RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with prolonged hospitalisation have a significant risk of carriage of and subsequent infection with extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, the distinctive roles of the community and hospital environments in the transmission of ESBL-producing or carbapenemase-producing K pneumoniae remain elusive. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and transmission of K pneumoniae within and between the two tertiary hospitals in Hanoi, Viet Nam, using whole-genome sequencing. METHODS: We did a prospective cohort study of 69 patients in intensive care units (ICUs) from two hospitals in Hanoi, Viet Nam. Patients were included if they were aged 18 years or older, admitted for longer than the mean length of stay in their ICU, and cultured K pneumoniae from their clinical samples. Longitudinally collected samples from patients (collected weekly) and the ICU environment (collected monthly) were cultured on selective media, and whole-genome sequences from K pneumoniae colonies analysed. We did phylogenetic analyses and correlated phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing with genotypic features of K pneumoniae isolates. We constructed transmission networks of patient samples, relating ICU admission times and locations with genetic similarity of infecting K pneumoniae. FINDINGS: Between June 1, 2017, and Jan 31, 2018, 69 patients were in the ICUs and eligible for inclusion, and a total of 357 K pneumoniae isolates were cultured and successfully sequenced. 228 (64%) of K pneumoniae isolates carried between two and four different ESBL-encoding and carbapenemase-encoding genes, with 164 (46%) isolates carrying genes encoding both, with high minimum inhibitory concentrations. We found a novel co-occurrence of blaKPC-2 and blaNDM-1 in 46·6% of samples from the globally successful ST15 lineage. Despite being physically and clinically separated, the two hospitals shared closely related strains carrying the same array of antimicrobial resistance genes. INTERPRETATION: These results highlight the high prevalence of ESBL-positive carbapenem-resistant K pneumoniae in ICUs in Viet Nam. Through studying K pneumoniae ST15 in detail, we showed how important resistance genes are contained within these strains that are carried broadly by patients entering the two hospitals directly or through referral. FUNDING: Medical Research Council Newton Fund, Ministry of Science and Technology, Wellcome Trust, Academy of Medical Sciences, Health Foundation, and National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre.
Asunto(s)
Klebsiella pneumoniae , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Vietnam/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Filogenia , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
Nosocomial acquisition and transmission of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) is the driver for E. faecium carriage in hospitalized patients, which, in turn, is a risk factor for invasive infection in immunocompromised patients. In the present study, we provide a comprehensive picture of E. faecium transmission in an entire sampled patient population using a sequence-driven approach. We prospectively identified and followed 149 haematology patients admitted to a hospital in England for 6 months. Patient stools (n = 376) and environmental swabs (n = 922) were taken at intervals and cultured for E. faecium. We sequenced 1,560 isolates (1,001 stool, 559 environment) and focused our genomic analyses on 1,477 isolates (95%) in the hospital-adapted clade A1. Of 101 patients who provided two or more stool samples, 40 (40%) developed E. faecium carriage after admission based on culture, compared with 64 patients (63%) based on genomic analysis (73% VREfm). Half of 922 environmental swabs (447, 48%) were positive for VREfm. Network analysis showed that, of 111 patients positive for the A1 clade, 67 had strong epidemiological and genomic links with at least one other patient and/or their direct environment, supporting nosocomial transmission. Six patients (3.4%) developed an invasive E. faecium infection from their own gut-colonizing strain, which was preceded by nosocomial acquisition of the infecting isolate in half of these. Two informatics approaches (subtype categorization to define phylogenetic clusters and the development of an SNP cut-off for transmission) were central to our analyses, both of which will inform the future translation of E. faecium sequencing into routine outbreak detection and investigation. In conclusion, we showed that carriage and environmental contamination by the hospital-adapted E. faecium lineage were hyperendemic in our study population and that improved infection control measures will be needed to reduce hospital acquisition rates.