Polyploidy as an outcome of anticancer therapies and a contributing cause of their lack of efficacy / Poliploidia jako rezultat terapii przeciwnowotworowych i przyczyna braku ich skutecznosci.

In addition to innate and gained resistance poliploidy of cancer cells is described as a mechanism responsible for lack of response or cancer relapses after initial patient recovery. Formation of these cells is induced by cyto- and genotoxic agents, which trigger endoreduplication, cytokinesis failure, cell fusion or canibalism. These processes lead to amplification of DNA, cell cycle arrest and escape from death. Cancer reinitiation results from depolyploidization by neosis, amitotic and meiotic-like divisions. In this paper we review the known mechanisms, which drive cancer cell transition to poliploidy, major features of these cells and their role in cancer progression. We also depict the current approaches, which target metabolic and signaling pathways that are crucial for survival and functioning of polyploid cells. The combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy with agents capable of inhibiting or eliminating polyploid cells could substantially improve the success rate and efficacy of anticancer therapies.

Characteristics of anticancer activity of CBP/p300 inhibitors - Features of their classes, intracellular targets and future perspectives of their application in cancer treatment.

Due to the contribution of highly homologous acetyltransferases CBP and p300 to transcription elevation of oncogenes and other cancer promoting factors, these enzymes emerge as possible epigenetic targets of anticancer therapy. Extensive efforts in search for small molecule inhibitors led to development of compounds targeting histone acetyltransferase catalytic domain or chromatin-interacting bromodomain of CBP/p300, as well as dual BET and CBP/p300 inhibitors. The promising anticancer efficacy in in vitro and mice models led CCS1477 and NEO2734 to clinical trials. However, none of the described inhibitors is perfectly specific to CBP/p300 since they share similarity of a key functional domains with other enzymes, which are critically associated with cancer progression and their antagonists demonstrate remarkable clinical efficacy in cancer therapy. Therefore, we revise the possible and clinically relevant off-targets of CBP/p300 inhibitors that can be blocked simultaneously with CBP/p300 thereby improving the anticancer potential of CBP/p300 inhibitors and pharmacokinetic predicting data such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) and toxicity.

I-CBP112 declines overexpression of ATP-binding cassette transporters and sensitized drug-resistant MDA-MB-231 and A549 cell lines to chemotherapy drugs.

Despite extensive efforts and ongoing progress in personalized anticancer approaches, chemotherapy remains the first line or the only treatment for some tumors that may develop resistance to chemotherapeutics in time due to inter alia overexpression of ATP-binding cassette transporters. Using clinically-relevant resistant models of triple negative breast cancer (MDA-MB-231; TNBC) as well as non-small cell lung cancer (A549; NSCLC), we tested the efficacy of I-CBP112 - CBP/EP300 bromodomain inhibitor to overcome drug resistance by declining ABC gene transcription. I-CBP112 significantly reduced ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2, ABCC3, ABCC5 and ABCG2 in all resistant lines, as well as ABCC10 in TNBC and ABCC4 in paclitaxel-resistant NSCLC, thereby increasing intracellular drug accumulation and cytotoxicity in 2D and 3D cultures. This was phenocopied only by the joint effect of ABC inhibitors such as tariquidar (ABCB1 - P-glycoprotein and ABCG2) and MK-571 (ABCC), whereas single inhibition of ABCB1/ABCG2 or ABCC proteins did not affect drug accumulation, thereby implying the need of simultaneous deficiency in activity of majority of drug pumps for enhanced drug retention. I-CBP112 failed to directly inhibit activity of ABCB1, ABCG2 and ABCC subfamily members at the same time. Importantly, I-CBP112 treated cancer cells polarized human macrophages into proinflammatory phenotypes. Moreover, I-CBP112 remained non-toxic to primary cell lines, nor did it enhance anticancer drug toxicity to blood-immune cells. In silico assay of ADMET properties confirmed the desired pharmacokinetic features of I-CBP112. The results suggest that the CBP/p300 inhibitor is a promising co-adjuvant to chemotherapy in drug-resistant cancer phenotypes, capable of decreasing ABC transporter expression.

Activation of ABCC Genes by Cisplatin Depends on the CoREST Occurrence at Their Promoters in A549 and MDA-MB-231 Cell Lines.

