Exceptional synergistic response of PARP inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor in esophageal adenocarcinoma with a germline BRCA2 mutation: a case report.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown efficacy in various tumors. A significant therapeutic challenge with either ICIs or PARP inhibitors as monotherapy is treatment failure from intrinsic primary resistance or the development of secondarily acquired resistance after a period of responsiveness. The combination of PARP inhibitors and ICIs could mitigate this by potentiating treatment response. We describe an 83-year-old male patient who initially presented with abdominal pain, and weight loss along with alternating constipation and diarrhea. Imaging and biopsy revealed metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma. Genomic testing revealed germline BRCA2 mutation. The patient initially underwent a few cycles of chemoimmunotherapy. However, due to intolerance to chemotherapy, the patient's case was discussed at a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board. He was switched to PARP inhibitor olaparib and ICI nivolumab. This combination led to a durable complete response. A combination of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) plus ICI may work in synergy through various mechanisms including enhanced neoantigen expression, release of immune-activating cytokines, and increased programmed death-ligand 1 expression. This may culminate in accentuated efficacy outcomes with a manageable safety profile. This exceptional response with ICI and PARPi in our case is consistent with the synergistic value of this combination, and prospective studies are warranted to definitively characterize clinical utility.

Non-Invasive Predictive Biomarkers for Immune-Related Adverse Events Due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are the most common complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. With the widespread use of ICIs in patients with solid tumors, up to 40% of the patients develop irAEs within five months of treatment, and 11% develop severe irAEs requiring interventions. A predictive test for irAEs would be a crucial tool for monitoring for complications during and after ICI therapy. We performed an extensive review of potential predictive biomarkers for irAEs in patients who received ICI therapy. Currently, only thyroid-stimulating hormone is utilized in common clinical practice. This is due to the unavailability of commercial tests and unclear predictive values from various studies. Given the lack of single strong predictive biomarkers, some novel approaches using composite scores using genomic, transcriptomics, cytokine levels, or clinical parameters appear appealing. Still, these have yet to be validated and incorporated into clinical practice. Further research conducted to validate the models before implementing them into real-world settings will be of the utmost importance for irAE prediction.

Treatment Patterns and Adverse Event-Related Hospitalization Among Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Treatment with EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Regimens.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are established first-line treatments among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Upon EGFR TKI resistance, there are scant data supporting a standard of care in subsequent lines of therapy. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize real-world treatment patterns and adverse events associated with hospitalization in later lines of therapy. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of administrative claims included adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who initiated a next line of therapy (index line of therapy) following EGFR TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy discontinuation on/after 1 November, 2015. Treatment regimens and adverse event rates during the index line of therapy were described. RESULTS: Among 195 eligible patients (median age: 59 years; female: 60%), the five most common index line of therapy regimens were immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (29%), EGFR TKI monotherapy (21%), platinum-based chemotherapy (19%), non-platinum-chemotherapy (13%), and EGFR TKI combinations (9%). The overall median (95% confidence interval) time to discontinuation of the index line of therapy was 2.8 (2.1-3.2) months. Common adverse events associated with hospitalizations included infection/sepsis, pneumonia/pneumonitis, and anemia (2.9, 2.8, and 2.0 per 100 person-months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among EGFR TKI-resistant patients who discontinued platinum-based chemotherapy, the duration of the next line of therapy was short, treatment was highly variable, and re-treatment with EGFR TKIs and platinum-based regimens was common, suggesting a lack of standard of care in later lines. Adverse event rates associated with hospitalization were high, especially among platinum-treated patients. These results underscore the unmet need for new therapies in a later line of treatment to reduce the clinical burden among patients in this population.

Molecular Tumor Board Case Series: Targeting KRAS G12C in Lung Cancer.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) identifies biomarkers with prognostic and predictive importance in patients with cancer. The enormous amounts of data generated by comprehensive NGS adds complexity to the identification of valid drug therapy targets. Rapid progress made in targeted drug development creates the need for novel methods to access these treatments for patients. Molecular tumor boards (MTB) not only aid in identifying targetable gene mutations by carefully reviewing NGS data, they can also take lead in creating patient access to the appropriate targeted therapy. Here we describe two patients with Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) G12C mutation positive lung adenocarcinoma for whom MTB was able to procure AMG510 or sotorasib, a covalent KRAS G12C inhibitor, by expanded access program ahead of FDA approval.

Large-scale pathogenicity prediction analysis of cancer-associated kinase mutations reveals variability in sensitivity and specificity of computational methods.

