RESUMEN
A 9-year-old boy was suspected of having acute myocardial infarction and emergency coronary angiogram was performed. No signs of flow limitation in either coronary artery was detected. We performed intravascular ultrasonography from the ascending aorta, which showed a ridge on the left main trunk acting like a valve, resulting in significant stenosis. Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent deployment was performed with good result.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often concomitant with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), which can cause adverse cardiovascular events. Although an appropriate approach to SDB prevents cardiac remodelling, detection of concomitant SDB in patients with HCM remains suboptimal. Thus, we aimed to develop a machine learning-based discriminant model for SDB in HCM. METHODS: In the present multicentre study, we consecutively registered patients with HCM and performed nocturnal oximetry. The outcome was a high Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI), defined as 3% ODI >10, which significantly correlated with the presence of moderate or severe SDB. We randomly divided the whole participants into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). With data from the training set, we developed a random forest discriminant model for high ODI based on clinical parameters. We tested the ability of the discriminant model on the test set and compared it with a previous logistic regression model for distinguishing SDB in patients with HCM. RESULTS: Among 369 patients with HCM, 228 (61.8%) had high ODI. In the test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the discriminant model was 0.86 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.94). The sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.98) and specificity was 0.68 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.84). When the test set was divided into low-probability and high-probability groups, the high-probability group had a higher prevalence of high ODI than the low-probability group (82.4% vs 17.4%, OR 20.9 (95% CI 5.3 to 105.8), Fisher's exact test p<0.001). The discriminant model significantly outperformed the previous logistic regression model (DeLong test p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our study serves as the first to develop a machine learning-based discriminant model for the concomitance of SDB in patients with HCM. The discriminant model may facilitate cost-effective screening tests and treatments for SDB in the population with HCM.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica , Aprendizaje Automático , Oximetría , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño , Humanos , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/complicaciones , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/diagnóstico , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/complicaciones , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Curva ROC , AdultoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in membranous septum (MS) length during the cardiac cycle and by measurement methods using the preoperative computed tomography (CT) images for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHOD: Among 34 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT for TAVR, we measured MS lengths by three measurement methods (coronal, stretched, and reformatted coronal view method) at 10% intervals in the cardiac cycle. RESULT: MS lengths differed between the three measurement methods in all cardiac phases. Moderate correlations were observed between the MS lengths measured by the coronal view method and the other two methods. In contrast, strong correlations were observed between the MS lengths measured by the stretched view method and the reformatted coronal view method. The frequencies of the minimum and maximum MS lengths during the cardiac cycle tended to be highest at R-R 90% and R-R 30%, respectively. The median MS lengths at R-R 90% were smaller than those at R-R 30% in all measurement methods. CONCLUSION: The MS length in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT for TAVR varies notably depending on the cardiac cycle and measurement methods. When evaluating MS length, it is crucial to consider the measurement method and to perform measurements during diastole in order to evaluate the minimum value during the cardiac cycle.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
In this case, we successfully repositioned the transcatheter heart valve (THV) by pulling it with a snare inserted via the right brachial artery. Attempting to pull the THV via the femoral approach was not successful, due to the vector of the pulling force not being coaxial. Changing the direction of the force by switching to an approach from the right brachial artery successfully prevented perivalvular leakage. While there are previous case reports of repositioning an implanted transcatheter valve in a native valve using a gooseneck snare, to our knowledge, this is the first case of successfully repositioning an implanted transcatheter valve in a valve-in-valve procedure using the precise assessment that can be achieved with intra-procedural transesophageal echocardiography. Learning objective: Perivalvular leakage (PVL) is a major problem after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. In this case, we experienced PVL after implantation of self-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) inside the previously inserted Mosaic bioprosthetic valve. Depth of the implanted valve was too low into left ventricle accessed with transesophageal echocardiogram. It is barely known whether THV in surgical implanted aortic valve could be repositioned using snare maneuver, but we successfully pulled the valve via brachial artery and PVL was controlled.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been no previous report evaluating the long impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the clinical outcomes stratified by the initial management [conservative or aortic valve replacement (AVR)] strategies of severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: We analyzed 3815 patients with severe AS enrolled in the CURRENT AS registry. Patients with AF were defined as those having a history of AF when severe AS was found on the index echocardiography. The primary outcome measure was a composite of aortic valve-related death or hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: The cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in patients with AF than in those without AF (44.2â¯% versus 33.2â¯%, HR 1.54, 95â¯% CI 1.35-1.76). After adjusting for confounders, the risk of AF relative to no AF remained significant (HR 1.34, 95â¯% CI 1.16-1.56). The magnitude of excess adjusted risk of AF for the primary outcome measure was greater in the initial AVR stratum (Nâ¯=â¯1197, HR 1.95, 95â¯% CI 1.36-2.78) than in the conservative stratum (Nâ¯=â¯2618, HR 1.26, 95â¯% CI 1.08-1.47) with a significant interaction (pâ¯=â¯0.04). In patients with AF, there was a significant excess adjusted risk of paroxysmal AF (Nâ¯=â¯254) relative to chronic AF (Nâ¯=â¯528) for the primary outcome measure (HR 1.34, 95â¯% CI 1.01-1.78). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS, concomitant AF was independently associated with worse clinical outcomes regardless of the initial management strategies. In those patients with conservative strategy, paroxysmal AF is stronger risk factor than chronic AF.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Fibrilación Atrial , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The left ventricular (LV) apex is recommended as the first choice for positioning the epicardial pacing. We encountered a patient with congenital heart disease (CHD) showing hypokinesis of the LV apical pacing site after implantation of a pacemaker with epicardial leads. This phenomenon was revealed by the early shortening and systolic rebound stretch of the same lesion on two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography, which developed in the intraventricular dyssynchrony between the LV apex and base. Cardiac resynchronization therapy provided an excellent result around the hypokinetic lesion. It is wise to arrange detailed evaluations in each patient with complicated CHD, aiming at a successful treatment to enable ventricular synchronicity.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Cardiomiopatías , Procedimiento de Fontan , Humanos , Procedimiento de Fontan/efectos adversos , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , EcocardiografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) has not been well addressed in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).MethodsâandâResults:We analyzed 3,815 patients from a retrospective multicenter registry of severe AS in Japan (CURRENT AS registry). We compared the clinical outcomes between patients with moderate/severe MR and with none/mild MR according to the initial treatment strategy (initial aortic valve replacement [AVR] or conservative strategy). The primary outcome measure was a composite of aortic valve-related death or heart failure hospitalization. At baseline, moderate/severe MR was present in 227/1,197 (19%) patients with initial AVR strategy and in 536/2,618 (20%) patients with a conservative strategy. The crude cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in patients with moderate/severe MR than in those with none/mild MR, regardless of the initial treatment strategy (25.2% vs. 14.4%, P<0.001 in the initial AVR strategy, and 63.3% vs. 40.7%, P<0.001 in the conservative strategy). After adjusting confounders, moderate/severe MR was not independently associated with higher risk for the primary outcome measure in the initial AVR strategy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.83, P=0.69), and in the conservative strategy (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93-1.37, P=0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant moderate/severe MR was not independently associated with higher risk for the primary outcome measure regardless of the initial treatment strategy.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/complicaciones , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Two randomized control trials demonstrated that transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with 1-2 year clinical outcomes comparable or even superior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, no previous study has reported the clinical outcomes after SAVR in Japanese patients with low surgical risk. From 3815 consecutive patients enrolled in the CURRENT AS registry, we retrieved 220 patients who underwent SAVR in reference to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the PARTNER 3 trial. Age and surgical risk score in the current study population were comparable to those in the PARTNER 3 trial (Age: 75 years versus 74 years, and STS-PROM score: 2.3 versus 1.9). The cumulative incidence of a composite all-cause death or stroke was comparable between the current study population and the SAVR patients in the PARTNER 3 trial both at 30-day (2.3% versus 3.3%), and at 1-year (4.1% versus 4.9%). The clinical outcomes of SAVR in low surgical risk patients with severe AS selected from a real world Japanese registry according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the PARTNER 3 trial was favorable and numerically comparable to those of SAVR patients in the PARTNER 3 trial.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Sistema de Registros , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity of aortic stenosis (AS), clinical evidence about the long-term effect of DM on patients with AS is insufficient.MethodsâandâResults:Data were acquired from CURRENT AS, a large Japanese multicenter registry that enrolled 3,815 patients with severe AS. Patients without initial valve replacement were defined as the conservative group; among them, 621 (23.4%) had DM, whereas 1997 did not. The DM group was further divided into 2 groups according to insulin treatment (insulin-treated DM, n=130; non-insulin treated DM, n=491). The primary outcome was a composite of aortic valve (AV)-related death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were AV-related death, HF hospitalization, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, sudden death, and surgical or transcatheter AV replacement during follow up. As a result, DM was associated with higher risk for the primary outcome (52.8% vs. 42.9%, P<0.001), with a statistically significant adjusted hazard ratio (HR 1.