Ultrasound-Guided Pectoserratus Plane Block and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND The combination of pectoserratus plane block (PSP) and superficial serratus anterior plane block (S-SAP) was established to reduce the risk of general anesthesia for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation in patients with high operative risk (American Society of Anesthesiologistsgrade III or IV). This study compared outcomes from ultrasound-guided PSP and S-SAP in 16 patients requiring a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) at a single center in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS A group of 16 patients with ASA grade III and IV qualified for S-ICD implantation was included. The pain assessment using numerical rating scale (NRS), patient's comfort using Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15), the operator's satisfaction using Operator's Comfort Scale, adverse event occurrence, and the parameters' stability were evaluated. RESULTS The mean volume of the local anesthetics mixture of PSP block was 19.4 mL; S-SAP was 34.7 mL (mean total volume, 54.1 mL). The mean duration of the block was 21.3 min; the mean time of the S-ICD implantation was 108.4 min. Neither circulatory nor respiratory instability was observed. In 8 patients (50%), non-opioid analgesics were administered intraoperatively; in 11 patients (69%), fentanyl bolus ≤200 µg was administered. The intraoperative NRS score was low (max 2 points); NRS 24 h after the procedure was low (max 4 points). The mean value of QoR-15 was 133.9 points. CONCLUSIONS S-SAP combined with PSP is feasible and safe in providing anesthesia/analgesia during S-ICD implantation and showed good effects in a group of patients with high operative risk (ASA III or IV).

Use of Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Plane Blocks in Anterior and Lateral Thoracic Wall Region as Safe Method for Patient Anesthesia and Analgesia: Review of Techniques and Approaches during COVID-19 Pandemic.

Ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks performed on the anterior and lateral thoracic wall have become an important adjuvant method to general anesthesia and an independent method of local anesthesia and pain management. These procedures diminish the harmful effects of anesthesia on respiratory function and reduce the risk of phrenic nerve paralysis or iatrogenic pneumothorax. In postoperative pain management, interfascial plane blocks decrease the dosage of intravenous drugs, including opioids. They can also eliminate the complications associated with general anesthesia when used as the sole method of anesthesia for surgical procedures. The following procedures are classified as interfascial plane blocks of the anterior and lateral thoracic wall: pectoral nerve plane block (PECS), serratus anterior plane block (SAP), transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTP), pectoral interfascial plane block (PIF), and intercostal nerve block (ICNB). These blocks are widely used in emergency medicine, oncologic surgery, general surgery, thoracic surgery, cardiac surgery, orthopedics, cardiology, nephrology, oncology, palliative medicine, and pain medicine. Regional blocks are effective for analgesic treatment, both as an anesthesia procedure for surgery on the anterior and lateral thoracic wall and as an analgesic therapy after trauma or other conditions that induce pain in this area. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks are safe alternatives for anesthesia in patients with symptoms of respiratory distress related to SARS-CoV-2 and appear to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection among medical personnel.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection.

The vascular access port implantation procedure can be performed using the venesection method by inserting a catheter into the cephalic vein in the region of the deltopectoral groove. This method eliminates the need for catheter tunneling. An alternative method to infiltration anaesthesia for port implantation may be a modified pectoral nerve block type II (PECS II). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of modified PECS II for vascular access port implantation using cephalic vein venesection. This retrospective observational study was conducted at the 4th Military Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland. A group of 114 patients underwent the modified PECS II block and additional cutaneous infiltration anesthesia at the incision line. Pain intensity was assessed on the NRS scale measured intraoperatively at four points. The QoR-15 questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction during the first 24 h after surgery. The operator's condition assessment score was used to assess surgical conditions and operator comfort. The analysis showed that the median pain intensity during vascular port implantation was 0. A statistically significant difference in pain intensity was demonstrated between the specialist's group and the resident's group at the second and third measurement points (p < 0.008; p < 0.012). The mean value on the QoR-15 scale was 132. There was a significant difference between the pain scores of the groups. The mean score in the pain position in the specialist's group was 18 points and in the resident's group, it was 19 points (p < 0.029). In conclusion, the present study revealed that the modified PECS II block is an effective and safe method of anesthesia for Port-A-Cath implantation.