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Enterococcus faecium/genética , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/transmisión , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alcoholes/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Clorhexidina/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Brotes de Enfermedades , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Enterococcus faecium/aislamiento & purificación , Genoma Bacteriano/genética , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/patología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Vancomicina/farmacología , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To analyse enrolment to interventional trials during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in England and describe the barriers to successful recruitment in the circumstance of a further wave or future pandemics. DESIGN: We analysed registered interventional COVID-19 trial data and concurrently did a prospective observational study of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who were being assessed for eligibility to one of the RECOVERY, C19-ACS or SIMPLE trials. SETTING: Interventional COVID-19 trial data were analysed from the clinicaltrials.gov and International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number databases on 12 July 2020. The patient cohort was taken from five centres in a respiratory National Institute for Health Research network. Population and modelling data were taken from published reports from the UK government and Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit. PARTICIPANTS: 2082 consecutive admitted patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from 27 March 2020 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions enrolled, and reasons for exclusion from the aforementioned trials. Comparisons of trial recruitment targets with estimated feasible recruitment numbers. RESULTS: Analysis of trial registration data for COVID-19 treatment studies enrolling in England showed that by 12 July 2020, 29 142 participants were needed. In the observational study, 430 (20.7%) proceeded to randomisation. 82 (3.9%) declined participation, 699 (33.6%) were excluded on clinical grounds, 363 (17.4%) were medically fit for discharge and 153 (7.3%) were receiving palliative care. With 111 037 people hospitalised with COVID-19 in England by 12 July 2020, we determine that 22 985 people were potentially suitable for trial enrolment. We estimate a UK hospitalisation rate of 2.38%, and that another 1.25 million infections would be required to meet recruitment targets of ongoing trials. CONCLUSIONS: Feasible recruitment rates, study design and proliferation of trials can limit the number, and size, that will successfully complete recruitment. We consider that fewer, more appropriately designed trials, prioritising cooperation between centres would maximise productivity in a further wave.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Selección de Paciente , Neumonía Viral , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino UnidoAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Salud Pública/educación , SARS-CoV-2 , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the optimal number of sampling sites for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization. METHODS: We performed a Medline search from January 1966 to February 2014 for articles that reported the prevalence of MRSA at different body sites. Studies were characterized by study design, country and period of the study, number of patients and/or isolates of MRSA, specimen type, sites of MRSA isolation, study population sampled, diagnostic testing method, and percentage of the MRSA isolates at each site in relation to the total number of sites. RESULTS: We reviewed 3,211 abstracts and 177 manuscripts, of which 17 met the criteria for analysis (n=52,642 patients). MRSA colonization prevalence varied from 8% to 99% at different body sites. The nasal cavity as a single site had MRSA detection sensitivity of 68% (34%-91%). The throat and nares gave the highest detection rates as single sites. A combination of two swabs improved MRSA detection rates with the best combination being groin/throat (89.6%; 62.5%-100%). A combination of three swab sites improved MRSA detection rate to 94.2% (81%-100%) with the best combination being groin/nose/throat. Certain combinations were associated with low detection rates. MRSA detection rates also varied with different culture methods. CONCLUSION: A combination of three swabs from different body sites resulted in the highest detection rate for MRSA colonization. The use of three swab sites would likely improve the recognition and treatment of MRSA colonization, which may in turn reduce infection and transmission of MRSA to other patients.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple/microbiología , Strongyloides stercoralis/aislamiento & purificación , Estrongiloidiasis/complicaciones , Animales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Estrongiloidiasis/microbiología , Estrongiloidiasis/patología , Sobreinfección/complicaciones , Sobreinfección/microbiologíaRESUMEN
PCR-restriction fragment length poymorphism (PCR-RFLP) is a simple, robust technique for the rapid identification of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. One hundred consecutive isolates from a Vietnamese tuberculosis hospital were tested by MspA1I PCR-RFLP for the detection of isoniazid-resistant katG_315 mutants. The test had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100% against conventional phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. The positive and negative predictive values were 1 and 0.86, respectively. None of the discrepant isolates had mutant katG_315 codons by sequencing. The test is cheap (less than $1.50 per test), specific, and suitable for the rapid identification of isoniazid resistance in regions with a high prevalence of katG_315 mutants among isoniazid-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates.