RESUMEN
Background: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the single-incision technique with a distal biceps repair system versus the modified double-incision technique, specifically the Morrey-modified approach, Krackow sutures, and drill holes, for the management of acute and chronic distal biceps tendon rupture. The study was conducted at the Orthopedic-Traumatology Clinic II of SCJUPBT Timisoara, Romania, between 2014 and 2022. Methods: A total of sixty-nine patients with acute distal biceps tendon rupture and five patients with chronic distal tendon rupture were included in the study. Forty-eight cases underwent the single-incision technique with the distal biceps repair system, while twenty-four patients were treated with the modified double-incision technique. Results: Both surgical techniques demonstrated favorable outcomes in terms of successful tendon repair and functional restoration. However, the single-incision technique exhibited slightly superior results in terms of patient satisfaction, range of motion, and postoperative rehabilitation. The modified double-incision technique showed comparable outcomes but had a higher incidence of complications, particularly related to wound healing. Conclusion: The single-incision technique with the distal biceps repair system and the modified double-incision technique, including the Morrey-modified approach, Krackow sutures, and drill holes, are effective surgical approaches for the management of distal biceps tendon rupture. The single-incision technique yielded better functional outcomes and patient satisfaction, while the modified double-incision technique had a higher risk of complications. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is necessary to validate these findings and determine the most appropriate surgical approach for distal biceps tendon rupture.
RESUMEN
Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries, though less common than other knee ligament injuries, pose significant management challenges. This study aimed to systematically review and analyze the current evidence on the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the evaluation and management of PCL injuries. It was hypothesized that POCUS has comparable diagnostic accuracy to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and that the use of POCUS improves patient outcomes and reduces healthcare costs. A comprehensive systematic review of articles published up to April 2023 was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases and adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were selected based on relevance to the research question, with a focus on diagnostic accuracy, reliability, clinical utility, and cost-effectiveness of POCUS in PCL injuries. Seven studies, analyzing a total of 242 patients with PCL injuries, were included. The reported sensitivity and specificity of POCUS for diagnosing PCL injuries ranged from 83.3% to 100% and 86.7% to 100%, respectively, across the studies. In one study, POCUS demonstrated a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.9% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82.4%. Additionally, three studies reported 100% accuracy in PCL injury detection using POCUS, suggesting a substantial potential for cost savings by eliminating the need for MRI. This systematic review supports the use of POCUS in the evaluation and management of PCL injuries, suggesting that POCUS is a reliable, cost-effective tool with high diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI, offering the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. The data collated in this review can inform clinical practice and guide future research in the field.
RESUMEN
Objective:The current study included a total of 10 patients, both males and females, who gave their consent to participate in the study and underwent clinical and ultrasound examinations. All patients had a history of carpal tunnel symptoms like tingling, numbness, nocturnal paraesthesia and weakness of the hand (loss of pinch and grip strength) for more than 12 months. Aim: The aim of our study was to investigate the morphopathology of the median nerve in clinically diagnosed carpal tunnel thought static and dynamic ultrasound assessment. Material and methods: The present study included a small group of 10 patients aged over 18, both males and females, who had a history of carpal tunnel symptoms for over 12 months and a positive Tinel's and reverse Phalen's tests during clinical examination. Ultrasound was performed by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon with musculoskeletal ultrasound training. Ultrasound evaluation was made using a standardized method and included transverse and longitudinal static examination and dynamic examination of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. Side-to-side evaluation was performed and differences of more than 10 mm width in the median nerve have been recorded, which was considered to be a positive test for carpal tunnel syndrome. Furthermore, the major advantage of the dynamic evaluation brought by performing the palmar hand and finger flexion test, while investigating the movement trajectory of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel, provides superior imagistic documentation of this pathology. Results:Dynamic evaluation of the median nerve has shown a decreased mobility of the nerve in the carpal tunnel on the side that also had an increased area value of the median nerve width. If in the asymptomatic hand at the time of dynamic evaluation, the median nerve would suddenly slide under the flexor tendons; therefore, we noted results only of a slight translational movement of the nerve in the carpal tunnel on the affected side. A side-to-side difference in the median nerve area, with values ranging between 3 mm up to 9 mm, was found in our patients. Furthermore, thenar atrophy has been discovered in patients with pre-existing carpal tunnel symptoms for more than 24 months. Conclusion:The present study highlights the importance of ultrasound assessment as an accessible static and dynamic evaluation tool. Ultrasound can be used as an in-office imaging tool to complete the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome by studying the morphology and morphopathology of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel through a bilateral standardized examination technique.
RESUMEN
The aim of our study was to investigate the accuracy of dynamic ultrasound assessment of the anterior tibial translation, in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament tears, and to assess its test−retest reliability. Twenty-three patients (32 ± 8.42 years; 69.56% males) with a history of knee trauma and knee instability participated in the study. Knee ultrasound was performed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon. The anterior tibial translation was measured in both knees and differences between the injured and uninjured knee were calculated. Side-to-side differences > 1 mm were considered a positive diagnosis of an ACL tear. The anterior tibial translation values were 3.34 ± 1.48 mm in injured knees and 0.86 ± 0.78 mm in uninjured knees. Side-to-side differences > 1 mm were found in 22 cases (95.65%). The diagnosis accuracy was 91.30% (95%CI: 71.96−98.92%) and sensitivity 95.45% (95%CI: 77.15−99.88%). The intraclass correlation coefficient showed an excellent test−retest reliability (ICC3,1 = 0.97 for the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation). The study highlights the accuracy and reliability of the dynamic ultrasound assessment of the anterior tibial translation in the diagnosis of unilateral anterior cruciate ligament tears. Ultrasound assessment is an accessible imaging tool that can provide valuable information and should be used together with physical examination in suspected cases of ACL injuries.