Posterolateral Floating Technique for the Thoracic Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament with Navigation: A Technical Note.

We describe a floating technique via a posterolateral approach with intraoperative O-arm navigation to facilitate decompression of the spinal cord in thoracic myelopathy due to severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). A 62-year-old man with myelopathy due to thoracic OPLL had left-leg muscle weakness, urinary disturbance, and spastic gait. Bilateral leg pain and gait disturbance had persisted for 2 years. He was successfully treated by the posterolateral OPLL floating procedure and posterior pedicle fixation under O-arm navigation. At a 2-year follow-up, manual muscle testing results and sensory function of the left leg had recovered fully. His cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association score had improved from 5/12 to 11/12. The novel intraoperative O-arm navigation-guided posterolateral floating procedure for thoracic OPLL is effective for achieving precise decompression and strong fixation with a posterior approach only and can provide an excellent result for severe thoracic OPLL without the risk of adverse events from intraoperative radiation.

Comparative Analysis of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in TLIF for Lumbar Degenerative Disorder: Single Center Large Series.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation is a well-accepted technique in lumbar degenerative disc disorder. Unilateral instrumentation in TLIF has been reported in the literature. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral and bilateral instrumented TLIF in a selected series of patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients operated with unilateral pedicle screw fixation in TLIF (UPSF TLIF) or with bilateral pedicle screw fixation in TLIF (BPSF TLIF) with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Patients were evaluated at regular intervals for functional and radiological outcomes. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog score (VAS) preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Fusion rates were assessed using Bridwell interbody fusion grading. RESULTS: Our study shows that there was a significant improvement in VAS and ODI in both groups at 2 years follow-up, and there was no significant difference in improvements between the groups. The complication rates between the groups were similar. The fusion rate in UPSF TLIF was 97.3% and was 98.34% in BPSF TLIF; this was not statistically significant between groups. There is a significant difference in terms of blood loss, duration of surgery, and average duration of hospital stay between the groups (P < .001), favoring UPSF TLIF. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral pedicle screw fixation in open TLIF is comparable with bilateral pedicle screw fixation in terms of patient-reported clinical outcomes, fusion rates, and complication rates with the additional benefits of less operative time, less blood loss, shorter hospitalization, and less cost in selective cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Long-Term Experience With Reduction Technique in High-Grade Spondylolisthesis in the Young.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis in the young is not only challenging but also controversial, from in-situ fusion to complete reduction. It is fraught with dangers such as neurological injury, pseudoarthrosis, and progressive deformity with subsequent global sagittal imbalance. We describe our experience of progressive reduction technique and restoration of lumbosacral alignment. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery between 1998 and 2012. The surgical technique involved positioning the hips in extension with traction, pedicle screw fixation, correction of lumbosacral kyphosis with a specific distraction maneuver, wide decompression, and gradual reduction of the deformity and maintenance of reduction with interbody fusion. All patients were serially assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months and yearly thereafter with clinical, radiological, and Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analogue Scale outcome measures. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 (3 cases grade 3, 7 grade 4, 17 grade 5) with an average age of 13.9 years were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 120 months (range 24-192). All patients presented a solid fusion at the 6-month visit; mean slip percentage was reduced from 89% to 23%, with all cases reduced to grade 2 or less. The slip angle improved from 45° to 3° postoperatively, with improvement in sacral slope from 13° to 35°. Four spondyloptosis patients had concomitant scoliosis which corrected spontaneously after the surgery and did not need further intervention. All but one patient (96.2%) had good functional outcomes and returned to their full normal activities. One patient developed a deep infection necessitating implant removal, with eventual deformity progression leading to a poor outcome. Three patients (11.1%) suffered partial drop foot that resolved in full by 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our technique demonstrated a significant reduction of high grade spondylolisthesis, with restoration of global sagittal balance via correction of the lumbosacral kyphosis. Though surgically demanding, it is safe and reproducible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.