17-Year Follow-up of Comparing Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Longer follow-up was necessary to determine the exact value of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND). METHODS: From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2005, 1027 patients with breast cancer were randomly assigned to two groups: MALND and CALND (conventional axillary lymph node dissection); 996 eligible patients were enrolled. RESULTS: The final cohort of 996 patients was followed for an average of 198 months. Events other than death differed significantly between the two cohorts (p = 0.0311; 46.3% in MALND and 53.2% in CALND, respectively). The sum of events other than death and deaths from other causes was much higher in the CALND (59.6%) than MALND (53.4%) group (p = 0.0494). The 17-year disease-free survival DFS rates were 36.7% for the MALND and 33.6% for the CALND group, respectively. There was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0306). Overall survival (OS) rates were 53.2% after MALND and 46.0% after CALND (p = 0.0119). MALND patients had much less axillary pain (p = 0.0000), numbness or paresthesia (p = 0.0000), arm mobility (p = 0.0000) and arm swelling on the operated side (p = 0.0000). Aesthetic appearance of the axilla was much better in the MALND than CALND group (p = 0.0000) at an average follow-up of 17 years. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MALND in breast cancer surgery not only decreases the relapse and arm complications but also improves long-term survival of patients. Therefore, MALND should be one of the preferred approaches for breast cancer surgery when ALND is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The comparison of long-term outcomes of mastoscopic and conventional axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: a multicenter randomized control trial. ChiCTR-TRC-11001477, CHiCTR. First registration 08/14/2011.

Comparison of mastoscopic and conventional axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: long-term results from a randomized, multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term results of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND) and conventional axillary lymph node dissection (CALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2005, a group of 1027 consecutive patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study groups: MALND and CALND. The median follow-up was 63 months. The primary end points of the study were operative outcomes, complication reduction, function conservation, and cosmetics. The secondary end points were disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: The mean operative blood loss in the MALND group was less than in the CALND group (P<.001). The patients who underwent MALND had less axillary pain, numbness or paresthesias, and arm swelling (P<.001). The aesthetic appearance of the axilla in the MALND group was much better than that in the CALND group (P=.001 at 6 months and P=.002 at 24 months). A significant difference was found between the 2 groups in distant metastasis (P=.04). The disease-free survival rate was 64.5% in the MALND group and 60.8% in the CALND group (P=.88). The overall survival rate was 81.7% in the MALND group and 78.6% in the CALND group (P=.95). CONCLUSION: Compared with CALND, MALND has advantages in operative outcomes, complication reduction, function conservation, and cosmetics.