[How did the survival of acute myeloid leukemia change over the last ten years in our unit?] / Hogyan változott az akut myeloid leukaemiás betegek túlélése a terápiás lehetoségek bovülésével az elmúlt 10 évben klinikánkon?

INTRODUCTION: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy with high mortality rate. The treatment is especially challenging in patients older than 65 years, which is the large majority of those. For patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy regimens, only palliative cytoreduction and basic supportive care used to be the options in our unit. However, from 2018, the azacitidine-venetoclax combination has been a new therapeutic alternative. This treatment resulted in marked survival benefit in clinical trials, however, its impact on the daily clinical practice and the entire patient population is unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate how the application of azacitidine-venetoclax changed the treatment and survival of AML patients in our practice. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the available clinical data of all AML patients treated consecutively between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2021 at the 3rd Department of Internal Medicine (from 2020 onward called Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology), examining their treatment depending on the time period of therapy (2011-2017 and 2018-2021). Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. RESULTS: 423 patients were diagnosed during this period. The number of cases showed a marked increase: in the first 7 years of our study, 184 patients were diagnosed, while this rose to 239 during the subsequent 4 years. The median age of patients was 67.6 years, with more than 60% of patients aged over 65. An improving trend can be observed in the overall survival: between 2011 and 2017, the median overall survival was 4.8 ± 0.9 months, while between 2018 and 2021, it was 8.3 ± 1.4 months (p = 0.051). Moreover, in the case of patients over 65 there was a significant overall survival improvement: 3.1 ± 0.5 vs. 4.9 ± 0.6 months (p = 0,01). The main factor behind this improvement could be that a large proportion of over 65 patients previously only fit for supportive care could now be treated with azacitidine-venetoclax: the percentage of actively treated patients grew from 57.1% to 75.3% in the second period. CONCLUSION: The survival of patients unfit for curative therapy and older than 65 showed a steady increase which can be attributed to the introduction of new therapeutic alternatives. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(45): 1787-1794.

[Venetoclax-based salvage in multiple myeloma with (11;14) translocation after suboptimal response to first-line therapy]. / Venetoclaxalapú mentokezelés (11;14)-transzlokációs myeloma multiplexben az elso vonalbeli kezelésre adott nem megfelelo válasz esetén.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma is one of the most common hematologic malignancies, with approximately 400 patients diagnosed in Hungary annually. Novel therapies emerging in the last decade have made a great impact on most patients' survival, however, those responding poorly to standard first-line therapy and failing to proceed to stem cell transplantation face a dire prognosis. Venetoclax, a selective Bcl-2 inhibitor has been shown very effective in the treatment of relapsed/refractory t(11;14) patients, but there are only a few studies about its safety and efficacy when used as salvage in the second line. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to analyze the data of t(11;14) patients treated with venetoclax salvage at our clinic and to evaluate its efficacy. METHOD: Between 2017 and 2021, 13 patients received venetoclax therapy at our clinic after suboptimal response to frontline treatment, whose data we analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Adverse prognostic markers were very prevalent in our group, 4 of our patients had del(17p), 5 had amp(1q21) and 6 had stage 3. Nevertheless, all 13 patients responded well to venetoclax therapy, with 6 reaching very good partial response and 7 complete response. All eligible patients (10) could proceed to transplantation. After median 38 months follow up, neither median progression-free, nor median overall survival was reached, since only 3 patients progressed and 1 died. CONCLUSION: We have shown that when salvage is needed for t(11;14) patients who respond suboptimally to standard frontline therapy, venetoclax is a remarkably good option. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(23): 894-899.

Soluble B-cell maturation antigen as a monitoring marker for multiple myeloma.

