Risk of breast implant bacterial contamination from endogenous breast flora, prevention with nipple shields, and implications for biofilm formation.

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture (CC) is a common complication of breast augmentation that is thought to arise from bacterial contamination and subsequent biofilm formation on the implant. Endogenous breast flora expressed through the nipple may contaminate the sterile field during breast augmentation, acting as a possible source for initiation of biofilm formation. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigate the incidence of nipple bacterial contamination with endogenous breast flora after standard chest wall sterilization during breast augmentation. METHODS: Bacterial contamination of nipples and nipple shields was assessed in a series of 32 consecutive patients presenting for breast augmentation (63 breasts: 31 bilateral procedures and 1 unilateral procedure). After standard sterilization of the chest wall, occlusive nipple shields were applied and breast augmentation was performed. At the conclusion of breast augmentation, the nipple shields were removed and, using the same swab, both the nipple/areolar area and occlusive dressings were cultured. RESULTS: Data from 63 cultured nipples and nipple shields revealed that 22 nipples/nipple shields (34.9%) were positive for bacterial contamination. Three patients, all of whom had negative cultures, developed CC after augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The exposed nipple is a potential source of implant contamination during breast augmentation. An improved understanding of biofilms and related risk factors for CC can provide surgeons with insights for addressing this common complication. Meticulous hemostasis, use of nipple shields, and submuscular device placement may contribute to a lower incidence of CC.

Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications.

BACKGROUND: Incisions for insertion of breast implants are most commonly placed in the inframammary fold, areola, or axilla. Previous studies have evaluated selection of incision location preoperatively and for nipple-areola complex sensation retention after primary augmentation mammaplasty. This study compares the most common postoperative complications for each incision location in patients who underwent primary breast augmentation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 619 patients who underwent primary breast augmentation, excluding simultaneous mastopexy, within a single group practice from July 1994 to June 2009. Incision location, postoperative complications (capsular contracture, hematoma formation, rippling, infection, and rupture), and total reoperation rates were recorded. Incision locations were also compared with respect to implant fill type (saline or silicone gel) and pocket location (subglandular or submuscular). RESULTS: A statistically significant association was identified between total reoperation and incision location (p = 0.0054). The highest rate of total reoperation occurred when using an inframammary fold incision compared to either the transaxillary or periareolar. This relationship with total reoperation was not attributed to the five complications analyzed, but rather with patient desire for size/style change, asymmetry, or ptosis. No statistically significant association was observed between incision location and specific complications such as capsular contracture, rippling, implant rupture, hematoma, or infection. CONCLUSIONS: None of the five complications analyzed correlated with incision location. The data generated from this study will assure the surgeon that all three incision locations are safe. Preoperative examination, patient preference, and surgeon comfort should remain the mainstays of incision planning in augmentation mammaplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article.

Contributing variables to post mastectomy tissue expander infection.

Tissue expander breast reconstruction is a common post mastectomy breast procedure performed by plastic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to define the incidence of breast reconstruction prosthetic infection, relate patient characteristics with increased rate of infection, and analyze the influence of postoperative complications to expander/implant infection. A retrospective, single-institution chart review of 195 women with post mastectomy tissue expander/implant reconstructions performed from 2006 through 2008 was conducted. Total periprosthetic infection rate was calculated. Patient factors, operative technique, and noninfectious complications were analyzed and related to increased periprosthetic infection rate. A binary logistic regression model was fitted using periprosthetic infection as the dependent variable and 12 patient characteristics as independent variables, followed by a step-wise model for best fit with a limited number of independent variables. The overall periprosthetic infection rate per patient over the 2 year period was 5.1%. The incidence of periprosthetic infection per reconstructed breast was 3.2%. Odds ratio estimates indicated that the presence of cellulitis increased the odds of periprosthetic infection more than 200 times (p = <0.0001), and inpatient procedures increased the odds 16 times (p = 0.02). Other variables (i.e., age > 65, DM, flap necrosis, smoking, dehiscence, AlloDerm, etc) failed to reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Postoperative breast cellulitis and inpatient status appear to be significant risk factors for increased periprosthetic infection. No significant increase in periprosthetic infection rate was noted with other variables in this model.

Tear trough deformity: review of anatomy and treatment options.

The lower eyelid can be a challenging area in facial rejuvenation. While lower eyelid bags are commonly the reason that patients present for lower eyelid rejuvenation, a separate entity known as a tear trough deformity may occur in conjunction with lower eyelid bags or alone. In this article, the authors outline the current understanding of the tear trough anatomy; describe multiple classification systems, which provide an objective means of evaluating the deformity and aid the surgeon in choosing appropriate treatment options; and review surgical and nonsurgical techniques for correcting the tear trough deformity. Treatment options include hyaluronic acid filler, fat grafting, skeletal implants, and fat transposition. Each procedure is associated with advantages and disadvantages, and each should be considered more complex than traditional lower blepharoplasty alone. While lower blepharoplasty removes excess fat and may tighten the anterior lamella, tear trough procedures require the addition of volume to the underlying depression. These procedures requiring release of the ligamentous structures and orbicularis (of which the tear trough is composed), as well as fat transposition or fat grafting, are associated with additional complications, which are also reviewed.

Distraction osteogenesis of the palate: an experimental model.

Although most cleft palates can be closed with conventional mucoperiosteal flap techniques, the occasional wide cleft or difficult fistula has few options for an early 1-stage reconstruction. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has the potential to close the palate with both hard and soft tissues as well as mitigating the possibility of future oronasal fistula. A right unilateral 5-mm cleft was surgically created in 15 New Zealand white rabbits. In group 1 (N = 5), no further repair was performed (NR); in group 2 (N = 5), mucoperiosteal flaps were used to close the cleft for a soft-tissue-only repair (STR); in group 3 (N = 5), a unilateral osteotomy in the palate on the noncleft side allowed distraction of the palatal shelf across the cleft until closed (DO). Clinical examination, Micro-computed tomography bone density, direct cephalometry, and histology were evaluated at 8 weeks after the completion of distraction. Bone mineral density (BMD; mg/mL) data were obtained from micro-computed tomography scans of both the cleft and noncleft sides for each rabbit, and a ratio was obtained [(BMDc/BMDnc) x100]; NR = 1.38, STR = 44.27, DO = 88.36, P = 0.007. Facial measurements revealed no growth disturbances as a result of DO. Histologic evaluation revealed increased organization of new bone in DO group compared with NR and STR. Clinically, DO group rabbits did not show any increase in feeding disturbances, infection, or wound healing. The success of membranous facial bone distraction has been applied to a new model for palatal repair with the potential to ameliorate the problems associated with soft-tissue-only repair.