Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 16(9): e69521, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39416529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Newborn hearing screening (NHS) is universally acknowledged as a critical early intervention to prevent adverse developmental outcomes caused by undetected hearing loss. Despite its proven benefits, the implementation of NHS varies, especially in tertiary care hospitals that manage high-risk neonates. This study investigates the effectiveness and implementation of NHS protocols in these settings. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Neonatology at Saveetha Medical College, Chennai. All newborns delivered between January 2023 and December 2023 were included. Screening involved initial otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) tests, automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) followed by brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA) for those who failed. Data on demographic characteristics, screening results, and follow-up compliance were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1,398 neonates were screened. Initial screening resulted in 416 (29.7%) referrals. Follow-up screenings showed high compliance rates, with significant detections of hearing impairments through BERA. The screening was completed for 1,341 babies. Fifty-five babies were lost to follow-up. Of these, 2 babies (0.1%) with a high risk for hearing loss were diagnosed with bilateral severe hearing loss. The study also noted demographic factors such as kinship and obstetric history that might influence hearing loss risks. CONCLUSIONS: NHS plays a vital role in the early detection and management of hearing impairments, which is crucial for preventing negative impacts on a child's development. This study advocates for the systematic implementation of NHS protocols in all tertiary care hospitals, especially those serving high-risk neonates, to ensure optimal developmental outcomes.

2.
Cureus ; 16(8): e66201, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39233927

RESUMEN

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) play a critical role in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), facilitating treatment in premature and critically ill neonates. However, achieving optimal PICC placement can present challenges, requiring meticulous monitoring and adjustment. Here, we describe the case of a 52-day-old, 1.9 kg preterm infant in the NICU requiring a central venous catheter for antibiotics and antifungals. Despite initial insertion into the basilic vein of the right forearm, imaging revealed the catheter's deviation into the right internal jugular vein. Leveraging the influence of arm position on catheter tip depth, external manipulation of the infant's right arm successfully repositioned the catheter tip into the superior vena cava (SVC). This case highlights the significant impact of arm positioning on PICC placement and underscores the efficacy of external extremity manipulation as a simple, non-invasive technique to adjust catheter position. Such innovative strategies offer promising alternatives to invasive interventions, emphasizing the importance of dynamic monitoring and adjustment techniques in neonatal PICC management.

3.
Lancet Glob Health ; 9(9): e1273-e1285, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34358491

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although therapeutic hypothermia reduces death or disability after neonatal encephalopathy in high-income countries, its safety and efficacy in low-income and middle-income countries is unclear. We aimed to examine whether therapeutic hypothermia alongside optimal supportive intensive care reduces death or moderate or severe disability after neonatal encephalopathy in south Asia. METHODS: We did a multicountry open-label, randomised controlled trial in seven tertiary neonatal intensive care units in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. We enrolled infants born at or after 36 weeks of gestation with moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy and a need for continued resuscitation at 5 min of age or an Apgar score of less than 6 at 5 min of age (for babies born in a hospital), or both, or an absence of crying by 5 min of age (for babies born at home). Using a web-based randomisation system, we allocated infants into a group receiving whole body hypothermia (33·5°C) for 72 h using a servo-controlled cooling device, or to usual care (control group), within 6 h of birth. All recruiting sites had facilities for invasive ventilation, cardiovascular support, and access to 3 Tesla MRI scanners and spectroscopy. Masking of the intervention was not possible, but those involved in the magnetic resonance biomarker analysis and neurodevelopmental outcome assessments were masked to the allocation. The primary outcome was a combined endpoint of death or moderate or severe disability at 18-22 months, assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (third edition) and a detailed neurological examination. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02387385. FINDINGS: We screened 2296 infants between Aug 15, 2015, and Feb 15, 2019, of whom 576 infants were eligible for inclusion. After exclusions, we recruited 408 eligible infants and we assigned 202 to the hypothermia group and 206 to the control group. Primary outcome data were available for 195 (97%) of the 202 infants in the hypothermia group and 199 (97%) of the 206 control group infants. 98 (50%) infants in the hypothermia group and 94 (47%) infants in the control group died or had a moderate or severe disability (risk ratio 1·06; 95% CI 0·87-1·30; p=0·55). 84 infants (42%) in the hypothermia group and 63 (31%; p=0·022) infants in the control group died, of whom 72 (36%) and 49 (24%; p=0·0087) died during neonatal hospitalisation. Five serious adverse events were reported: three in the hypothermia group (one hospital readmission relating to pneumonia, one septic arthritis, and one suspected venous thrombosis), and two in the control group (one related to desaturations during MRI and other because of endotracheal tube displacement during transport for MRI). No adverse events were considered causally related to the study intervention. INTERPRETATION: Therapeutic hypothermia did not reduce the combined outcome of death or disability at 18 months after neonatal encephalopathy in low-income and middle-income countries, but significantly increased death alone. Therapeutic hypothermia should not be offered as treatment for neonatal encephalopathy in low-income and middle-income countries, even when tertiary neonatal intensive care facilities are available. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research, Garfield Weston Foundation, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. TRANSLATIONS: For the Hindi, Malayalam, Telugu, Kannada, Singhalese, Tamil, Marathi and Bangla translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías/terapia , Hipotermia Inducida , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Encefalopatías/mortalidad , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Masculino , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sri Lanka/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...