RESUMEN
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as health-related quality of life (HRQL), are important outcome measures for patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs). Presence of cirrhosis and advanced liver disease have been associated with worsened HRQL and fatigue. On the other hand, some patients with earlier stages of CLD also experience fatigue, causing PRO impairment. Treatment for some CLDs may improve HRQL and, sometimes, levels of fatigue. We aimed to provide an in-depth expert review of concepts related to fatigue and HRQL in patients with primary biliary cholangitis, hepatitis C virus and MASLD (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease). A panel of experts in fatigue and CLD reviewed and discussed the literature and collaborated to provide this expert review of fatigue in CLD. Herein, we review and report on the complexity of fatigue, highlighting that it is comprised of peripheral (neuromuscular failure, often in conjunction with submaximal cardiorespiratory function) and central (central nervous system dysfunction) causes. Fatigue and HRQL are measured using validated self-report instruments. Additionally, fatigue can be measured through objective tests (e.g. grip strength). Fatigue has deleterious effects on HRQL and one's ability to be physically active and socially engaged but does not always correlate with CLD severity. Treatments for hepatitis C virus and MASLD can improve levels of fatigue and HRQL, but current treatments for primary biliary cholangitis do not seem to affect levels of fatigue. We conclude that obtaining PRO data, including on HRQL and fatigue, is essential for determining the comprehensive burden of CLD and its potential treatments.
RESUMEN
Altered metabolic function has many detrimental effects on the body that can manifest as cardiovascular and liver diseases. Traditional approaches to understanding and treating metabolic dysfunction-associated disorders have been organ-centered, leading to silo-type disease care. However, given the broad impact that systemic metabolic dysfunction has on the human body, approaches that simultaneously involve multiple medical specialists need to be developed and encouraged to optimize patient outcomes. In this review, we highlight how several of the treatments developed for cardiac care may have a beneficial effect on the liver and vice versa, suggesting that there is a need to target the disease process, rather than specifically target the cardiovascular or liver specific sequelae of metabolic dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Gastroenterología , Humanos , Cardiología/métodos , Gastroenterología/métodos , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/metabolismo , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/terapia , Hígado/metabolismo , Hígado/patología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/metabolismo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment outcomes for people living with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are limited by a lack of specific therapies, as well as limited well-validated prognostic tools and clinical trial endpoints. We sought to identify predictors of outcome for people living with AIH. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical course of people with AIH across 11 Canadian centres. Biochemical changes were analysed using linear mixed-effect and logistic regression. Clinical outcome was dynamically modelled using time-varying Cox proportional hazard modelling and landmark analysis. RESULTS: In 691 patients (median age 49 years, 75.4% female), with a median follow-up of 6 years (25th-75th percentile, 2.5-11), 118 clinical events occurred. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalisation occurred in 63.8% of the cohort by 12 months. Older age at diagnosis (odd ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.35) and female sex (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.18-3.19) were associated with ALT normalisation at 6 months, whilst baseline cirrhosis status was associated with reduced chance of normalisation at 12 months (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.82). Baseline total bilirubin, aminotransferases, and IgG values, as well as initial prednisone dose, did not predict average ALT reduction. At baseline, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.25, 95% CI 1.12-1.40), cirrhosis at diagnosis (HR 3.67, 95% CI 2.48-5.43), and elevated baseline total bilirubin (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.17-1.58) increased the risk of clinical events. Prolonged elevations in ALT (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.13) and aspartate aminotransferase (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.21), but not IgG (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95-1.07), were associated with higher risk of clinical events. Higher ALT at 6 months was associated with worse clinical event-free survival. CONCLUSION: In people living with AIH, sustained elevated aminotransferase values, but not IgG, are associated with poorer long-term outcomes. Biochemical response and long-term survival are not associated with starting prednisone dose. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Using clinical data from multiple Canadian liver clinics treating autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), we evaluate treatment response and clinical outcomes. For the first time, we apply mixed-effect and time-varying survival statistical methods to rigorously examine treatment response and the impact of fluctuating liver biochemistry on clinical event-free survival. Key to the study impact, our data is 'real-world', represents a diverse population across Canada, and uses continuous measurements over follow-up. Our results challenge the role of IgG as a marker of treatment response and if normalisation of IgG should remain an important part of the definition of biochemical remission. Our analysis further highlights that baseline markers of disease severity may not prognosticate early treatment response. Additionally, the initial prednisone dose may be less relevant for achieving aminotransferase normalisation. This is important for patients and treating clinicians given the relevance and importance of side effects.
