RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although lobectomy has been the treatment of choice for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sub-lobar resection (i.e., segmentectomy or wedge resection) has emerged as an alternative over time due to its ability to preserve additional lung function. This meta-analysis explores the survival outcomes of sub-lobar resection versus lobectomy in patients with stage I NSCLC (tumor size: ≤2 cm). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception up to July 28, 2023. The hazard ratios and odds ratios for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and mortality were calculated using the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies, comprising 10,449 patients, were included. Sub-lobar resection demonstrated comparable OS and DFS to that of lobectomy. Similarly, there was no significant risk of mortality associated with any of the groups. However, the subgroup analysis according to patient selection (intentional, compromised, not specified, and both [intentional and compromised]) showed that the patients in the compromised subgroup had a poor DFS with sub-lobar resection as compared to lobectomy (hazard ratio: 1.52, confidence interval: 1.14-2.02, P = 0.004). Additionally, there was no significant difference in OS, DFS, or overall mortality in the results stratified by surgical procedure or patient selection. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with stage I NSCLC who underwent sub-lobar resection showed a significantly worse DFS and OS in the "compromised group." However, there was no overall significant difference in OS, DFS, or mortality in the sub-lobar resection group as compared to lobectomy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vague symptoms and a lack of pathognomonic features hinder the timely diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors (PBTs). However, patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) must also bear the brunt of a multitude of additional factors contributing to diagnostic delays and subsequently affecting survival. Therefore, this study aims to assess these factors and quantify the durations associated with diagnostic delays for PBTs in LMICs. METHODS: A systematic review of extant literature regarding children from LMICs diagnosed with brain tumors was conducted. Articles published before June 2023 were identified using PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model through R Statistical Software. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies including 2483 patients with PBT from 21 LMICs were identified. Overall, nonspecific symptoms (62.5%) and socioeconomic status (45.0%) were the most frequently reported factors contributing to diagnostic delays. Potential sources of patient-associated delay included lack of parental awareness (45.0%) and financial constraints (42.5%). Factors contributing to health care system delays included misdiagnoses (42.5%) and improper referrals (32.5%). A pooled mean prediagnostic symptomatic interval was calculated to be 230.77 days (127.58-333.96), the patient-associated delay was 146.02 days (16.47-275.57), and the health care system delay was 225.05 days (-64.79 to 514.89). CONCLUSION: A multitude of factors contribute to diagnostic delays in LMICs. The disproportionate effect of these factors is demonstrated by the long interval between symptom onset and the definitive diagnosis of PBTs in LMICs, when compared with high-income countries. While evidence-based policy recommendations may improve the pace of diagnosis, policy makers will need to be cognizant of the unique challenges patients and health care systems face in LMICs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often struggle to provide adequate neurosurgical care due to poor governance and institutional efforts, making access to care difficult. Therefore, our review of literature aims to identify gaps in government, national, and institutional efforts to combat barriers to neurosurgical care of brain tumors in LMICs, to inform future policy and action planning. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and CINAHL without language restrictions from inception to October 20, 2022. After screening and data extraction, a thematic analysis based on the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) systematically identified and classified notable themes, which were then quantified and presented as percentages. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included in the final analysis. The review highlighted some of the barriers to providing surgical care of brain tumors in LMICs, including political instability (14%), inadequate national budget for healthcare (43%), poor government support (14%), lack of support of hospital management (14%), and no coverage under national insurance plans (14%). Strategies that can be implemented to address the barriers include strengthening the local health system (17%), advocating for health ministry support (33%), developing national treatment guidelines (17%), making neurosurgery a part of the national surgical plan (17%), fostering collaborations across various levels of government (17%), changing national insurance policy to include neurosurgical care (17%), and advocating for more resources and changes in global care (33%). CONCLUSION: Effective governance plays a critical role in addressing challenges as it shapes the availability of resources and policies that affect the quality of care provided. Our study outlines key challenges and strategies reported within literature in an attempt to drive government attention and thereby policy to support the neurosurgical care of brain tumors, particularly in the developing world.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is becoming a major global health concern, especially in developing nations. The high prevalence of obesity and related diabetes cases are attributed to rapid economic progress, physical inactivity, the consumption of high-calorie foods, and changing lifestyles. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the roles of pro-inflammatory chemokines CCL1, 2, 4, and 5 in T2DM with varying levels of obesity in the Asir region of Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 170 confirmed T2DM subjects and a normal control group were enrolled. Demographic data, serum levels of CCL-1, 2, 4, and 5, and biochemical indices were assessed in the subjects and control groups by standard procedures. RESULTS: T2DM subjects were divided into four groups: A (normal body weight), B (overweight), C (obese), and D (highly obese). We observed that male and female control subjects had similar mean serum concentrations of pro-inflammatory chemokines CCL-1, 2, 4, and 5. T2DM subjects in all the four groups showed significantly higher levels of all the four chemokines compared to the controls, regardless of gender. In T2DM subjects with obesity and severe obesity, the rise was most significant. There was a progressive rise in the concentrations of CCL-1, 2, and 4 in T2DM subjects with increasing BMI. Serum CCL5 levels increased significantly in all T2DM subject groups. The increase in CCL5 was more predominant in normal-weight people, compared to overweight and obese T2DM subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Male and female control subjects had similar serum levels of pro-inflammatory chemokines CCL-1, 2, 4, and 5. The progressive rise in blood concentrations of three pro-inflammatory chemokines CCL-1, 2, and 4 in T2DM subjects with increasing BMI supports the idea that dyslipidemia and obesity contribute to chronic inflammation and insulin resistance. Serum CCL5 levels increased significantly in all T2DM subject groups. The selective and more pronounced increase in CCL5 in the T2DM group with normal BMI, compared to subjects with varying degrees of obesity, was rather surprising. Further research is needed to determine if CCL5 underexpression in overweight and obese T2DM subjects is due to some unexplained counterbalancing processes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite the historical neurological use of Withania somnifera, limited evidence supports its efficacy for conditions like anxiety and insomnia. Given its known anti-stress properties, this review evaluated its safety and efficacy for anxiety and insomnia. METHODS: We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar until August 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing W. somnifera to placebo in patients with anxiety and/or insomnia. Outcome measures included changes in anxiety levels via the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), Sleep Onset Latency (SOL), Total Sleep Time (TST), Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO), Total Time in Bed (TIB), Sleep Efficiency (SE), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score. We utilized a random-effect model for pooling Mean Differences (MD) with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed through sensitivity and subgroup analysis, and the quality of RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane revised risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Pooled results from five RCTs (n = 254) demonstrated that W. somnifera significantly reduced HAM-A scores (MD = -5.96; [95% CI -10.34, -1.59]; P = 0.008; I2 = 98%), as well as sleep parameters such as SOL, TST, PSQI, and SE, but not WASO and TIB. CONCLUSION: While W. somnifera extracts yielded promising results, further research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm its effects on anxiety and insomnia.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Brain tumors have a poor prognosis and a high death rate. Sufficient aftercare is necessary to enhance patient results. But follow-up care provision is fraught with difficulties in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where a variety of variables can impede access to care. Therefore, our systematic review aimed to identify challenges to follow-up care for brain tumors and possible solutions in LMICs. METHODS: A thorough search of the literature was performed from the beginning until October 20, 2022, using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. Studies focusing on the aftercare of brain tumors in LMICs met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers used the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan categories to identify themes, extract relevant data, and evaluate individual articles. After being discovered, these themes were arranged in Microsoft Excel to make reporting and comprehension simpler. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included in the review. Among the studies included, the most frequently cited barriers to follow-up care were financial constraints (54%), long-distance travel (42%), and a lack of awareness about the importance of follow-up care (25%). Other challenges included preference for traditional or alternative medications (4%) and high treatment costs (8%). Proposed strategies included implementing mobile clinics (20%), establishing a documentation system (13%), and educating patients about the importance of follow-up care (7%). CONCLUSION: In LMICs, several issues pertaining to personnel, infrastructure, service delivery, financing, information management, and governance impede the provision of follow-up treatment for patients with brain tumors. As established by the suggested techniques found in the literature, addressing these issues will necessitate concurrent action by stakeholders, legislators, health ministries, and government agencies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Health care in developing countries often lacks adequate bookkeeping and national cancer registries, means of information that have proven to impact disease research and care. The true burden of brain tumors therefore remains unchecked and so does the extent of the problem. Therefore, this study aims to explore the challenges and potential strategies related to information management of brain tumors in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, without any language restrictions, from inception to October 20, 2022. Following screening and extraction of data, themes were generated using the information management domain of the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan framework. RESULTS: The final analysis includes 23 studies that highlighted the challenges to managing information to the surgical care given to brain tumors in LMICs, including lack of proper hospital record system (43%), lack of national brain tumor registry (67%), lack of local management guidelines (10%), and low research output (33%). Some of the proposed strategies in the literature to address these barriers include improving data management systems (45%), developing a population-based brain tumor registry (64%), and formulating local treatment guidelines (9%) for the management of brain tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In LMICs, improving patient outcomes and quality of life postneurosurgical intervention for brain tumors requires coordinated efforts to enhance information systems. The support of the government and public health professionals is vital in implementing strategies to achieve this goal.