The Effectiveness of Atezolizumab in Metastatic Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lungs: Insights from the LANCE Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) presents significant treatment challenges due to its rarity and limited therapeutic options. The LANCE study was designed to explore the survival benefits of incorporating atezolizumab in chemotherapy for metastatic LCNEC. METHODS: In this non-randomized study, patients with metastatic LCNEC were prospectively enrolled and assigned to receive either standard chemotherapy plus atezolizumab followed by maintenance with atezolizumab or standard chemotherapy alone. The primary outcomes measured were 12- and 24-month survival rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients screened, 17 met the inclusion criteria and received either atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 10) or chemotherapy alone (n = 7). After a median follow-up of 23.3 months, the 12-month survival rate was 57.1% (95% CI: 32.6-100%) and 14.3% (95% CI: 2.33-87.7%) for the atezolizumab and the chemotherapy-only groups, respectively. The survival benefit for the atezolizumab group was sustained at 24 months (45.7% vs. 14.3%). Overall survival was significantly higher for the atezolizumab group, and PFS was non-significantly associated with the addition of atezolizumab (log-rank p = 0.04 and 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that the addition of atezolizumab to standard platinum-based chemotherapy may provide a substantial survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of metastatic LCNEC.

Extended Anticoagulant Treatment with Full- or Reduced-Dose Apixaban in Patients with Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Rationale and Design of the API-CAT Study.

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CT) is associated with a high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolic (VTE) events that require extended anticoagulation in patients with active cancer, putting them at risk of bleeding. The aim of the API-CAT study (NCT03692065) is to assess whether a reduced-dose regimen of apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily [bid]) is noninferior to a full-dose regimen of apixaban (5 mg bid) for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with active cancer who have completed ≥6 months of anticoagulant therapy for a documented index event of proximal deep-vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. API-CAT is an international, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, noninferiority trial with blinded adjudication of outcome events. Consecutive patients are randomized to receive apixaban 2.5 or 5 mg bid for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome is a composite of recurrent symptomatic or incidental VTE during the treatment period. The principal safety endpoint is clinically relevant bleeding, defined as a composite of major bleeding or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding. Assuming a 12-month incidence of the primary outcome of 4% with apixaban and an upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio <2.0, 1,722 patients will be randomized, assuming an up to 10% loss in total patient-years (ß = 80%; α one-sided = 0.025). This trial has the potential to demonstrate that a regimen of extended treatment for patients with CT beyond an initial 6 months, with a reduced apixaban dose, has an acceptable risk of recurrent VTE recurrence and decreases the risk of bleeding.

Spatial Mapping and Immunomodulatory Role of the OX40/OX40L Pathway in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tissue distribution and clinical significance of OX40 and OX40L in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using multiplexed quantitative immunofluorescence, we conducted simultaneous and localized measurements of OX40 and OX40L proteins, major T-cell subsets, and conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1) in 614 primary NSCLCs from three independent cohorts represented in tissue microarrays. We also measured OX40L protein in samples from a phase I clinical trial of intratumor administration of a lipid nanoparticle encapsulated mRNA encoding OX40L (mRNA-2416) in human solid tumors. Finally, we studied the OX40 pathway in 212 uterine/ovarian serous carcinomas. RESULTS: OX40 protein was expressed in approximately 90% of NSCLCs, and OX40L was detected in approximately 10% of cases. Increased expression of OX40 was associated with higher CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, as well as cDC1s. Elevated expression of OX40L was consistently associated with increased CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and longer overall survival. No association was found between OX40 or OX40L levels and oncogenic driver mutations in EGFR and KRAS in lung adenocarcinomas. Delivering OX40L mRNA using intratumor mRNA-2416 injection mediated increased local OX40L protein levels that was most prominent in a patient with ovarian serous carcinoma. Detectable OX40L protein levels were observed in 15% of primary uterine/ovarian serous malignancies and associated with longer survival. CONCLUSIONS: The OX40 pathway is expressed in a fraction of NSCLCs and is associated with a favorable immune contexture. Although OX40L is uncommonly expressed in NSCLC and serous malignancies, it is associated with better prognosis and can be introduced using exogenous mRNA.

Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of MB02 (Bevacizumab Biosimilar) versus Reference Bevacizumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study (STELLA).

