Comparison of the 2022 world health organization classification and international consensus classification in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms.

In 2022, two novel classification systems for myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have been proposed: the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO-2022) classification. These two contemporary systems exhibit numerous shared features but also diverge significantly in terminology and the definition of new entities. Thus, we retrospectively validated the ICC and WHO-2022 classification and found that both systems promoted efficient segregation of this heterogeneous disease. After examining the distinction between the two systems, we showed that a peripheral blood blast percentage ≥ 5% indicates adverse survival. Identifying MDS/acute myeloid leukemia with MDS-related gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities helps differentiate survival outcomes. In MDS, not otherwise specified patients, those diagnosed with hypoplastic MDS and single lineage dysplasia displayed a trend of superior survival compared to other low-risk MDS patients. Furthermore, the impact of bone marrow fibrosis on survival was less pronounced within the ICC framework. Allogeneic transplantation appears to improve outcomes for patients diagnosed with MDS with excess blasts in the ICC. Therefore, we proposed an integrated system that may lead to the accurate diagnosis and advancement of future research for MDS. Prospective studies are warranted to validate this refined classification.

Validation of the molecular international prognostic scoring system in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes defined by international consensus classification.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have varied prognoses and require a risk-adapted treatment strategy for treatment optimization. Recently, a molecular prognostic model (Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS-M]) that combines clinical parameters, cytogenetic abnormalities, and mutation topography was proposed. This study validated the IPSS-M in 649 patients with primary MDS (based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification [ICC]) and compared its prognostic power to those of the IPSS and revised IPSS (IPSS-R). Overall, 42.5% of the patients were reclassified and 29.3% were up-staged from the IPSS-R. After the reclassification, 16.9% of the patients may receive different treatment strategies. The IPSS-M had greater discriminative potential than the IPSS-R and IPSS. Patients with high, or very high-risk IPSS-M might benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. IPSS-M, age, ferritin level, and the 2022 ICC categorization predicted outcomes independently. After analyzing demographic and genetic features, complementary genetic analyses, including KMT2A-PTD, were suggested for accurate IPSS-M categorization of patients with ASXL1, TET2, STAG2, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, DNMT3A, U2AF1, and BCOR mutations and those classified as MDS, not otherwise specified with single lineage dysplasia/multi-lineage dysplasia based on the 2022 ICC. This study confirmed that the IPSS-M can better risk-stratified MDS patients for optimized therapeutic decision-making.

Validation of the prognostic significance of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk stratification system in intensive chemotherapy treated aged 18 to 65 years patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recently proposed a revised recommendation for the diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults, recognized as ELN-2022. However, validation in a large real-world cohort remains lacking. In this study, we aimed to validate the prognostic relevance of the ELN-2022 in a cohort of 809 de novo, non-M3, younger (ages 18-65 years) AML patients receiving standard chemotherapy. The risk categories of 106 (13.1%) patients were reclassified from that determined using ELN-2017 to that determined using ELN-2022. The ELN-2022 effectively helped distinguish patients as favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk groups in terms of remission rates and survival. Among patients who achieved first complete remission (CR1), allogeneic transplantation was beneficial for those in the intermediate risk group, but not for those in the favorable or adverse risk groups. We further refined the ELN-2022 system by re-categorizing AML patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/RUNX1::RUNX1T1 with KIThigh , JAK2 or FLT3-ITDhigh mutations into the intermediate risk subset, AML patients with t(7;11)(p15;p15)/NUP98::HOXA9 and AML patients with co-mutated DNMT3A and FLT3-ITD into the adverse risk subsets, and AML patients with complex or monosomal karyotypes, inv (3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2)/GATA2,MECOM(EVI1) or TP53 mutation into the very adverse risk subset. The refined ELN-2022 system performed effectively to distinguish patients as favorable, intermediate, adverse, and very adverse risk groups. In conclusion, the ELN-2022 helped distinguish younger, intensively treated patients into three groups with distinct outcomes; the proposed refinement of ELN-2022 may further improve risk stratification among AML patients. Prospective validation of the new predictive model is necessary.

Poor prognostic implications of myelodysplasia-related mutations in both older and younger patients with de novo AML.

