Safety and utility of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is an increasingly utilized therapeutic option in AMI-CS, studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of different forms of MCS have yielded conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different forms of MCS. METHODS: A database search was performed for studies reporting on the association of different forms of MCS with clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS. The primary efficacy endpoints were short term (≤30 days) and long term (>30 days) all-cause mortality. Secondary efficacy endpoints included recurrent AMI, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, device-related limb complications, moderate to severe bleeding events, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). RESULTS: 2752 patients with AMI-CS met inclusion criteria. Results were available comparing ECMO to other MCS or medical therapy alone, comparing IABP to medical therapy alone, and comparing pLVAD to IABP. Use of ECMO was not associated with lower risk of 30-day or long-term mortality compared to pVAD or standard medical therapy with or without IABP placement but was associated with higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to pVAD. IABP use was not associated with a lower risk of 30 day or long-term mortality but was associated with higher risk of recurrent AMI and moderate to severe bleeding compared to medical therapy. Compared to IABP, pVAD use was associated with lower risk of CV mortality but not recurrent AMI. pVAD was associated with a higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to IABP use. CONCLUSION: Use of ECMO or IABP in patients with AMI-CS is not associated with significant improvement in mortality. pVAD is associated with a lower risk of CV mortality. All MCS types are associated with increased risk of complications. Additional high-quality studies are needed to determine the optimal MCS therapy for patients with AMI-CS.

Safety and Efficacy of Anti-Hypertensive Medications in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension (HTN) is a co-morbidity that is commonly associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it remains unclear whether treatment of hypertension in HFpEF patients is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. AIM: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association of anti-hypertensive medical therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: We performed a database search for studies reporting on the association of anti-hypertensive medications with cardiovascular outcomes and safety endpoints in patients with HFpEF. The databases searched include OVID Medline, Web of Science, and Embase. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints include cardiovascular (CV) mortality, worsening heart failure (HF), CV hospitalization, composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hyperkalemia, worsening renal function, and hypotension. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with 14062 HFpEF participants (7010 treated with medical therapy versus 7052 treated with placebo) met inclusion criteria. Use of anti-hypertensive medications was not associated with lower all-cause mortality, CV mortality or CV hospitalization compared to treatment with placebo (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77-1.35; p = 0.9, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.06; p = 0.19, OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.12; p = 0.83, OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.03; p = 0.11). Anti-hypertensive medications were not associated with lower risk of subsequent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.07-3.73; p = 0.5). Use of anti-hypertensive medications was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of MACE (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: While treatment with anti-hypertensive medications was not associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, their use may be associated with reduce risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF regardless of whether they have HTN. Additional high quality studies are required to clarify this association and determine the effect based on specific classes of medications.

Utility of coronary revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Revascularization in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction has been a subject of ongoing uncertainty and conflicting results. This is further complicated by factors including viability, severity of LV dysfunction, and method of revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association of coronary revascularization with outcomes in patients with ischemic LV dysfunction. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for studies reporting on cardiovascular outcomes after revascularization compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with ischemic LV dysfunction. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies with 10,110 participants met inclusion criteria. Revascularization was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality and CV mortality compared to OMT. The association was statistically significant regardless of severity of LV dysfunction or method of revascularization. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that revascularization was significantly associated with lower all-cause and CV mortality compared to OMT for patients with viable myocardium and mixed cohorts with variable viability, but not patients without viable myocardium. Revascularization was not associated with a significant difference in risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalization or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to OMT. CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization in patients with ischemic LV dysfunction is associated with lower risk of all-cause and CV mortality independent of severity of LV dysfunction or method of revascularization. Revascularization is not associated with lower risk of mortality in patients without evidence of viable myocardium and is not associated with lower risk of AMI or HF hospitalization.

