to characterize disparities in reported safety events. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to summarize the state of the evidence as it relates to differences in safety events and safety event reporting by age, gender, and race. Using a broad-based query, a systematic search for published, peer-reviewed literature that discusses patient safety event reporting and differences by age, gender, race, and socioeconomic status was conducted. Based on modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 283 studies underwent title and abstract review, yielding 56 studies for full text review. After full text review, 23 studies were carefully reviewed individually, grouped thematically, and summarized to highlight the most pertinent findings. The studies reviewed yielded important insights, particularly with regard to race, gender, and the ways events are identified. Patients from minoritized groups may be less likely to have events reported and more likely to suffer serious events. Some studies found differences in rates of reporting safety events for female vs. male providers. The rate of VER is consistently lower than the rate of events identified through identified using automated detection. The current literature describing VER data shows disparities by race, language, age, and gender for patients and providers. Further research and systematic change are needed to specifically study these disparities to guide health care institutions on ways to mitigate bias and deliver more equitable care.


Asunto(s)
Seguridad del Paciente , Proyectos de Investigación , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino
2.
Acad Pediatr ; 2023 Dec 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38159600

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Children residing in impoverished neighborhoods have reduced access to health care resources. Our objective was to identify potential associations between Child Opportunity Index (COI), a composite score of neighborhood characteristics, and inpatient severity of illness and clinical trajectory among United States (US) children. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study assessed data using the Pediatric Health Information System Registry from 2018 to 2019. Primary exposure variable was COI level (range: very low [CO1 1], low [COI 2], moderate [COI 3], high [COI 4], and very high [COI 5]). Markers of inpatient clinical severity included index mortality, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Subgroup analysis of COI and clinical outcome variation by United States Census Geographic Regions was conducted. Adjusted regression analysis was utilized to understand associations between COI and inpatient clinical severity outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 132,130 encounters, 44% resided in very low or low COI neighborhoods. In adjusted models, very low COI was associated with increased mortality (aOR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.74, P = .018), PICU admission (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.014), IMV (aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04-1.21, P = .002), and higher hospital LOS (P = .045). Regional variation by COI depicted the East North Central region having the highest rate of mortality (20.5%), P < .001, and PICU admissions (23%), P = .014. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter, retrospective study highlights the interaction between neighborhood-level deprivation and worsened health disparities, indicating a need for prospective study.

3.
Crit Care Med ; 51(11): 1597-1599, 2023 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37902345
4.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 24(8): 670-680, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37125808

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is variation in microbiology testing among PICU patients with fever offering opportunities to reduce avoidable testing and treatment. Our objective is to describe the development and assess the impact of a novel comprehensive testing algorithm to support judicious testing practices and expanded diagnostic differentials for PICU patients with new fever or instability. DESIGN: A mixed-methods quality improvement study. SETTING: Single-center academic PICU and pediatric cardiac ICU. SUBJECTS: Admitted PICU patients and physicians. INTERVENTIONS: A multidisciplinary team developed a clinical decision-support algorithm. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We evaluated blood, endotracheal, and urine cultures, urinalyses, and broad-spectrum antibiotic use per 1,000 ICU patient-days using statistical process control charts and incident rate ratios (IRRs) and assessed clinical outcomes 24 months pre- and 18 months postimplementation. We surveyed physicians weekly for 12 months postimplementation. Blood cultures declined by 17% (IRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89), endotracheal cultures by 26% (IRR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86), and urine cultures by 36% (IRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.56-0.73). There was an anticipated rise in urinalysis testing by 23% (IRR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.33). Despite higher acuity and fewer brief hospitalizations, mortality, hospital, and PICU readmissions were stable, and PICU length of stay declined. Of the 108 physician surveys, 46 replied (43%), and 39 (85%) recently used the algorithm; 0 reported patient safety concerns, two (4%) provided constructive feedback, and 28 (61%) reported the algorithm improved patient care. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive fever algorithm was associated with reductions in blood, endotracheal, and urine cultures and anticipated increase in urinalyses. We detected no patient harm, and physicians reported improved patient care.