A set of myelodysplasia-related (MDS-R) gene mutations are incorporated into the 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk classification as adverse genetic factors for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on their poor prognostic impact on older patients. The impact of these mutations on younger patients (age < 60 years) remains elusive. In the study of 1213 patients with de novo non-M3 AML, we identified MDS-R mutations in 32.7% of the total cohort, 44.9% of older patients and 23.4% of younger patients. The patients with MDS-R mutations had a significantly lower complete remission rate in both younger and older age groups. With a median follow-up of 9.2 years, the MDS-R group experienced shorter overall survival (P = 0.034 for older and 0.035 for younger patients) and event-free survival (P = 0.004 for older and 0.042 for younger patients). Furthermore, patients with MDS-R mutations more frequently harbored measurable residual disease that was detectable using next generation sequencing at morphological CR than those without MDS-R mutations. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) might ameliorate the negative impact of MDS-R mutations. In summary, AML patients with MDS-R mutations have significantly poorer outcomes regardless of age. More intensive treatment, such as allo-HSCT and/or novel therapies, is warranted for AML patients with MDS-R mutations.

Clinico-genetic and prognostic analyses of 716 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification.

The 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) recategorized myeloid neoplasms based on recent advances in the understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, in which myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with blasts of 10%-19% is classified as MDS/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MDS with mutated SF3B1, irrespective of the number of ring sideroblasts, as MDS-SF3B1, and those with multi-hit TP53 mutations as MDS with mutated TP53. In the analysis of 716 patients with MDS diagnosed according to the 2016 WHO classification, we found that 75.3% of patients remained in the MDS group based on the ICC, while 24.7% of patients were reclassified to the MDS/AML group after the exclusion of 15 patients who were classified to the AML group. Patients with MDS/AML showed a distinct mutational landscape and had poorer outcomes, compared to those with MDS. In the MDS group, patients with MDS-SF3B1 had higher frequencies of DNMT3A and TET2 mutations than those with MDS, not otherwise specified, with single lineage dysplasia or multilineage dysplasia. Patients with mutated TP53 were associated with dismal outcomes, irrespective of the blast percentage. In conclusion, this study showed that the ICC facilitates efficient segregation and risk-stratification of MDS which can help guide the treatment choice of patients with the disease.

Distinct genetic landscapes and their clinical implications in younger and older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of clinically and genetically diverse diseases that impose patients with an increased risk of leukemic transformation. While MDS is a disease of the elderly, the interplay between aging and molecular profiles is not fully understood, especially in the Asian population. Thus, we compared the genetic landscape between younger and older patients in a cohort of 698 patients with primary MDS to advance our understanding of the distinct pathogenesis and different survival impacts of gene mutations in MDS according to age. We found that the average mutation number was higher in the older patients than younger ones. The younger patients had more WT1 and CBL mutations, but less mutated ASXL1, DNMT3A, TET2, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, and TP53 than the older patients. In multivariable survival analysis, RUNX1 mutations with higher variant allele frequency (VAF) and U2AF1 and TP53 mutations were independent poor prognostic indicators in the younger patients, whereas DNMT3A and IDH2 mutations with higher VAF and TP53 mutations conferred inferior outcomes in the older patients. In conclusion, we demonstrated the distinct genetic landscape between younger and older patients with MDS and suggested that mutations impact survival in an age-depended manner.

Effect of mutation allele frequency on the risk stratification of myelodysplastic syndrome patients.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of clonal myeloid malignancies. Though several recurrent mutations are closely correlated with clinical outcomes, data concerning the association between mutation variant allele frequencies (VAF) and prognosis are limited. In this study, we performed comprehensive VAF analyses of relevant myeloid-malignancy related mutations in 698 MDS patients and correlated the results with their prognosis. Mutation VAF in DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, EZH2, SETBP1, BCOR, SFSF2, ZRSR2, and TP53 mutations correlated with outcomes. In multivariable analysis, DNMT3A and ZRSR2 mutations with high VAF and mutant IDH2, CBL, U2AF1, and TP53 were independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival. A substantial portion of patients in each revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) risk group could be adjusted to different prognostic groups based on the integrated VAF and mutational profiles. Patients with these unfavorable mutations in each IPSS-R risk subgroup had survivals worse than other patients of the same risk but similar to those in the next higher-risk subgroup. Furthermore, patients harboring U2AF1 mutation might benefit from hypomethylating agents. This study demonstrated the critical role of VAF of mutations for risk stratification in MDS patients and may be incorporated in novel scoring systems.