Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World Neurosurg ; 188: 150-160, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796146

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a significant public health issue, leading to physical, psychological, and social complications. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have shown potential in diagnosing and predicting the functional and neurologic outcomes of subjects with SCI. ML algorithms can predict scores for SCI classification systems and accurately predict outcomes by analyzing large amounts of data. This systematic review aimed to examine the performance of ML algorithms for diagnosing and predicting the outcomes of subjects with SCI. METHODS: The literature was comprehensively searched for the pertinent studies from inception to May 25, 2023. Therefore, electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched with individual search syntax. RESULTS: A total of 9424 individuals diagnosed with SCI across multiple studies were analyzed. Among the 21 studies included, 5 specifically aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy, while the remaining 16 focused on exploring prognostic factors or management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: ML and deep learning (DL) have shown great potential in various aspects of SCI. ML and DL algorithms have been employed multiple times in predicting and diagnosing patients with SCI. While there are studies on diagnosing acute SCI using DL algorithms, further research is required in this area.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Automático , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Algoritmos , Aprendizaje Profundo , Pronóstico , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia
2.
Emerg Med J ; 41(2): 123-127, 2024 Jan 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38071537

RESUMEN

A short-cut systematic review was conducted using a described protocol. The three-part question addressed was: In patients with COVID-19 infection, does blood group type O versus non-O blood groups lead to a lower risk of severe COVID-19 infection? MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant evidence. Altogether, 238 papers were found using the search strategy developed. Seventeen provided the best evidence to answer the three-part question. The data on first author name, publication year, country of origin, study type, study sample size, participant's gender, reported effect sizes, main findings and limitations were extracted from the relevant studies and listed in a table. Finally, 4 out of 17 studies revealed that having blood group type O may be associated with a lower risk of severe COVID-19 among patients with COVID-19 infection and the 13 remaining studies reported no significant relationship between having O blood group and risk of COVID-19 severity among the infected individuals. Of three systematic reviews and meta-analyses identified, none detected a protective effect of blood group type O. The clinical bottom line is that the best available evidence does not support the notion that blood group type O is protective against serious outcomes in COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Grupos Sanguíneos , COVID-19 , Humanos
3.
World Neurosurg ; 2023 Nov 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) encompass a set of tumors, and those tumors with H3K27M mutation carry a poor prognosis. In recent years, machine learning (ML)-based radiomics have shown promising results in predicting gene mutation status non-invasively. Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic performance of ML-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in predicting H3K27M mutation status in DMG patients. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using relevant keywords in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to May 2023. Original studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of ML models in predicting H3K27M mutation status in DMGs were enrolled. Quality assessment of the enrolled studies was conducted using QUADAS-2. Data were analyzed using STATA version 17.0 to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic score, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). RESULTS: A total of 13 studies, including 12 retrospectives and one both retrospective and prospective study, enrolled 1510 (male=777) DMG patients. Six studies underwent meta-analysis which showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, diagnostic score, and DOR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.77-0.97), 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.88), 4.86 (95% CI 3.25-7.24), 0.11 (95% CI 0.04-0.29), 3.75 (95% CI 2.62-4.88), and 42.61 (95% CI 13.77-131.87), respectively. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive prediction of H3K27M mutation status in patients with DMGs using MRI radiomics is a promising tool with good diagnostic performance. However, the pooled metrics had a wide confidence interval, which required further studies to enhance ML algorithms' accuracy and facilitate their integration into daily clinical practice.

4.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 35(11): 2333-2348, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37801265

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disease. Early diagnosis of AD and its precursor, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), is crucial for timely intervention and management. Radiomics involves extracting quantitative features from medical images and analyzing them using advanced computational algorithms. These characteristics have the potential to serve as biomarkers for disease classification, treatment response prediction, and patient stratification. Of note, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics showed a promising result for diagnosing and classifying AD, and MCI from normal subjects. Thus, we aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of the MRI radiomics for this task. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A comprehensive search of the current literature was conducted using relevant keywords in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to August 5, 2023. Original studies discussing the diagnostic performance of MRI radiomics for the classification of AD, MCI, and normal subjects were included. Method quality was evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) and the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools. RESULTS: We identified 13 studies that met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 5448 participants. The overall quality of the included studies was moderate to high. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI radiomics for differentiating AD from normal subjects were 0.92 (95% CI [0.85; 0.96]) and 0.91 (95% CI [0.85; 0.95]), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI radiomics for differentiating MCI from normal subjects were 0.74 (95% CI [0.60; 0.85]) and 0.79 (95% CI [0.70; 0.86]), respectively. Also, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI radiomics for differentiating AD from MCI were 0.73 (95% CI [0.64; 0.80]) and 0.79 (95% CI [0.64; 0.90]), respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI radiomics has promising diagnostic performance in differentiating AD, MCI, and normal subjects. It can potentially serve as a non-invasive and reliable tool for early diagnosis and classification of AD and MCI.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Disfunción Cognitiva , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas , Humanos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
5.
J Neurol ; 270(11): 5131-5154, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37535100