BACKGROUND: MB02 (bevacizumab biosimilar) showed similar structural, functional, and pharmacokinetic properties to reference bevacizumab (Avastin®; EU-bevacizumab). OBJECTIVES: To confirm clinical similarity between MB02 and EU-bevacizumab, a comparability study was undertaken in the first-line treatment of stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multinational, double-blind, randomized, phase III study (STELLA) compared MB02 or EU-bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) administered with chemotherapy (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC6) on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for 6 cycles (Week 18), followed by MB02/EU-bevacizumab in blinded monotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, withdrawal of consent or end of study (Week 52). The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) evaluated by an independent radiological review committee (IRC) at Week 18 (intent-to-treat population). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and immunogenicity. RESULTS: A total of 627 subjects were randomized 1:1 to MB02 (n = 315) or EU-bevacizumab (n = 312). ORR, assessed by the IRC at Week 18, was comparable in MB02 (40.3%) and EU-bevacizumab (44.6%) groups. ORR risk ratio of 0.910 (90% CI 0.780 to 1.060; 95% CI 0.758 to 1.092) and ORR risk difference of -4.02 (90% CI -10.51 to 2.47; 95% CI -11.76 to 3.71) were within the similarity predefined margins. There were no significant differences between MB02 and EU-bevacizumab groups in median PFS (36.0 vs 37.3 weeks, respectively; HR 1.187; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.44) and median OS (not achieved; HR 1.108; 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.49) at the end of study. The safety profile of MB02 and EU-bevacizumab regarding nature, frequency and severity of the adverse events (AE) was comparable. The most frequent grade ≥3 investigational-product-related AEs were hypertension and anemia, with a difference between treatment groups of <5%. Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and neutralizing ADA (NAb) incidence were similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: MB02 demonstrated similar efficacy to EU-bevacizumab, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, in subjects with advanced non-squamous NSCLC, with comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT No. 2017-001769-26; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03296163.

Spatial Analysis and Clinical Significance of HLA Class-I and Class-II Subunit Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyze the distribution, associated immune contexture, and clinical significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class-I and HLA class-II subunits in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using spatially resolved and quantitative multiplexed immunofluorescence we studied the tumor/stromal tissue distribution, cancer cell-specific defects, and clinicopathologic/survival associations of ß2 microglobulin (ß2M), HLA-A, and HLA-B,-C heavy chains, as well as HLA class-II ß chain in >700 immunotherapy-naïve NSCLCs from four independent cohorts. Genomic analysis of HLA genes in NSCLC was performed using two publicly available cohorts. RESULTS: Cancer cell-specific downregulation of HLA markers was identified in 30.4% of cases. ß2M was downregulated in 9.8% (70/714), HLA-A in 9% (65/722), HLA-B,-C in 12.1% (87/719), and HLA class-II in 17.7% (127/717) of evaluable samples. Concurrent downregulation of ß2M, HLA-B,-C, and HLA class-II was commonly identified. Deleterious mutations in HLA genes were detected in <5% of lung malignancies. Tumors with cancer cell-specific ß2M downregulation displayed reduced T cells and increased natural killer (NK)-cell infiltration. Samples with cancer cell HLA-A downregulation displayed modest increase in CD8+ T cells and NK-cell infiltration. Samples with cancer cell-selective HLA-B,-C or HLA class-II downregulation displayed reduced T cells and NK-cell infiltration. There was limited association of the markers with clinicopathologic variables and KRAS/EGFR mutations. Cancer cell-selective downregulation of the HLA subunits was associated with shorter overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal frequent and differential defects in HLA class-I and HLA class-II protein subunit expression in immunotherapy-naïve NSCLCs associated with distinct tumor microenvironment composition and patient survival.

Hyperprogressive disease: A distinct pattern of progression to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a novel pattern of progression attributed to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and characterized by a dramatic tumor surge and poor survival. The concept of HPD is still controversial, while the definition varies widely across studies. Although HPD has been associated with multiple clinicopathological and molecular features, there is no biomarker to predict this detrimental effect of immunotherapy and the underlying mechanism remains unknown. The aim of this comprehensive review is to summarize current data on HPD and present the controversies and clinical care management challenges for oncologists treating patients with ICIs.

