Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the COPD Assessment Test in fibrotic interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (FILD) have impaired health status. The simple questionnaire in the COPD assessment test (CAT) has been validated for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), but no or limited data exist for patients with FILD as a whole. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability, repeatability and responsiveness of the CAT, and estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patients with FILD. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of 358 consecutive patients with FILD including 131 with IPF, who underwent clinical assessment over 6-12 month intervals. We assessed the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the CAT. MCID was estimated using distribution methods and anchor methods with mean change and regression models. RESULTS: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.898) and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.865) for the CAT score was acceptable. A cross-sectional study showed constructive validity. Changes in the CAT over 6-12 months were significantly associated with change in anchors including physiological function, exercise capacity, and dyspnea regardless of IPF diagnosis. The estimated MCIDs of the CAT for the deterioration and improvement directions were at least +5 and at least -3 points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CAT is a reliable, responsive and clinically relevant instrument for assessing health status in patients with FILD.

Validation of a computed tomography diagnostic model for differentiating fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) from other interstitial lung diseases, particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), is often difficult. This study aimed to examine computed tomography (CT) findings that were useful for differentiating between fHP and IPF and to develop and validate a radiological diagnostic model. METHODS: In this study, 246 patients (fHP, n = 104; IPF, n = 142) from two institutions were included and randomly divided into the test (n = 164) and validation (n = 82) groups (at a 2:1 ratio). Three radiologists evaluated CT findings, such as pulmonary fibrosis, small airway disease, and predominant distribution, and compared them between fHP and IPF using binomial logistic regression and multivariate analysis. A prognostic model was developed from the test group and validated with the validation group. RESULTS: Ground-glass opacity (GGO) with traction bronchiectasis (TB), honeycombing, hypoattenuation area, three-density pattern, diffuse craniocaudal distribution, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were more common in fHP than in IPF. In multivariate analysis, GGO with TB, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were significant features. The area under the curve of the fHP diagnostic model with the three aforementioned CT features was 0.733 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.655-0.811, p < 0.001) in the test group and 0.630 (95% CI, 0.504-0.755, p < 0.047) in the validation group. CONCLUSION: GGO with TB, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were important CT features for differentiating fHP from IPF.

Pulmonary function and chest CT abnormalities 3 months after discharge from COVID-19, 2020-2021: A nation-wide multicenter prospective cohort study from the Japanese respiratory society.

BACKGROUND: No comprehensive analysis of the pulmonary sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Japan based on respiratory function tests and chest computed tomography (CT) has been reported. We evaluated post-COVID-19 conditions, especially focusing on pulmonary sequelae assessed by pulmonary function tests and chest CT. METHODS: For this prospective cohort study, we enrolled 1069 patients who presented pneumonia at the time of admission in 55 hospitals from February 2020 to September 2021. Disease severity was classified as moderateⅠ, moderate II, and severe, defined primarily according to the degree of respiratory failure. The data on post-COVID-19 conditions over 12 months, pulmonary function, and chest CT findings at 3 months were evaluated in this study. Additionally, the impact of COVID-19 severity on pulmonary sequelae, such as impaired diffusion capacity, restrictive pattern, and CT abnormalities, was also evaluated. RESULTS: The most frequently reported post-COVID-19 conditions at 3 months after COVID-19 were muscle weakness, dyspnea, and fatigue (48.4%, 29.0%, and 24.7%, respectively). The frequency of symptoms gradually decreased over subsequent months. In pulmonary function tests at 3 months, the incidence of impaired diffusion capacity and restrictive pattern increased depending on disease severity. There also were differences in the presence of chest CT abnormalities at the 3 months, which was markedly correlated with the severity. CONCLUSION: We reported a comprehensive analysis of post-COVID-19 condition, pulmonary function, and chest CT abnormalities in Japanese patients with COVID-19. The findings of this study will serve as valuable reference data for future post-COVID-19 condition research in Japan.

Role of microbiota-derived corisin in coagulation activation during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: Coagulopathy is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Hypercoagulability in COVID-19 results in deep vein thrombosis, thromboembolic complications, and diffuse intravascular coagulation. Microbiome dysbiosis influences the clinical course of COVID-19. However, the role of dysbiosis in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy is not fully understood. OBJECTIVES: The present study tested the hypothesis that the microbiota-derived proapoptotic corisin is involved in the coagulation system activation during SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 47 consecutive patients who consulted for symptoms of COVID-19. A mouse acute lung injury model was used to recapitulate the clinical findings. A549 alveolar epithelial, THP-1, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells were used to evaluate procoagulant and anticoagulant activity of corisin. RESULTS: COVID-19 patients showed significantly high circulating levels of corisin, thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimer, tumor necrosis factor-α, and monocyte-chemoattractant protein-1 with reduced levels of free protein S compared with healthy subjects. The levels of thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimer, and corisin were significantly correlated. A monoclonal anticorisin-neutralizing antibody significantly inhibited the inflammatory response and coagulation system activation in a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-associated acute lung injury mouse model, and the levels of corisin and thrombin-antithrombin complex were significantly correlated. In an in vitro experiment, corisin increased the tissue factor activity and decreased the anticoagulant activity of thrombomodulin in epithelial, endothelial, and monocytic cells. CONCLUSION: The microbiota-derived corisin is significantly increased and correlated with activation of the coagulation system during SARS-CoV-2 infection, and corisin may directly increase the procoagulant activity in epithelial, endothelial, and monocytic cells.

