Multicenter evaluation of the addition of eltrombopag to immunosuppressive therapy for adults with severe aplastic anemia.

Eltrombopag has been shown to improve response rates when added to standard therapy in adults with severe aplastic anemia in controlled trial settings. However, outcomes in real-world populations have mostly been examined in small retrospective studies. This robust, multicenter, retrospective cohort study across six academic health systems compared outcomes in patients who received immunosuppressive therapy with or without eltrombopag. The study included 82 patients who received front-line therapy from January 2014 to August 2021. Overall response rates at 6 months did not differ significantly for patients receiving eltrombopag versus immunosuppressive therapy alone (58% v. 65%, p = 0.56). However, complete response rates at 6 and 12 months were over two times higher in the eltrombopag arm (29% v. 12%, p = 0.06 and 48% v. 18%, p = 0.005). Rates of hepatotoxicity were similar across both arms. Eltrombopag addition did not impact overall survival (median not reached in either arm at 2 years, p = 0.86) or disease-free survival (median not reached v. 13.3 months at 2 years, p = 0.20). Eltrombopag may not produce as large of a benefit in real-world settings compared to controlled trial settings but may offer patients deeper responses with similar rates of toxicity to immunosuppressive therapy alone.

Outcomes with high dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone induction for adults with mixed phenotype acute leukemia.

The optimal induction strategy for mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is unknown, though retrospective data has shown improved remission rates and overall survival with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)-based regimens. At Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), the most utilized induction regimen for MPAL is high dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone ("ALL-2"), though outcomes with this regimen are not well described. In this study, outcomes to first-line induction chemotherapy in 24 patients at MSKCC with MPAL classified by 2016 World Health Organization criteria are reported. The overall response rate was 94 % (16 of 17) in patients receiving ALL-2, including 86 % (6 of 7) in patients with extramedullary disease. Thirteen patients who received ALL-2 induction proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT). The most common toxicity associated with ALL-2 was febrile neutropenia, documented in 12 patients. With a median follow-up of 37 months, median overall survival was not reached in the ALL-2 cohort, and 3-year overall survival was 62 %. In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 60 years and MPAL with isolated extramedullary disease were associated with significantly worse overall survival (P = .009 and P = .01, respectively). These results support further prospective investigation of ALL-2 as a front-line induction regimen for adults with MPAL.

Evaluation of an interdisciplinary venetoclax initiation process in minimizing risk of tumor lysis syndrome.

Venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor approved for treatment of adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Due to significant risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) upon treatment initiation, a 5-week dose ramp-up is recommended. University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC) utilizes a novel interdisciplinary model of care involving clinical pharmacists (CPs) who oversee the 5-week ramp-up to minimize treatment-related adverse events. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a pharmacist-led venetoclax initiation protocol on patient outcomes. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of venetoclax-induced TLS during dose ramp-up in patients managed by a CP. In this cohort (n = 39), there were no cases of TLS during the venetoclax ramp-up. Reduced TLS rates were observed in CP-managed real-world patients compared to previous real-world reports. This real-world analysis supports the utilization of CPs for intensive monitoring of patients initiated on venetoclax.

Real-world management of targeted therapies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

The advent of novel targeted therapies, including B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors, has substantially changed the treatment paradigm for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although targeted therapies have improved outcomes compared to traditional chemoimmunotherapy in the front-line and relapsed or refractory settings, they are associated with resistance mutations and suboptimal outcomes in certain high-risk patients. Additionally, targeted therapies are associated with drug interactions and unique adverse effect profiles which can be challenging for patients and clinicians to manage. Ongoing studies continue to address questions regarding optimal sequencing of therapies, the role of treatment combinations, and the efficacy of next-generation novel agents. This review provides a comprehensive overview regarding the clinical management of targeted therapies for CLL and applies current literature to clinical practice.

Multicenter comparison of first salvage chemotherapy versus novel therapy regimens in adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represent a heterogeneous population and therefore there is no standard of care first salvage regimen. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis to compare chemotherapy (e.g. HyperCVAD, MOAD, Larson/CALGB-9511, etc.) to novel agents (blinatumomab or inotuzumab) in first salvage. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not significantly different among treatment arms, with a median OS of 10.6 months with chemotherapy and 10.1 months with novel therapy (p = .799). Similarly, there was no difference in the CR/CRi rate, with a CR/CRi in 18 patients (41.9%) versus 16 patients (47.1%) treated with salvage chemotherapy and novel therapy, respectively (p = .817). Age significantly impacted the probability of achieving CR/CRi with novel therapy versus chemotherapy. This analysis suggests the use of chemotherapy in first salvage still represents an appropriate treatment option, particularly for young fit patients, as the median OS was roughly 10 months regardless of whether patients received novel therapy or chemotherapy in first salvage. For the reported outcomes, 100% of patients in the novel therapy arm received a novel therapy (per design), whereas only 60.5% of patients in the chemotherapy arm required a novel therapy. Thus, 40% of patients did not require a novel therapy for similar OS. This analysis demonstrates that first-line chemotherapy can achieve similar results to novel therapies, especially now that novel therapies are available for subsequent relapses. However, this study has several limitations including younger age, increased CNS involvement, and higher blast percentage in the chemotherapy arm and potential confounders, including selection of treatment sequence as 43 patients (55.8%) ultimately received both chemotherapy and novel therapy. Therefore, a larger, prospective, randomized study with adequate chemotherapy comparators and availability of novel agents upon relapse is warranted to confirm these results.