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy is an important tool in the arsenal of brain tumor management and can improve patients' outcomes significantly but low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often face challenges in provision. Therefore, our study aims to highlight barriers and strategies to adjuvant therapy of brain tumors in low-resource settings. METHOD: A comprehensive search of literature was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Scopus, from inception to October 20, 2022. The review included studies on adjuvant therapy for brain tumors in LMICs and identified themes using the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) domains. RESULTS: 32 studies were included in the review. The most reported barriers to adjuvant care were limited access to healthcare (14â¯%), limited access to chemotherapy and radiation equipment (25â¯%), and traditional or alternative medications (11â¯%). Strategies for improvement include improving the availability of specialized radiation oncology training (8â¯%) and improving access to neuro-diagnostics and neurotherapeutics (12â¯%). In addition, efforts to subsidize treatment (4â¯%) and provide financial coverage through the Ministry of Health (4â¯%) can help to address the high cost of care and improve access to funding for chemotherapy. Finally, establishing documentation systems and registries (16â¯%), implementing standardized national treatment guidelines (8â¯%) can help to improve overall care for brain tumor patients in LMICs. CONCLUSION: A multimodal approach of strategies targeting workforce, infrastructure, service delivery, financing, and information management is needed to improve adjuvant care for brain tumors. International collaboration and partnerships can also play a key role in addressing barriers and improving care in LMICs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Países en Desarrollo , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Radioterapia AdyuvanteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While early diagnosis of brain tumors is essential for improving prognoses, several challenges prevent early diagnosis of these illnesses in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and evaluate the barriers and challenges to early detection of brain tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), as well as to propose potential solutions. METHOD: A thorough search of the literature was carried out with the aid of multiple databases, including Google Scholar, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus. Studies focusing on the early detection of brain tumors in low- and middle-income countries met the inclusion criteria for this review. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers. National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia plan (NSOAP) framework was used to extract relevant data and develop themes. Microsoft Excel was then used to arrange and analyze these themes. RESULTS: Out of 21 articles included in the final analysis, notable challenges to early detection of brain tumors included healthcare providers' lack of awareness of early signs and symptoms of brain tumors (21%), limited diagnostic facilities (38%), misdiagnosis by healthcare providers (33%) and financial constraints (46%). Potential strategies for addressing these barriers and challenges include educating healthcare providers on early warning signs (50%), improving the early referral system (25%) and establishing local clinical guidelines (19%). CONCLUSION: Significant barriers to early detection persist in LMICs. Collaboration between stakeholders, legislators, health ministries, and governmental organizations is essential for developing and implementing focused interventions, such as establishment of referral pathways and specialized centers, adapting guidelines to local cultural contexts and raising public and professional awareness.
RESUMEN
Limited neurosurgical workforces remain one of the critical problems experienced in low resource settings. Therefore, our study aims to explore and summarize the key challenges to neurosurgical care of brain tumors in terms of workforce in LMICs. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from inception to October 20, 2022. All extracted data were screened independently by 2 reviewers and thematically analyzed. We found and screened 3764 articles, of which 33 studies were included in our final analysis as per our inclusion criteria. Among the studies included, 33% highlighted the limited number of neurosurgeons, 39% emphasized the absence of specialized surgical teams, 7% pointed out a shortage of nursing staff, and 4% noted suboptimal anesthesia teams. The study uncovered the need for improved training programs in neuro-oncology (32%) and neuro-anesthesia (3%), as well as improved collaboration (32%), and multidisciplinary team structures (15%), are essential for tackling these workforce challenges and improving patient outcomes. It is crucial to implement targeted interventions and policy changes to address the barriers to the workforce in providing effective neurosurgical care to patients with brain tumors in developing countries. This might entail capacity building and training programs for healthcare professionals. Policymakers should consider allocating resources and funding for workforce development and making neurosurgical care a priority in healthcare plans.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Making neurosurgical care accessible to a larger portion of the population in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is integral due to the high mortality and morbidity associated with brain tumors. However, the high cost of care often makes it financially out of reach for many individuals. Therefore, this review aims to identify barriers to neurosurgical care of brain tumors in terms of financing in LMICs. METHODS: Without restriction to language, a search of the literature was undertaken in a number of databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and CINAHL, in order to find the most pertinent research involving financing of brain tumors in LMICs. The last day of the search was October 20, 2022. Following screening and data extraction, significant themes were found and categorized using thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were analyzed in this review. The review highlighted some of the barriers to providing surgical care of brain tumors in LMICs. In the cited studies, surgical expenses (41%), neuroimaging costs (30%), and care-related expenses (33%) were the primary concerns. Addressing these challenges involves cross-border collaboration (23%), transparent financing systems (46%), awake craniotomy (15%), cost-effective/reusable intra-operative supplies (8%), and optimizing resources in healthcare systems (8%). CONCLUSIONS: This study explored barriers and challenges to financing neurosurgical care of brain tumors in LMICs. Government support and transparency in healthcare financing should be prioritized to ensure that all individuals have access to surgical care of brain tumors.