Non-interventional LUME-BioNIS study of nintedanib plus docetaxel after chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma non-small cell lung cancer: A subgroup analysis in patients with prior immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nintedanib plus docetaxel in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with both chemo- and immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LUME-BioNIS is a European, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study of patients with advanced adenocarcinoma NSCLC, who initiated nintedanib plus docetaxel after first-line chemotherapy in routine practice according to the approved nintedanib EU label. The primary objective is to explore whether molecular biomarkers can predict overall survival (OS). Information on clinical or radiologic progression and death, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs)/fatal adverse events (AEs) was collected during follow-up. Here, we report a subgroup analysis evaluating outcomes in immunotherapy-pretreated patients. RESULTS: Of 260 enrolled patients, 67 (25.8%) had prior immunotherapy and were included in this subgroup analysis. Prior immunotherapy was administered in first-line in 20 patients (29.9%; combined with chemotherapy in 4 patients [6.0%]) and later-lines in 47 patients (70.1%), and most commonly comprised nivolumab (39 patients; 58.2%), atezolizumab (14 patients; 20.9%) and pembrolizumab (11 patients; 16.4%). Nintedanib plus docetaxel was given in second-line in 10 patients (14.9%) and in later-lines in 57 patients (85.1%). Median OS was 8.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.0-11.5) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.5-5.7). Among 55 patients with available data, rates of objective response and disease control were 18.2% and 78.2%, respectively. In 65 patients evaluable for safety, the most common on-treatment ADRs/AEs were malignant neoplasm progression (19 patients; 29.2%), diarrhea (21 patients; 32.3%) and nausea (10 patients; 15.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Used according to the approved nintedanib label in routine practice, nintedanib plus docetaxel demonstrated clinical effectiveness, with no unexpected safety findings, in patients with prior chemotherapy and first- or later-line immunotherapy. These data add to the real-world evidence that can inform clinical decisions in the changing therapeutic landscape.

Overview of risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with cancer.

A B S T R A C T Important progress has been made in the development of risk assessment models (RAM) for the identification of outpatients on anticancer treatment at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Since the breakthrough publication of the original Khorana risk score (KRS) more than 10 years ago, a new generation of KRS-based scores have been developed, including the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study, PROTECHT, CONKO, ONCOTEV, TicOnco and the CATS/MICA score. Among these the CATS/MICA score showed that a simplified score composed of only two calibrated predictors, the type of cancer and the D-dimer levels, offers a user-friendly tool for the evaluation of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) risk. The COMPASS-CAT score is the first that introduced a more synthetic approach of risk evaluation by combining cancer-related predictors with patient comorbidity in a score which is designed for the types of cancer frequently seen in the community (i.e. breast, lung colon or ovarian cancers) and has been externally validated in independent studies. The Throly score is registered as part of the same group as it has a similar structure to the COMPASS-CAT score and is applicable in patients with lymphoma. The incorporation of specific biomarkers of hypercoagulability to the RAM for CAT offers the possibility to perform a precision medicine approach in the prevention of CAT. The improvement of RAM for CAT with artificial intelligence methodologies and deep learning techniques is the challenge in the near future.

PF-06439535 (a Bevacizumab Biosimilar) Compared with Reference Bevacizumab (Avastin®), Both Plus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin, as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND: PF-06439535 is a bevacizumab biosimilar. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PF-06439535 with that of reference bevacizumab (Avastin®) sourced from the EU (bevacizumab-EU), each with paclitaxel and carboplatin, in the first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group study, we recruited patients from 159 centers in 27 countries. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive PF-06439535 plus paclitaxel and carboplatin or bevacizumab-EU plus paclitaxel and carboplatin on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4-6 cycles, followed by blinded monotherapy with PF-06439535 or bevacizumab-EU until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study. Randomization was stratified by region, sex, and smoking history. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in accordance with RECIST 1.1, based on responses achieved by week 19 and confirmed by week 25. RESULTS: Between 21 May 2015 and 14 November 2016, 719 patients were randomized to the PF-06439535 group (n = 358) or the bevacizumab-EU group (n = 361). As of data cutoff for analysis of the primary endpoint (8 May 2017), 45.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 40.01-50.57) of patients in the PF-06439535 group and 44.6% (95% CI 39.40-49.89) of patients in the bevacizumab-EU group achieved an objective response by week 19 that was confirmed by week 25. The unstratified ORR risk ratio was 1.015 (95% CI 0.863-1.193; 90% CI 0.886-1.163), and the unstratified ORR risk difference was 0.653% (95% CI - 6.608 to 7.908); all three CIs fell within pre-specified equivalence margins. Using final data after study completion (22 December 2017), no notable differences in progression-free survival or overall survival were observed between the groups. The most frequently reported grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were hypertension, neutropenia, and anemia. There were no clinically meaningful differences in safety, pharmacokinetics, or immunogenicity across treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC, PF-06439535 demonstrated similarity to bevacizumab-EU in terms of efficacy. Safety profiles for the two treatments were comparable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02364999. FUNDING: Pfizer.