Utility of native T1 mapping and myocardial extracellular volume fraction in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) based T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) are powerful tools for identifying myocardial fibrosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to characterize the utility of native T1 mapping and ECV in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and to clarify the prognostic significance of elevated values. Methods: A literature search was conducted for studies reporting on use of CMR-based native T1 mapping and ECV measurement in NICM patients and their association with major adverse cardiac events (MACE), ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR). Databases searched included: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The search was not restricted to time or publication status. Results: Native T1 and ECV were significantly higher in NICM patients compared to controls (MD 78.80, 95 % CI 50.00, 107.59; p < 0.01; MD 5.86, 95 % CI 4.55, 7.16; p < 0.01). NICM patients who experienced MACE had higher native T1 and ECV (MD 52.87, 95 % CI 26.59, 79.15; p < 0.01; MD 6.03, 95 % CI 3.79, 8.26; p < 0.01). There was a non-statistically significant trend toward higher native T1 time in NICM patients who experienced VAs. NICM patients who were poor treatment responders had higher baseline native T1 and ECV (MD 40.58, 95 % CI 12.90, 68.25; p < 0.01; MD 3.29, 95 % CI 2.25, 4.33; p < 0.01). Conclusions: CMR-based native T1 and ECV quantification may be useful tools for risk stratification of patients with NICM. They may provide additional diagnostic utility in combination with LGE, which poorly characterizes fibrosis in patients with diffuse myocardial involvement.

Utility of Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Coronary computed tomography angiography is a modality with high negative predictive value for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, its diagnostic accuracy for obstructive CAD is limited by multiple factors. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) computed tomography (FFRCT) is an emerging analysis tool for identifying flow-limiting disease; nonetheless, the prognostic value of FFRCT is not well established. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association of FFRCT with clinical outcomes in patients with stable CAD. A literature search was conducted for studies reporting the association between FFRCT measurements and all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and any need for coronary revascularization. Obstructive disease was defined as a FFR value ≤0.80; nonobstructive disease was defined as an FFR value >0.80. Ten studies were identified to meet the inclusion criteria; mean follow-up was 17 months (range, 3 to 56 months). There was no difference in risk of all-cause mortality between patients with obstructive and those with nonobstructive CAD on FFRCT. However, obstructive lesions were associated with increased risk of MACE, AMI, and any need for revascularization. FFRCT is a useful adjunctive modality for further risk stratification of patients with stable CAD. Obstructive lesions identified by FFRCT are associated with increased risk of MACE, AMI, and any need for revascularization.

Race and Ethnicity in Heart Failure: JACC Focus Seminar 8/9.

Heart failure (HF) affects >6 million Americans, with variations in incidence, prevalence, and clinical outcomes by race/ethnicity. Black adults have the highest risk for HF, with earlier age of onset and the highest risk of death and hospitalizations. The risk of hospitalizations for Hispanic patients is higher than White patients. Data on HF in Asian individuals are more limited. However, the higher burden of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, particularly among South Asian adults, is associated with increased risk of HF. The role of environmental, socioeconomic, and other social determinants of health, more likely for Black and Hispanic patients, are increasingly recognized as independent risk factors for HF and worse outcomes. Structural racism and implicit bias are drivers of health care disparities in the United States. This paper will review the clinical, physiological, and social determinants of HF risk, unique for race/ethnic minorities, and offer solutions to address systems of inequality that need to be recognized and dismantled/eradicated.

Graphical Instructions for Administration and Scoring the Mini-Cog: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel set of graphical Mini-Cog instructions designed to aid clinicians previously untrained on the Mini-Cog in accurate administration and scoring and to determine whether use of these graphical instructions improved the speed and accuracy of deployment of this tool. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Testing was conducted in a simulated environment with a mock patient. PARTICIPANTS: Registered nurses working in inpatient or outpatient settings at a large academic medical center who had no prior exposure to or training with the Mini-Cog (N=92). MEASUREMENTS: Our primary outcome was the composite proportion of nurses who made errors in administration or scoring of the Mini-Cog. RESULTS: None of the nurses in the graphical instruction group and 28 (61%) in the standardized instructions group (15 (33%) made administration errors, 22 (48%) made scoring errors) made errors. Nurses randomly assigned to the graphical group were able to read (median 36 vs 54 seconds, P<.001), administer (46 vs 62 seconds, P<.001), and score (15 vs 84 seconds, P<.001) the Mini-Cog more quickly than those in the standardized instructions group. CONCLUSION: Graphical instructions increase the accuracy and speed of test administration in nurses without prior training in Mini-Cog administration. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings and evaluate the use of this method in other healthcare professionals and settings.