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with nervous system involvement, with more than one-third of COVID-19 patients experiencing neurological manifestations. Utilizing a systematic review, this study aims to summarize brain MRI findings in COVID-19 patients presenting with neurological symptoms. METHODS: Systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for literature addressing brain MRI findings in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. RESULTS: 25 publications containing a total number of 3118 COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms who underwent MRI were included. The most common MRI findings and the respective pooled incidences in decreasing order were acute/subacute infarct (22%), olfactory bulb abnormalities (22%), white matter abnormalities (20%), cerebral microbleeds (17%), grey matter abnormalities (12%), leptomeningeal enhancement (10%), ADEM (Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis) or ADEM-like lesions (10%), non-traumatic ICH (10%), cranial neuropathy (8%), cortical gray matter signal changes compatible with encephalitis (8%), basal ganglia abnormalities (5%), PRES (Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome) (3%), hypoxic-ischemic lesions (4%), venous thrombosis (2%), and cytotoxic lesions of the corpus callosum (2%). CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that a considerable proportion of patients with COVID-19 might harbor neurological abnormalities detectable by MRI. Among various findings, the most common MRI alterations are acute/subacute infarction, olfactory bulb abnormalities, white matter abnormalities, and cerebral microbleeds.

6.
J Clin Neurol ; 19(6): 597-611, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37455513

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE) is a rare neurological disorder that is often associated with viral infections. Since the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a few COVID-19-associated ANE cases have been reported. Since very little is known about ANE, the present study aimed to determine the clinical, biochemical, and radiological characteristics of affected patients. METHODS: A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases for articles published up to August 30, 2022 using relevant keywords. Case reports and series in the English language that reported ANE in adult patients with COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were included in this study. Data on the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics of patients were extracted and analyzed using the SPSS software (version 26). RESULTS: The study included 30 patients (18 males) with COVID-19 and ANE who were aged 49.87±18.68 years (mean±standard deviation). Fever was the most-prevalent symptom at presentation (66.7%). Elevated C-reactive protein was observed in the laboratory assessments of 13 patients. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were the most-common radiological modalities used for brain assessments. The most commonly prescribed medications were methylprednisolone (30%) and remdesivir (26.7%). Sixteen patients died prior to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of COVID-19-associated ANE requires a thorough knowledge of the disease. Since the clinical presentations of ANE are neither sensitive nor specific, further laboratory and brain radiological evaluations will be needed to confirm the diagnosis. The suspicion of ANE should be raised among patients with COVID-19 who present with progressive neurological symptoms.

7.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(8): 3515-3528, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37093291

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 can result in an extensive range of extrapulmonary, and neurological signs and symptoms such as olfactory and/or taste dysfunction, and otologic symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate the hearing loss manifestation from COVID-19. METHODS: The goal of this umbrella review was to examine hearing loss associated with COVID-19 disease. English literature published until October 15, 2022 in online databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was considered for this purpose. Eligibility of the articles for subsequent data extraction was evaluated in a two-step selection process with consideration to an inclusion/exclusion criterion. This review followed the PRISMA protocol and the Amstar-2 checklist for quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of four treatment strategies were used by different studies which included oral corticosteroids, intratympanic corticosteroids, combined oral and intratympanic corticosteroids, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Five studies investigated corticosteroid use in the forms of oral or intratympanic injection; four studies reported (complete or partial) hearing improvements after steroid treatment, while one study stated no significant improvement in hearing function. One study reported that oral corticosteroid monotherapy alone was not effective, while vestibular symptoms were ameliorated by a combination of oral prednisone, intratympanic dexamethasone injection, and hydroxychloroquine. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that despite being one of the rare complications of COVID-19, hearing loss can impact a patient's quality of life. The most common type reported was sensorineural hearing loss, which can be diagnosed with variable techniques.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sordera , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural , Pérdida Auditiva Súbita , Humanos , Pérdida Auditiva Súbita/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida , COVID-19/complicaciones , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/diagnóstico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Inyección Intratimpánica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico
8.
Tanaffos ; 20(1): 75-78, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34394374

RESUMEN

Since SARS-CoV-2 virus emerging in winter 2019 in Wuhan, Hubei, China, COVID-19 has spread among different countries. The novel corona virus has affected more than 15,000,000 people all around the world. Becoming pandemic, COVID-19 is a major concern for both people and health systems. Novel corona virus affects multiple organs such as lungs and kidneys which can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury (AKI) ending to death. Furthermore, patients with COVID-19 may present different atypical symptoms making the diagnoses more complicated. The current patient presented to the emergency department with a 7-day history of hemoptysis and hematuria which are among the less common symptoms among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus. In addition to delayed diagnosis, atypical symptoms and signs make management and treatment more difficult. Awareness of new, atypical symptoms and the effective treatment is associated with better outcome and prognosis.

9.
Arch Acad Emerg Med ; 8(1): e88, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33244523

RESUMEN

Since the novel coronavirus emerged in late December, 2019 in Wuhan, China, millions of people have been infected and thousands of patients have died. Fever and dyspnea are the most common symptoms of infection with SARS-CoV-2. However, these symptoms are neither specific nor diagnostic for COVID-19. Symptom overlap between COVID-19 and some other conditions may lead other diseases to be missed and underdiagnosed. Just like COVID-19, pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) and pulmonary infarction may present with fever and respiratory symptoms. Since COVID-19 emerged and spread worldwide, many clinicians are focused on diagnosis and treatment of this novel viral infection. Hence, other diseases presenting with the same symptoms as COVID-19 may remain underdiagnosed. Here, we report three cases of PTE and pulmonary infarction presenting with fever and respiratory symptoms mimicking COVID-19.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...