Asunto(s)
Médicos , Tráquea , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico
5.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) ; 23(4): e237-e244, 2022 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36103319

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic thoracic spondyloptosis (TTS) is a rare but devastating spinal injury often secondary to high-impact trauma. TTS is typically managed with surgical fusion and stabilization. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current surgical management of TTS while presenting a novel surgical technique for reduction and fusion. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of surgical management of TTS using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Individual Participant Data guidelines with 2 independent reviewers. We identified patient demographics, level of spondyloptosis, American Spinal Injury Association grade, level of spinal fusion, surgical approach, type of construct used, and reduction of fracture. RESULTS: Seventeen articles with 37 patients with TTS managed surgically were identified. The male:female ratio was 31:6. The average age was 33 years (±15). Motorized injury including motor vehicle accident, road traffic accident, and motor vehicle collision (16 patients, 43%) and fall including fall from height, stairs, train, or standing (16 patients, 43%) were equivalent. The middle (15 patients 40%) and lower (18 patients, 49%) thoracic regions were similar for the level of spondyloptosis. Thirty-four patients (92%) were American Spinal Injury Association A. Thirty-six patients (97.3%) underwent posterior only surgery and 1 (2.7%) underwent a combined posterior-anterior approach. There were 29 (78%) dual rod constructs and 8 (22%) dual rod with connectors or crosslinks. Complete reduction was obtained in 24 (65%) patients, incomplete in 11 (30%), and 2 (5%) patients were not reported. Two of our patients underwent novel quad rod reconstruction with complete reduction. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of TTS is typically posterior only with complete fracture reduction. We have presented a novel quad rod approach for reduction of TTS.


Asunto(s)
Fusión Vertebral , Traumatismos Vertebrales , Espondilolistesis , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Espondilolistesis/complicaciones , Espondilolistesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía
6.
J Patient Saf ; 18(6): e928-e933, 2022 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35797590

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Hospitals rely on voluntary event reporting (VER) for adverse event (AE) identification, although it captures fewer events than a trigger tool, such as Global Assessment of Pediatric Patient Safety (GAPPS). Medical providers exhibit bias based on patient weight status, race, and English proficiency. We compared the AE rate identified by VER with that identified using the GAPPS between hospitalized children by weight category, race, and English proficiency. METHODS: We identified a cohort of patients 2 years to younger than 18 years consecutively discharged from an academic children's hospital between June and October 2018. We collected data on patient weight status from age, sex, height, and weight, race/ethnicity by self-report, and limited English proficiency by record of interpreter use. We reviewed each chart with the GAPPS to identify AEs and reviewed VER entries for each encounter. We calculated an AE rate per 1000 patient-days using each method and compared these using analysis of variance. RESULTS: We reviewed 834 encounters in 680 subjects; 262 (38.5%) had overweight or obesity, 144 (21.2%) identified as Black, and 112 (16.5%) identified as Hispanic; 82 (9.8%) of encounters involved an interpreter. We identified 288 total AEs, 270 (93.8%) by the GAPPS and 18 (6.3%) by VER. A disparity in AE reporting was found for children with limited English proficiency, with fewer AEs by VER ( P = 0.03) compared with no difference in AEs by GAPPS. No disparities were found by weight category or race. CONCLUSIONS: Voluntary event reporting may systematically underreport AEs in hospitalized children with limited English proficiency.