RESUMEN
Renal lymphangiectasia (RL) is a rare condition in which lymphatic vessels are dilated giving rise to cyst formation in peripelvic, perirenal and intrarenal locations. Knowledge about RL is limited and based upon individual case reports. This can be genetic or acquired. There is no significant association with any gender or age. It can be manifested as focal or diffuse forms and can be unilateral or bilateral. Most of the cases present with abdominal or flank pain. The diagnosis is based on radiological imaging. Due to rarity of diseases, it has potential to be misdiagnosed as other cystic disease of kidneys. The treatment is mainly conservative but prolonged follow up for associated complications like hypertension and renal vein thrombosis is required. We have presented a case of bilateral renal lymphangiectasia with the review of available literature.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Linfangiectasia , Humanos , Linfangiectasia/diagnóstico , Linfangiectasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite a large burden of life-limitingillness, there exists a dearth of services of palliative care in Pakistan. International guidelines have questionable applicability in Pakistan due to the socioeconomic differences. We generated a protocol describing the process of developing comprehensive palliative care guidelines and palliative care referral pathways for primary care practitioners to adopt in Pakistan. METHODS: A GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach with modification has been employed to create guidelines for a Pakistani context. The "National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Insights: Palliative Care, Version 2.2021" was used as the source guideline. Recommendations from the source guideline were reviewed by two local palliative care specialists to either "Adopt," "Adapt" or "Exclude". The finalized recommendations were incorporated into the local palliative care guideline. Clinical diagnosis and referral pathways were made from the finalized guideline. Any gaps in management found in the pathways were filled by taking existing recommendations from other credible guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty-seven recommendations were adopted without modification. No recommendations were deemed to be adapted and 15 were excluded. The referral care pathways created were reflective of the local guideline and included elements of initial assessment, preliminary management, reassessment, and referral. 6 additional recommendations were made. CONCLUSION: The described clinical practice guidelines and primary care clinical referral pathways will aid to standardize palliative care provision in Pakistan. These can be used by other resource constrained settings to develop guidelines within their own local context.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Pakistán , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Brain tumors pose a major challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to limited resources and high costs, resulting in hampered service delivery of neurosurgical care and significant disparities in patient outcomes compared to high-income nations. Therefore, our systematic review aims to identify barriers to service delivery in providing adequate surgical care for the management of brain tumors in LMICs. METHODS: We searched Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and CINAHL, from inception to October 20, 2022. The data from the eligible studies were extracted and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: The final analysis included 35 articles, which highlighted significant challenges in providing adequate surgical care for brain tumors in LMICs. Among the cited studies, 10% reported lack of multidisciplinary team structures, 61% noted delayed patient presentation, 16% highlighted delays in neuroimaging, 10% reported delays in scheduling surgery, lack of training for specialized surgery (3%), lack of intra-operative facilities (19%), power supply interruption (6%), and lack of advanced diagnostic and specialized surgery facilities (19%). Strategies for addressing these challenges include cross-border collaboration (7%), public education, and awareness (13%), establishing multidisciplinary teams (20%), utilizing alternative surgical techniques (13%), 7% intraoperative ultrasound, 13% intraoperative cytology smear), and establishing satellite hospitals for low-risk care (7%), standard operating procedure and infection control (13%). CONCLUSION: Targeted interventions considering economic constraints are essential to improve the availability, affordability, and quality of neuro-oncologic services in developing countries. International collaborations and building capacity are vital for improving patient outcomes and service delivery, as well as forming multidisciplinary teams and utilizing resource-saving, innovative methods.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Países en Desarrollo , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Atención a la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de SaludRESUMEN
Conventional therapeutic techniques for brain tumours have limitations and side effects, necessitating the need for alternative treatment options. MRI-monitored therapeutic hydrogel systems show potential as a non-surgical approach for brain tumour treatment. Hydrogels have unique physical and chemical properties that make them promising for brain tumour treatment, including the ability to encapsulate therapeutic agents, provide sustained and controlled drug release, and overcome the blood-brain barrier for better penetration. By combining hydrogel systems with MRI techniques, it is possible to develop therapeutic approaches that provide real-time monitoring and controlled release of therapeutic agents. Surgical resection remains important, but there is a growing need for alternative approaches that can complement or replace traditional methods. The objective of this comprehensive narrative review is to evaluate the potential of MRI-monitored therapeutic hydrogel systems in non-surgical brain tumour treatment.