Although cisplatin-based therapies are common among anticancer approaches, they are often associated with the development of cancer drug resistance. This phenomenon is, among others, caused by the overexpression of ATP-binding cassette, membrane-anchored transporters (ABC proteins), which utilize ATP to remove, e.g., chemotherapeutics from intracellular compartments. To test the possible molecular basis of increased expression of ABCC subfamily members in a cisplatin therapy mimicking model, we generated two cisplatin-resistant cell lines derived from non-small cell lung cancer cells (A549) and triple-negative breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231). Analysis of data for A549 cells deposited in UCSC Genome Browser provided evidence on the negative interdependence between the occurrence of the CoREST complex at the gene promoters and the overexpression of ABCC genes in cisplatin-resistant lung cancer cells. Pharmacological inhibition of CoREST enzymatic subunits-LSD1 and HDACs-restored gene responsiveness to cisplatin. Overexpression of CoREST-free ABCC10 in cisplatin-resistant phenotypes was caused by the activity of EP300 that was enriched at the ABCC10 promoter in drug-treated cells. Cisplatin-induced and EP300-dependent transcriptional activation of ABCC10 was only possible in the presence of p53. In summary, the CoREST complex prevents the overexpression of some multidrug resistance proteins from the ABCC subfamily in cancer cells exposed to cisplatin. p53-mediated activation of some ABCC genes by EP300 occurs once their promoters are devoid of the CoREST complex.

LSD1 Facilitates Pro-Inflammatory Polarization of Macrophages by Repressing Catalase.

The increased level of hydrogen peroxide accompanies some modes of macrophage specification and is linked to ROS-based antimicrobial activity of these phagocytes. In this study, we show that activation of toll-like receptors with bacterial components such as LPS is accompanied by the decline in transcription of hydrogen peroxide decomposing enzyme-catalase, suppression of which facilitates the polarization of human macrophages towards the pro-inflammatory phenotype. The chromatin remodeling at the CAT promoter involves LSD1 and HDAC1, but activity of the first enzyme defines abundance of the two proteins on chromatin, histone acetylation status and the CAT transcription. LSD1 inhibition prior to macrophage activation with LPS prevents CAT repression by enhancing the LSD1 and interfering with the HDAC1 recruitment to the gene promoter. The maintenance of catalase level with LSD1 inhibitors during M1 polarization considerably limits LPS-triggered expression of some pro-inflammatory cytokines and markers such as IL1ß, TNFα, COX2, CD14, TLR2, and IFNAR, but the effect of LSD1 inhibitors is lost upon catalase deficiency. Summarizing, activity of LSD1 allows for the CAT repression in LPS stimulated macrophages, which negatively controls expression of some key pro-inflammatory markers. LSD1 inhibitors can be considered as possible immunosuppressive drugs capable of limiting macrophage M1 specialization.

CBP/p300 Bromodomain Inhibitor-I-CBP112 Declines Transcription of the Key ABC Transporters and Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy Drugs.

The high expression of some ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters is linked to multidrug resistance in cancer cells. We aimed to determine if I-CBP112, which is a CBP/p300 bromodomain inhibitor, altered the vulnerability of the MDA-MB-231 cell line to chemotherapy drugs, which are used in neoadjuvant therapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). MDA-MB-231 cells represent TNBC, which is negative for the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 protein. An I-CBP112-induced decrease in the expression of all the studied ABCs in the breast, but also in the lung (A549), and hepatic (HepG2) cancer cell lines was associated with increased accumulation of doxorubicin, daunorubicin, and methotrexate inside the cells as well as with considerable cell sensitization to a wide range of chemotherapeutics. Gene promoters repressed by I-CBP112 in MDA-MB-231 cells, such as ABCC1 and ABCC10, were characterized by enhanced nucleosome acetylation and, simultaneously, by considerably lower trimethylation in the transcription-promoting form of H3K4me3. The CBP/p300 bromodomain inhibitor induced the recruitment of LSD1 to the gene promoters. The inhibition of this demethylase in the presence of I-CBP112 prevented the repression of ABCC1 and ABCC10 and, to a considerable extent, cancer cells' sensitization to drugs. In conclusion, the CBP/p300 bromodomain inhibitor I-CBP112 can be considered as a potent anti-multidrug-resistance agent, capable of repressing key ABC transporters responsible for drug efflux in various cancer types.

Contribution of BRG1-dependent SWI/SNF complexes to determining the phenotype of cancer cell / Udzial kompleksów SWI/SNF opartych na aktywnosci BRG1 w determinowaniu fenotypu komórek nowotworowych.

ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes are documented as indispensible element of epigenetic mechanisms, which control transcription. These multiprotein functional units are capable of insertion, deletion and sliding of nucleosomes at the gene regulatory elements thereby defining DNA accessibility to transcription machinery. SWI/SNF is one out of four identified and described complexes. The enzymatic role in SWI/SNF molecular "motors" is assigned to two ATP-ases: BRM and BRG1. Accumulating evidence suggests the link between BRG1 and pathophysiology of some types of cancer. BRG1 has been documented as an activator of genes encoding factors responsible for i.a. proliferation, DNA repair, transmembrane transport and metabolism. Therefore, inhibitors of BRG1 and co-operating enzymes, which modulate activity of this ATP-ase or mark histones for shuttling to/from the chromatin, may turn out as an alternative to the compounds that are currently used to suppress the growth of tumors or as supplements that increase cell vulnerability to anticancer drugs.