Asunto(s)
Niño Hospitalizado , Errores Médicos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente
8.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 97(2): 205-207, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35120688
10.
Acad Pediatr ; 22(5): 747-753, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34543672

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify associations between patient body mass index (BMI) category and adverse event (AE) rate, severity, and preventability in a cohort of children discharged from an academic children's hospital. METHODS: We identified patients 2 to 17 years old consecutively discharged between June and October 2018. Patient age, sex, height, and weight were used to categorize patients as having underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obesity. We used the Global Assessment of Pediatrics Patient Safety trigger tool to identify AEs, which were scored for harm and preventability. The primary outcome was the rate of AEs; these were compared with Poisson regression. We used multivariable logistic regression to model event preventability. RESULTS: We reviewed 834 encounters in 680 subjects; 51 (7.5%) had underweight, 367 (54.0%) had normal weight, 112 (16.5%) had overweight, and 150 (22.1%) had obesity. Our cohort experienced 270 AEs, with an overall rate of 69.7 (61.8-78.5) AEs per 1000 patient-days: 67.7 (46.4-98.7) in underweight, 70.0 (59.4-82.4) in normal weight, 58.6 (42.5-79.7) in overweight, and 80.4 (62.5-103.6) in obesity, P = .46. No associations were seen between BMI category and AE severity. Children with obesity had an increased rate of preventable AEs (P < .01), but this association did not persist in the multivariable model. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, we did not find associations between BMI category and rate, severity, or preventability of AEs.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño Hospitalizado , Errores Médicos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad/epidemiología , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Delgadez/epidemiología
11.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 6(5): e463, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476315

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Accurate assessment of infection in critically ill patients is vital to their care. Both indiscretion and under-utilization of diagnostic microbiology testing can contribute to inappropriate antibiotic administration or delays in diagnosis. However, indiscretion in diagnostic microbiology cultures may also lead to unnecessary tests that, if false-positive, would incur additional costs and unhelpful evaluations. This quality improvement project objective was to assess pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) clinicians' attitudes and practices around the microbiology work-up for patients with new-onset fever. METHODS: We developed and conducted a self-administered electronic survey of PICU clinicians at a single institution. The survey included 7 common clinical vignettes of PICU patients with new-onset fever and asked participants whether they would obtain central line blood cultures, peripheral blood cultures, respiratory aspirate cultures, cerebrospinal fluid cultures, urine cultures, and/or urinalyses. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 54 clinicians (87%) completed the survey. Diagnostic specimen ordering practices were notably heterogeneous. Respondents unanimously favored a decision-support algorithm to guide culture specimen ordering practices for PICU patients with fever (100%, N = 47). A majority (91.5%, N = 43) indicated that a decision-support algorithm would be a means to align PICU and consulting care teams when ordering culture specimens for patients with fever. CONCLUSION: This survey revealed variability of diagnostic specimen ordering practices for patients with new fever, supporting an opportunity to standardize practices. Clinicians favored a decision-support tool and thought that it would help align patient management between clinical team members. The results will be used to inform future diagnostic stewardship efforts.

12.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 35(6): 817-823, 2021 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416716

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative infection remains prevalent after spinal surgical procedures. Institutional protocols for infection prevention have improved rates of infection after spine surgery. However, prior studies have focused on only elective surgical patients. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a multiinstitutional intraoperative sodium oxychlorosene-based infection prevention protocol for decreasing rate of infection after instrumented spinal surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed at two tertiary care institutions with level I trauma programs, and patients who underwent posterior instrumented spinal fusion between January 1, 2011, and May 31, 2019, were included. Postoperative deep wound infection rates were captured before and after implementation of a multiinstitutional infection prevention protocol. Possible adverse outcomes related to infection prevention techniques were also examined. In addition, consecutive patients treated from January 1, 2018, to May 31, 2019, were prospectively included in a database to collect preoperative and postoperative spine-specific quality of life measures and to assess the impact of postoperative infection on quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 5047 patients fit the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1043 patients underwent surgery prior to protocol implementation. The infection rate of this cohort (3.5%) decreased significantly after protocol implementation (1.2%, p < 0.001). Postoperative sterile seroma rates did not differ between the preprotocol and postprotocol groups (0.7% vs 0.7%, p = 0.5). In the 1031 patients who underwent surgery between January 2018 and May 2019, the fusion rate was 89.2%. Quality of life outcomes between patients with infection and those without infection were similar, although statistical power was limited owing to the low rate of infection. Notably, 2 of 10 patients who developed deep wound infection died of infection-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: An intraoperative sodium oxychlorosene-based infection prevention protocol helped to significantly decrease the rate of infection after spine surgery without negatively impacting other postoperative procedure-related metrics. Postoperative wound infection may be associated with higher-than-expected rate of postoperative mortality.


