Efficacy and Safety of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension (NDLS) versus Conventional Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy for Primary Operable Breast Cancer.

Objective: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) is a novel formulation developed to overcome toxicity issues caused by excipients (polysorbate 80 and ethanol) present in commercially available docetaxel formulation. We conducted a prospective, observational study to compare the outcomes of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS)-based versus conventional docetaxel-based chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer. Methods: Sixty adult women with newly diagnosed stage IIb-III breast cancer were included. Patients received NDLS-based (n=30) or docetaxel-based (n=30) chemotherapy. Patients received (1) four cycles of preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by four cycles of NDLS or docetaxel (T) and surgery (neoadjuvant AC→NDLS [n=9], or neoadjuvant AC→T [n=10]), or (2) four cycles of preoperative AC followed by surgery and postoperative NDLS or T (neoadjuvant AC→adjuvant NDLS [n=14], or neoadjuvant AC→adjuvant T [n=15]), or (3) surgery followed by postoperative AC→NDLS or T (adjuvant AC→NDLS [n=7], or adjuvant AC→T [n=5]) regimens. The study outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR) rates, clinical overall response rates (ORR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse event (AE) profile. Results: For neoadjuvant AC→T (n=10) vs neoadjuvant AC→NDLS (n=9), the pCR rates were 100% each, and the ORR were 100% vs 88.9% (p=1.0). All patients were alive at 6 months, and the median OS was not reached. Three patients had progressive disease (T: n=2, NDLS: n=1) with a DFS of 12 weeks in all three patients. Grade 3 infusion-related reactions were seen in five patients (16.7%) in T vs none in NDLS arms. Conclusion: NDLS-based neo/adjuvant chemotherapy was efficacious in the treatment of primary operable breast cancer and showed comparable pCR, ORR, DFS and OS rates versus conventional docetaxel. NDLS was better tolerated than conventional docetaxel.

Survival analysis in advanced non small cell lung cancer treated with platinum based chemotherapy in combination with paclitaxel, gemcitabine and etoposide.

BACKGROUND: The wide spectrum of clinical features in advanced stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) probably contributes to disparities in outcomes because of different prognostic variables significant for stage IIIB/IV patients. Hence the aim of this study was to check for favorable response of patients to various chemotherapeutic combinations with respect to patient survival in stage IIIB and stage IV NSCLC disease. We selected those patients for our study who were receiving treatment with paclitaxel, gemcitabine or etoposide in combination with platinum based drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients who visited the hospital from June 2009 to November 2012 with confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer were included, and data were collected for follow up and classified according to treatment received with respect to patients' regimen and response, and overall survival. This study analyzed tumor variables that were associated with clinical outcome in advanced NSCLC patients who were undergoing first-line chemotherapy for stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. RESULTS: Comparative data on various parameters like age, gender, stage, histology, site of disease, metastatic site and chemo-regimens was analyzed; these parameters predicted variable significant improvement for overall survival (p≥0.05). One and two year survival rates were 20.8% and 15.3% . CONCLUSIONS: In this study we found slight improvement in survival rates in NSCLC and clinical outcomes with one combination (carboplatin+paclitaxel). Overall there were only marginal differences in survival rates for other chemo-regimens evaluated in this study.