Facilitators and barriers of Hepatitis B screening and vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most common cause of liver disease and liver cancer in Singapore, being endemic despite availability of an efficacious vaccine. OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors associated with HBV screening and vaccination. METHODS: Using mixed methods analysis, focus group discussions were conducted alongside a cross-sectional study amongst 784 Singapore Citizens and Permanent Residents aged 25-69 residing in Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats. RESULTS: Amongst the respondents, 50.6% were screened and 37.8% were vaccinated. The self-reported prevalence of HBV infection was 3.4% and that of HBsAg seropositivity among those screened was 4.3%. Routine health screening was the most common reason cited for screening (32.9%) while doctors' recommendation was the most common reason for vaccination (42.7%). For both screening and vaccination, knowledge and cost were the top facilitators and barriers respectively. Multivariable regression models revealed the most significant predictors for not undergoing screening to be poor knowledge (p < 0.001), the presence of stigma (p = 0.040) and not being employed in a healthcare sector (p = 0.022), while factors associated with not undergoing vaccination are that of having not undergone screening (p < 0.001) and the lack of importance placed on the knowledge of the possibility of HBV being a silent killer (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Several facilitators and barriers are seen to regulate health-seeking behaviour towards HBV infection. Public initiatives including education and financial relief targeting specific population groups should be considered to increase the uptake of HBV screening and vaccination.

Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Follow-up for Patients With Abdominal Pain Using Video Consultation (SAVED Study): Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of telemedicine include cost savings and decentralized care. Video consultation is one form that enables early detection of deteriorating patients and promotion of self-efficacy in patients who are well but anxious. Abdominal pain is a common symptom presented by patients in emergency departments. These patients could benefit from video consultation, as it enables remote follow-up of patients who do not require admission and facilitates early discharge of patients from overcrowded hospitals. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the use of digital telereview in patients presenting with undifferentiated acute abdominal pain. METHODS: The SAVED study was a prospective randomized controlled trial in which follow-up using existing telephone-based telereview (control) was compared with digital telereview (intervention). Patients with undifferentiated acute abdominal pain discharged from the emergency department observation ward were studied based on intention-to-treat. The control arm received routine, provider-scheduled telereview with missed reviews actively coordinated and rescheduled by emergency department staff. The intervention arm received access to a platform for digital telereview (asynchronous and synchronous format) that enabled patient-led appointment rescheduling. Patients were followed-up for 2 weeks for outcomes of service utilization, efficacy (compliance with their disposition plan), and safety (re-presentation for the same condition). RESULTS: A total of 70 patients participated, with patients randomly assigned to each arm (1:1 ratio). Patients were a mean age of 40.0 (SD 13.8; range 22-71) years, predominantly female (47/70, 67%), and predominantly of Chinese ethnicity (39/70, 56%). The telereview service was used by 32 patients in the control arm (32/35, 91%) and 18 patients in the intervention arm (18/35, 51%). Most patients in control (33/35, 94%; 95% CI 79.5%-99.0%) and intervention (34/35, 97%; 95% CI 83.4%-99.9%) arms were compliant with their final disposition. There was a low rate of re-presentation at 72 hours and 2 weeks for both control (72 hours: 2/35, 6%; 95% CI 1.0%-20.5%; 2 weeks: 2/35, 6%, 95% CI 1.0%-20.5%) and intervention (72 hours: 2/35, 6%; 95% CI 1.0%-20.5%; 2 weeks: 3/35, 9%, 95% CI 2.2%-24.2%) arms. There were no significant differences in safety (P>.99) and efficacy (P>.99) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The application of digital telereview for the follow-up of patients with abdominal pain may be safe and effective. Future studies are needed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness and usefulness for broader clinical application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN28468556; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN28468556.