Disease progression and changes in KL-6 in patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the annual change in Krebs von Lungen-6 (KL-6) and its correlation with forced vital capacity (FVC) in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (lcSSc-ILD). We aimed to clarify the correlation during the clinical course. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from consecutive patients with lcSSc-ILD. We measured FVC and KL-6 annually and calculated their annual changes using the difference in absolute values. Decline in FVC was defined as annual decline in FVC ≥5 %. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with SSc-ILD were included. The median age was 62 years and 58 % were female. The median FVC was 87.3 % and the median KL-6 was 1629 U/ml. The median observation period was 55.2 months and the annual changes in FVC and KL-6 were evaluated 151 times simultaneously. The annual change in KL-6 had a significant negative correlation with that in FVC in the first year from the initial evaluation (from the baseline to one-year follow-up) (r = -0.819, p < 0.01), but not after the first year. In the multivariable analysis adjusted by age, sex, and FVC at each year, the annual change of KL-6 (per 100 U/ml) was significantly associated with decline in FVC in the first year (odds ratio: 3.03, 95 % confidence interval: 1.21-7.59, p = 0.02), but not after the first year. CONCLUSIONS: Only in the first year from the initial evaluation, there was negative correlation between the annual change in FVC and that in KL-6 and the annual elevation in KL-6 was associated with decline in FVC in patients with lcSSc-ILD.

Changes in patient-reported outcomes in patients with non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrotic interstitial lung disease and progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) captures different aspects of the fibrotic interstitial lung disease (FILD) evaluation from the patient's perspective. However, little is known about how HRQoL changes in patients with non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) FILD, especially in those with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). The aim of this study is to clarify whether HRQoL deteriorates in patients with non-IPF FILD and to evaluate the differences in the changes in HRQoL between those with and without PPF. Methods: We collected data from consecutive patients with non-IPF FILD and compared annual changes in HRQoL over 2 years between patients with PPF and those without. The St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and COPD assessment test (CAT) were used to assess HRQoL. Changes in the SGRQ and CAT scores for 24 months from baseline were evaluated with a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Results: A total of 396 patients with non-IPF FILD were reviewed. The median age was 65 years and 202 were male (51.0%). The median SGRQ and CAT scores were 29.6 and 11, respectively. Eighty-six (21.7%) showed PPF. Both SGRQ and CAT scores were significantly deteriorated in patients with PPF compared to those without PPF (p < 0.01 for both). Clinically important deterioration in the SGRQ and CAT scores were observed in 40.0 and 35.7% of patients with PPF and 11.7 and 16.7% of those without, respectively. PPF was significantly associated with clinically important deterioration in the SGRQ score (odds ratio 5.04; 95%CI, 2.61-9.76, p < 0.01) and CAT score (odds ratio 2.78; 95%CI, 1.27-6.06, p = 0.02). Conclusion: The SGRQ and CAT scores were significantly deteriorated in patients with non-IPF FILD and PPF. Considering an evaluation of HRQoL would be needed when assessing PPF.

Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in High-Risk Patients with COVID-19 in a Community Setting.

Molnupiravir (MOV) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) are efficacious oral antiviral agents for patients with the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19). However, little is known about their effectiveness in older adults and those at high risk of disease progression. This retrospective single-center observational study assessed and compared the outcomes of COVID-19 treated with MOV and NMV/r in a real-world community setting. We included patients with confirmed COVID-19 combined with one or more risk factors for disease progression from June to October 2022. Of 283 patients, 79.9% received MOV and 20.1% NMV/r. The mean patient age was 71.7 years, 56.5% were men, and 71.7% had received ≥3 doses of vaccine. COVID-19-related hospitalization (2.8% and 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.978) or death (0.4% and 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.104) did not differ significantly between the MOV and NMV/r groups. The incidence of adverse events was 2.7% and 5.3%, and the incidence of treatment discontinuation was 2.7% and 5.3% in the MOV and NMV/r groups, respectively. The real-world effectiveness of MOV and NMV/r was similar among older adults and those at high risk of disease progression. The incidence of hospitalization or death was low.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and histologic usual interstitial pneumonia treated with anti-fibrotic versus immunosuppressive therapy.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic strategies in patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and histological usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (IPAF-UIP) have not been thoroughly evaluated. We compared the therapeutic efficacy of anti-fibrotic therapy with that of immunosuppressive treatment for patients with IPAF-UIP. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, we identified consecutive IPAF-UIP patients treated with anti-fibrotic therapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Clinical characteristics, one-year treatment response, acute exacerbation, and survival were studied. We performed a stratified analysis by the pathological presence or absence of inflammatory cell infiltration. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with anti-fibrotic therapy and 29 with immunosuppressive treatment were included. There was a significant difference in one-year forced vital capacity (FVC) change between patients with anti-fibrotic treatment (4 in 27 improved, 12 stable, and 11 worsened) and those with immunosuppressive treatment (16 in 29 improved, eight stable, and five worsened) (p = 0.006). There was also a significant difference in one-year St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) change between patients with anti-fibrotic therapy (2 in 27 improved, ten stable, and 15 worsened) and those with immunosuppressive treatment (14 in 29 improved, 12 stable, and worsened) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival between the groups (p = 0.32). However, in the subgroup with histological inflammatory cell infiltration, survival was significantly better with immunosuppressive therapy (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In IPAF-UIP, immunosuppressive therapy seemed to be superior to anti-fibrotic treatment in terms of therapeutic response, and provided better outcomes in the histological inflammatory subgroup. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the therapeutic strategy in IPAF-UIP.