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.56, P<0.001). All secondary outcomes were not significantly different between DM and non-DM patients after adjusting for confounding factors, except for HF hospitalization. Insulin use was not associated with higher incidence of primary or secondary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In initially conservatively managed patients with AS, DM was independently associated with higher risk for a composite of AV-related death or HF hospitalization; however, insulin use was not associated with poor outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Insulinas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are no data comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) outcomes in real clinical practice in Japan. METHODSâANDâRESULTS: We combined 2 independent registries, the K-TAVI Registry (a 6-center prospective registry of consecutive patients who underwent TAVI) and the CURRENT AS Registry (a large, 27-center registry of 3,815 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis [AS]). In the K-TAVI Registry, 338 patients underwent TAVI with SAPIEN XT balloon-expandable valves from October 2013 to January 2016, whereas in the CURRENT AS Registry 237 patients with severe AS underwent SAVR from January 2003 to December 2011. Propensity score matching was conducted, with final cohort comprising 306 patients. The cumulative 2-year incidence of all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization did not differ significantly between the TAVI and SAVR groups (13.7% vs. 12.4% [P=0.81] and 7.9% vs 3.9% [P=0.13], respectively). After adjusting for residual confounders, there were no significant differences between the TAVI and SAVR groups in the risk for all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-1.58; P=0.43) or HF hospitalization (HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.40-4.59; P=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: These findings from 2 independent Japanese registries suggest that the 2-year risk of all-cause mortality and HF does not differ significantly between TAVI and SAVR groups in real-world practice in Japan.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Recuperación de la Función , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the initial aortic valve replacement (AVR) strategy relative to a conservative strategy on long-term outcomes stratified by age among asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).MethodsâandâResults:Among 1,808 asymptomatic severe AS patients in the CURRENT AS registry, there were 1,166 patients aged ≥75 years (initial AVR: n=124, and conservative: n=1,042), and 642 patients with age <75 years (initial AVR: n=167, and conservative: n=475). Median follow-up interval was 1,280 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1,012-1,611) days, and 1461 (IQR: 1,132-1,886) days in patients aged ≥ and <75 years, respectively. The favorable effect of the initial AVR strategy relative to conservative strategy for heart failure (HF) hospitalization was seen regardless of the age stratum (≥75 years: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.34, and <75 years: HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.99, interaction P=0.35). However, the lower mortality risk of the initial AVR strategy relative to conservative strategy was significant in patients aged ≥75 years, but not in patients <75 years, with significant interaction (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20-0.61, and HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.41-1.16, interaction P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of initial AVR in reducing HF hospitalization in asymptomatic patients with severe AS was consistently seen regardless of age. The magnitude of mortality benefit of initial AVR was greater in super-elder patients than in non-super-elder patients.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Hemodinámica , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Conservador/mortalidad , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recuperación de la Función , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: Early aortic valve replacement (AVR) might be beneficial in selected high-risk asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), considering their poor prognosis when managed conservatively. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical scoring system to predict AS-related events within 1 year after diagnosis in asymptomatic severe AS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 1274 asymptomatic severe AS patients derived from a retrospective multicentre registry enrolling consecutive patients with severe AS in Japan (CURRENT AS registry), who were managed conservatively and completed 1-year follow-up without AVR. From a randomly assigned derivation set (N = 849), we developed CURRENT AS risk score for the AS-related event (a composite of AS-related death and heart failure hospitalization) within 1 year using a multivariable logistic regression model. The risk score comprised independent risk predictors including left ventricular ejection fraction <60%, haemoglobin ≤11.0 g/dL, chronic lung disease (2 points), diabetes mellitus, haemodialysis, and any concomitant valve disease (1 point). The predictive accuracy of the model was good with the area under the curve of 0.79 and 0.77 in the derivation and validation sets (N = 425). In the validation set, the 1-year incidence of AS-related events was much higher in patients with score ≥2 than in patients with score ≤1 (Score 0: 2.2%, Score 1: 1.9%, Score 2: 13.4%, Score 3: 14.3%, and Score ≥4: 22.7%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CURRENT-AS risk score integrating clinical and echocardiographic factors well-predicted the risk of AS-related events at 1 year in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and was validated internally.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Sistema de Registros , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Anciano , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1-year follow-up in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) managed conservatively. BACKGROUND: No previous study has explored the association between LVEF decline during follow-up and clinical outcomes in patients with severe AS. METHODS: Among 3,815 patients with severe AS enrolled in the multicenter CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry in Japan, 839 conservatively managed patients who underwent echocardiography at 1-year follow-up were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was a composite of AS-related deaths and hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: There were 91 patients (10.8%) with >10% declines in LVEF and 748 patients (89.2%) without declines. Left ventricular dimensions and the prevalence of valve regurgitation and atrial fibrillation or flutter significantly increased in the group with declines in LVEF. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in the group with declines in LVEF than in the group with no decline (39.5% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of decline in LVEF over no decline for the primary outcome measure remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.29 to 3.06). When stratified by LVEF at index echocardiography (≥70%, 60% to 69%, and <60%), the risk of decline in LVEF on the primary outcome was consistently seen in all the subgroups, without any interaction (p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe AS with >10% declines in LVEF at 1 year after diagnosis had worse AS-related clinical outcomes than those without declines in LVEF under conservative management. (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Registry; UMIN000012140).