Asunto(s)
Fusión Vertebral , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Bencenosulfonatos , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sodio , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
13.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 34(4): 623-631, 2021 Jan 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33482645

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Type II odontoid fractures may be managed operatively or nonoperatively. If managed with bracing, bony union may never occur despite stability. This phenomenon is termed fibrous union. The authors aimed to determine associations with stable fibrous union and compare the morbidity of patients managed operatively and nonoperatively. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of their spine trauma database for adults with type II odontoid fractures between 2015 and 2019. Two-sample t-tests and Fisher's exact tests identified associations with follow-up stability and were used to compare operative and nonoperative outcomes. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to validate initial stable upright cervical radiographs related to follow-up stability. RESULTS: Among 88 patients, 10% received upfront surgical fixation, and 90% were managed nonoperatively, of whom 22% had fracture instability on follow-up. Associations with instability after nonoperative management include myelopathy (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.0-0.92), cerebrovascular disease (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-1.0), and dens displacement ≥ 2 mm (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07-1.0). Advanced age was not associated with follow-up instability. Initial stability on upright radiographs was associated with stability on follow-up (OR 4.29, 95% CI 1.0-18) with excellent sensitivity and positive predictive value (sensitivity 89%, specificity 35%, positive predictive value 83%, and negative predictive value 46%). The overall complication rate and respiratory failure requiring ventilation on individual complication analysis were more common in operatively managed patients (33% vs 3%, respectively; p = 0.007), even though they were generally younger and healthier than those managed nonoperatively. Operative or nonoperative management conferred no difference in length of hospital or ICU stay, discharge disposition, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The authors delineate the validity of upright cervical radiographs on presentation in association with follow-up stability in type II odontoid fractures. In their experience, factors associated with instability included cervical myelopathy, cerebrovascular disease, and fracture displacement but not increased age. Operatively managed patients had higher complication rates than those managed without surgery. Fibrous union, which can occur with nonoperative management, provided adequate stability.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Apófisis Odontoides/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Vertebrales/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 8(2): 2325967120902714, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32128317

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In American football, fewer fatalities and severe injuries have been seen annually since 1976, after data from 1971 through 1975 were retrospectively reviewed to better understand the mechanisms involved in catastrophic cervical spine injury and rules were enacted to prohibit certain types of aggressive tackling. The National Football Head and Neck Injury Registry was established in 1975. PURPOSE: To assess (1) tackling techniques that coaches were teaching at 3 levels-youth level (YL; 4th to 5th grades), middle school (MS; 6th to 8th grades), and high school (HS; 9th to 12th grades); (2) tackling techniques used during games; and (3) the successful tackle rates of these techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Surveys were distributed via email to 500 coaches of YL, MS, and HS football teams in Texas. Coaches provided video recordings of football games, and all tackle attempts were graded by a single reviewer who watched game videos; 1000 consecutive tackles were observed for each group. Survey data included how coaches instructed their players to tackle, the types of tackles, the number of tackles versus missed tackles, the head position, and the initial contact. Data were analyzed with the chi-square test. A subset of 100 consecutive tackles at each level of play was reviewed by 2 blinded reviewers to assess intra- and interrater reliabilities. RESULTS: In all groups, coaches responded that they preferred to teach the at-risk "head across the bow" tackling technique (83% YL, 81% MS, 75% HS). Coaches stated that they instructed players to "keep your head up," as currently recommended, 89% in YL, 100% in MS, and 81% in HS. During games, players used head-up, inside-shoulder tackles more successfully across all groups (97.5% YL, 99.5% MS, 98.8% HS). While intra- and interrater reliabilities were in the good range, these scores were lower in the youth group. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the effectiveness of tackling with the head up and making the initial contact with the inside shoulder. Lower reliability ratings for the youth group were likely due to lower video quality and the lack of players' tackling experience.

