RESUMEN
Capnography has been the standard in the operating room for a long time now. When variable amounts of intrapulmonary shunt and intracardiac shunt are taken into account, arterial carbon dioxide (CO2) and end-tidal CO2 typically match rather well. The gap between arterial and end-tidal CO2 widens in patients with cardiopulmonary disorders. The current study sought to determine how arterial and end-tidal CO2 correlated with each other and with hemoglobin saturation both before and after pulmonary catheterization in a pediatric population with congenital heart disease. Methods: Fifty-seven children with congenital heart disease who underwent cardiopulmonary catheterization between March 2018 and April 2019 were included in a prospective cohort study at Children's Medical Center. Arterial and end-tidal CO2, and hemodynamic variables were assessed prior to the catheterization procedure. Then the patients underwent catheterization, and before being extubated, these variables were again assessed and compared to the baseline levels. Results: End-tidal CO2 increased significantly in cyanotic patients following the catheterization procedure, and the difference between arterial and end-tidal CO2 decreased significantly. End-tidal CO2, arterial CO2, and their difference did not significantly change in non-cyanotic patients following the catheterization procedure. End-tidal and arterial CO2 were not significantly correlated in cyanotic patients (r=0.411, P=0.128), but they were correlated after the catheterization procedure (r=0.617, P=0.014). Conclusions: End-tidal CO2 can estimate arterial CO2 in non-cyanotic patients reasonably. End-tidal CO2 cannot be used to estimate arterial CO2 in cyanotic patients since there is no association. After cardiac defect correction, end-tidal CO2 can be a reliable predictor of arterial CO2.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Correct endotracheal intubation results in better ventilation, prevents hypoxia and its possible damages, such as brain injury, and minimizes attempts for re-intubation. Up to now, several formulas have been published to estimate nasotracheal intubation tube length. This study aims to compare the accuracy of different suggested formulas to find the one that better estimates the tube insertion distance. METHODS: This cross-sectional retrospective study was carried out in 102 (51 female, 51 male) children who underwent cardiac surgery under general anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were correct nasotracheal intubation according to the postintubation chest X-ray (CXR). The estimated tracheal tube length was calculated by four different formulas. Pearson...s correlation coefficient was used to find the correlations between the estimated length of each formula and the correct nasotracheal tube length. Also, linear regression was used to obtain a formula to estimate nasotracheal tube length by weight, height, and age. RESULTS: The formula L=3*tube size+2 had the best correlation with tube length (r ...=...0.81, Confidence Interval: 0.732...0.878, p-value < 0.001). Among demographic variables, height had the highest correlation coefficient with the tube length (r...=...0.83, Confidence Interval: 0.788...0.802, p-value < 0.001). Therefore, considering the height as an independent variable and tube length as a dependent variable, using linear regression, the following formula was achieved for determining tube length: nasotracheal tube length...=...0.1*Height+7. CONCLUSIONS: The formula L=3*tube size+2 and the new suggested formula in this study can be used to estimate nasotracheal tube length in children under 4 years old. However, these formulas are only guides and require confirmation by auscultation and CXR.