Cell Labeling with Magneto-Endosymbionts and the Dissection of the Subcellular Location, Fate, and Host Cell Interactions.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study are to characterize magneto-endosymbiont (ME) labeling of mammalian cells and to discern the subcellular fate of these living contrast agents. MEs are novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents that are being used for cell tracking studies. Understanding the fate of MEs in host cells is valuable for designing in vivo cell tracking experiments. PROCEDURES: The ME's surface epitopes, contrast-producing paramagnetic magnetosomal iron, and genome were studied using immunocytochemistry (ICC), Fe and MRI contrast measurements, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), respectively. These assays, coupled with other common assays, enabled validation of ME cell labeling and dissection of ME subcellular processing. RESULTS: The assays mentioned above provide qualitative and quantitative assessments of cell labeling, the subcellular localization and the fate of MEs. ICC results, with an ME-specific antibody, qualitatively shows homogenous labeling with MEs. The ferrozine assay shows that MEs have an average of 7 fg Fe/ME, ∼30 % of which contributes to MRI contrast and ME-labeled MDA-MB-231 (MDA-231) cells generally have 2.4 pg Fe/cell, implying ∼350 MEs/cell. Adjusting the concentration of Fe in the ME growth media reduces the concentration of non-MRI contrast-producing Fe. Results from the qPCR assay, which quantifies ME genomes in labeled cells, shows that processing of MEs begins within 24 h in MDA-231 cells. ICC results suggest this intracellular digestion of MEs occurs by the lysosomal degradation pathway. MEs coated with listeriolysin O (LLO) are able to escape the primary phagosome, but subsequently co-localize with LC3, an autophagy-associated molecule, and are processed for digestion. In embryos, where autophagy is transiently suppressed, MEs show an increased capacity for survival and even replication. Finally, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of ME-labeled MDA-231 cells confirms that the magnetosomes (the MRI contrast-producing particles) remain intact and enable in vivo cell tracking. CONCLUSIONS: MEs are used to label mammalian cells for the purpose of cell tracking in vivo, with MRI. Various assays described herein (ICC, ferrozine, and qPCR) allow qualitative and quantitative assessments of labeling efficiency and provide a detailed understanding of subcellular processing of MEs. In some cell types, MEs are digested, but the MRI-producing particles remain. Coating with LLO allows MEs to escape the primary phagosome, enhances retention slightly, and confirms that MEs are ultimately processed by autophagy. Numerous intracellular bacteria and all endosymbiotically derived organelles have evolved molecular mechanisms to avoid intracellular clearance, and identification of the specific processes involved in ME clearance provides a framework on which to develop MEs with enhanced retention in mammalian cells.

Mouse Sperm Cryopreservation and Recovery of Genetically Modified Mice.

Highly definable genetically, the humble mouse is the "reagent" mammal of choice with which to probe and begin to understand the human condition in all its complexities. With the recent advance in direct genome editing via targeted nucleases, e.g., TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9, the possibilities in using these sophisticated tools have increased substantially leading to a massive increase in the variety of strain numbers of genetically modified lines. With this increase comes a greater need to economically and creatively manage their numbers. Further, once characterized, lines may be of limited use but still need to be archived in a format allowing their rapid resurrection. Further, maintaining colonies on "the shelf" is financially draining and carries potential risks including natural disaster loss, disease, and strain contamination. Here we outline a simple and economic protocol to cryopreserve mouse sperm from many different genetic backgrounds, and outline its recovery via in vitro fertilization (IVF). The combined use of sperm cryopreservation and IVF now allows a freedom and versatility in mouse management facilitating rapid line close down with the option to later recover and rapidly expand as needed.

Contemporary techniques for freezing mouse spermatozoa.

Each year, thousands of new mouse models are generated around the world to further biomedical research. Unfortunately, the cost of maintaining mouse colonies makes it uneconomical to keep strains on the shelf that are not part of active research programs. Ideally, these retired strains should be archived. If this is not done and the line is simply killed off, the genetics are lost to future generations of scientists. Traditionally, embryo freezing has been used to cryopreserve mice, but this is expensive, time consuming, requires large numbers of donor females, and usually involves invasive superovulation procedures. Sperm freezing circumvents all of these disadvantages and is rapidly becoming the technique of choice for many repositories. This has been made possible through the use of refined cryoprotective agents and the development of improved in vitro fertilization techniques. This article describes two popular sperm freezing techniques employed by mouse repositories to archive spermatozoa using cryoprotective agents supplemented with either L-glutamine or monothioglycerol.

The sophisticated mouse: protecting a precious reagent.

Definable, genetically and environmentally, the humble mouse has become a reagent with which to probe the human condition. The information thus gained is leading to a greater understanding of inter-individual variation in drug responses and disease processes and is forming the basis for personalized medicine. Inbred mice are the tool of choice as each strain is essentially clonal in nature creating a defined, uniform setting where the effects of genetic background and modifications can be evaluated coherently. However, the creation and characterization of novel mouse strains remain expensive and time consuming. Further, the continual maintenance of these valuable animals as live colonies is financially draining and carries continual potential risks, including disastrous loss due to fire, flood, disease, etc. There are also other more insidious disasters including genetic contamination and genetic drift, either of which can go undiscovered until their effects ruin experiments. With this in mind, we strongly recommend that all mouse strains be cryopreserved as a matter of standard mouse management. Cryopreservation is a powerful colony management tool, assuring strains are available upon demand, for example, for regulatory requirements, re-initiation of projects, collaborations, re-evaluation of data etc. However, it is essential that any cryopreservation approach be cost-effective for both strain closure and strain recovery. In this chapter, we describe the variables which can afflict an inbred mouse's genetic background (and hence phenotype), options to consider for strain archiving, and describe how to economically store and recover strains by sperm cryopreservation.

Performance of ten inbred mouse strains following assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs).

Superovulation, in vitro fertilization, embryo cryopreservation, and embryo transfer are assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) widely used in laboratory mice. Inbred strains of mice have inherent genetic differences that cause them to respond differently to these technologies. Knowing how common inbred strains will perform when used for ARTs will ensure the most efficient use of mice, time, and resources. In this study, we characterized the ability of 10 inbred strains: 129S1/SvImJ, A/J, BALB/cJ, BALB/cByJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, FVB/NJ, NOD/LtJ, and SJL/J to superovulate, fertilize in vitro, and produce live pups subsequent to embryo transfer. Three-week-old female mice were superovulated using eCG (5.0 IU) and hCG (5.0 IU). The resulting oocytes were fertilized in vitro in human tubal fluid medium with spermatozoa of the same strain. The following day, two-cell embryos were either transferred into pseudopregnant recipient females or cryopreserved. The cryopreserved embryos were later thawed and transferred into pseudopregnant recipient females. Differences in response to superovulation, fertilization, and number of live born produced after embryo transfer were observed between strains, substantiating the influence of genetic variability on ARTs. The response to the superovulation treatment varied among strains and ranged from 5+/-1(A/J) to 40+/-3 (129S1/SvImJ) normal oocytes per female. The average proportion of oocytes that fertilized ranged among strains from 24% (129S1/SvImJ) to 93% (DBA/2J and A/J). The average proportion of two-cell embryos that were transferred into recipient females and subsequently developed into live pups varied from 5% (A/J) to 53% (C57BL/6J) for fresh embryos and from 18% (BALB/cByJ) to 45% (129S1/SvImJ) for thawed embryos.