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is criticized by some as an expensive treatment in super-elder patients with limited life expectancy. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the magnitude of clinical benefit provided by TAVI in comparison with conservative management in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) in real clinical practice, which would be important in the decision making for TAVI. METHODS: We combined two independent registries, namely CURRENT AS and K-TAVI registries. CURRENT AS was a multicenter registry enrolling 3815 consecutive patients with severe AS irrespective to treatment modalities between January 2003 and December 2011. K-TAVI was a multicenter, prospective registry including 449 consecutive patients with severe AS, who underwent TAVI with SAPIEN XT balloon-expandable valves between October 2013 and June 2016. In these 2 registries, 449 patients received TAVI and 894 patients were managed with conservative strategy. We conducted propensity score matching and finally obtained a cohort of 556 patients (278 patients for each group) for the analysis. The primary outcome measures were all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization at 2-year. RESULTS: The cumulative 2-year incidences of all-cause death and HF hospitalization were significantly lower in the TAVI group than in the conservative group (16.8% versus 36.6%, P<0.001, and 10.7% versus 37.2%, P<0.001). After adjusting the residual confounders, TAVI reduced the risks of all-cause death (HR, 0.46; 95%CI, 0.32-0.69; P = 0.0001) and HF hospitalizations (HR, 0.25; 95%CI, 0.16-0.40; P<0.0001) compared with conservative strategy. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of non-cardiovascular death between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI in the early Japanese experience was associated with striking risk reduction for all-cause death as well as HF hospitalization as compared with the historical cohort of patients with severe AS who were managed conservatively just before introduction of TAVI in Japan.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/prevención & control , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has not been a previous report on the long-term outcomes of those patients who refuse aortic valve replacement (AVR) despite physicians' recommendations.MethodsâandâResults:Among 3,815 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) enrolled in the CURRENT AS registry, the study population comprised 2,005 symptomatic patients, who were subdivided into 3 groups by their treatment strategy and the reasons for conservative strategy (Initial AVR group: n=905; Patient rejection group: n=256; Physician judgment group, n=844). The primary outcome measure was a composite of aortic valve-related death and heart failure hospitalization. Patients in the patient rejection group as compared with those in the physician judgment group were younger, and had less comorbidities, and lower surgical risk scores. The cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure in the patient rejection group was markedly higher than that in the initial AVR group, and was similar to that in the physician judgment group (60.7%, 19.0%, and 66.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patient rejection was the reason for non-referral to AVR in nearly one-quarter of the symptomatic patients with severe AS who were managed conservatively. The dismal outcome in patients who refused AVR was similar to that in patients who were not referred to AVR based on physician judgment despite less comorbidities and lower surgical risk scores in the former than in the latter.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Tratamiento Conservador , Selección de Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Pronóstico , Derivación y Consulta , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Background Data are scarce on the role of aortic valve area (AVA) to identify those patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are at high risk of adverse events. We sought to explore the prognostic impact of AVA in asymptomatic patients with severe AS in a large observational database. Methods and Results Among 3815 consecutive patients with severe AS enrolled in the CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry, the present study included 1309 conservatively managed asymptomatic patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. The study patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on AVA (group 1: AVA >0.80 cm2, N=645; group 2: 0.8 cm2 ≥AVA >0.6 cm2, N=465; and group 3: AVA ≤0.6 cm2, N=199). The prevalence of very severe AS patients (peak aortic jet velocity ≥5 m/s or mean aortic pressure gradient ≥60 mm Hg) was 2.0%, 5.8%, and 26.1% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The cumulative 5-year incidence of AVR was not different across the 3 groups (39.7%, 43.7%, and 39.9%; P=0.43). The cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure (a composite of aortic valve-related death or heart failure hospitalization) was incrementally higher with decreasing AVA (24.1%, 29.1%, and 48.1%; P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of group 3 and group 2 relative to group 1 for the primary outcome measure remained significant (hazard ratio, 2.21, 95% CI, 1.56-3.11, P<0.001; and hazard ratio, 1.34, 95% CI, 1.01-1.78, P=0.04, respectively). Conclusions AVA ≤0.6 cm2 would be a useful marker to identify those high-risk patients with asymptomatic severe AS, who might benefit from early AVR. Clinical Trial Registration URL: www.umin.ac.jp . Unique identifier: UMIN000012140.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
