RESUMEN
Little attention has been paid to neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) in high-income countries and no literature provides an overview of NTDs in Japan. This scoping review aims to synthesize the latest evidence and information to understand epidemiology of and public health response to NTDs in Japan. Using three academic databases, we retrieved articles that mentioned NTDs in Japan, written in English or Japanese, and published between 2010 and 2020. Websites of key public health institutions and medical societies were also explored. From these sources of information, we extracted data that were relevant to answering our research questions. Our findings revealed the transmission of alveolar echinococcosis, Buruli ulcer, Chagas disease, dengue, foodborne trematodiases, mycetoma, scabies, and soil-transmitted helminthiasis as well as occurrence of snakebites within Japan. Other NTDs, such as chikungunya, cystic echinococcosis, cysticercosis, leishmaniasis, leprosy, lymphatic filariasis, rabies, and schistosomiasis, have been imported into the country. Government agencies tend to organize surveillance and control programs only for the NTDs targeted by the Infectious Disease Control Law, namely, echinococcosis, rabies, dengue, and chikungunya. At least one laboratory offers diagnostic testing for each NTD except for dracunculiasis, human African trypanosomiasis, onchocerciasis, and yaws. No medicine is approved for treatment of Chagas disease and fascioliasis and only off-label use drugs are available for cysticercosis, opisthorchiasis, human African trypanosomiasis, onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, and yaws. Based on these findings, we developed disease-specific recommendations. In addition, three policy issues are discussed, such as lack of legal frameworks to organize responses to some NTDs, overreliance on researchers to procure some NTD products, and unaffordability of unapproved NTD medicines. Japan should recognize the presence of NTDs within the country and need to address them as a national effort. The implications of our findings extend beyond Japan, emphasizing the need to study, recognize, and address NTDs even in high-income countries.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Chagas , Fiebre Chikungunya , Cisticercosis , Dengue , Oncocercosis , Rabia , Esquistosomiasis , Medicina Tropical , Tripanosomiasis Africana , Buba , Animales , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Enfermedades Desatendidas/prevención & control , Rabia/epidemiología , Esquistosomiasis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Leprosy is caused by Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) and M. lepromatosis, an obligate intracellular organism, and over 200,000 new cases occur every year. M. leprae parasitizes histiocytes (skin macrophages) and Schwann cells in the peripheral nerves. Although leprosy can be treated by multidrug therapy, some patients relapse or have a prolonged clinical course and/or experience leprosy reaction. These varying outcomes depend on host factors such as immune responses against bacterial components that determine a range of symptoms. To understand these host responses, knowledge of the mechanisms by which M. leprae parasitizes host cells is important. This article describes the characteristics of leprosy through bacteriology, genetics, epidemiology, immunology, animal models, routes of infection, and clinical findings. It also discusses recent diagnostic methods, treatment, and measures according to the World Health Organization (WHO), including prevention. Recently, the antibacterial activities of anti-hyperlipidaemia agents against other pathogens, such as M. tuberculosis and Staphylococcus aureus have been investigated. Our laboratory has been focused on the metabolism of lipids which constitute the cell wall of M. leprae. Our findings may be useful for the development of future treatments.
Asunto(s)
Lepra , Mycobacterium leprae , Animales , Mycobacterium leprae/genética , Virulencia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Leprostáticos , Lepra/tratamiento farmacológico , Lepra/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Leprosy, or Hansen's disease was a major public health problem in Japan in the early 20th century. Today, the number of new cases has decreased significantly. We aimed to investigate the trends of leprosy in Japan over the past 73 years and the challenges faced in recent years. METHODS: We assessed the data on newly registered cases of leprosy from 1947 to 2020. RESULTS: A total of 10,796 newly registered cases of leprosy were reported during the study period, of which 7573 were registered in mainland Japan, 2962 in Okinawa, and 250 were of foreign origin. Most autochthonous cases were born before 1950 in mainland Japan and before 1975 in Okinawa. The number of nonautochthonous cases surpassed that of autochthonous cases in 1992. Nonautochthonous cases originated from 26 countries, particularly Brazil and the Philippines. Three cases of antimicrobial resistance have been detected among nonautochthonous cases since 2004. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that ongoing transmission of leprosy likely ceased in the 1940s in mainland Japan and in the 1970s in Okinawa. With the recent rise of nonautochthonous cases with globalization, continuous surveillance and efforts to maintain leprosy services within the country are necessary even after reaching the state of elimination.
Asunto(s)
Lepra , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Lepra/epidemiología , Lepra/prevención & control , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Salud Pública , BrasilRESUMEN
Skin infections caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), especially the USA300 clone, have been increasing in Japan. To prevent an epidemic of PVL-positive MRSA, rapid diagnosis and effective antimicrobial therapy are essential. However, the clinical features of, and antimicrobial efficacy against, these skin infections are not well understood in Japan. Here, we report 10 cases of skin infections caused by PVL-positive MRSA that presented over a two-year period in our clinic. Genetic analyses revealed that 90% of the PVL-positive MRSA strains were identified as USA300 and its related clones. Notably, 70% of the patients had atopic dermatitis (AD) as an underlying disease. Average durations of antimicrobial therapy for AD patients (10.6 weeks) were 2.9-fold longer than those for non-AD patients (3.7 weeks). However, all cases were improved by a long-term course of fosfomycin, minocycline, doxycycline, and/or rifampicin. Our data suggest that AD may be an important risk factor for intractable skin infections caused by PVL-positive MRSA.