Objective: Response to treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) is routinely measured by serum and urine M-protein and free light chain (FLC), as described by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) consensus statement. A non-negligible subgroup of patients however present without measurable biomarkers, others become oligo or non-secretory during recurrent relapses. The aim of our research was to evaluate soluble B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) as a monitoring marker measured concurrent with the standard monitoring in MM patients at diagnosis, at relapse and during follow up, in order to establish its potential usefulness in oligo and non-secretory disease. Method: sBCMA levels were measured in 149 patients treated for plasma cell dyscrasia (3 monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, 5 smoldering myeloma, 7 plasmacytoma, 8 AL amyloidosis and 126 MM) and 16 control subjects using a commercial ELISA kit. In 43 newly diagnosed patients sBCMA levels were measured at multiple timepoints during treatment, and compared to conventional IMWG response and progression free survival (PFS). Results: sBCMA levels among control subjects were significantly lower than among newly diagnosed or relapsed MM patients [20.8 (14.7-38.7) ng/mL vs. 676 (89.5-1,650) and 264 (20.7-1,603) ng/mL, respectively]. Significant correlations were found between sBCMA and the degree of bone marrow plasma cell infiltration. Out of the 37 newly diagnosed patients who have reached partial response or better per IMWG criteria, 33 (89%) have had at least a 50% drop in sBCMA level by therapy week 4. Cohorts made similarly to IMWG response criteria-achieving a 50% or 90% drop in sBCMA levels compared to level at diagnosis-had statistically significant differences in PFS. Conclusion: Our results confirmed that sBCMA levels are prognostic at important decision points in myeloma, and the percentage of BCMA change is predictive for PFS. This highlights the great potential use of sBCMA in oligo- and non-secretory myeloma.

Targeted Venetoclax Therapy in t(11;14) Multiple Myeloma: Real World Data From Seven Hungarian Centers.

Despite the introduction of novel agents, multiple myeloma remains incurable for most patients, necessitating further therapeutic options. Venetoclax, a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, had shown promising results in patients with translocation t(11;14), but questions remain open about its optimal use. We have contacted all Hungarian haematology centers for their experience treating t(11;14) myeloma patients with venetoclax. 58 patients were reported. 37 received venetoclax in the relapsed/refractory setting with few or no other therapeutic options available. 21 patients started venetoclax as salvage after failing to achieve satisfactory response to first line therapy. In the relapsed/refractory setting objective response rate (ORR) was 94%, median progression-free survival (PFS) 10.0 months and median overall survival (OS) 14.6 months. In reinduction patients, ORR was 100%, median PFS and OS were not reached. Importantly, we found no adverse effect of high risk features such as deletion 17p or renal failure, in fact renal failure ameliorated in 42% of the cases, including three patients who became dialysis independent. Our study also reports the highest number of plasma cell leukemia cases successfully treated with venetoclax published in literature, with refractory plasma cell leukemia patients achieving a median PFS of 10.0 and a median OS of 12.2 months.

Limitations of VS38c labeling in the detection of plasma cell myeloma by flow cytometry.

Plasma cell myeloma (multiple myeloma [MM]) is a malignant neoplasm originating from the plasma cells. Besides other methods, flow cytometric analysis of the patient's bone marrow aspirate has an important role in the diagnosis and also in the response assessment. Since the cell surface markers, used for identifying abnormal plasma cells, are expressed diversely and the treatment can also alter the phenotype of the plasma cells, there is an increasing demand for new plasma cell markers. VS38c is a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the CLIMP-63 protein in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. CLIMP-63 is known to be expressed at high levels in normal and pathologic plasma cells in the bone marrow, thus VS38c antibody can be used to identify them. Although VS38c staining of plasma cells is reported to be constant and strong even in myeloma, we were wondering whether sample preparation can affect the staining. We have investigated the effect of different permeabilization agents and washing of the cells on the quality of the VS38c staining and found that in many cases the staining is inadequate to identify the plasma cells. We measured the VS38c staining of the bone marrow aspirates of 196 MM patients and observed that almost all cases showed bright staining with VS38c. However, permeabilization with mild detergent resulted in the appearance of a significant VS38cdim subpopulation, which showed increased sensitivity to mechanical stress (centrifugation). Our results indicate that VS38cdim MM cells can appear due to the improper permeabilization of the endoplasmic reticulum and this finding raises the possibility of the existence of a plasma cell subpopulation with different membrane properties. The significance of this population is unclear yet, but these cells can be easily missed with VS38c staining and can be lost due to centrifugation-induced lysis during sample preparation.