Prognostic impact of anemia complicating severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains unclear. We assessed the impact of anemia on cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in 3403 patients enrolled in the CURRENT AS registry. 835 patients (25%) had mild (hemoglobin 11.0-12.9 g/dl for men/11.0-11.9 g/dl for women) and 1282 patients (38%) had moderate/severe anemia (Hb ≤ 10.9 g/dl) at diagnosis of severe AS. Mild and moderate/severe anemia were associated with significantly increased risks relative to no anemia (hemoglobin ≥13.0 g/dl for men/≥12.0 g/dl for women) for the primary outcome measure (aortic valve-related death or heart failure hospitalization) in the entire population [hazard ratio (HR): 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.57 and HR: 1.56; 95%CI: 1.31-1.87, respectively] and in the conservative management stratum (HR: 1.73; 95%CI: 1.40-2.13 and HR: 2.05; 95%CI: 1.69-2.47, respectively). Even in the initial aortic valve replacement stratum, moderate/severe anemia was associated with significantly increased risk for the primary outcome measure (HR: 2.12; 95%CI: 1.44-3.11). Moreover, moderate/severe anemia was associated with significantly increased risk for major bleeding while under conservative management (HR: 1.93; 95%CI: 1.21-3.06). These results warrant further study to explore whether better management of anemia would lead to improvement of clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Anemia/sangre , Anemia/etiología , Anemia/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/sangre , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the prognostic impact of the B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS), who were not referred for aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We used data from a Japanese multicentre registry, the Contemporary outcomes after sURgery and medical tREatmeNT in patients with severe Aortic Stenosis Registry, which enrolled 3815 consecutive patients with severe AS. Of those, 387 asymptomatic patients who were not referred for AVR without left ventricular dysfunction and very severe AS were subdivided into four groups based on their BNP levels (BNP<100 pg/mL, n=201; 100≤BNP<200 pg/mL, n=94; 200≤BNP<300 pg/mL, n=42 and BNP>300 pg/mL, n=50). RESULTS: The cumulative 5-year incidence of AS-related events (aortic valve-related death or heart failure hospitalisation) was incrementally higher with increasing BNP level (14.2%, 29.6%, 46.3% and 47.0%, p<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the risk for AS-related events was incrementally greater with increasing BNP levels (HR: 1.97, 95% CI: 0.97 to 3.98, p=0.06; HR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.55 to 8.32, p=0.03 and HR: 7.38, 95% CI: 3.21 to 16.9, p<0.001, respectively). Notably, asymptomatic patients with BNPlevels of <100 pg/mL had an event rate of only 2.1% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Increased BNP level was associated with a higher risk for AS-related adverse events in patients with asymptomatic severe AS with normal left ventricular ejection fraction who were not referred for AVR. Asymptomatic patients with BNP levels of <100 pg/mL had relatively low event rate, who might be safely followed with watchful waiting strategy. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000012140.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/sangre , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Biomarcadores/sangre , Causas de Muerte , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadAsunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/métodos , Atrios Cardíacos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Trombectomía/métodos , Trombosis , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Atrios Cardíacos/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Síncope/diagnóstico , Síncope/etiología , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/fisiopatología , Trombosis/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/etiologíaRESUMEN
Caseous calcification of the mitral annulus is a rare variant of mitral annular calcification (MAC). MAC is detected using conventional echocardiography and is prevalent in the elderly. However, limited information is currently available on the transformation of MAC. We herein report a case of a sudden liquified change in MAC, which was diagnosed using echocardiography and computed tomography.