15.
J Appl Lab Med ; 3(6): 1035-1048, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31639695

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laboratory and medication data in electronic health records create opportunities for clinical decision support (CDS) tools to improve medication dosing, laboratory monitoring, and detection of side effects. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of such tools in preventing medication-related harm. METHODS: We followed the Laboratory Medicine Best Practice (LMBP) initiative's A-6 methodology. Searches of 6 bibliographic databases retrieved 8508 abstracts. Fifteen articles examined the effect of CDS tools on (a) appropriate dose or medication (n = 5), (b) laboratory monitoring (n = 4), (c) compliance with guidelines (n = 2), and (d) adverse drug events (n = 5). We conducted meta-analyses by using random-effects modeling. RESULTS: We found moderate and consistent evidence that CDS tools applied at medication ordering or dispensing can increase prescriptions of appropriate medications or dosages [6 results, pooled risk ratio (RR), 1.48; 95% CI, 1.27-1.74]. CDS tools also improve receipt of recommended laboratory monitoring and appropriate treatment in response to abnormal test results (6 results, pooled RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05-1.87). The evidence that CDS tools reduced adverse drug events was inconsistent (5 results, pooled RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the practice of healthcare systems with the technological capability incorporating test-based CDS tools into their computerized physician ordering systems to (a) identify and flag prescription orders of inappropriate dose or medications at the time of ordering or dispensing and (b) alert providers to missing laboratory tests for medication monitoring or results that warrant a change in treatment. More research is needed to determine the ability of these tools to prevent adverse drug events.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
17.
Hosp Pediatr ; 9(1): 1-5, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30509900

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have revealed racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in quality of care and patient safety. However, these disparities have not been examined in a pediatric inpatient environment by using a measure of clinically confirmed adverse events (AEs). In this study, we do so using the Global Assessment of Pediatric Patient Safety (GAPPS) Trigger Tool. METHODS: GAPPS was applied to medical records of randomly selected pediatric patients discharged from 16 hospitals in the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings Network across 4 US regions from January 2007 to December 2012. Disparities in AEs for hospitalized children were identified on the basis of patient race/ethnicity (black, Latino, white, or other; N = 17 336 patient days) and insurance status (public, private, or self-pay/no insurance; N = 19 030 patient days). RESULTS: Compared with hospitalized non-Latino white children, hospitalized Latino children experienced higher rates of all AEs (Latino: 30.1 AEs per 1000 patient days versus white: 16.9 AEs per 1000 patient days; P ≤ .001), preventable AEs (Latino: 15.9 AEs per 1000 patient days versus white: 8.9 AEs per 1000 patient days; P = .002), and high-severity AEs (Latino: 12.6 AEs per 1000 patient days versus white: 7.7 AEs per 1000 patient days; P = .02). Compared with privately insured children, publicly insured children experienced higher rates of preventable AEs (public: 12.1 AEs per 1000 patient days versus private: 8.5 AEs per 1000 patient days; P = .02). No significant differences were observed among other groups. CONCLUSIONS: The GAPPS analysis revealed racial and/or ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in rates of AEs experienced by hospitalized children across a broad range of geographic and hospital settings. Further investigation may reveal underlying mechanisms of these disparities and could help hospitals reduce harm.