Asunto(s)
Alanina Transaminasa , Hepatitis Autoinmune , Humanos , Hepatitis Autoinmune/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis Autoinmune/mortalidad , Hepatitis Autoinmune/sangre , Hepatitis Autoinmune/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Canadá/epidemiología , Adulto , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pronóstico , Bilirrubina/sangre , Estudios de Seguimiento , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Inmunoglobulina G/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cholestatic liver diseases (CLD) are commonly associated with behavioral changes, including social isolation, that negatively affects patient quality of life and remains unaltered by current therapies. It remains unclear whether CLD-associated social dysfunction stems from a direct effect on the brain, or from the psychological impact of CLD. The psychological component of disease is absent in animals, so we investigated the impact of CLD on social behavior and gene expression profiles in key social behavior-regulating brain regions in a mouse model. METHODS: CLD due to bile duct ligation was used with the three-chamber sociability test for behavioral phenotyping. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) signatures were delineated in 3 key brain regions regulating social behavior using RNA-seq. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA®) was applied to streamline DEG data interpretation and integrate findings with social behavior-regulating pathways to identify important brain molecular networks and regulatory mechanisms disrupted in CLD. RESULTS: CLD mice exhibited enhanced social interactive behavior and significantly altered gene expression in each of the three social behavior-regulating brain regions examined. DEG signatures in BDL mice were associated with key IPA®-identified social behavior-regulating pathways including Oxytocin in Brain Signaling, GABA Receptor Signaling, Dopamine Receptor Signaling, and Glutamate Receptor Signaling. CONCLUSIONS: CLD causes complex alterations in gene expression profiles in key social behavior-regulating brain areas/pathways linked to enhanced social interactive behavior. These findings, if paralleled in CLD patients, suggest that CLD-associated reductions in social interactions predominantly relate to psychological impacts of disease and may inform new approaches to improve management.
Asunto(s)
Colestasis , Hepatopatías , Humanos , Ratones , Animales , Calidad de Vida , Conducta SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identifying strategies for stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major goal in CHB management. Our study describes our tertiary-centre experience stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) in CHB. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all individuals with CHB seen at the Calgary Liver Unit between January 2009 and May 2020 who stopped NUC. We collected baseline demographics and HBV lab parameters before and after stopping NUC with results stratified by off-treatment durability. Clinical flare was defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) over twice the upper limit of normal and virological flare as HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL. RESULTS: Forty-seven (3.5%) of the 1337 individuals with CHB stopped NUC therapy. During follow-up, six patients (12.8%) restarted NUCs because of a flare. All flares occurred within six months of discontinuation. Median time to restart treatment was 90 days (Q1 65, Q3 133). Upon restarting, all showed suppression of HBV DNA and ALT normalization. Factors associated with restarting NUC therapy included hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive status at first appointment and longer NUC consolidation therapy. Age, sex, ethnicity, liver stiffness measurement, choice of NUC, and quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at stopping were not associated with sustained response off-treatment. Six patients had functional cure with HBsAg loss. CONCLUSIONS: Stopping long-term NUC is feasible in HBeAg negative CHB. Hepatic flares can occur despite low levels of qHBsAg. Finite NUC therapy can be considered in eligible patients who are adherent to close monitoring and follow-up, particularly in the first six months after stopping NUC therapy.
RESUMEN
Autoimmune cholestatic liver disease includes both Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC). Both conditions result in impairment of hepatic bile flow ultimately leading to chronic liver injury, liver fibrosis and eventually end stage cirrhosis. Early and accurate diagnosis are important for the risk stratification, follow up and management of these patients. The underlying pathogenesis of these conditions have not been completely resolved and poses a barrier for the development of new diagnostic and prognostics tools. Current research work suggests that the pathogenesis of autoimmune cholestatic liver disease results from environmental, genetic, and a large component of underlying immune dysfunction. While the current available serum biomarkers and imaging modalities showcases progression in precision medicine for the management of autoimmune cholestatic liver disease, development of new biomarkers are still an area of need in this field. In this review, we will discuss the current and emerging biomarkers in patients with PBC, PSC, and a special population that exhibit overlap syndrome with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The use of these biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of these patients will be reviewed through the lens of the current understanding of the complex immune pathophysiology of these conditions.