Periostin is essential for periodontal ligament remodeling during orthodontic treatment.

Orthodontic tooth movement is a process stimulated and maintained by external tensile stress; periodontal ligament remodeling serves an important role during this process. However, the function and underlying mechanism of periostin (PN) during orthodontic periodontal ligament remodeling remain unclear. The present study established in vitro and in vivo models of orthodontic treatment to investigate the expression levels of PN under conditions of external tensile stress load. These results indicated that tensile stress load increased the expression levels of PN in mouse peridontal ligaments and human periodontal ligament cells (hPDLCs), during orthodontic tooth movement. Furthermore, the present study demonstrated that the expression levels of PN were regulated by transforming grown factor ß, and that PN promotes type I collagen and α­smooth muscle actin expression levels in hPDLCs. Therefore, PN may be essential for periodontal ligament remodeling during orthodontic treatment, and therefore may represent a potential therapeutic target.

Blockade of toll-like receptor 2 expression and membrane translocation in rat corneal epithelial cells by glucocorticoid (TobraDex) after penetrating keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and the effect of glucocorticoid on immune rejection of penetrating keratoplasty. METHODS: Allograft corneal transplantation was performed between host Sprague Dawley (SD) and Wistar donor rats. The expression of TLR2 messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein in corneas was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence on days 5, 7, and 9 after operation. Three groups were included: allograft, allograft treated with TobraDex (Alcon, Rijksweg, Belgium), and isograft. Normal rat corneas were included as an additional control. RESULTS: Various degrees of congregation of inflammatory cells and neovascularization of grafts were confirmed by histopathology. Immunohistochemistry revealed that TLR2 was expressed in epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cells of normal tissue, and in all of the grafts. Immunofluorescence analysis of TLR2 showed membrane staining of epithelial cells in the allografts on days 7 and 9. This was absent in the isografts and the allografts treated with TobraDex. TLR2 mRNA was detected in normal corneas, and levels were increased in all of the grafts, as determined by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. By day 9 after transplantation, a 3.6-fold increase in TLR2 mRNA was observed in the allografts compared with the isografts or the allografts treated with TobraDex, which was statistically significant, at P < 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of TLR2 in the rat cornea was significantly increased and concurred with the allograft rejection, but was effectively blocked by treatment with TobraDex.

[Application of three-dimensional laser scanning-based maxillofacial soft tissue reconstruction in orthodontic treatment].

OBJECTIVE: To establish a convenient and rapid method for constructing a digital model of the maxillofacial soft tissue based on three-dimensional laser surface scanning to allow direct and accurate observation of the soft tissue changes in the course of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: The point cloud data of three-dimensional laser scanning of the maxillofacial region were acquired from a healthy woman with Angle Class I occlusion, who maintained a horizontal Frankfort plane during scanning with the scanner placed at a distance of 80 cm. The scanning was repeated twice after wearing the dental cast for an Angle Class I occlusion. The three-dimensional digital model of the maxillofacial soft tissue was constructed based on the point cloud using GeoMagic10.0 software. RESULTS: The high-resolution three-dimensional model of the maxillofacial soft tissue reconstructed allowed accurate observation of the distinct facial anatomical landmarks and represented directly the soft tissue changes in the process of orthodontic treatment by merging the models. Using the analytic tool provided by the software, this model also allowed direct quantitative measurement of the nasolabial angle and the distances from the esthetic plane to the upper lip, labral inferior, and mentolabial sulcus, which were 111.86°, -3.57 mm, -2.54 mm, and 3.95 mm before orthodontic treatment as compared to 114.31°, -2.73 mm, -1.06 mm, and 3.46 mm during treatment, and 116.53°, -0.15 mm, 0.64 mm, and 3.11 mm after the treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional laser surface scanning enables accurate and rapid construction of the digital model of the facial soft tissues, which may provide valuable assistance in orthodontic treatment.

[Clinical effect of removable lingual arch plus auxiliary spring for dental arch expansion].

OBJECTIVE: Observe the clinical effect of removable lingual arch plus auxiliary spring for convenient dental (especially mandibular) arch expansion. METHODS: Seventeen patients with dental arch constriction complicated by mild dental crowding were enrolled in this study, including 9 requiring maxillary arch expansion and 8 necessitating mandibular expansion. The patients were divided to two groups at random for arch expansion with removable lingual arch plus auxiliary spring and with Quad-helix, respectively, and the effect of arch expansion was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of arch expansion, the average width of U4-U4 and U5-U5 in removable lingual arch group was enlarged by 2.2 mm and 3.0 mm, and that in Quad-helix group by 2.3 mm and 3.5 mm, respectively, showing no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). After 12 weeks of treatment, the average width of L4-L4 and L5-L5 in the former group was enlarged by 2.3 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively, significantly greater than that in the latter group (1.0 mm and 1.2 mm, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Removable lingual arch plus auxiliary spring allows significant expansion of the middle segment of the dental arch (bicuspids), and can be more effective than Quad-helix for mandibular arch expansion.