Asunto(s)
Niño Hospitalizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
18.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 3(1): e050, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30229186

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Develop and test a new metric to assess meaningful variability in inpatient flow. METHODS: Using the pediatric administrative dataset, Pediatric Health Information System, that quantifies the length of stay (LOS) in hours, all inpatient and observation encounters with 21 common diagnoses were included from the calendar year 2013 in 38 pediatric hospitals. Two mutually exclusive composite groups based on diagnosis and presence or absence of an ICU hospitalization termed Acute Care Composite (ACC) and ICU Composite (ICUC), respectively, were created. These composites consisted of an observed-to-expected (O/E) LOS as well as an excess LOS percentage (ie, the percent of day beyond expected). Seven-day all-cause risk-adjusted rehospitalizations was used as a balancing measure. The combination of the ACC, the ICUC, and the rehospitalization measures forms this new metric. RESULTS: The diagnosis groups in the ACC and the ICUC included 113,768 and 38,400 hospitalizations, respectively. The ACC had a median O/E LOS of 1.0, a median excess LOS percentage of 23.9% and a rehospitalization rate of 1.7%. The ICUC had a median O/E LOS of 1.1, a median excess LOS percentage of 32.3%, and rehospitalization rate of 4.9%. There was no relationship of O/E LOS and rehospitalization for either ACC or ICUC. CONCLUSIONS: This metric shows variation among hospitals and could allow a pediatric hospital to assess the performance of inpatient flow.

19.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 3(3): e081, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30229193

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To improve patient safety, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has promoted systematically measuring and reporting harm due to patient care. The CMS's Partnership for Patients program identified 9 hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) for reduction, to make care safer, more reliable, and less costly. However, the proportion of inpatient pediatric harm represented by these HACs is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 240 harms previously identified using the Pediatric All-Cause Harm Measurement Tool, a trigger tool that is applied to medical records to comprehensively identify harms. The original sample included 600 randomly selected patients from 6 children's hospitals in February 2012. Patients with rehabilitation, obstetric, newborn nursery, and psychiatric admissions were excluded. The 240 identified harms were classified as a HAC if the event description potentially met the definition of 1 of the 9 CMS-defined HACs. HAC assessment was performed independently by 2 coauthors and compared using Cohen's Kappa. RESULTS: Two hundred forty harms across 6 children's hospitals were identified in February 2012 using a pediatric global trigger tool. Agreement between the coauthors on HAC classification was high (Kappa = 0.77). After reconciling differences, of the 240 identified harms, 58 (24.2%; 95% confidence interval: 9.1-31.7%) were classified as a CMS-defined HAC. CONCLUSIONS: One-fourth of all harms detected by a pediatric-specific trigger tool are represented by HACs. Although substantial effort is focused on identifying and minimizing HACs, to better understand and ultimately mitigate harm, more comprehensive harm identification and quantification may be needed to address events unidentified using this approach.

20.
J Crit Care ; 48: 72-77, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30172964

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), it remains unclear whether designating an individual person as team leader compared with emergent leadership results in better team performance. Also, the effect of CPR team size on team performance remains understudied. METHODS: This randomized-controlled trial compared designated versus emergent leadership and size of rescue team (3 vs 6 rescuers) on resuscitation performance. RESULTS: We included 90 teams with a total of 408 students. No difference in mean (±SD) hands-on time (seconds) were observed between emergent leadership (106 ±â€¯30) compared to designated leadership (103 ±â€¯27) groups (adjusted difference - 2.97 (95%CI -15.75 to 9.80, p = 0.645), or between smaller (103 ±â€¯30) and larger teams (106 ±â€¯26, adjusted difference 3.53, 95%CI -8.47 to 15.53, p = 0.56). Emergent leadership groups had a shorter time to circulation check and first defibrillation, but the quality of CPR based on arm and shoulder position was lower. No differences in CPR quality measures were observed between smaller and larger teams. CONCLUSIONS: Within this international US/Swiss trial, leadership designation and larger team size did not improve hands-on time, but emergent leadership teams initiated defibrillation earlier. Improvements in performance may be more likely to be achieved by optimization of emergent leadership than increasing the size of cardiac arrest teams.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Competencia Clínica/normas , Liderazgo , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Entrenamiento Simulado/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maniquíes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...