Management of Progressive Pulmonary Nodules Found during and outside of CT Lung Cancer Screening Studies.

Although the effectiveness of screening for lung cancer remains controversial, it is a fact that most lung cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage outside of lung cancer screening programs. In 2013, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force revised its lung cancer screening recommendation, now supporting lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography in patients at high risk. This is also endorsed by many major medical societies and advocacy group stakeholders, albeit with different eligibility criteria. In Europe, population-based lung cancer screening has so far not been recommended or implemented, as some important issues remain unresolved. Among them is the open question of how enlarging pulmonary nodules detected in lung cancer screening should be managed. This article comprises two parts: a review of the current lung cancer screening approaches and the potential therapeutic options for enlarging pulmonary nodules, followed by a meeting report including consensus statements of an interdisciplinary expert panel that discussed the potential of the different therapeutic options.

The Potential of Combined Immunotherapy and Antiangiogenesis for the Synergistic Treatment of Advanced NSCLC.

Over the past few years, there have been considerable advances in the treatments available to patients with metastatic or locally advanced NSCLC, particularly those who have progressed during first-line treatment. Some of the treatment options available to patients are discussed here, with a focus on checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and antiangiogenic agents (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and nintedanib). It is hypothesized that combining immunotherapy with antiangiogenic treatment may have a synergistic effect and enhance the efficacy of both treatments. In this review, we explore the theory and potential of this novel treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC. We discuss the growing body of evidence that proangiogenic factors can modulate the immune response (both by reducing T-cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment and through systemic effects on immune-regulatory cell function), and we examine the preclinical evidence for combining these treatments. Potential challenges are also considered, and we review the preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy and safety with this novel combination in a variety of solid tumor types.

New concepts in the treatment strategy of neuroendocrine tumors: the role of biotherapy.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) comprise a wide range of neoplasms with diverse biological behaviors, often secreting excessive amounts of endocrine-active substances causing hormone syndromes. They are classified according to the location of the primary site and the level of histological differentiation, which has prognostic as well as therapeutic implications. Biotherapy had traditionally a significant role in the treatment of these tumors, when not amenable to surgery or local treatments. Control of carcinoid syndrome with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) significantly contributed to the improvement of the quality of life. Also, interferon has long been administered, but data were based on small studies. In contrast, PROMID and CLARINET randomized phase III trials provided the first strong evidence of significant improvement in progression-free survival in patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs with octreotide and lanreotide, respectively, validating somatostatin receptors as important targets. Clinical trials testing the role of these SSAs in other primaries, e.g., lung carcinoids, as well as the efficacy of newer analogs are underway.

Novel therapeutic approaches and mechanisms in neuroendocrine tumors: the role of targeted agents.

Low-intermediate grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are usually slow-growing cancers with a clinical course spanning few to several years managed with active surveillance, locoregional treatments, or somatostain analogs. At some point in their natural history, they develop resistance to these treatments and become more aggressive. Chemotherapy offers only limited therapeutic benefit and any evidence is based on small trials or retrospective studies. The significant progress in molecular biology shed light on the significant role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and angiogenesis in NETs, while the success of everolimus and sunitinib in landmark clinical trials opened new avenues in the discovery of effective treatments. Ongoing and planned pivotal studies testing newer agents targeting other pathways are underway. In addition to providing better treatment options, these drugs also broadened our understanding of the biology of these tumors. Biomarkers are eagerly needed with the scope of personalizing future treatment.