BACKGROUND: Mutations in kinases are the most frequent genetic alterations in cancer; however, experimental evidence establishing their cancerous nature is available only for a small fraction of these mutants. AIMS: Predicition analysis of kinome mutations is the primary aim of this study. Further objective is to compare the performance of various softwares in pathogenicity prediction of kinase mutations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We employed a set of computational tools to predict the pathogenicity of over forty-two thousand mutations and deposited the kinase-wise data in Mendeley database (Estimated Pathogenicity of Kinase Mutants [EPKiMu]). RESULTS: Mutations are more likely to be drivers when being present in the kinase domain (vs. non-kinase domain) and belonging to hotspot residues (vs. non-hotspot residues). We identified that, while predictive tools have low specificity in general, PolyPhen-2 had the best accuracy. Further efforts to combine all four tools by consensus, voting, or other simple methods did not significantly improve accuracy. DISCUSSION: The study provides a large dataset of kinase mutations along with their predicted pathogenicity that can be used as a training set for future studies. Furthermore, a comparative sensitivity and selectivity of commonly used computational tools is presented. CONCLUSION: Primary-structure-based in silico tools identified more cancerous/deleterious mutations in the kinase domains and at the hot spot residues while having higher sensitivity than specificity in detecting deleterious mutations.

Molecular Tumor Board Case Series: Targeted Treatments For Cancer And Their Toxicities: Amivantamab-Induced Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis.

In the era of targeted treatments based on next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, clinicians must be diligent in aligning patients with treatments giving them the best chance of survival while weighing the risk of toxicity caused by agents targeting specific gene mutations. In this case, we describe a patient with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutation positive recurrent lung adenocarcinoma who received amivantamab and experienced severe dermatologic toxicity.

Bridging the Gap: Innovative 'Center for Precision Oncology' in Missouri.

Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become standard practice for identification and treatment of targetable driver mutations in advanced cancer. However, NGS interpretation of clinical applicability can be challenging to clinician, with potential impact on patient's outcome. Specialized precision medicine services are poised to bridge this gap by creating collaborative frameworks to formulate and deliver genomic patient care plans. Methods: Saint Luke's Cancer Institute in Kansas City, Missouri, (SLCI) instituted the Center for Precision Oncology (CPO) in 2017. The program accepts patient referrals for a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board and offers CPO clinic visits. An Institutional Review Board-approved molecular registry was initiated. It catalogues genomic files along with patient demographics, treatment and outcomes. CPO patient volumes, recommendation acceptance, clinical trial matriculation and funding for drug procurement were closely tracked. Results: In 2020 there were 93 referrals to the CPO with 29 patient clinic visits. 20 patients matriculated to CPO-recommended therapies. Two patients were successfully enrolled in Expanded Access Programs (EAPs). CPO successfully procured eight off-label treatments. Treatments initiated per CPO recommendations totaled over $1 million in drug costs. Conclusion: Precision medicine services are essential tool for oncology clinicians. In addition to expert NGS analysis interpretation, precision medicine programs provide crucial multidisciplinary support for patients to understand the implications of their genomic report and pursue targeted treatment as indicated. Molecular registries associated with these services offer valuable opportunities for research.

A review of therapeutic failures in late-stage clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: The process of drug approval involves extensive and expensive preclinical and clinical examination. Most drugs entering late-stage clinical trials get terminated for a variety of reasons including inability to achieve the primary endpoints or intolerable adverse effects. Only one-tenth of the drugs that enter clinical trials progress to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory submission. AREAS COVERED: This review offers insight into some of the attributes that may be responsible for a drug's failure in late-stage trials. Information from multiple open sources including PubMed articles published between 1989 and 2019, recent articles from authentic websites like www.ClinicalTrials.gov, www.fda.gov, and pharmaceutical news articles for the years between 2017 and 2021 were accumulated and summarized. Further, a few drug candidates that reached the phase III clinical trials but were discontinued at later stages have been presented as case studies. EXPERT OPINION: Ineluctable failures were observed due to insufficient knowledge about the mechanism of action where the disease progression stages are unclear. Other reasons were choice of patient population, late-stage treatment, and dosage. Adhering to the guidelines and recommendations provided by the regulatory authorities and learning from past failures, considerably reduce failure rates.