Impact of adherence to ibrutinib on clinical outcomes in real-world patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Ibrutinib is an oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Clinical trial data suggest that strict adherence is directly related to clinical outcomes. This retrospective, multicenter study aimed to evaluate ibrutinib adherence and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with CLL/SLL treated in the real-world setting. The primary outcome was to quantify ibrutinib adherence rates in the real-world setting using the proportion of days covered (PDC) calculation. Secondary outcomes included the association of ibrutinib adherence with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). For the 100 patients in the primary analysis, the mean PDC was 95% (range: 65-100%). Patients who maintained PDC > 95% for each of the first 6 months experienced fewer PFS events (n = 1) compared to those with PDC ≤ 95% (n = 5; p=.03). The correlation between adherence and OS was not assessed due to a low number of events.

Tolerability and toxicity of pegaspargase in adults 40 years and older with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Pegaspargase is a modified version of asparaginase with prolonged asparagine depletion. It appears to be safe in adults <40 years old, but has a unique spectrum of toxicities, the risks of which appear to increase with age. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate pegaspargase tolerability and toxicity as assessed by evaluation of incidence and severity of adverse events. Secondary objectives included characterization of the reasons underlying pegaspargase discontinuation, when applicable. Grade 3/4 asparaginase-related toxicities with ≥10% incidence included: hyperbilirubinemia, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and transaminitis. 63% of patients (38 of 60) received all intended doses of pegaspargase, with the most common reasons for discontinuation noted as hypersensitivity (12%), hyperbilirubinemia/transaminitis (8%), and hematopoietic transplantation in complete remission (10%). This study suggests that while hepatotoxicity and other known adverse effects are common, with careful monitoring, pegaspargase can safely be administered to adults with ALL age ≥40 years old.

Evaluation of mobilization efficacy with an extended interval following plerixafor administration.

Plerixafor is a hematopoietic stem cell mobilizing agent used in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to improve collection for autologous stem cell transplantation. Despite a recommendation for administration 11 h prior to apheresis per package labeling, logistical challenges lead many institutions to administer plerixafor at an extended interval. The purpose of this study was to determine if plerixafor effectively and efficiently mobilizes CD34+ cells when given at an extended interval prior to apheresis. This was a retrospective evaluation of adult patients who received plerixafor based on an algorithm reserving daily plerixafor only for patients with a pre-apheresis CD34+ count of < 20 cells/µL (pre-apheresis plerixafor) or with a low CD34+ yield after the first apheresis session (rescue plerixafor). The primary outcome was achievement of a disease-specific collection goal of ≥ 6 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg for multiple myeloma and ≥ 4 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg for lymphoma. The mean interval between plerixafor administration and apheresis was 17 h in this study. Despite this extended interval, 64% of patients met their disease-specific collection goal. A minimum collection goal of ≥ 2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg was achieved by 95% of patients. Mobilization remained efficient with a median of two days to complete collection. Based on this data, plerixafor effectively and efficiently mobilizes CD34+ cells when given at an extended interval prior to apheresis.

No Loose Ends: A Review of the Pharmacotherapy of Hairy Cell and Hairy Cell Leukemia Variant.

Objective: To review the literature for the treatment of classical and variant hairy cell leukemia (HCL, HCLv), evaluating efficacy, safety, and supportive care involved in the use of purine analogues (PAs), interferon, BRAF inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and new immunotoxin, moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk (MPT). An electronic literature search of PubMed (January 1958 to January 2019) was conducted in PubMed using the MESH terms hairy cell leukemia, hairy cell leukemia variant, cladribine, pentostatin, rituximab, interferon, vemurafenib, moxetumomab pasudotox. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Studies written in the English language were considered for this article. The significance of each article was determined by authors independently. Data Synthesis: HCL and HCLv are rare B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, each with distinct biologies. Symptoms are characterized by pancytopenia and splenomegaly. Initial treatments for HCL were suboptimal, leading to minimal and transient remissions. PAs significantly improved outcomes, inducing remission in most patients. However, those with purine-resistant disease were left with a dearth of options, leading to implementation of vemurafenib for BRAF V600 mutated disease and chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab. Despite these advances, some HCL and a majority of HCLv patients experience relapse. Newer targeted agents offer promise for relapsed and refractory patients, including the recently approved MPT. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review provides a comprehensive update on the pharmacological management of HCL and HCLv for clinicians who encounter patients with this rare disease. Conclusion: HCL and HCLv are uncommon lymphoid neoplasms that lead to a characteristic constellation of symptoms. The emergence of PAs and novel targeted agents have improved the likelihood and durability of responses for these patients.