The safety and efficacy of Onivyde (irinotecan liposome injection) for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer following gemcitabine-based therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer refractory to gemcitabine based therapy have a dismal prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Recently, the FDA approved nanoliposomal irinotecan combined with fluorouracil/folinic acid for such patients based upon results of the NAPOLI-1 study which showed this regimen compared to fluorouracil/folinic acid significantly prolonged progression free survival (3.1 vs. 1.5 months) and overall survival (6.2 vs. 4.1 months). AREAS COVERED: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic characteristics of this novel formulation of irinotecan, its safety profile, and use in a clinical context for patients with pancreatic cancer are reviewed. Expert commentary: Nanoliposomal irinotecan, in combination with 5-FU/folinic acid, represents an important step forward in improving second line treatment options in patients with progression of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, the novel drug formulation offers pharmacokinetic advantages which serve as a basis for further clinical testing in a various pancreatic cancer settings and other malignancies.

HER Family Protein Expression in a Greek Population with Gastric Cancer. A Retrospective Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is a relatively common malignancy. Recently, the presence of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was identified as a molecular target in a proportion of patients who benefited from the addition of appropriate anti-HER2 treatments. Our study explored the clinical and prognostic role of known HER family members, human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR or HER1), HER2, HER3 and HER4. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue samples from 249 gastric cancer patients were studied by immunohistochemistry for protein expression of EGFR, HER2, HER3 and HER4. RESULTS: Of the 249 evaluable patients, 32 did not have complete data of treatment details and/or follow-up and were excluded from the survival analyses. Of the 217 patients with complete treatment and follow-up data, 178 were operated and treated for early disease (group 1), while 39 for advanced disease (group 2). The frequency of positive EGFR, HER2, HER3 and HER4 protein expression in all patients was 17.5%, 11.8%, 14.8% and 32.9%, respectively. There were no differences in protein expression of any of the markers between the two groups. There were, however, statistically significant associations between HER4 and all other HER family members, as well as between HER2 and HER3 expression. Of note, EGFR-positive membranous protein expression was significantly associated with the presence of lymphovascular invasion (p=0.027) and HER3 and HER4 negative cytoplasmic protein expression with well/moderately-differentiated tumors (p=0.030 and p=0.014, respectively). None of the HER family members were of prognostic value for OS in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed the known protein expression frequencies of HER family members in gastric cancer in a Greek population. Several associations were observed among the HER family members and between clinicopathological characteristics and HER family members. Further research is needed on their exact prognostic role, as well as their therapeutic targeting.

Percentage Change in Plasma Cytokeratin 18 Is Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Pemetrexed and Carboplatin for the Adenocarcinoma Subtype of NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: The adenocarcinoma subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (adeno-NSCLC) is routinely treated with chemotherapy if patients do not have molecular aberrations such as epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements. There are currently no validated biomarkers that can predict if patients will gain clinical benefit from chemotherapy, leading to a majority of patients receiving many cycles of unnecessary chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the percentage rise in plasma caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 (cCK18) and total cytokeratin 18 (tCK18) assessed before and after chemotherapy correlates with the radiological response to chemotherapy. METHODS: Plasma samples from 40 patients with stage IV adeno-NSCLC, treated with first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC5) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)), were collected prior to chemotherapy and 48 h after treatment. ELISA was used to quantify cCK18 and tCK18. RESULTS: The male-to-female ratio was 3:1, and the median age of patients was 63 years. Patients who had a clinical benefit (complete response, partial response or stable disease) at the first radiological assessment following chemotherapy had a significantly higher percentage change in plasma tCK18 levels compared to those who had no clinical benefit, i.e. progressive disease (69.5 ± 75.1 vs. 25.3 ± 30.9%, respectively; p = 0.042). The receiver operating characteristic area was 0.712 (p = 0.039). There was an increase in the percentage change in cCK18 in patients with clinical benefit compared to those without clinical benefit but this was not statistically significant (57.6 ± 112.8 vs. 24.38 ± 45.1%, respectively; p = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage change in plasma tCK18 levels before and after the first cycle of pemetrexed and carboplatin chemotherapy is associated with clinical benefit. If validated in larger cohorts, this test can be used to identify patients unlikely to respond to treatment who can thus be offered alternative treatments or entry into clinical trials.

Incidence and management of ZIv-aflibercept related toxicities in colorectal cancer.