Usage of epidermal growth factor mutation testing and impact on treatment patterns in non-small cell lung cancer: An international observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (EGFRm) are common oncogene drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This real-world study explored treatment patterns and time to receive EGFRm test results in patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC. METHODS: A cross-sectional medical chart review was completed May-August 2020 in Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, UK, and USA. Eligible patients had advanced NSCLC and a positive EGFRm test result January-December 2017. Data were abstracted from NSCLC diagnosis to end of follow-up (31 March 2020) or patient's death whichever occurred earlier. The index date was the date of EGFRm confirmation. RESULTS: 223 physicians provided data for 1,793 patients. Patients' mean age was 64.7 years, 54 % were male, 30.7 % had no history of smoking. Overall, 78 % of EGFRm test results were received ≤ 2 weeks after request (range of median 7-14 days across countries). Median time from advanced NSCLC diagnosis to EGFRm test result was 18 days (median range 10-22 days across countries). Over a third (37 %) of patients received a systemic treatment prior to EGFRm result; chemotherapy (25 %) and EGFR-TKI (15 %) were most commonly prescribed; post-EGFR test-result was EGFR-TKI (68 %); 80 % of patients initiated EGFR-TKI at any time point post-NSCLC diagnosis. Of those receiving a first-line EGFR-TKI post-EGFRm testing, 84 % received a TKI alone, 12 % in combination with chemotherapy, and 3 % with other treatments. Median time from first-line EGFR-TKI initiation post-EGFRm testing to first subsequent treatment was 19.8 months. CONCLUSION: Over one-fifth of patients wait >14 days for their EGFRm test results, affecting their likelihood of receiving first-line EGFR-TKI with 20 % of patients never receiving EGFR TKI treatment. There was significant inter-country variability in the proportion of patients receiving EGFR TKIs. Our study highlights the need to improve EGFRm testing turnaround times and treatment initiation across countries.

Treating patients with platinum-sensitive extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in a real-world setting.

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is an aggressive disease with poor 5-year survival. The first-line standard-of-care for ES-SCLC is platinum plus etoposide, along with 1 of the immune checkpoint inhibitors atezolizumab or durvalumab. Although SCLC first-line therapy often leads to rapid responses, treatment becomes more challenging at progression, particularly for those with a chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI) of ≤6 months. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for SCLC no longer specify treatment recommendations in this setting, but options approved by the US Food and Drug Administration include topotecan and lurbinectedin. Participation in a clinical trial is recommended as an option regardless of CTFI. Other NCCN-recommended regimens are paclitaxel, irinotecan, temozolomide, and cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine, among others. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are options in those not previously treated with a checkpoint inhibitor. For patients with platinum-sensitive SCLC (CTFI >6 months), preferred treatment per the NCCN Guidelines® for SCLC is retreatment with platinum and etoposide, although the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is discouraged if there is progression on a drug in this class. Further research on immunotherapies and combination regimens is ongoing, and continuing work on the subcharacterization of SCLC may lead to better precision of therapies that promote more durable responses in individual patients with ES-SCLC.

Estimated sensitivity profiles of lung cancer specific uncommon BRAF mutants towards experimental and clinically approved kinase inhibitors.

Current experimental and clinical data are inadequate to conclusively predict the oncogenicity of uncommon BRAF mutants and their sensitivity towards kinase inhibitors. Therefore, the present study aims at estimating sensitivity profiles of uncommon lung cancer specific BRAF mutations towards clinically approved as well as experimental therapeutics based on computationally derived direct binding energies. Based on the data derived from cBioportal, BRAF mutants displayed significant mutual exclusivity with KRAS and EGFR mutants indicating them as potential drivers in lung cancer. Predicted sensitivity of BRAF-V600E conformed to published experimental and clinical data thus validating the usefulness of computational approach. The BRAF-V600K displayed higher sensitivity to most inhibitors as compared to that of the BRAF-V600E. All the uncommon mutants displayed higher sensitivity than both the wild type and BRAF-V600E towards PLX 8394 and LSN3074753. While V600K, G469R and N581S displayed favorable sensitivity profiles to most inhibitors, V600L/M, G466A/E/V and G469A/V displayed resistance profiles to a variable degree. Notably, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation revealed that increased number of interactions caused enhanced sensitivity of G469R and N581S towards sorafenib. RAF kinase inhibitors were further classified into two groups as per their selectivity (Group I: BRAF-V600E-selective and Group II: CRAF-selective) based on which potential mutation-wise combinations of RAF kinase inhibitors were proposed to overcome resistance. Based on computational inhibitor sensitivity profiles, appropriate treatment strategies may be devised to prevent or overcome secondary drug resistance in lung cancer patients with uncommon mutations.

Safety and Efficacy of Dostarlimab in Patients With Recurrent/Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from Cohort E of the Phase I GARNET Trial.