Cabozantinib-induced serum creatine kinase elevation and musculoskeletal complaints.

Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic medullary thyroid cancer and advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy. While associations between serum creatine kinase (CK) elevations and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors used for the treatment of solid malignancies have been previously reported, we report a case of cabozantinib-associated CK elevation that was associated with musculoskeletal complaints by an RCC patient. Nine days following initiation of cabozantinib, the patient reported muscle cramps and serum CK had increased from levels 12 months earlier that were within normal limits to a grade 1 elevation of 244 units/L. Despite a dose reduction, her CK continued to rise over the next 2 months, leading to a peak CK of 914 units/L. Due to this grade 3 elevation, cabozantinib was permanently discontinued, and her CK subsequently returned to a grade 1 elevation within one week and then to baseline within 3 weeks. The temporal relationship between drug exposure and CK increase strongly suggests causality. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of CK elevation attributed to cabozantinib, but cabozantinib-induced CK elevations could be under-reported, and providers should monitor for musculoskeletal complaints during cabozantinib therapy.

Comparison of Weight-Based Dosing Strategies for Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a weight-based therapy used to treat and prevent infections in patients with hematologic malignancies. IVIG doses were calculated traditionally using actual body weight (ABW). However, limited pharmacokinetic data suggest dosing strategies using ideal body weight (IBW) or adjusted body weight (adjBW) may be appropriate given the small volume of distribution of IVIG. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of using a precision-dosing strategy (IBW or adjBW) with a traditional-dosing strategy (ABW) for IVIG in patients with hematologic malignancies or those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant, as well as to perform an IVIG drug use analysis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Between April 2014 and September 2016, 209 IVIG encounters met inclusion criteria for the primary outcome. Of those encounters, 125 were dosed using the traditional-dosing strategy, and 84 used the precision-dosing strategy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was infection rate within 30 days of IVIG administration. Secondary outcomes included 60-day infection rate, immunoglobulin G (IgG)-level response (IgG higher than 400 mg/dl), and realized and potential IVIG savings. No difference in 30-day infection rate between precision- and traditional-dosing strategies was identified (15.5% vs 16%, respectively, p=0.823). Similarly, no difference was identified in the 60-day infection rate between groups (23.2% vs 19.8%, respectively, p=0.568). Levels of IgG obtained after IVIG repletion showed a treatment response rate of 86% in both groups. Use of a precision-dosing strategy achieved $2600/month in institutional savings with the opportunity for an additional $4600/month in savings with complete adherence to this dosing strategy. CONCLUSION: No differences in infection rate and IgG-level response were identified when a precision-dosing strategy was used. Implementation of an IVIG precision-dosing strategy provided institutional cost savings.

Accuracy of nimodipine gel extraction.

INTRODUCTION: Until recently, use of nimodipine in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients unable to swallow required extraction of gel from inside the commercially available capsule. Despite the Black-Box warning against inadvertent intravenous administration, bedside extraction of the gel from the capsule continues to be a common practice in some institutions. The accuracy of bedside extraction has not been formally evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-eight nurses from the neurology and neurosurgical ICUs at a single center attempted to extract nimodipine gel from 2 capsules, each using the method currently approved by the US FDA. The primary outcome was mean weight of extracted gel per capsule, which was compared to both gel weight from batch compounded pharmacy syringes and a pre-calculated appropriate weight for 30 mg nimodipine gel. RESULTS: Simulated bedside extraction provided lower yield than pharmacy-compounded syringes (22.6 ± 4.6 mg vs 30.4 ± 0.59 mg, p = 0.001). Bedside extraction provided inconsistent and low yield (75.4 ± 15.32 % of possible dose extracted, p = 0.0001 for comparison of means between bedside extraction syringes and predicted gel weight). Pharmacy-compounded syringes provided consistent high yield (101.3 ± 2.0 % of possible dose extracted, p = 0.14 for comparison of means between pharmacy syringes and predicted gel weight). CONCLUSION: Combined with reports of significant patient harm and death with inadvertent intravenous administration, this study suggests that there is no role for bedside extraction of nimodipine in clinical practice.