RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the image quality and focal lesion detection ability of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images obtained using compressed sensing (CS) and controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) in patients with liver cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 244 gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI from 244 patients with cirrhosis obtained by two HBP images using CS and CAIPIRINHA from July 2020 to December 2020. The optimized resolution and scan time for CS-HBP and CAIPIRINHA-HBP were 0.9 × 0.9 × 1.5 mm3 and 15 s and 1.3 × 1.3 × 3 mm3 and 16 s, respectively. We compared the image quality between the two sets of images in 244 patients and focal lesion (n = 294) analyses for 112 patients. RESULTS: CS-HBP showed comparable overall image quality (3.7 ± 0.9 vs. 3.6 ± 0.8, p = 0.680), superior liver edge sharpness (3.9 ± 0.6 vs. 3.6 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), and fewer respiratory motion artifacts (4.0 ± 0.7 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), but higher non-respiratory artifacts (3.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.001) and subjective image noise (3.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7, p = 0.014) than CAIPIRINHA-HBP. CS-HBP showed a higher signal-to-noise ratio in the liver than CAIPIRINHA-HBP (20.9 ± 9.0 vs. 18.9 ± 7.1, p = 0.008). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 90.0%, 77.5%, and 0.84 for CS-HBP and 73.5%, 82.4%, and 0.78 for CAIPIRINHA-HBP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CS-HBP showed better focal lesion detection ability, comparable overall image quality, and fewer respiratory motion artifacts, but higher non-respiratory artifacts and noise compared to CAIPIRINHA-HBP. Thus, CS-HBP could be recommended for liver MRI in patients with cirrhosis to improve diagnostic performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Thin-slice CS-HBP may be useful for detecting sub-centimeter hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with Child-Pugh classification A while maintaining comparable subjective image quality. KEY POINTS: ⢠Compared with controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration, compressed sensing hepatobiliary phase yielded thinner slices and shorter scan time at a higher accelerating factor. ⢠Compressed sensing hepatobiliary phase showed comparable overall image quality, superior liver edge sharpness, and fewer respiratory motion artifacts, but higher non-respiratory artifacts and subjective image noise than controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration-hepatobiliary phase. ⢠Compressed sensing hepatobiliary phase can detect sub-centimeter hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with Child-Pugh classification A.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Medios de Contraste , Estudios Retrospectivos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Gadolinio DTPA , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Aceleración , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Artefactos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical usefulness of deep learning (DL)-accelerated turbo spin echo (TSEDL) sequences relative to standard TSE sequences (TSES) for acute radius fracture patients wearing a splint. METHODS: This prospective consecutive study investigated 50 patients' preoperative wrist MRI scans acquired between July 2021 and January 2022. Examinations were performed at 3 Tesla MRI with body array coils due to the wrist splint. Besides TSES obtained according to the routine protocol, TSEDL sequences for axial T2-, coronal T1-, and coronal PD-weighted TSE sequences were scanned for comparison. For quantitative assessment, the relative signal-to-noise ratio (rSNR), the relative contrast-to-noise ratio (rCNR), and the relative contrast ratio (rCR) were measured. For qualitative assessment, all images were assessed by two independent musculoskeletal radiologists in terms of perceived SNR, image contrast, image sharpness, artifacts disturbing evaluation, overall image quality and diagnostic confidence for injuries using a four- or five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The scan time was shortened approximately by a factor of two for TSEDL compared to TSES. TSEDL images showed significantly better rSNR, rCNR, and rCR values for all sequences, and scored significantly better in terms of both image quality and diagnostic confidence for both readers than TSES images (all p < .05). Interrater reliabilities were in almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSION: The DL-accelerated technique proved to be very helpful not only to reduce scan time but also to improve image quality for acute painful fracture patients wearing a splint despite using body array coils instead of a wrist-specific coil. Based on our study, the DL-accelerated technique can be very useful for MRI of any part of the extremities in trauma settings just with body array coils.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Fracturas del Radio , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Férulas (Fijadores) , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , ArtefactosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To validate the subjective image quality and lesion detectability of deep learning-accelerated Dixon (DL-Dixon) imaging of the cervical spine compared with routine Dixon imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients underwent sagittal routine Dixon and DL-Dixon imaging of the cervical spine. Acquisition parameters were compared and non-uniformity (NU) values were calculated. Two radiologists independently assessed the two imaging methods for subjective image quality and lesion detectability. Interreader and intermethod agreements were estimated with weighted kappa values. RESULTS: Compared with the routine Dixon imaging, the DL-Dixon imaging reduced the acquisition time by 23.76%. The NU value is slightly higher in DL-Dixon imaging (p value: 0.015). DL-Dixon imaging showed superior visibility of all four anatomical structures (spinal cord, disc margin, dorsal root ganglion, and facet joint) for both readers (p value: < 0.001 ~ 0.002). The motion artifact scores were slightly higher in the DL-Dixon images than in routine Dixon images (p value = 0.785). Intermethod agreements were almost perfect for disc herniation, facet osteoarthritis, uncovertebral arthritis, central canal stenosis (κ range: 0.830 ~ 0.980, all p values < 0.001) and substantial to almost perfect for foraminal stenosis (κ = 0.955, 0.705 for each reader). There was an improvement in the interreader agreement of foraminal stenosis by DL-Dixon images, from moderate to substantial agreement. CONCLUSION: The DLR sequence can substantially decrease the acquisition time of the Dixon sequence with subjective image quality at least as good as the conventional sequence. And no significant differences in lesion detectability were observed between the two sequence types.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Constricción Patológica/patología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical feasibility of accelerated deep learning-reconstructed diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and to compare its image quality and acquisition time with those of conventional DWI. METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive patients who underwent 3 T abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively enrolled. DWI were acquired using both conventional DWI and DWI with deep-learning reconstruction (DL DWI). Image quality (overall image quality, anatomic sharpness and details, artifacts, noise, and lesion conspicuity) was scored by two radiologists and compared between two DWI sequences. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in six locations of the liver parenchyma and focal lesions and compared between two DWI sequences. RESULTS: The mean acquisition time for the DL DWI (216.87 ± 49.23 sec) was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) than for conventional DWI (358.69 ± 105.93 sec). DL DWI achieved higher scores than conventional DWI for all qualitative image quality parameters (P < 0.001). DL DWI had a more homogeneous distribution of ADC values throughout the liver, except for the left superior section, compared with conventional DWI. The standard deviations of the ADC values for all hepatic areas were significantly lower in DL DWI than in conventional DWI (all, P < 0.001). The ADC values for the liver parenchyma and focal hepatic lesions were lower in DL DWI than in conventional DWI. CONCLUSIONS: DL DWI is a feasible acquisition technique in clinical routines and provides improved image quality and simultaneously significant reduction in scan time compared with conventional DWI.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of high-resolution contrast-enhanced dynamic T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) using compressed sensing (CS) in magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 35 patients who underwent dynamic T1WI using volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) with CS reconstruction (CS-VIBE) and 35 patients with conventional VIBE for comparison. Two observers assessed the liver and pancreas edges, hepatic artery, motion artifacts, and overall image quality. Quantitative analysis was performed by measuring signal intensity and image noise. RESULTS: The results showed that CS-VIBE achieved significantly better anatomic delineation of the liver and pancreas edges and hepatic artery clarity than VIBE (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in motion artifacts in dynamic phases and overall image quality. The signal intensities and INs of CS-VIBE were higher than VIBE. CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution dynamic T1WI using CS provides better anatomic delineation with comparable or better overall image quality than conventional VIBE.