Ziv-afilbercept (Zaltrap, Ziv) is a humanized fusion protein constructed by joining the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) binding portions of human VEGF receptors 1 and 2 to the Fc portion of human immunoglobulin IgG1. Recently, a randomized, open-label, phase III study compared 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Ziv with FOLFIRI/placebo in patients who had been previously treated with oxaliplatin based chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer (mCRC). Patients who had received prior bevacizumab therapy were also eligible. This study showed that the addition of Ziv improved overall survival with median survival time of 13.5 mo vs 12.06 mo in ziv vs placebo arm. Ziv also improved progression free survival from 4.67 mo to 6.9 mo with a response rate of 19.8% in the Ziv/FOLFIRI group vs 11.1% in FOLFIRI alone group. This led to the approval of Ziv in combination with FOLFIRI in metastatic colon cancer patients treated with prior oxaliplatin regimens. The most common side effects were diarrhea, stomatitis, fatigue, hypertension, weight loss, loss of appetite, abdominal pain, and headache. As the use of Ziv has become more widespread in oncology practices, familiarity with the toxicity profile of the drug and the use of practice guidelines for their treatment has become increasing important. This review will address the toxicities noted in trials using Ziv for the treatment of mCRC, and will provide recommendations for toxicity management.

Maintenance therapy with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Therapeutic options for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) include concurrent chemoradiation, induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or systemic therapy alone. The original Gastro-Intestinal Study Group and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group studies defined fluorouracil (5-FU) with concurrent radiation therapy followed by maintenance 5-FU until progression, as the standard therapy for this subset of patients. Although this combined therapy has been demonstrated to increase local control and median survival from 8 to 12 months, almost all patients succumb to the disease secondary to either local or distant recurrence. Our earlier studies provided a strong rationale for the use of capecitabine in combination with concurrent radiation followed by maintenance capecitabine therapy. To report our clinical experience, we retrospectively evaluated our patients who were treated with maintenance capecitabine. We reviewed the medical records of patients with LAPC who received treatment with capecitabine and radiation, followed by a 4-week rest, then capecitabine alone 1,000 mg twice daily (ECOG performance status 2 or age >70 years) or 1,500 mg twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks until progressive disease. We treated 43 patients between September 2004 and September 2012. The population consisted of 16 females and 25 males, with a median age of 64 years (range, 38-80 years). Patients received maintenance capecitabine for median duration of 9 months (range, 3-18 months). The median overall survival (OS) for these patients was 17 months, with two patients still living and receiving therapy. The 6-month survival rate was 91% (39/43), 1-year survival rate was 72% (31/43) and 2-year OS rate was 26% (11/43). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed rarely: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in two patients, diarrhea in one patient and peripheral neuropathy in one patient, and there was no mortality directly related to treatment. Capecitabine maintenance therapy following chemoradiation in LAPC offers an effective, tolerable and convenient alternative to 5-FU. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study of its kind which has determined the safety and efficacy of capecitabine maintenance therapy for patients with LAPC.

First line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: looking for the step forward.

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease and its prognosis remains dismal. The modest results of existing available treatments in the first line setting reveal the need of new therapeutic strategies. In this year's American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting four remarkable studies were presented regarding this vulnerable group of patients. The efficacy and toxicity profile of gemcitabine plus erlotinib plus capecitabine (Abstract #4122), refametinib plus gemcitabine (Abstract #4025), gemcitabine plus docetaxel plus capecitabine plus cisplatin (Abstract #4135) were examined and the predictive value of a biomarker panel testing response to gemcitabine with or without the addition of erlotinib (Abstract #4133) was also presented.

Quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer.

QOL is highly affected in individuals suffering from pancreatic cancer. One parameter that influences negatively QOL in these patients is cancer -cachexia syndrome. During the ASCO Annual Meeting 2014, one abstract focusing on cancer-cachexia syndrome (Abstract #15208) emphasized the fact that cachexia is under diagnosed even in patients with pancreatic cancer who constitute a high-risk group for presenting this syndrome. In addition the abstract raises concerns about the benefit of the use of dronabinol and megestrol acetate in treating the cachexia syndrome in this group of patients. Another important factor that determines QOL in pancreatic cancer patients is surgical procedures-pancreatectomies that these patients may undergo. A very interesting abstract presented also at the ASCO Annual Meeting 2014 (Abstract #15234) explores the benefit of using pasireotide perioperative in ameliorating QOL of patients who had surgical intervention.