A microRNA network regulates proliferative timing and extracellular matrix synthesis during cellular quiescence in fibroblasts.

BACKGROUND: Although quiescence (reversible cell cycle arrest) is a key part in the life history and fate of many mammalian cell types, the mechanisms of gene regulation in quiescent cells are poorly understood. We sought to clarify the role of microRNAs as regulators of the cellular functions of quiescent human fibroblasts. RESULTS: Using microarrays, we discovered that the expression of the majority of profiled microRNAs differed between proliferating and quiescent fibroblasts. Fibroblasts induced into quiescence by contact inhibition or serum starvation had similar microRNA profiles, indicating common changes induced by distinct quiescence signals. By analyzing the gene expression patterns of microRNA target genes with quiescence, we discovered a strong regulatory function for miR-29, which is downregulated with quiescence. Using microarrays and immunoblotting, we confirmed that miR-29 targets genes encoding collagen and other extracellular matrix proteins and that those target genes are induced in quiescence. In addition, overexpression of miR-29 resulted in more rapid cell cycle re-entry from quiescence. We also found that let-7 and miR-125 were upregulated in quiescent cells. Overexpression of either one alone resulted in slower cell cycle re-entry from quiescence, while the combination of both together slowed cell cycle re-entry even further. CONCLUSIONS: microRNAs regulate key aspects of fibroblast quiescence including the proliferative state of the cells as well as their gene expression profiles, in particular, the induction of extracellular matrix proteins in quiescent fibroblasts.

Quiescent fibroblasts are protected from proteasome inhibition-mediated toxicity.

Proteasome inhibition is used as a treatment strategy for multiple types of cancers. Although proteasome inhibition can induce apoptotic cell death in actively proliferating cells, it is less effective in quiescent cells. In this study, we used primary human fibroblasts as a model system to explore the link between the proliferative state of a cell and proteasome inhibition-mediated cell death. We found that proliferating and quiescent fibroblasts have strikingly different responses to MG132, a proteasome inhibitor; proliferating cells rapidly apoptosed, whereas quiescent cells maintained viability. Moreover, MG132 treatment of proliferating fibroblasts led to increased superoxide anion levels, juxtanuclear accumulation of ubiquitin- and p62/SQSTM1-positive protein aggregates, and apoptotic cell death, whereas MG132-treated quiescent cells displayed fewer juxtanuclear protein aggregates, less apoptosis, and higher levels of mitochondrial superoxide dismutase. In both cell states, reducing reactive oxygen species with N-acetylcysteine lessened protein aggregation and decreased apoptosis, suggesting that protein aggregation promotes apoptosis. In contrast, increasing cellular superoxide levels with 2-methoxyestradiol treatment or inhibition of autophagy/lysosomal pathways with bafilomycin A1 sensitized serum-starved quiescent cells to MG132-induced apoptosis. Thus, antioxidant defenses and the autophagy/lysosomal pathway protect serum-starved quiescent fibroblasts from proteasome inhibition-induced cytotoxicity.

Distinct pharmacological effects of inhibitors of signal peptide peptidase and gamma-secretase.

Signal peptide peptidase (SPP) and gamma-secretase are intramembrane aspartyl proteases that bear similar active site motifs but with opposite membrane topologies. Both proteases are inhibited by the same aspartyl protease transition-state analogue inhibitors, further evidence that these two enzymes have the same basic cleavage mechanism. Here we report that helical peptide inhibitors designed to mimic SPP substrates and interact with the SPP initial substrate-binding site (the "docking site") inhibit both SPP and gamma-secretase, but with submicromolar potency for SPP. SPP was labeled by helical peptide and transition-state analogue affinity probes but at distinct sites. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which shift the site of proteolysis by SPP and gamma-secretase, did not affect the labeling of SPP or gamma-secretase by the helical peptide or transition-state analogue probes. On the other hand, another class of previously reported gamma-secretase modulators, naphthyl ketones, inhibited SPP activity as well as selective proteolysis by gamma-secretase. These naphthyl ketones significantly disrupted labeling of SPP by the helical peptide probe but did not block labeling of SPP by the transition-state analogue probe. With respect to gamma-secretase, the naphthyl ketone modulators allowed labeling by the transition-state analogue probe but not the helical peptide probe. Thus, the naphthyl ketones appear to alter the docking sites of both SPP and gamma-secretase. These results indicate that pharmacological effects of the four different classes of inhibitors (transition-state analogues, helical peptides, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and naphthyl ketones) are distinct from each other, and they reveal similarities and differences with how they affect SPP and gamma-secretase.