RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the effects of candidate drugs on the nervous system in preclinical safety pharmacology studies utilises a global neurobehavioral assessment, usually in the rat. This either takes the form of the functional observational battery (FOB) or modified Irwin Test, both of which evaluate effects across 4 functional domains: autonomic, neuromuscular, sensorimotor and behavioral. Although there is a great deal of overlap in the parameters they address, the two tests approach the assessments slightly differently. We undertook a broad pharmacological validation of both the FOB and the Irwin test, and compared the two outcomes. METHODS: Male rats (6 per treatment group) were used to assess each of 12 reference drugs alongside vehicle controls in separate FOB and Irwin studies. The drugs compared in the two study types were chlorpromazine, chlordiazepoxide, clonidine, baclofen, (+)-amphetamine, harmaline, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin, buspirone, physostigmine, picrotoxin, yohimbine and atropine. There is a high degree of semantic equivalence in the parameters assessed in the autonomic domain between the two tests, with a lower degree of equivalence for neuromuscular and behavioral domains, whereas sensorimotor reflex testing in the FOB is far more extensive than in the Irwin test. RESULTS: Across the set of reference drugs, concordance between the two tests was generally good across the 4 functional domains at the 'domain' level (i.e., detecting 'an effect'), whereas there was generally a poor concordance at the individual parameter level. However, this was partially explained by variability between repeated studies on a single reference drug using the same test (FOB or Irwin). CONCLUSIONS: Both tests are 'fit-for-purpose' in detecting effects of candidate drugs on the nervous system. We would encourage the global safety pharmacology community to consider whether (a) the tests could be combined into one industry standard; (b) candidate drugs could be triaged according to CNS penetration, with the level of scrutiny in the CNS core battery assessment adjusted accordingly and (c) whether new home cage technology could be applied to semi-automate the preclinical neurobehavioral assessment.
Asunto(s)
Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos de los fármacos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Animales , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Masculino , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-DawleyRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In October 2009, the United Kingdom Department of Health recommended vaccination of high-risk groups, including children with HIV, with a novel, oil-in-water AS03(B) adjuvanted Influenza A (H1N1) vaccine (Pandemrix). There were no published data available regarding the immunogenicity of this vaccine in such children. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the immunogenicity of the adjuvanted Influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in HIV-infected children immunised according to national recommendations and assessed the impact of vaccination on individual CD4 counts and HIV viral loads. METHODS: HIV-infected children attending outpatient appointments between 01 November and 31 December 2009 were offered two doses of H1N1 vaccine three weeks apart and a blood test before and 3 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. Serum antibody responses were determined by a haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay using standard methods. RESULTS: Of the 39 children recruited for vaccination, 31 (median age 11.2, range 3.0-17.9 years) received both doses of vaccine and provided pre- and post-vaccination blood samples. Eight children (26%) had baseline HAI titres ≥ 1:32. After vaccination, 29 children (94%, 95% CI, 78.6-99.2%) had HAI titres ≥ 1:32 (seroprotection), of whom 27 (87.1%, 95% CI, 70.1-96.4%) had also had a four-fold rise in titres (seroconversion). In the univariate analysis, post-vaccination geometric mean titres (GMTs) were higher among the 21 children receiving highly active anti-retroviral therapy compared with the 10 treatment-naïve children (GMT 406 [95% CI 218-757] vs. 128 [49-336]; P=0.035), but this was no longer statistically significant when adjusted for prevaccine GMTs. There was no significant impact of vaccination on CD4+ T cell count or HIV viral load. CONCLUSION: The AS03(B)-adjuvanted pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) vaccine is highly immunogenic and appears to be safe in HIV-infected children.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Adolescente , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Niño , Preescolar , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , VIH-1/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Inhibición de Hemaglutinación , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Masculino , Polisorbatos/administración & dosificación , Polisorbatos/efectos adversos , Escualeno/administración & dosificación , Escualeno/efectos adversos , Reino Unido , Vacunación/métodos , Carga Viral , alfa-Tocoferol/administración & dosificación , alfa-Tocoferol/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We have evaluated the ability of a semi-automated, optomotor reflex method to assess drug-induced visual dysfunction, in albino and pigmented rats and mice. METHODS: Male Han Wistar (HW) and Long Evans (LE) rats and mice (CD-1 and C57BL/6) were tested in a chamber formed by 4 computer monitors displaying a rotating vertical grating, to elicit head-tracking movements. The highest visible grating frequency was taken as the threshold of visual acuity, in cycles per degree (c/d). Animals received an intravenous infusion of either sodium iodate (50mg/kg) or 0.9% w/v NaCl (aq). They were tested 2h later, then re-tested daily for a further 3 days. The time course of the effect was assessed in HW rats over a 6-week period, including electron microscopy, and immunohistochemical analysis of markers of injury and repair in the retina. RESULTS: Baseline visual acuities for HW and LE rats were 0.355 ± 0.007 and 0.530 ± 0.004 c/d, respectively, and 0.296 ± 0.003 c/d and 0.370 ± 0.001 c/d for CD-1 and C57BL/6 mice, respectively (n=10 for each). In HW rats there was a dramatic loss of visual acuity 2h after administration of sodium iodate (0.021 ± 0.021 c/d; P<0.001). Less dramatic decreases in visual acuity were seen in LE rats and in the two mouse strains. In HW rats, visual acuity was restored after 4 weeks. This paralleled the histopathological recovery of the peripheral retina, whereas the central retina did not recover. DISCUSSION: The method proved to be very convenient, and the stability of visual acuity in vehicle control rats over a 6-week period also demonstrated its suitability for inclusion in long-term toxicity studies. Both albino and pigmented mice and rats are suitable for assessment of retinotoxicity using this method, but albino rats are the most sensitive to sodium iodate.
Asunto(s)
Yodatos/toxicidad , Retina/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Albinismo , Animales , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratas , Ratas Long-Evans , Ratas Wistar , Retina/citología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Functional Observational Battery (FOB) is a systematic evaluation of nervous system function in the rat, comprising more than 30 parameters across autonomic, neuromuscular, sensorimotor and behavioural domains. We have collated FOB outcomes from 50 compounds that were not targeted at CNS disorders, and would therefore be anticipated to have relatively few CNS side-effects, for evaluation of the FOB as part of the safety pharmacology 'core battery'. METHODS: Male Han Wistar rats (200-300 g) were used, with n=6 per treatment group. Each compound was tested acutely at 3 dose levels (oral route), from the therapeutic dose up to either 100 times this dose or to the maximal tolerated dose (MTD). A vehicle control group was included in each study. RESULTS: Effects were detected in the FOB for 94% of compounds tested. The commonest effects were weight loss/decreased body weight gain overnight post-dose (46% of compounds), and changes in core temperature (36%). Dose-related effects were observed with 62% of compounds; the commonest was decreased body weight gain (32%), followed by effects on tail flick latency (14%), landing foot splay (12%), decreased rectal temperature (10%), time to exit the centre circle in the open field (10%), diarrhoea/loose faeces (8%), respiratory effects (4%), grasping reflex (4%) and supported rears in the open field (4%). Remaining parameters were affected by < or =2% of compounds. DISCUSSION: The value of doing the FOB as part of the safety pharmacology 'core battery' is emphasised by the fact that, even for non-CNS targeted compounds, the majority affected at least one of the parameters in the FOB. These data may also help to anticipate the most frequently required 'follow-up' studies.