BACKGROUND: Dostarlimab is an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody being evaluated in recurrent/advanced solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in the ongoing Phase I, multi-center, open-label, 2-part (dose escalation and cohort expansion) GARNET study (NCT02715284). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we report an interim analysis of patients with recurrent/advanced NSCLC who progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received dostarlimab (500 mg IV every 3 weeks [Q3W] for Cycles 1-4, then 1000 mg Q6W) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for > 2 years. The primary endpoints were immune-related objective response rate (irORR) per investigator-assessed irRECIST and safety. RESULTS: As of 8, July 2019, 67 patients with recurrent/advanced NSCLC were enrolled and treated with dostarlimab; the majority had programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) < 1% (35.8% of patients) or PD-L1 TPS 1%-49% (29.9% of patients); 7.5% had PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, and 26.9% had unknown PD-L1 TPS status. Median follow-up was 13.8 months (range: 0.0-22.6). irORR was 26.9%, including 2 complete and 16 partial responses. The median duration of response of 11.6 months (range: 2.8-19.4). Responses were observed in 2 of 24 (16.7%) patients with PD-L1 TPS < 1%, 4 of 20 (20.0%) patients with PD-L1 TPS 1%-49% and 2 of 5 (40.0%) patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%. Fatigue (4.5%) was the most common Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event (TRAE). Immune-related TRAEs (any grade) were observed in 28.4% of patients. CONCLUSION: Dostarlimab demonstrated promising antitumor activity in advanced/recurrent NSCLC that progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy, including across all PD-L1 subgroups, and has an acceptable safety profile.

Refining colorectal cancer classification and clinical stratification through a single-cell atlas.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) have different immunological, stromal cell, and clinicopathological characteristics. Single-cell characterization of CMS subtype tumor microenvironments is required to elucidate mechanisms of tumor and stroma cell contributions to pathogenesis which may advance subtype-specific therapeutic development. We interrogate racially diverse human CRC samples and analyze multiple independent external cohorts for a total of 487,829 single cells enabling high-resolution depiction of the cellular diversity and heterogeneity within the tumor and microenvironmental cells. RESULTS: Tumor cells recapitulate individual CMS subgroups yet exhibit significant intratumoral CMS heterogeneity. Both CMS1 microsatellite instability (MSI-H) CRCs and microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC demonstrate similar pathway activations at the tumor epithelial level. However, CD8+ cytotoxic T cell phenotype infiltration in MSI-H CRCs may explain why these tumors respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cellular transcriptomic profiles in CRC exist in a tumor immune stromal continuum in contrast to discrete subtypes proposed by studies utilizing bulk transcriptomics. We note a dichotomy in tumor microenvironments across CMS subgroups exists by which patients with high cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and C1Q+TAM content exhibit poor outcomes, providing a higher level of personalization and precision than would distinct subtypes. Additionally, we discover CAF subtypes known to be associated with immunotherapy resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct CAFs and C1Q+ TAMs are sufficient to explain CMS predictive ability and a simpler signature based on these cellular phenotypes could stratify CRC patient prognosis with greater precision. Therapeutically targeting specific CAF subtypes and C1Q + TAMs may promote immunotherapy responses in CRC patients.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: improving the detection and management of immune-related adverse events.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment for patients with non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently approved ICIs are monoclonal antibodies that target programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1), its ligand PD-L1, or CTLA-4. With ICIs comes a novel collection of toxicities: immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Management of IRAEs requires multidisciplinary expertise. We review the biology of IRAEs and their management in patients with squamous NSCLC. AREAS COVERED: We review the pathophysiology of ICIs and IRAEs. For IRAEs related to squamous NSCLC, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, and PubMed were queried for trials with patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma histology, who were assessed for incidence rates of IRAEs. Thirteen trials met inclusion criteria. National guidelines are reviewed to outline management strategies for IRAEs. EXPERT OPINION: IRAEs are unique compared to standard chemotherapy. As the role of ICIs expand across all stages of squamous cell NSCLC and with different combinations of antineoplastics, management of IRAEs will become crucial. Optimal management of IRAEs requires multidisciplinary teamwork. Further investigation into the pathophysiology of IRAEs can enhance current management strategies.

NTRK1 Fusions identified by non-invasive plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) across 9 cancer types.

BACKGROUND: Activating fusions of the NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 genes are drivers of carcinogenesis and proliferation across a broad range of tumour types in both adult and paediatric patients. Recently, the FDA granted tumour-agnostic approvals of TRK inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, based on significant and durable responses in multiple primary tumour types. Unfortunately, testing rates in clinical practice remain quite low. Adding plasma next-generation sequencing of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to tissue-based testing increases the detection rate of oncogenic drivers and demonstrates high concordance with tissue genotyping. However, the clinical potential of ctDNA analysis to identify NTRK fusion-positive tumours has been largely unexplored. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a ctDNA database in advanced stage solid tumours for NTRK1 fusions. RESULTS: NTRK1 fusion events, with nine unique fusion partners, were identified in 37 patients. Of the cases for which clinical data were available, 44% had tissue testing for NTRK1 fusions; the NTRK1 fusion detected by ctDNA was confirmed in tissue in 88% of cases. Here, we report for the first time that minimally-invasive plasma NGS can detect NTRK fusions with a high positive predictive value. CONCLUSION: Plasma ctDNA represents a rapid, non-invasive screening method for this rare genomic target that may improve identification of patients who can benefit from TRK-targeted therapy and potentially identify subsequent on- and off-target resistance mechanisms.