Methotrexate might reduce ischemic stroke in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

AIM: To investigate the effects of hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and methotrexate on ischemic stroke in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study included 7904 RA patients and 15 808 non-RA patients between 2000 and 2010. All of the participants were sampled from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. Using univariate analyses, these two groups of patients were compared to evaluate the differences in disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs usage and demographic variables. Cox proportional hazard models and Schoenfeld residuals test were performed to estimate the hazard ratios for ischemic stroke and proportional hazard assumptions of these drugs, respectively. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was about 53 years old, and about 70% of RA patients were women. The hazard ratio for ischemic stroke was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.10-1.34; P < 0.01) in the case group compared with the control group, and this significant difference persisted throughout the 10-year period. With respect to RA patients, while hydroxychloroquine showed an insignificant protective effect on ischemic stroke, sulfasalazine and methotrexate were found out to have inconsistent effects during these 10 years. The proportional hazard assumption test of methotrexate at > 0.5 defined daily dose (8.75 mg/week) was violated at a significant level after adjustment (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: At a dosage of > 0.5 defined daily dose, short-term methotrexate might decrease ischemic stroke risk in RA patients, while hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine were neutral.

Sulfasalazine might reduce risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study.

AIM: To assess the effects of celecoxib and sulfasalazine on cardiovascular risk in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: We performed a 10-year population-based retrospective cohort study. A total of 1208 AS patients and 19 328 non-AS patients were sampled from the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) database. We compared these two groups of patients to identify the differences in the exposure of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and sulfasalazine and their effects on cardiovascular risk. Univariate analyses were performed using Chi-squared tests for dichotomous variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Cox proportional hazard models were conducted to investigate the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVD). RESULTS: AS patients had an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.72 (CI = 1.46-2.02, P < 0.01) for CVD compared with non-AS controls. The risk increased significantly with the progression of the disease. The use of celecoxib and sulfasalazine provided protective effects against CVD in both groups of patients. Both drugs at high cumulative defined daily doses (DDD) and celecoxib alone at high cumulative DDD showed significant protective effects against CVD in AS patients and the control group, respectively. Sulfasalazine at ≥ 0.5 DDD (1000 mg/day) reduced CVD risk in patients with AS (HR = 0.65, CI = 0.43-0.998, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, sulfasalazine at its optimal dose reduced CVD risk in patients with AS. Celecoxib was neutral regarding CVD risk in AS patients.