RESUMEN
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common and aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The overall risk of developing DLBCL is increased in patients with other lymphomas, such as mycosis fungoides (MF). In this report, we present an 81-year-old female with early-stage MF who simultaneously progressed to tumor stage, large-cell transformed (LCT) MF and developed a primary DLBCL in a lymph node (LN). She presented with a tumor on her leg and new lymphadenopathy in her right axilla. Skin biopsy of the tumor revealed infiltration of large atypical CD3+, CD4+, and CD30+ cells, and a smaller portion of CD8+ cells in the dermis, consistent with LCT MF. Biopsy of the axillary LN revealed diffuse sheets of CD20+, BCL-2+, c-MYC+, and CD10- cells, highly suggestive of double expressor DLBCL. High-throughput sequencing revealed monoclonal T cells in the skin tumor and a monoclonal B-cell population in the LN. The above findings led to simultaneous diagnoses of LCT MF and nodal double expressor DLBCL. Our case demonstrates the importance of performing a full pathological workup in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients presenting with lymphadenopathy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common subtype of Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, is caused by malignant T-cell proliferations in the skin that can invade blood, lymph nodes, or viscera. Currently, data on efficacy of maintenance therapies in MF are lacking. We developed a unique protocol to use chlormethine/mechlorethamine 0.016% gel formulation as maintenance regimen for MF patients in remission. PURPOSE: To determine progression-free survival and efficacy of chlormethine/mechlorethamine as maintenance and active treatment regimens for MF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of MF patients seen at Thomas Jefferson University from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Patients of all stages treated with chlormethine/mechlorethamine as maintenance or active treatment with 2 consecutive mSWATs (modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool) documented were included. Treatment outcomes were assessed by change in mSWAT and progression-free survival. Dermatology Life Quality Index surveys before and after treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 186 MF patients, 44 met inclusion criteria. Patients on maintenance therapy had a 65.22% progression-free survival rate with median time to progression of 29.45 months. By-time analysis for responders on active and maintenance treatment showed an increased response over time. Peak responses were seen at last mSWAT recorded. Both cohorts experienced improved quality-of-life scores from initiation to discontinuation of chlormethine/mechlorethamine. CONCLUSION: Patients on maintenance and active chlormethine/mechlorethamine treatment regimens demonstrated improvement in mSWAT and quality-of-life. Chlormethine/mechlorethamine treatment showed progression-free survival for a median of 29.45 months, indicating this therapy may be an effective maintenance regimen.
