Improving Surgical Triage in Spine Clinic: Predicting Likelihood of Surgery Using Machine Learning.

BACKGROUND: Correctly triaging patients to a surgeon or a nonoperative provider is an important part of the referral process. Clinics typically triage new patients based on simple intake questions. This is time-consuming and does not incorporate objective data. Our goal was to use machine learning to more accurately screen surgical candidates seen in a spine clinic. METHODS: Using questionnaire data and magnetic resonance imaging reports, a set of artificial neural networks was trained to predict whether a patient would be recommended for spine surgery. Questionnaire responses included demographics, chief complaint, and pain characteristics. The primary end point was the surgeon's determination of whether a patient was an operative candidate. Model accuracy in predicting this end point was assessed using a separate subset of patients. RESULTS: The retrospective dataset included 1663 patients in cervical and lumbar cohorts. Questionnaire data were available for all participants, and magnetic resonance imaging reports were available for 242 patients. Within 6 months of initial evaluation, 717 (43.1%) patients were deemed surgical candidates by the surgeon. Our models predicted surgeons' recommendations with area under the curve scores of 0.686 for lumbar (positive predictive value 66%, negative predictive value 80%) and 0.821 for cervical (positive predictive value 83%, negative predictive value 85%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our models used patient data to accurately predict whether patients will receive a surgical recommendation. The high negative predictive value demonstrates that this approach can reduce the burden of nonsurgical patients in surgery clinic without losing many surgical candidates. This could reduce unnecessary visits for patients, increase the proportion of operative candidates seen by surgeons, and improve quality of patient care.

Clinical outcomes of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer and superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Functionally irreparable rotator cuff tears (FIRCTs) present an ongoing challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. The aim of this systematic review was to critically compare the outcomes of three latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDT) techniques and two superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) techniques in treatment of FIRCTs. METHODS: A systematic review of studies evaluating the outcome of FIRCT treatment was performed via a search of four databases in April 2020. Each included study was reviewed in duplicate by two reviewers for evaluation of methodological quality. The treatments analyzed were arthroscopic LDT (aLDT), open LDT Gerber technique (oLDTG), open LDT L'Episcopo technique (oLDTL), SCR with allograft (SCR-Allo), and SCR with autograft (SCR-TFL). Demographics, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures, radiographic acromiohumeral distance (AHD), treatment failures, and revisions were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-six studies (1287 shoulders) met criteria for inclusion. Twenty-three studies involved open latissimus transfer, with 445 shoulders undergoing oLDTG with mean follow-up of 63.2 months and 60 patients undergoing oLDTL with mean follow-up of 51.8 months. Ten studies (n = 369, F/U 29.2mo) reported on aLDT. Seven studies (n = 253, F/U 16.9mo) concerned SCR-Allo, and six studies (n = 160, F/U 32.mo) reported on SCR-TFL. Range of motion and subjective outcome scores improved in all techniques with no differences across treatments. Both SCR methods provided greater improvement in AHD than open LDT methods (p < 0.01). The re-tear rates were lower in both oLDT groups compared to the SCR groups (p = 0.03). Clinical failure rates were higher in the SCR-Allo and oLDTG groups, while overall treatment failures were lowest in oLDTL compared to all four other groups. CONCLUSION: SCR techniques were associated with improved short-term radiographic acromiohumeral distance, while the open LDT techniques had lower tendon re-tear and treatment failure rates. All techniques resulted in improved clinical outcomes and pain relief compared to preoperative levels with no differences across techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Systematic review of case series and cohort studies.

Capsular Management in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The direct anterior approach (DAA) is a popular approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Unlike the posterior approach, the importance of anterior capsular management is unknown. This randomized controlled trial compares capsular repair versus capsulectomy. METHODS: This single-surgeon, single-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial occurred between 2013 and 2016. Patients undergoing unilateral, primary THA for osteoarthritis consented to undergo blinded, simple randomization to anterior capsulotomy with repair or anterior capsulectomy. Primary outcome measures included hip range of motion, hip flexion strength, and pain with seated hip flexion. Secondary outcome measures included surgical time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, and hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. Data were prospectively collected intraoperatively, six weeks, six months, an average of over 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were ultimately enrolled in the trial; 50 received capsulectomy and 48 received capsulotomy. No significant differences were seen in preoperative demographics or in primary or secondary outcomes during this study. No difference was seen in pain at final follow-up at average > 5 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that capsular management in DAA THA does not affect postoperative pain or range of motion. The anterior capsule's role in prosthetic stability after DAA THA remains uncertain, but it does not currently appear that repair provides benefit and may lead to increased surgical time and blood loss. As such, capsular management in DAA THA is at surgeon discretion.

Management of shoulder instability in hypermobility-type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Shoulder instability in hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome can result in lifelong pain and functional disability. Treatment in this population is complicated by the severe degree of instability as well as the underlying abnormalities of the joint connective tissue. Appropriate care for these patients requires a thorough understanding of the natural history of their disease, knowledge of the available treatment options, and certain special considerations. This article reviews the pathoanatomy, recognition, and management of shoulder instability in the patient with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.